)
'
+# Test for basic rename/add-dest conflict, with rename needing content merge:
+# Commit O: a
+# Commit A: rename a->b, modifying b too
+# Commit B: modify a, add different b
+
+test_expect_success 'setup rename-with-content-merge vs. add' '
+ test_create_repo rename-with-content-merge-and-add &&
+ (
+ cd rename-with-content-merge-and-add &&
+
+ test_seq 1 5 >a &&
+ git add a &&
+ git commit -m O &&
+ git tag O &&
+
+ git checkout -b A O &&
+ git mv a b &&
+ test_seq 0 5 >b &&
+ git add b &&
+ git commit -m A &&
+
+ git checkout -b B O &&
+ echo 6 >>a &&
+ echo hello world >b &&
+ git add a b &&
+ git commit -m B
+ )
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'handle rename-with-content-merge vs. add' '
+ (
+ cd rename-with-content-merge-and-add &&
+
+ git checkout A^0 &&
+
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
+ test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/add)" out &&
+
+ git ls-files -s >out &&
+ test_line_count = 2 out &&
+ git ls-files -u >out &&
+ test_line_count = 2 out &&
+ # Also, make sure both unmerged entries are for "b"
+ git ls-files -u b >out &&
+ test_line_count = 2 out &&
+ git ls-files -o >out &&
+ test_line_count = 1 out &&
+
+ test_path_is_missing a &&
+ test_path_is_file b &&
+
+ test_seq 0 6 >tmp &&
+ git hash-object tmp >expect &&
+ git rev-parse B:b >>expect &&
+ git rev-parse >actual \
+ :2:b :3:b &&
+ test_cmp expect actual &&
+
+ # Test that the two-way merge in b is as expected
+ git cat-file -p :2:b >>ours &&
+ git cat-file -p :3:b >>theirs &&
+ >empty &&
+ test_must_fail git merge-file \
+ -L "HEAD" \
+ -L "" \
+ -L "B^0" \
+ ours empty theirs &&
+ test_cmp ours b
+ )
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'handle rename-with-content-merge vs. add, merge other way' '
+ (
+ cd rename-with-content-merge-and-add &&
+
+ git reset --hard &&
+ git clean -fdx &&
+
+ git checkout B^0 &&
+
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive A^0 >out &&
+ test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/add)" out &&
+
+ git ls-files -s >out &&
+ test_line_count = 2 out &&
+ git ls-files -u >out &&
+ test_line_count = 2 out &&
+ # Also, make sure both unmerged entries are for "b"
+ git ls-files -u b >out &&
+ test_line_count = 2 out &&
+ git ls-files -o >out &&
+ test_line_count = 1 out &&
+
+ test_path_is_missing a &&
+ test_path_is_file b &&
+
+ test_seq 0 6 >tmp &&
+ git rev-parse B:b >expect &&
+ git hash-object tmp >>expect &&
+ git rev-parse >actual \
+ :2:b :3:b &&
+ test_cmp expect actual &&
+
+ # Test that the two-way merge in b is as expected
+ git cat-file -p :2:b >>ours &&
+ git cat-file -p :3:b >>theirs &&
+ >empty &&
+ test_must_fail git merge-file \
+ -L "HEAD" \
+ -L "" \
+ -L "A^0" \
+ ours empty theirs &&
+ test_cmp ours b
+ )
+'
+
# Test for all kinds of things that can go wrong with rename/rename (2to1):
# Commit A: new files: a & b
# Commit B: rename a->c, modify b
git ls-files -u c >out &&
test_line_count = 2 out &&
git ls-files -o >out &&
- test_line_count = 3 out &&
+ test_line_count = 1 out &&
test_path_is_missing a &&
test_path_is_missing b &&
- test_path_is_file c~HEAD &&
- test_path_is_file c~C^0 &&
- git rev-parse >expect \
- C:a B:b &&
- git hash-object >actual \
- c~HEAD c~C^0 &&
+ git rev-parse >expect \
+ C:a B:b &&
+ git rev-parse >actual \
+ :2:c :3:c &&
+ test_cmp expect actual &&
+
+ # Test that the two-way merge in new_a is as expected
+ git cat-file -p :2:c >>ours &&
+ git cat-file -p :3:c >>theirs &&
+ >empty &&
+ test_must_fail git merge-file \
+ -L "HEAD" \
+ -L "" \
+ -L "C^0" \
+ ours empty theirs &&
+ git hash-object c >actual &&
+ git hash-object ours >expect &&
test_cmp expect actual
)
'
git ls-files -u c >out &&
test_line_count = 2 out &&
git ls-files -o >out &&
- test_line_count = 5 out &&
+ test_line_count = 1 out &&
git rev-parse >expect \
A:a C:b B:b C:c B:c &&
:1:a :2:b :3:b :2:c :3:c &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
- git rev-parse >expect \
- C:c B:c C:b B:b &&
- git hash-object >actual \
- c~HEAD c~B\^0 b~HEAD b~B\^0 &&
- test_cmp expect actual &&
+ # Record some contents for re-doing merges
+ git cat-file -p A:a >stuff &&
+ git cat-file -p C:b >important_info &&
+ git cat-file -p B:c >precious_data &&
+ >empty &&
- test_path_is_missing b &&
- test_path_is_missing c
+ # Test the merge in b
+ test_must_fail git merge-file \
+ -L "HEAD" \
+ -L "" \
+ -L "B^0" \
+ important_info empty stuff &&
+ test_cmp important_info b &&
+
+ # Test the merge in c
+ test_must_fail git merge-file \
+ -L "HEAD" \
+ -L "" \
+ -L "B^0" \
+ stuff empty precious_data &&
+ test_cmp stuff c
)
'
test_conflicts_with_adds_and_renames() {
sideL=$1
sideR=$2
- expect=$3
# Setup:
# L
)
'
- test_expect_$expect "check simple $sideL/$sideR conflict" '
+ test_expect_success "check simple $sideL/$sideR conflict" '
(
cd simple_${sideL}_${sideR} &&
'
}
-test_conflicts_with_adds_and_renames rename rename failure
-test_conflicts_with_adds_and_renames rename add failure
-test_conflicts_with_adds_and_renames add rename failure
-test_conflicts_with_adds_and_renames add add success
+test_conflicts_with_adds_and_renames rename rename
+test_conflicts_with_adds_and_renames rename add
+test_conflicts_with_adds_and_renames add rename
+test_conflicts_with_adds_and_renames add add
+
+# Setup:
+# L
+# / \
+# master ?
