SYNOPSIS
--------
[verse]
-'git merge' [-n] [--stat] [--no-commit] [--squash]
+'git merge' [-n] [--stat] [--no-commit] [--squash] [--[no-]edit]
[-s <strategy>] [-X <strategy-option>]
[--[no-]rerere-autoupdate] [-m <msg>] [<commit>...]
'git merge' <msg> HEAD <commit>...
however, git cannot randomly pick one side over the other, and asks you to
resolve it by leaving what both sides did to that area.
-By default, git uses the same style as that is used by "merge" program
+By default, git uses the same style as the one used by the "merge" program
from the RCS suite to present such a conflicted hunk, like this:
------------