}
if (len) {
struct strbuf truname = STRBUF_INIT;
- strbuf_addstr(&truname, "refs/heads/");
- strbuf_addstr(&truname, remote);
+ strbuf_addf(&truname, "refs/heads/%s", remote);
strbuf_setlen(&truname, truname.len - len);
if (ref_exists(truname.buf)) {
strbuf_addf(msg,
strbuf_release(&truname);
goto cleanup;
}
+ strbuf_release(&truname);
}
if (!strcmp(remote, "FETCH_HEAD") &&
"not something we can merge");
remotes = &commit_list_insert(commit, remotes)->next;
}
- *remotes = NULL;
+ /*
+ * Is the current HEAD reachable from another commit being
+ * merged? If so we do not want to record it as a parent of
+ * the resulting merge, unless --no-ff is given. We will flip
+ * this variable to 0 when we find HEAD among the independent
+ * tips being merged.
+ */
+ *head_subsumed = 1;
+
+ /* Find what parents to record by checking independent ones. */
parents = reduce_heads(remoteheads);
- *head_subsumed = 1; /* we will flip this to 0 when we find it */
for (remoteheads = NULL, remotes = &remoteheads;
parents;
parents = next) {
*head_subsumed = 0;
else
remotes = &commit_list_insert(commit, remotes)->next;
+ free(parents);
}
return remoteheads;
}
option_commit = 0;
}
- if (!abort_current_merge) {
- if (!argc) {
- if (default_to_upstream)
- argc = setup_with_upstream(&argv);
- else
- die(_("No commit specified and merge.defaultToUpstream not set."));
- } else if (argc == 1 && !strcmp(argv[0], "-"))
- argv[0] = "@{-1}";
+ if (!argc) {
+ if (default_to_upstream)
+ argc = setup_with_upstream(&argv);
+ else
+ die(_("No commit specified and merge.defaultToUpstream not set."));
+ } else if (argc == 1 && !strcmp(argv[0], "-")) {
+ argv[0] = "@{-1}";
}
+
if (!argc)
usage_with_options(builtin_merge_usage,
builtin_merge_options);
- /*
- * This could be traditional "merge <msg> HEAD <commit>..." and
- * the way we can tell it is to see if the second token is HEAD,
- * but some people might have misused the interface and used a
- * commit-ish that is the same as HEAD there instead.
- * Traditional format never would have "-m" so it is an
- * additional safety measure to check for it.
- */
-
- if (!have_message && head_commit &&
- is_old_style_invocation(argc, argv, head_commit->object.sha1)) {
- strbuf_addstr(&merge_msg, argv[0]);
- head_arg = argv[1];
- argv += 2;
- argc -= 2;
- remoteheads = collect_parents(head_commit, &head_subsumed, argc, argv);
- } else if (!head_commit) {
+ if (!head_commit) {
struct commit *remote_head;
/*
* If the merged head is a valid one there is no reason
* to forbid "git merge" into a branch yet to be born.
* We do the same for "git pull".
*/
- if (argc != 1)
- die(_("Can merge only exactly one commit into "
- "empty head"));
if (squash)
die(_("Squash commit into empty head not supported yet"));
if (fast_forward == FF_NO)
remote_head = remoteheads->item;
if (!remote_head)
die(_("%s - not something we can merge"), argv[0]);
+ if (remoteheads->next)
+ die(_("Can merge only exactly one commit into empty head"));
read_empty(remote_head->object.sha1, 0);
update_ref("initial pull", "HEAD", remote_head->object.sha1,
NULL, 0, UPDATE_REFS_DIE_ON_ERR);
goto done;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * This could be traditional "merge <msg> HEAD <commit>..." and
+ * the way we can tell it is to see if the second token is HEAD,
+ * but some people might have misused the interface and used a
+ * commit-ish that is the same as HEAD there instead.
+ * Traditional format never would have "-m" so it is an
+ * additional safety measure to check for it.
+ */
+ if (!have_message &&
+ is_old_style_invocation(argc, argv, head_commit->object.sha1)) {
+ strbuf_addstr(&merge_msg, argv[0]);
+ head_arg = argv[1];
+ argv += 2;
+ argc -= 2;
+ remoteheads = collect_parents(head_commit, &head_subsumed, argc, argv);
} else {
struct strbuf merge_names = STRBUF_INIT;