NAME
----
-git-reset - Reset current HEAD to the specified state.
+git-reset - Reset current HEAD to the specified state
SYNOPSIS
--------
Sets the current head to the specified commit and optionally resets the
index and working tree to match.
+This command is useful if you notice some small error in a recent
+commit (or set of commits) and want to redo that part without showing
+the undo in the history.
+
+If you want to undo a commit other than the latest on a branch,
+gitlink:git-revert[1] is your friend.
+
OPTIONS
-------
--mixed::
- Like --soft but reports what has not been updated. This is the
- default action.
+ Resets the index but not the working tree (ie, the changed files
+ are preserved but not marked for commit) and reports what has not
+ been updated. This is the default action.
--soft::
Does not touch the index file nor the working tree at all, but
- requires them in a good order.
+ requires them to be in a good order. This leaves all your changed
+ files "Updated but not checked in", as gitlink:git-status[1] would
+ put it.
--hard::
Matches the working tree and index to that of the tree being
- switched to.
+ switched to. Any changes to tracked files in the working tree
+ since <commit-ish> are lost.
<commit-ish>::
Commit to make the current HEAD.
+Examples
+--------
+
+Undo a commit and redo::
++
+------------
+$ git commit ...
+$ git reset --soft HEAD^ <1>
+$ edit <2>
+$ git commit -a -c ORIG_HEAD <3>
+------------
++
+<1> This is most often done when you remembered what you
+just committed is incomplete, or you misspelled your commit
+message, or both. Leaves working tree as it was before "reset".
+<2> make corrections to working tree files.
+<3> "reset" copies the old head to .git/ORIG_HEAD; redo the
+commit by starting with its log message. If you do not need to
+edit the message further, you can give -C option instead.
+
+Undo commits permanently::
++
+------------
+$ git commit ...
+$ git reset --hard HEAD~3 <1>
+------------
++
+<1> The last three commits (HEAD, HEAD^, and HEAD~2) were bad
+and you do not want to ever see them again. Do *not* do this if
+you have already given these commits to somebody else.
+
+Undo a commit, making it a topic branch::
++
+------------
+$ git branch topic/wip <1>
+$ git reset --hard HEAD~3 <2>
+$ git checkout topic/wip <3>
+------------
++
+<1> You have made some commits, but realize they were premature
+to be in the "master" branch. You want to continue polishing
+them in a topic branch, so create "topic/wip" branch off of the
+current HEAD.
+<2> Rewind the master branch to get rid of those three commits.
+<3> Switch to "topic/wip" branch and keep working.
+
+Undo update-index::
++
+------------
+$ edit <1>
+$ git-update-index frotz.c filfre.c
+$ mailx <2>
+$ git reset <3>
+$ git pull git://info.example.com/ nitfol <4>
+------------
++
+<1> you are happily working on something, and find the changes
+in these files are in good order. You do not want to see them
+when you run "git diff", because you plan to work on other files
+and changes with these files are distracting.
+<2> somebody asks you to pull, and the changes sounds worthy of merging.
+<3> however, you already dirtied the index (i.e. your index does
+not match the HEAD commit). But you know the pull you are going
+to make does not affect frotz.c nor filfre.c, so you revert the
+index changes for these two files. Your changes in working tree
+remain there.
+<4> then you can pull and merge, leaving frotz.c and filfre.c
+changes still in the working tree.
+
+Undo a merge or pull::
++
+------------
+$ git pull <1>
+Trying really trivial in-index merge...
+fatal: Merge requires file-level merging
+Nope.
+...
+Auto-merging nitfol
+CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in nitfol
+Automatic merge failed/prevented; fix up by hand
+$ git reset --hard <2>
+$ git pull . topic/branch <3>
+Updating from 41223... to 13134...
+Fast forward
+$ git reset --hard ORIG_HEAD <4>
+------------
++
+<1> try to update from the upstream resulted in a lot of
+conflicts; you were not ready to spend a lot of time merging
+right now, so you decide to do that later.
+<2> "pull" has not made merge commit, so "git reset --hard"
+which is a synonym for "git reset --hard HEAD" clears the mess
+from the index file and the working tree.
+<3> merge a topic branch into the current branch, which resulted
+in a fast forward.
+<4> but you decided that the topic branch is not ready for public
+consumption yet. "pull" or "merge" always leaves the original
+tip of the current branch in ORIG_HEAD, so resetting hard to it
+brings your index file and the working tree back to that state,
+and resets the tip of the branch to that commit.
+
+Interrupted workflow::
++
+Suppose you are interrupted by an urgent fix request while you
+are in the middle of a large change. The files in your
+working tree are not in any shape to be committed yet, but you
+need to get to the other branch for a quick bugfix.
++
+------------
+$ git checkout feature ;# you were working in "feature" branch and
+$ work work work ;# got interrupted
+$ git commit -a -m 'snapshot WIP' <1>
+$ git checkout master
+$ fix fix fix
+$ git commit ;# commit with real log
+$ git checkout feature
+$ git reset --soft HEAD^ ;# go back to WIP state <2>
+$ git reset <3>
+------------
++
+<1> This commit will get blown away so a throw-away log message is OK.
+<2> This removes the 'WIP' commit from the commit history, and sets
+ your working tree to the state just before you made that snapshot.
+<3> At this point the index file still has all the WIP changes you
+ committed as 'snapshot WIP'. This updates the index to show your
+ WIP files as uncommitted.
+
Author
------
Written by Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> and Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
GIT
---
Part of the gitlink:git[7] suite
-