the tests.
*** t0000-basic.sh ***
- * ok 1: .git/objects should be empty after git-init in an empty repo.
- * ok 2: .git/objects should have 256 subdirectories.
- * ok 3: git-update-index without --add should fail adding.
+ ok 1 - .git/objects should be empty after git init in an empty repo.
+ ok 2 - .git/objects should have 3 subdirectories.
+ ok 3 - success is reported like this
...
- * ok 23: no diff after checkout and git-update-index --refresh.
- * passed all 23 test(s)
- *** t0100-environment-names.sh ***
- * ok 1: using old names should issue warnings.
- * ok 2: using old names but having new names should not issue warnings.
- ...
-
-Or you can run each test individually from command line, like
-this:
-
- $ sh ./t3001-ls-files-killed.sh
- * ok 1: git-update-index --add to add various paths.
- * ok 2: git-ls-files -k to show killed files.
- * ok 3: validate git-ls-files -k output.
- * passed all 3 test(s)
+ ok 43 - very long name in the index handled sanely
+ # fixed 1 known breakage(s)
+ # still have 1 known breakage(s)
+ # passed all remaining 42 test(s)
+ 1..43
+ *** t0001-init.sh ***
+ ok 1 - plain
+ ok 2 - plain with GIT_WORK_TREE
+ ok 3 - plain bare
+
+Since the tests all output TAP (see http://testanything.org) they can
+be run with any TAP harness. Here's an example of parallel testing
+powered by a recent version of prove(1):
+
+ $ prove --timer --jobs 15 ./t[0-9]*.sh
+ [19:17:33] ./t0005-signals.sh ................................... ok 36 ms
+ [19:17:33] ./t0022-crlf-rename.sh ............................... ok 69 ms
+ [19:17:33] ./t0024-crlf-archive.sh .............................. ok 154 ms
+ [19:17:33] ./t0004-unwritable.sh ................................ ok 289 ms
+ [19:17:33] ./t0002-gitfile.sh ................................... ok 480 ms
+ ===( 102;0 25/? 6/? 5/? 16/? 1/? 4/? 2/? 1/? 3/? 1... )===
+
+prove and other harnesses come with a lot of useful options. The
+--state option in particular is very useful:
+
+ # Repeat until no more failures
+ $ prove -j 15 --state=failed,save ./t[0-9]*.sh
+
+You can give DEFAULT_TEST_TARGET=prove on the make command (or define it
+in config.mak) to cause "make test" to run tests under prove.
+GIT_PROVE_OPTS can be used to pass additional options, e.g.
+
+ $ make DEFAULT_TEST_TARGET=prove GIT_PROVE_OPTS='--timer --jobs 16' test
+
+You can also run each test individually from command line, like this:
+
+ $ sh ./t3010-ls-files-killed-modified.sh
+ ok 1 - git update-index --add to add various paths.
+ ok 2 - git ls-files -k to show killed files.
+ ok 3 - validate git ls-files -k output.
+ ok 4 - git ls-files -m to show modified files.
+ ok 5 - validate git ls-files -m output.
+ # passed all 5 test(s)
+ 1..5
You can pass --verbose (or -v), --debug (or -d), and --immediate
(or -i) command line argument to the test, or by setting GIT_TEST_OPTS
--debug::
This may help the person who is developing a new test.
It causes the command defined with test_debug to run.
+ The "trash" directory (used to store all temporary data
+ during testing) is not deleted even if there are no
+ failed tests so that you can inspect its contents after
+ the test finished.
--immediate::
This causes the test to immediately exit upon the first
not see any output, this option implies --verbose. For
convenience, it also implies --tee.
+ Note that valgrind is run with the option --leak-check=no,
+ as the git process is short-lived and some errors are not
+ interesting. In order to run a single command under the same
+ conditions manually, you should set GIT_VALGRIND to point to
+ the 't/valgrind/' directory and use the commands under
+ 't/valgrind/bin/'.
+
--tee::
In addition to printing the test output to the terminal,
write it to files named 't/test-results/$TEST_NAME.out'.
implied by other options like --valgrind and
GIT_TEST_INSTALLED.
+--root=<directory>::
+ Create "trash" directories used to store all temporary data during
+ testing under <directory>, instead of the t/ directory.
