-X <strategy-option>::
--strategy-option=<strategy-option>::
Pass the <strategy-option> through to the merge strategy.
- This implies `\--merge` and, if no strategy has been
+ This implies `--merge` and, if no strategy has been
specified, `-s recursive`. Note the reversal of 'ours' and
'theirs' as noted in above for the `-m` option.
where point 2. consists of several instances of
-a. regular use
+a) regular use
+
1. finish something worthy of a commit
2. commit
-b. independent fixup
+
+b) independent fixup
+
1. realize that something does not work
2. fix that
3. commit it
Hard case: The changes are not the same.::
This happens if the 'subsystem' rebase had conflicts, or used
- `\--interactive` to omit, edit, squash, or fixup commits; or
- if the upstream used one of `commit \--amend`, `reset`, or
+ `--interactive` to omit, edit, squash, or fixup commits; or
+ if the upstream used one of `commit --amend`, `reset`, or
`filter-branch`.
NOTE: While an "easy case recovery" sometimes appears to be successful
even in the hard case, it may have unintended consequences. For
example, a commit that was removed via `git rebase
- \--interactive` will be **resurrected**!
+ --interactive` will be **resurrected**!
The idea is to manually tell 'git rebase' "where the old 'subsystem'
ended and your 'topic' began", that is, what the old merge-base
of the old 'subsystem', for example:
* With the 'subsystem' reflog: after 'git fetch', the old tip of
- 'subsystem' is at `subsystem@\{1}`. Subsequent fetches will
+ 'subsystem' is at `subsystem@{1}`. Subsequent fetches will
increase the number. (See linkgit:git-reflog[1].)
* Relative to the tip of 'topic': knowing that your 'topic' has three