static int allow_overlap;
static int no_add;
static int threeway;
+static int unsafe_paths;
static const char *fake_ancestor;
static int line_termination = '\n';
static unsigned int p_context = UINT_MAX;
if (!deleted && !added)
leading++;
trailing++;
+ if (!apply_in_reverse &&
+ ws_error_action == correct_ws_error)
+ check_whitespace(line, len, patch->ws_rule);
break;
case '-':
if (apply_in_reverse &&
const char *name,
unsigned expected_mode)
{
- if (cached) {
+ if (cached || check_index) {
if (read_file_or_gitlink(ce, buf))
return error(_("read of %s failed"), name);
} else if (name) {
return read_file_or_gitlink(ce, buf);
else
return SUBMODULE_PATCH_WITHOUT_INDEX;
+ } else if (has_symlink_leading_path(name, strlen(name))) {
+ return error(_("reading from '%s' beyond a symbolic link"), name);
} else {
if (read_old_data(st, name, buf))
return error(_("read of %s failed"), name);
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * We need to keep track of how symlinks in the preimage are
+ * manipulated by the patches. A patch to add a/b/c where a/b
+ * is a symlink should not be allowed to affect the directory
+ * the symlink points at, but if the same patch removes a/b,
+ * it is perfectly fine, as the patch removes a/b to make room
+ * to create a directory a/b so that a/b/c can be created.
+ */
+static struct string_list symlink_changes;
+#define SYMLINK_GOES_AWAY 01
+#define SYMLINK_IN_RESULT 02
+
+static uintptr_t register_symlink_changes(const char *path, uintptr_t what)
+{
+ struct string_list_item *ent;
+
+ ent = string_list_lookup(&symlink_changes, path);
+ if (!ent) {
+ ent = string_list_insert(&symlink_changes, path);
+ ent->util = (void *)0;
+ }
+ ent->util = (void *)(what | ((uintptr_t)ent->util));
+ return (uintptr_t)ent->util;
+}
+
+static uintptr_t check_symlink_changes(const char *path)
+{
+ struct string_list_item *ent;
+
+ ent = string_list_lookup(&symlink_changes, path);
+ if (!ent)
+ return 0;
+ return (uintptr_t)ent->util;
+}
+
+static void prepare_symlink_changes(struct patch *patch)
+{
+ for ( ; patch; patch = patch->next) {
+ if ((patch->old_name && S_ISLNK(patch->old_mode)) &&
+ (patch->is_rename || patch->is_delete))
+ /* the symlink at patch->old_name is removed */
+ register_symlink_changes(patch->old_name, SYMLINK_GOES_AWAY);
+
+ if (patch->new_name && S_ISLNK(patch->new_mode))
+ /* the symlink at patch->new_name is created or remains */
+ register_symlink_changes(patch->new_name, SYMLINK_IN_RESULT);
+ }
+}
+
+static int path_is_beyond_symlink_1(struct strbuf *name)
+{
+ do {
+ unsigned int change;
+
+ while (--name->len && name->buf[name->len] != '/')
+ ; /* scan backwards */
+ if (!name->len)
+ break;
+ name->buf[name->len] = '\0';
+ change = check_symlink_changes(name->buf);
+ if (change & SYMLINK_IN_RESULT)
+ return 1;
+ if (change & SYMLINK_GOES_AWAY)
+ /*
+ * This cannot be "return 0", because we may
+ * see a new one created at a higher level.
+ */
+ continue;
+
+ /* otherwise, check the preimage */
+ if (check_index) {
+ struct cache_entry *ce;
+
+ ce = cache_file_exists(name->buf, name->len, ignore_case);
+ if (ce && S_ISLNK(ce->ce_mode))
+ return 1;
+ } else {
+ struct stat st;
+ if (!lstat(name->buf, &st) && S_ISLNK(st.st_mode))
+ return 1;
+ }
+ } while (1);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int path_is_beyond_symlink(const char *name_)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct strbuf name = STRBUF_INIT;
+
+ assert(*name_ != '\0');
+ strbuf_addstr(&name, name_);
+ ret = path_is_beyond_symlink_1(&name);
+ strbuf_release(&name);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void die_on_unsafe_path(struct patch *patch)
+{
+ const char *old_name = NULL;
+ const char *new_name = NULL;
+ if (patch->is_delete)
+ old_name = patch->old_name;
+ else if (!patch->is_new && !patch->is_copy)
+ old_name = patch->old_name;
+ if (!patch->is_delete)
+ new_name = patch->new_name;
+
+ if (old_name && !verify_path(old_name))
+ die(_("invalid path '%s'"), old_name);
+ if (new_name && !verify_path(new_name))
+ die(_("invalid path '%s'"), new_name);
+}
+
/*
* Check and apply the patch in-core; leave the result in patch->result
* for the caller to write it out to the final destination.
}
}
+ if (!unsafe_paths)
+ die_on_unsafe_path(patch);
+
+ /*
+ * An attempt to read from or delete a path that is beyond a
+ * symbolic link will be prevented by load_patch_target() that
+ * is called at the beginning of apply_data() so we do not
+ * have to worry about a patch marked with "is_delete" bit
+ * here. We however need to make sure that the patch result
+ * is not deposited to a path that is beyond a symbolic link
+ * here.
+ */
+ if (!patch->is_delete && path_is_beyond_symlink(patch->new_name))
+ return error(_("affected file '%s' is beyond a symbolic link"),
+ patch->new_name);
+
if (apply_data(patch, &st, ce) < 0)
return error(_("%s: patch does not apply"), name);
patch->rejected = 0;
{
int err = 0;
+ prepare_symlink_changes(patch);
prepare_fn_table(patch);
while (patch) {
if (apply_verbosely)
N_("make sure the patch is applicable to the current index")),
OPT_BOOL(0, "cached", &cached,
N_("apply a patch without touching the working tree")),
+ OPT_BOOL(0, "unsafe-paths", &unsafe_paths,
+ N_("accept a patch that touches outside the working area")),
OPT_BOOL(0, "apply", &force_apply,
N_("also apply the patch (use with --stat/--summary/--check)")),
OPT_BOOL('3', "3way", &threeway,
die(_("--cached outside a repository"));
check_index = 1;
}
+ if (check_index)
+ unsafe_paths = 0;
+
for (i = 0; i < argc; i++) {
const char *arg = argv[i];
int fd;