- "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks
This is a stupid (but extremely fast) directory content manager. It
-doesn't do a whole lot, but what it _does_ do is track directory
+doesn't do a whole lot, but what it 'does' do is track directory
contents efficiently.
There are two object abstractions: the "object database", and the
characteristics: they are all deflated with zlib, and have a header
that not only specifies their tag, but also provides size information
about the data in the object. It's worth noting that the SHA1 hash
-that is used to name the object is the hash of the original data.
+that is used to name the object is the hash of the original data
+plus this header, so `sha1sum` 'file' does not match the object name
+for 'file'.
(Historical note: in the dawn of the age of git the hash
-was the sha1 of the _compressed_ object)
+was the sha1 of the 'compressed' object.)
As a result, the general consistency of an object can always be tested
independently of the contents or the type of the object: all objects can
The structured objects can further have their structure and
connectivity to other objects verified. This is generally done with
-the "git-fsck-cache" program, which generates a full dependency graph
+the `git-fsck-objects` program, which generates a full dependency graph
of all objects, and verifies their internal consistency (in addition
to just verifying their superficial consistency through the hash).
~~~~~~~~~~~
A "blob" object is nothing but a binary blob of data, and doesn't
refer to anything else. There is no signature or any other
-verification of the data, so while the object is consistent (it _is_
+verification of the data, so while the object is consistent (it 'is'
indexed by its sha1 hash, so the data itself is certainly correct), it
has absolutely no other attributes. No name associations, no
permissions. It is purely a blob of data (i.e. normally "file
directory tree, and renaming a file does not change the object that
file is associated with in any way.
-A blob is typically created when link:git-update-cache.html[git-update-cache]
-is run, and its data can be accessed by link:git-cat-file.html[git-cat-file].
+A blob is typically created when gitlink:git-update-index[1]
+is run, and its data can be accessed by gitlink:git-cat-file[1].
Tree Object
~~~~~~~~~~~
So you can trust the contents of a tree to be valid, the same way you
can trust the contents of a blob, but you don't know where those
-contents _came_ from.
+contents 'came' from.
Side note on trees: since a "tree" object is a sorted list of
"filename+content", you can create a diff between two trees without
noticing that the blob stayed the same. However, renames with data
changes need a smarter "diff" implementation.
-A tree is created with link:git-write-tree.html[git-write-tree] and
-its data can be accessed by link:git-ls-tree.html[git-ls-tree]
+A tree is created with gitlink:git-write-tree[1] and
+its data can be accessed by gitlink:git-ls-tree[1].
+Two trees can be compared with gitlink:git-diff-tree[1].
Commit Object
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
result, for example.
Note on commits: unlike real SCM's, commits do not contain
-rename information or file mode chane information. All of that is
+rename information or file mode change information. All of that is
implicit in the trees involved (the result tree, and the result trees
of the parents), and describing that makes no sense in this idiotic
file manager.
-A commit is created with link:git-commit-tree.html[git-commit-tree] and
-its data can be accessed by link:git-cat-file.html[git-cat-file]
+A commit is created with gitlink:git-commit-tree[1] and
+its data can be accessed by gitlink:git-cat-file[1].
Trust
~~~~~
An aside on the notion of "trust". Trust is really outside the scope
of "git", but it's worth noting a few things. First off, since
-everything is hashed with SHA1, you _can_ trust that an object is
+everything is hashed with SHA1, you 'can' trust that an object is
intact and has not been messed with by external sources. So the name
of an object uniquely identifies a known state - just not a state that
you may want to trust.
way once you have the name of a commit.
So to introduce some real trust in the system, the only thing you need
-to do is to digitally sign just _one_ special note, which includes the
+to do is to digitally sign just 'one' special note, which includes the
name of a top-level commit. Your digital signature shows others
that you trust that commit, and the immutability of the history of
commits tells others that they can trust the whole history.
integrity; the trust framework (and signature provision and
verification) has to come from outside.
-A tag is created with link:git-mktag.html[git-mktag] and
-its data can be accessed by link:git-cat-file.html[git-cat-file]
+A tag is created with gitlink:git-mktag[1],
+its data can be accessed by gitlink:git-cat-file[1],
+and the signature can be verified by
+gitlink:git-verify-tag[1].