+ Using this option with a RAM-based filesystem (such as tmpfs)
+ can massively speed up the test suite.
+
You can also set the GIT_TEST_INSTALLED environment variable to
the bindir of an existing git installation to test that installation.
You still need to have built this git sandbox, from which various
If you create files under t/ directory (i.e. here) that is not
the top-level test script, never name the file to match the above
pattern. The Makefile here considers all such files as the
-top-level test script and tries to run all of them. A care is
+top-level test script and tries to run all of them. Care is
especially needed if you are creating a common test library
file, similar to test-lib.sh, because such a library file may
not be suitable for standalone execution.
- If the script is invoked with command line argument --help
(or -h), it shows the test_description and exits.
- - Creates an empty test directory with an empty .git/objects
- database and chdir(2) into it. This directory is 't/trash directory'
- if you must know, but I do not think you care.
+ - Creates an empty test directory with an empty .git/objects database
+ and chdir(2) into it. This directory is 't/trash
+ directory.$test_name_without_dotsh', with t/ subject to change by
+ the --root option documented above.
- Defines standard test helper functions for your scripts to
use. These functions are designed to make all scripts behave
consistently when command line arguments --verbose (or -v),
--debug (or -d), and --immediate (or -i) is given.
+Do's, don'ts & things to keep in mind
+-------------------------------------
+
+Here are a few examples of things you probably should and shouldn't do
+when writing tests.
+
+Do:
+
+ - Put all code inside test_expect_success and other assertions.
+
+ Even code that isn't a test per se, but merely some setup code
+ should be inside a test assertion.
+
+ - Chain your test assertions
+
+ Write test code like this:
+
+ git merge foo &&
+ git push bar &&
+ test ...
+
+ Instead of:
+
+ git merge hla
+ git push gh
+ test ...
+
+ That way all of the commands in your tests will succeed or fail. If
+ you must ignore the return value of something, consider using a
+ helper function (e.g. use sane_unset instead of unset, in order
+ to avoid unportable return value for unsetting a variable that was
+ already unset), or prepending the command with test_might_fail or
+ test_must_fail.
+
+ - Check the test coverage for your tests. See the "Test coverage"
+ below.
+
+ Don't blindly follow test coverage metrics; if a new function you added
+ doesn't have any coverage, then you're probably doing something wrong,
+ but having 100% coverage doesn't necessarily mean that you tested
+ everything.
+
+ Tests that are likely to smoke out future regressions are better
+ than tests that just inflate the coverage metrics.
+
+ - When a test checks for an absolute path that a git command generated,
+ construct the expected value using $(pwd) rather than $PWD,
+ $TEST_DIRECTORY, or $TRASH_DIRECTORY. It makes a difference on
+ Windows, where the shell (MSYS bash) mangles absolute path names.
+ For details, see the commit message of 4114156ae9.
+
+Don't:
+
+ - exit() within a <script> part.
+
+ The harness will catch this as a programming error of the test.
+ Use test_done instead if you need to stop the tests early (see
+ "Skipping tests" below).
+
+ - Break the TAP output
+
+ The raw output from your test may be interpreted by a TAP harness. TAP
+ harnesses will ignore everything they don't know about, but don't step
+ on their toes in these areas:
+
+ - Don't print lines like "$x..$y" where $x and $y are integers.
+
+ - Don't print lines that begin with "ok" or "not ok".
+
+ TAP harnesses expect a line that begins with either "ok" and "not
+ ok" to signal a test passed or failed (and our harness already
+ produces such lines), so your script shouldn't emit such lines to
+ their output.
+
+ You can glean some further possible issues from the TAP grammar
+ (see http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?TAP::Parser::Grammar#TAP_Grammar)
+ but the best indication is to just run the tests with prove(1),
+ it'll complain if anything is amiss.
+
+Keep in mind:
+
+ - Inside <script> part, the standard output and standard error
+ streams are discarded, and the test harness only reports "ok" or
+ "not ok" to the end user running the tests. Under --verbose, they
+ are shown to help debugging the tests.
+
+
+Skipping tests
+--------------
+
+If you need to skip tests you should do so by using the three-arg form
+of the test_* functions (see the "Test harness library" section
+below), e.g.:
+
+ test_expect_success PERL 'I need Perl' "
+ '$PERL_PATH' -e 'hlagh() if unf_unf()'
+ "
+
+The advantage of skipping tests like this is that platforms that don't
+have the PERL and other optional dependencies get an indication of how
+many tests they're missing.
