* altogether if seen[] already only contains non-zero entries.
*
* If seen[] has not already been written to, it may make sense
- * to use find_used_pathspec() instead.
+ * to use find_pathspecs_matching_against_index() instead.
*/
-void fill_pathspec_matches(const char **pathspec, char *seen, int specs)
+void add_pathspec_matches_against_index(const char **pathspec,
+ char *seen, int specs)
{
int num_unmatched = 0, i;
/*
* Finds which of the given pathspecs match items in the index.
*
- * This is a one-shot wrapper around fill_pathspec_matches() which
- * allocates, populates, and returns a seen[] array indicating the
- * nature of the "closest" (i.e. most specific) matches which each of
- * the given pathspecs achieves against all items in the index.
+ * This is a one-shot wrapper around add_pathspec_matches_against_index()
+ * which allocates, populates, and returns a seen[] array indicating the
+ * nature of the "closest" (i.e. most specific) matches which each of the
+ * given pathspecs achieves against all items in the index.
*/
-char *find_used_pathspec(const char **pathspec)
+char *find_pathspecs_matching_against_index(const char **pathspec)
{
char *seen;
int i;
for (i = 0; pathspec[i]; i++)
; /* just counting */
seen = xcalloc(i, 1);
- fill_pathspec_matches(pathspec, seen, i);
+ add_pathspec_matches_against_index(pathspec, seen, i);
return seen;
}