glossary: define the term shallow clone

diff --git a/Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt b/Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt
index acf3e477e59f1bab9addde756274afe15d39a8ed..462255ed5d8053cbb4dadeec224cb81d14c4ada6 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt
+++ b/Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ where C and D are to fix what was broken in A and B, and you may already
 have some other changes on the mainline after W.
 
 If you merge the updated side branch (with D at its tip), none of the
-changes made in A nor B will be in the result, because they were reverted
+changes made in A or B will be in the result, because they were reverted
 by W.  That is what Alan saw.
 
 Linus explains the situation:
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ with:
     $ git revert W
 
 This history would (ignoring possible conflicts between what W and W..Y
-changed) be equivalent to not having W nor Y at all in the history:
+changed) be equivalent to not having W or Y at all in the history:
 
  ---o---o---o---M---x---x-------x----
               /