+#define NO_THE_INDEX_COMPATIBILITY_MACROS
#include "cache.h"
+#include "config.h"
#include "dir.h"
#include "pathspec.h"
#include "attr.h"
* to use find_pathspecs_matching_against_index() instead.
*/
void add_pathspec_matches_against_index(const struct pathspec *pathspec,
+ const struct index_state *istate,
char *seen)
{
int num_unmatched = 0, i;
num_unmatched++;
if (!num_unmatched)
return;
- for (i = 0; i < active_nr; i++) {
- const struct cache_entry *ce = active_cache[i];
+ for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++) {
+ const struct cache_entry *ce = istate->cache[i];
ce_path_match(ce, pathspec, seen);
}
}
* nature of the "closest" (i.e. most specific) matches which each of the
* given pathspecs achieves against all items in the index.
*/
-char *find_pathspecs_matching_against_index(const struct pathspec *pathspec)
+char *find_pathspecs_matching_against_index(const struct pathspec *pathspec,
+ const struct index_state *istate)
{
char *seen = xcalloc(pathspec->nr, 1);
- add_pathspec_matches_against_index(pathspec, seen);
+ add_pathspec_matches_against_index(pathspec, istate, seen);
return seen;
}
/*
* If everything is an exclude pattern, add one positive pattern
- * that matches everyting. We allocated an extra one for this.
+ * that matches everything. We allocated an extra one for this.
*/
if (nr_exclude == n) {
int plen = (!(flags & PATHSPEC_PREFER_CWD)) ? 0 : prefixlen;
attr_check_free(pathspec->items[i].attr_check);
}
- free(pathspec->items);
- pathspec->items = NULL;
+ FREE_AND_NULL(pathspec->items);
pathspec->nr = 0;
}