travis-ci: record and skip successfully built trees
[gitweb.git] / split-index.c
index 3c75d4b9ce717fa92520881ef754485d068a3a60..83e39ec8d7739816188ba909a4cb9da302d48f73 100644 (file)
@@ -83,8 +83,7 @@ void move_cache_to_base_index(struct index_state *istate)
        si->base->timestamp = istate->timestamp;
        ALLOC_GROW(si->base->cache, istate->cache_nr, si->base->cache_alloc);
        si->base->cache_nr = istate->cache_nr;
-       memcpy(si->base->cache, istate->cache,
-              sizeof(*istate->cache) * istate->cache_nr);
+       COPY_ARRAY(si->base->cache, istate->cache, istate->cache_nr);
        mark_base_index_entries(si->base);
        for (i = 0; i < si->base->cache_nr; i++)
                si->base->cache[i]->ce_flags &= ~CE_UPDATE_IN_BASE;
@@ -141,8 +140,7 @@ void merge_base_index(struct index_state *istate)
        istate->cache       = NULL;
        istate->cache_alloc = 0;
        ALLOC_GROW(istate->cache, istate->cache_nr, istate->cache_alloc);
-       memcpy(istate->cache, si->base->cache,
-              sizeof(*istate->cache) * istate->cache_nr);
+       COPY_ARRAY(istate->cache, si->base->cache, istate->cache_nr);
 
        si->nr_deletions = 0;
        si->nr_replacements = 0;
@@ -169,10 +167,9 @@ void merge_base_index(struct index_state *istate)
 
        ewah_free(si->delete_bitmap);
        ewah_free(si->replace_bitmap);
-       free(si->saved_cache);
+       FREE_AND_NULL(si->saved_cache);
        si->delete_bitmap  = NULL;
        si->replace_bitmap = NULL;
-       si->saved_cache    = NULL;
        si->saved_cache_nr = 0;
 }
 
@@ -189,7 +186,7 @@ void prepare_to_write_split_index(struct index_state *istate)
                /* Go through istate->cache[] and mark CE_MATCHED to
                 * entry with positive index. We'll go through
                 * base->cache[] later to delete all entries in base
-                * that are not marked eith either CE_MATCHED or
+                * that are not marked with either CE_MATCHED or
                 * CE_UPDATE_IN_BASE. If istate->cache[i] is a
                 * duplicate, deduplicate it.
                 */
@@ -319,3 +316,25 @@ void replace_index_entry_in_base(struct index_state *istate,
                istate->split_index->base->cache[new->index - 1] = new;
        }
 }
+
+void add_split_index(struct index_state *istate)
+{
+       if (!istate->split_index) {
+               init_split_index(istate);
+               istate->cache_changed |= SPLIT_INDEX_ORDERED;
+       }
+}
+
+void remove_split_index(struct index_state *istate)
+{
+       if (istate->split_index) {
+               /*
+                * can't discard_split_index(&the_index); because that
+                * will destroy split_index->base->cache[], which may
+                * be shared with the_index.cache[]. So yeah we're
+                * leaking a bit here.
+                */
+               istate->split_index = NULL;
+               istate->cache_changed |= SOMETHING_CHANGED;
+       }
+}