The "index" aka "Current Directory Cache"
In particular, the index certainly does not need to be consistent with
the current directory contents (in fact, most operations will depend on
-different ways to make the index _not_ be consistent with the directory
+different ways to make the index 'not' be consistent with the directory
hierarchy), but it has three very important attributes:
'(a) it can re-generate the full state it caches (not just the
haven't lost any information as long as you have the name of the tree
that it described.
-At the same time, the directory index is at the same time also the
+At the same time, the index is at the same time also the
staging area for creating new trees, and creating a new tree always
involves a controlled modification of the index file. In particular,
the index file can have the representation of an intermediate tree that
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You update the index with information from the working directory with
-the link:git-update-cache.html[git-update-cache] command. You
+the gitlink:git-update-index[1] command. You
generally update the index information by just specifying the filename
you want to update, like so:
- git-update-cache filename
+ git-update-index filename
but to avoid common mistakes with filename globbing etc, the command
will not normally add totally new entries or remove old entries,
To tell git that yes, you really do realize that certain files no
longer exist in the archive, or that new files should be added, you
-should use the "--remove" and "--add" flags respectively.
+should use the `--remove` and `--add` flags respectively.
-NOTE! A "--remove" flag does _not_ mean that subsequent filenames will
+NOTE! A `--remove` flag does 'not' mean that subsequent filenames will
necessarily be removed: if the files still exist in your directory
structure, the index will be updated with their new status, not
-removed. The only thing "--remove" means is that update-cache will be
+removed. The only thing `--remove` means is that update-cache will be
considering a removed file to be a valid thing, and if the file really
does not exist any more, it will update the index accordingly.
-As a special case, you can also do "git-update-cache --refresh", which
+As a special case, you can also do `git-update-index --refresh`, which
will refresh the "stat" information of each index to match the current
-stat information. It will _not_ update the object status itself, and
+stat information. It will 'not' update the object status itself, and
it will only update the fields that are used to quickly test whether
an object still matches its old backing store object.
git-read-tree <sha1 of tree>
and your index file will now be equivalent to the tree that you saved
-earlier. However, that is only your _index_ file: your working
+earlier. However, that is only your 'index' file: your working
directory contents have not been modified.
4) index -> working directory
files. This is not a very common operation, since normally you'd just
keep your files updated, and rather than write to your working
directory, you'd tell the index files about the changes in your
-working directory (i.e. "git-update-cache").
+working directory (i.e. `git-update-index`).
However, if you decide to jump to a new version, or check out somebody
else's version, or just restore a previous tree, you'd populate your
index file with read-tree, and then you need to check out the result
with
- git-checkout-cache filename
-or, if you want to check out all of the index, use "-a".
+ git-checkout-index filename
-NOTE! git-checkout-cache normally refuses to overwrite old files, so
+or, if you want to check out all of the index, use `-a`.
+
+NOTE! git-checkout-index normally refuses to overwrite old files, so
if you have an old version of the tree already checked out, you will
-need to use the "-f" flag (_before_ the "-a" flag or the filename) to
-_force_ the checkout.
+need to use the "-f" flag ('before' the "-a" flag or the filename) to
+'force' the checkout.
Finally, there are a few odds and ends which are not purely moving
git-commit-tree will return the name of the object that represents
that commit, and you should save it away for later use. Normally,
-you'd commit a new "HEAD" state, and while git doesn't care where you
+you'd commit a new `HEAD` state, and while git doesn't care where you
save the note about that state, in practice we tend to just write the
-result to the file ".git/HEAD", so that we can always see what the
+result to the file `.git/HEAD`, so that we can always see what the
last committed state was.
6) Examining the data
You can examine the data represented in the object database and the
index with various helper tools. For every object, you can use
-link:git-cat-file.html[git-cat-file] to examine details about the
+gitlink:git-cat-file[1] to examine details about the
object:
git-cat-file -t <objectname>
shows the type of the object, and once you have the type (which is
usually implicit in where you find the object), you can use
- git-cat-file blob|tree|commit <objectname>
+ git-cat-file blob|tree|commit|tag <objectname>
to show its contents. NOTE! Trees have binary content, and as a result
there is a special helper for showing that content, called
-"git-ls-tree", which turns the binary content into a more easily
+`git-ls-tree`, which turns the binary content into a more easily
readable form.