+
+If the test code is too hairy for that (i.e. does a lot of setup work
+outside test assertions) you can also skip all remaining tests by
+setting skip_all and immediately call test_done:
+
+ if ! test_have_prereq PERL
+ then
+ skip_all='skipping perl interface tests, perl not available'
+ test_done
+ fi
+
+The string you give to skip_all will be used as an explanation for why
+the test was skipped.
End with test_done
------------------
There are a handful helper functions defined in the test harness
library for your script to use.
- - test_expect_success <message> <script>
+ - test_expect_success [<prereq>] <message> <script>
- This takes two strings as parameter, and evaluates the
+ Usually takes two strings as parameters, and evaluates the
<script>. If it yields success, test is considered
successful. <message> should state what it is testing.
'git-write-tree should be able to write an empty tree.' \
'tree=$(git-write-tree)'
- - test_expect_failure <message> <script>
+ If you supply three parameters the first will be taken to be a
+ prerequisite; see the test_set_prereq and test_have_prereq
+ documentation below:
+
+ test_expect_success TTY 'git --paginate rev-list uses a pager' \
+ ' ... '
+
+ You can also supply a comma-separated list of prerequisites, in the
+ rare case where your test depends on more than one:
+
+ test_expect_success PERL,PYTHON 'yo dawg' \
+ ' test $(perl -E 'print eval "1 +" . qx[python -c "print 2"]') == "4" '
+
+ - test_expect_failure [<prereq>] <message> <script>
This is NOT the opposite of test_expect_success, but is used
to mark a test that demonstrates a known breakage. Unlike
success and "still broken" on failure. Failures from these
tests won't cause -i (immediate) to stop.
+ Like test_expect_success this function can optionally use a three
+ argument invocation with a prerequisite as the first argument.
+
- test_debug <script>
This takes a single argument, <script>, and evaluates it only
- test_tick
Make commit and tag names consistent by setting the author and
- committer times to defined stated. Subsequent calls will
+ committer times to defined state. Subsequent calls will
advance the times by a fixed amount.
- test_commit <message> [<filename> [<contents>]]
Merges the given rev using the given message. Like test_commit,
creates a tag and calls test_tick before committing.
+ - test_set_prereq <prereq>
+
+ Set a test prerequisite to be used later with test_have_prereq. The
+ test-lib will set some prerequisites for you, see the
+ "Prerequisites" section below for a full list of these.
+
+ Others you can set yourself and use later with either
+ test_have_prereq directly, or the three argument invocation of
+ test_expect_success and test_expect_failure.
+
+ - test_have_prereq <prereq>
+
+ Check if we have a prerequisite previously set with
+ test_set_prereq. The most common use of this directly is to skip
+ all the tests if we don't have some essential prerequisite:
+
+ if ! test_have_prereq PERL
+ then
+ skip_all='skipping perl interface tests, perl not available'
+ test_done
+ fi
+
+ - test_external [<prereq>] <message> <external> <script>
+
+ Execute a <script> with an <external> interpreter (like perl). This
+ was added for tests like t9700-perl-git.sh which do most of their
+ work in an external test script.
+
+ test_external \
+ 'GitwebCache::*FileCache*' \
+ "$PERL_PATH" "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/t9503/test_cache_interface.pl
+
+ If the test is outputting its own TAP you should set the
+ test_external_has_tap variable somewhere before calling the first
+ test_external* function. See t9700-perl-git.sh for an example.
+
+ # The external test will outputs its own plan
+ test_external_has_tap=1
+
+ - test_external_without_stderr [<prereq>] <message> <external> <script>
+
+ Like test_external but fail if there's any output on stderr,
+ instead of checking the exit code.
+
+ test_external_without_stderr \
+ 'Perl API' \
+ "$PERL_PATH" "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/t9700/test.pl
+
+ - test_expect_code <exit-code> <command>
+
+ Run a command and ensure that it exits with the given exit code.
