newinfo = *info;
newinfo.prev = info;
+ newinfo.pathspec = info->pathspec;
newinfo.name = *p;
newinfo.pathlen += tree_entry_len(p->path, p->sha1) + 1;
newinfo.conflicts |= df_conflicts;
info.fn = unpack_callback;
info.data = o;
info.show_all_errors = o->show_all_errors;
+ info.pathspec = o->pathspec;
if (o->prefix) {
/*
*/
mark_new_skip_worktree(o->el, &o->result, CE_ADDED, CE_SKIP_WORKTREE | CE_NEW_SKIP_WORKTREE);
+ ret = 0;
for (i = 0; i < o->result.cache_nr; i++) {
struct cache_entry *ce = o->result.cache[i];
* correct CE_NEW_SKIP_WORKTREE
*/
if (ce->ce_flags & CE_ADDED &&
- verify_absent(ce, ERROR_WOULD_LOSE_UNTRACKED_OVERWRITTEN, o))
- return -1;
+ verify_absent(ce, ERROR_WOULD_LOSE_UNTRACKED_OVERWRITTEN, o)) {
+ if (!o->show_all_errors)
+ goto return_failed;
+ ret = -1;
+ }
if (apply_sparse_checkout(ce, o)) {
+ if (!o->show_all_errors)
+ goto return_failed;
ret = -1;
- goto done;
}
if (!ce_skip_worktree(ce))
empty_worktree = 0;
}
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto return_failed;
+ /*
+ * Sparse checkout is meant to narrow down checkout area
+ * but it does not make sense to narrow down to empty working
+ * tree. This is usually a mistake in sparse checkout rules.
+ * Do not allow users to do that.
+ */
if (o->result.cache_nr && empty_worktree) {
- /* dubious---why should this fail??? */
ret = unpack_failed(o, "Sparse checkout leaves no entry on working directory");
goto done;
}