newinfo.prev = info;
newinfo.pathspec = info->pathspec;
newinfo.name = *p;
- newinfo.pathlen += tree_entry_len(p->path, p->sha1) + 1;
+ newinfo.pathlen += tree_entry_len(p) + 1;
newinfo.conflicts |= df_conflicts;
for (i = 0; i < n; i++, dirmask >>= 1) {
ce_len -= pathlen;
ce_name = ce->name + pathlen;
- len = tree_entry_len(n->path, n->sha1);
+ len = tree_entry_len(n);
return df_name_compare(ce_name, ce_len, S_IFREG, n->path, len, n->mode);
}
struct unpack_trees_options *o = info->data;
struct index_state *index = o->src_index;
int pfxlen = info->pathlen;
- int p_len = tree_entry_len(p->path, p->sha1);
+ int p_len = tree_entry_len(p);
for (pos = o->cache_bottom; pos < index->cache_nr; pos++) {
struct cache_entry *ce = index->cache[pos];
*/
mark_new_skip_worktree(o->el, &o->result, CE_ADDED, CE_SKIP_WORKTREE | CE_NEW_SKIP_WORKTREE);
+ ret = 0;
for (i = 0; i < o->result.cache_nr; i++) {
struct cache_entry *ce = o->result.cache[i];
* correct CE_NEW_SKIP_WORKTREE
*/
if (ce->ce_flags & CE_ADDED &&
- verify_absent(ce, ERROR_WOULD_LOSE_UNTRACKED_OVERWRITTEN, o))
- return -1;
+ verify_absent(ce, ERROR_WOULD_LOSE_UNTRACKED_OVERWRITTEN, o)) {
+ if (!o->show_all_errors)
+ goto return_failed;
+ ret = -1;
+ }
if (apply_sparse_checkout(ce, o)) {
+ if (!o->show_all_errors)
+ goto return_failed;
ret = -1;
- goto done;
}
if (!ce_skip_worktree(ce))
empty_worktree = 0;
}
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto return_failed;
+ /*
+ * Sparse checkout is meant to narrow down checkout area
+ * but it does not make sense to narrow down to empty working
+ * tree. This is usually a mistake in sparse checkout rules.
+ * Do not allow users to do that.
+ */
if (o->result.cache_nr && empty_worktree) {
- /* dubious---why should this fail??? */
ret = unpack_failed(o, "Sparse checkout leaves no entry on working directory");
goto done;
}