+# \ /
+# R
+#
+# Where:
+# master has two files, named 'one' and 'two'.
+# branches L and R both modify 'one', in conflicting ways.
+# branches L and R both modify 'two', in conflicting ways.
+# branch L also renames 'one' to 'three'.
+# branch R also renames 'two' to 'three'.
+#
+# So, we have four different conflicting files that all end up at path
+# 'three'.
+test_expect_success 'setup nested conflicts from rename/rename(2to1)' '
+ test_create_repo nested_conflicts_from_rename_rename &&
+ (
+ cd nested_conflicts_from_rename_rename &&
+
+ # Create some related files now
+ for i in $(test_seq 1 10)
+ do
+ echo Random base content line $i
+ done >file_v1 &&
+
+ cp file_v1 file_v2 &&
+ cp file_v1 file_v3 &&
+ cp file_v1 file_v4 &&
+ cp file_v1 file_v5 &&
+ cp file_v1 file_v6 &&
+
+ echo one >>file_v1 &&
+ echo uno >>file_v2 &&
+ echo eins >>file_v3 &&
+
+ echo two >>file_v4 &&
+ echo dos >>file_v5 &&
+ echo zwei >>file_v6 &&
+
+ # Setup original commit (or merge-base), consisting of
+ # files named "one" and "two".
+ mv file_v1 one &&
+ mv file_v4 two &&
+ git add one two &&
+ test_tick && git commit -m english &&
+
+ git branch L &&
+ git branch R &&
+
+ # Handle the left side
+ git checkout L &&
+ git rm one two &&
+ mv -f file_v2 three &&
+ mv -f file_v5 two &&
+ git add two three &&
+ test_tick && git commit -m spanish &&
+
+ # Handle the right side
+ git checkout R &&
+ git rm one two &&
+ mv -f file_v3 one &&
+ mv -f file_v6 three &&
+ git add one three &&
+ test_tick && git commit -m german
+ )
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'check nested conflicts from rename/rename(2to1)' '
+ (
+ cd nested_conflicts_from_rename_rename &&
+
+ git checkout L^0 &&
+
+ # Merge must fail; there is a conflict
+ test_must_fail git merge -s recursive R^0 &&
+
+ # Make sure the index has the right number of entries
+ git ls-files -s >out &&
+ test_line_count = 2 out &&
+ git ls-files -u >out &&
+ test_line_count = 2 out &&
+ # Ensure we have the correct number of untracked files
+ git ls-files -o >out &&
+ test_line_count = 1 out &&
+
+ # Compare :2:three to expected values
+ git cat-file -p master:one >base &&
+ git cat-file -p L:three >ours &&
+ git cat-file -p R:one >theirs &&
+ test_must_fail git merge-file \
+ -L "HEAD:three" -L "" -L "R^0:one" \
+ ours base theirs &&
+ sed -e "s/^\([<=>]\)/\1\1/" ours >L-three &&
+ git cat-file -p :2:three >expect &&
+ test_cmp expect L-three &&
+
+ # Compare :2:three to expected values
+ git cat-file -p master:two >base &&
+ git cat-file -p L:two >ours &&
+ git cat-file -p R:three >theirs &&
+ test_must_fail git merge-file \
+ -L "HEAD:two" -L "" -L "R^0:three" \
+ ours base theirs &&
+ sed -e "s/^\([<=>]\)/\1\1/" ours >R-three &&
+ git cat-file -p :3:three >expect &&
+ test_cmp expect R-three &&
+
+ # Compare three to expected contents
+ >empty &&
+ test_must_fail git merge-file \
+ -L "HEAD" -L "" -L "R^0" \
+ L-three empty R-three &&
+ test_cmp three L-three
+ )
+'
test_done