It's especially instructive to look at "commit" objects, since those
tend to be small and fairly self-explanatory. In particular, if you
-follow the convention of having the top commit name in ".git/HEAD",
+follow the convention of having the top commit name in `.git/HEAD`,
you can do
git-cat-file commit $(cat .git/HEAD)
Once you know the three trees you are going to merge (the one
"original" tree, aka the common case, and the two "result" trees, aka
the branches you want to merge), you do a "merge" read into the
-index. This will throw away your old index contents, so you should
+index. This will complain if it has to throw away your old index contents, so you should
make sure that you've committed those - in fact you would normally
always do a merge against your last commit (which should thus match
what you have in your current index anyway).
To do the merge, do
- git-read-tree -m <origtree> <target1tree> <target2tree>
+ git-read-tree -m -u <origtree> <yourtree> <targettree>
which will do all trivial merge operations for you directly in the
index file, and you can just write the result out with
-"git-write-tree".
+`git-write-tree`.
+
+Historical note. We did not have `-u` facility when this
+section was first written, so we used to warn that
+the merge is done in the index file, not in your
+working directory, and your working directory will no longer match your
+index.
-NOTE! Because the merge is done in the index file, and not in your
-working directory, your working directory will no longer match your
-index. You can use "git-checkout-cache -f -a" to make the effect of
-the merge be seen in your working directory.
-NOTE2! Sadly, many merges aren't trivial. If there are files that have
+8) Merging multiple trees, continued
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Sadly, many merges aren't trivial. If there are files that have
been added.moved or removed, or if both branches have modified the
same file, you will be left with an index tree that contains "merge
-entries" in it. Such an index tree can _NOT_ be written out to a tree
+entries" in it. Such an index tree can 'NOT' be written out to a tree
object, and you will have to resolve any such merge clashes using
other tools before you can write out the result.
-
-[ fixme: talk about resolving merges here ]
+You can examine such index state with `git-ls-files --unmerged`
+command. An example:
+
+------------------------------------------------
+$ git-read-tree -m $orig HEAD $target
+$ git-ls-files --unmerged
+100644 263414f423d0e4d70dae8fe53fa34614ff3e2860 1 hello.c
+100644 06fa6a24256dc7e560efa5687fa84b51f0263c3a 2 hello.c
+100644 cc44c73eb783565da5831b4d820c962954019b69 3 hello.c
+------------------------------------------------
+
+Each line of the `git-ls-files --unmerged` output begins with
+the blob mode bits, blob SHA1, 'stage number', and the
+filename. The 'stage number' is git's way to say which tree it
+came from: stage 1 corresponds to `$orig` tree, stage 2 `HEAD`
+tree, and stage3 `$target` tree.
+
+Earlier we said that trivial merges are done inside
+`git-read-tree -m`. For example, if the file did not change
+from `$orig` to `HEAD` nor `$target`, or if the file changed
+from `$orig` to `HEAD` and `$orig` to `$target` the same way,
+obviously the final outcome is what is in `HEAD`. What the
+above example shows is that file `hello.c` was changed from
+`$orig` to `HEAD` and `$orig` to `$target` in a different way.
+You could resolve this by running your favorite 3-way merge
+program, e.g. `diff3` or `merge`, on the blob objects from
+these three stages yourself, like this:
+
+------------------------------------------------
+$ git-cat-file blob 263414f... >hello.c~1
+$ git-cat-file blob 06fa6a2... >hello.c~2
+$ git-cat-file blob cc44c73... >hello.c~3
+$ merge hello.c~2 hello.c~1 hello.c~3
+------------------------------------------------
+
+This would leave the merge result in `hello.c~2` file, along
+with conflict markers if there are conflicts. After verifying
+the merge result makes sense, you can tell git what the final
+merge result for this file is by:
+
+ mv -f hello.c~2 hello.c
+ git-update-index hello.c
+
+When a path is in unmerged state, running `git-update-index` for
+that path tells git to mark the path resolved.
+
+The above is the description of a git merge at the lowest level,
+to help you understand what conceptually happens under the hood.
+In practice, nobody, not even git itself, uses three `git-cat-file`
+for this. There is `git-merge-index` program that extracts the
+stages to temporary files and calls a `merge` script on it
+
+ git-merge-index git-merge-one-file hello.c
+
+and that is what higher level `git resolve` is implemented with.