)
'
+# Testcase rad, rename/add/delete
+# Commit O: foo
+# Commit A: rm foo, add different bar
+# Commit B: rename foo->bar
+# Expected: CONFLICT (rename/add/delete), two-way merged bar
+
+test_expect_success 'rad-setup: rename/add/delete conflict' '
+ test_create_repo rad &&
+ (
+ cd rad &&
+ echo "original file" >foo &&
+ git add foo &&
+ git commit -m "original" &&
+
+ git branch O &&
+ git branch A &&
+ git branch B &&
+
+ git checkout A &&
+ git rm foo &&
+ echo "different file" >bar &&
+ git add bar &&
+ git commit -m "Remove foo, add bar" &&
+
+ git checkout B &&
+ git mv foo bar &&
+ git commit -m "rename foo to bar"
+ )
+'
+
+test_expect_failure 'rad-check: rename/add/delete conflict' '
+ (
+ cd rad &&
+
+ git checkout B^0 &&
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive A^0 >out 2>err &&
+
+ # Not sure whether the output should contain just one
+ # "CONFLICT (rename/add/delete)" line, or if it should break
+ # it into a pair of "CONFLICT (rename/delete)" and
+ # "CONFLICT (rename/add)"; allow for either.
+ test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename.*add)" out &&
+ test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename.*delete)" out &&
+ test_must_be_empty err &&
+
+ git ls-files -s >file_count &&
+ test_line_count = 2 file_count &&
+ git ls-files -u >file_count &&
+ test_line_count = 2 file_count &&
+ git ls-files -o >file_count &&
+ test_line_count = 2 file_count &&
+
+ git rev-parse >actual \
+ :2:bar :3:bar &&
+ git rev-parse >expect \
+ B:bar A:bar &&
+
+ test_cmp file_is_missing foo &&
+ # bar should have two-way merged contents of the different
+ # versions of bar; check that content from both sides is
+ # present.
+ grep original bar &&
+ grep different bar
+ )
+'
+
+# Testcase rrdd, rename/rename(2to1)/delete/delete
+# Commit O: foo, bar
+# Commit A: rename foo->baz, rm bar
+# Commit B: rename bar->baz, rm foo
+# Expected: CONFLICT (rename/rename/delete/delete), two-way merged baz
+
+test_expect_success 'rrdd-setup: rename/rename(2to1)/delete/delete conflict' '
+ test_create_repo rrdd &&
+ (
+ cd rrdd &&
+ echo foo >foo &&
+ echo bar >bar &&
+ git add foo bar &&
+ git commit -m O &&
+
+ git branch O &&
+ git branch A &&
+ git branch B &&
+
+ git checkout A &&
+ git mv foo baz &&
+ git rm bar &&
+ git commit -m "Rename foo, remove bar" &&
+
+ git checkout B &&
+ git mv bar baz &&
+ git rm foo &&
+ git commit -m "Rename bar, remove foo"
+ )
+'
+
+test_expect_failure 'rrdd-check: rename/rename(2to1)/delete/delete conflict' '
+ (
+ cd rrdd &&
+
+ git checkout A^0 &&
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
+
+ # Not sure whether the output should contain just one
+ # "CONFLICT (rename/rename/delete/delete)" line, or if it
+ # should break it into three: "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" and
+ # two "CONFLICT (rename/delete)" lines; allow for either.
+ test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out &&
+ test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename.*delete)" out &&
+ test_must_be_empty err &&
+
+ git ls-files -s >file_count &&
+ test_line_count = 2 file_count &&
+ git ls-files -u >file_count &&
+ test_line_count = 2 file_count &&
+ git ls-files -o >file_count &&
+ test_line_count = 2 file_count &&
+
+ git rev-parse >actual \
+ :2:baz :3:baz &&
+ git rev-parse >expect \
+ O:foo O:bar &&
+
+ test_cmp file_is_missing foo &&
+ test_cmp file_is_missing bar &&
+ # baz should have two-way merged contents of the original
+ # contents of foo and bar; check that content from both sides
+ # is present.
+ grep foo baz &&
+ grep bar baz
+ )
+'
+
test_done