"-s subtree" should be given an explicit subtree option?
There doesn't seem to be a way to do this. We'd have to
patch git-merge-subtree. Ugh.
+ (but we could avoid this problem by generating squashes with
+ exactly the right subtree structure, rather than using
+ subtree merge...)
add a 'push' subcommand to parallel 'pull'
add a 'log' subcommand to see what's new in a subtree?
- add a --squash option so we don't merge histories but can still split
-
add to-submodule and from-submodule commands
+
+ automated tests for --squash stuff