+ For example:
+
+ test_expect_success 'Merge with d/f conflicts' '
+ test_expect_code 1 git merge "merge msg" B master
+ '
+
+ - test_must_fail <git-command>
+
+ Run a git command and ensure it fails in a controlled way. Use
+ this instead of "! <git-command>". When git-command dies due to a
+ segfault, test_must_fail diagnoses it as an error; "! <git-command>"
+ treats it as just another expected failure, which would let such a
+ bug go unnoticed.
+
+ - test_might_fail <git-command>
+
+ Similar to test_must_fail, but tolerate success, too. Use this
+ instead of "<git-command> || :" to catch failures due to segv.
+
+ - test_cmp <expected> <actual>
+
+ Check whether the content of the <actual> file matches the
+ <expected> file. This behaves like "cmp" but produces more
+ helpful output when the test is run with "-v" option.
+
+ - test_line_count (= | -lt | -ge | ...) <length> <file>
+
+ Check whether a file has the length it is expected to.
+
+ - test_path_is_file <path> [<diagnosis>]
+ test_path_is_dir <path> [<diagnosis>]
+ test_path_is_missing <path> [<diagnosis>]
+
+ Check if the named path is a file, if the named path is a
+ directory, or if the named path does not exist, respectively,
+ and fail otherwise, showing the <diagnosis> text.
+
+ - test_when_finished <script>
+
+ Prepend <script> to a list of commands to run to clean up
+ at the end of the current test. If some clean-up command
+ fails, the test will not pass.
+
+ Example:
+
+ test_expect_success 'branch pointing to non-commit' '
+ git rev-parse HEAD^{tree} >.git/refs/heads/invalid &&
+ test_when_finished "git update-ref -d refs/heads/invalid" &&
+ ...
+ '
+
+Prerequisites
+-------------
+
+These are the prerequisites that the test library predefines with
+test_have_prereq.
+
+See the prereq argument to the test_* functions in the "Test harness
+library" section above and the "test_have_prereq" function for how to
+use these, and "test_set_prereq" for how to define your own.
+
+ - PERL & PYTHON
+
+ Git wasn't compiled with NO_PERL=YesPlease or
+ NO_PYTHON=YesPlease. Wrap any tests that need Perl or Python in
+ these.
+
+ - POSIXPERM
+
+ The filesystem supports POSIX style permission bits.
+
+ - BSLASHPSPEC
+
+ Backslashes in pathspec are not directory separators. This is not
+ set on Windows. See 6fd1106a for details.
+
+ - EXECKEEPSPID
+
+ The process retains the same pid across exec(2). See fb9a2bea for
+ details.
+
+ - SYMLINKS
+
+ The filesystem we're on supports symbolic links. E.g. a FAT
+ filesystem doesn't support these. See 704a3143 for details.
+
+ - SANITY
+
+ Test is not run by root user, and an attempt to write to an
+ unwritable file is expected to fail correctly.
+
+ - LIBPCRE
+
+ Git was compiled with USE_LIBPCRE=YesPlease. Wrap any tests
+ that use git-grep --perl-regexp or git-grep -P in these.
+
Tips for Writing Tests
----------------------
validation in one place. Your test also ends up needing
updating when such a change to the internal happens, so do _not_
do it and leave the low level of validation to t0000-basic.sh.
+
+Test coverage
+-------------
+
+You can use the coverage tests to find code paths that are not being
+used or properly exercised yet.
+
+To do that, run the coverage target at the top-level (not in the t/
+directory):
+
+ make coverage
+
+That'll compile Git with GCC's coverage arguments, and generate a test
+report with gcov after the tests finish. Running the coverage tests
+can take a while, since running the tests in parallel is incompatible
+with GCC's coverage mode.
+
+After the tests have run you can generate a list of untested
+functions:
+
+ make coverage-untested-functions
+
+You can also generate a detailed per-file HTML report using the
+Devel::Cover module. To install it do:
+
+ # On Debian or Ubuntu:
+ sudo aptitude install libdevel-cover-perl
+
+ # From the CPAN with cpanminus
+ curl -L http://cpanmin.us | perl - --sudo --self-upgrade
+ cpanm --sudo Devel::Cover
+
+Then, at the top-level:
+
+ make cover_db_html
+
+That'll generate a detailed cover report in the "cover_db_html"
+directory, which you can then copy to a webserver, or inspect locally
+in a browser.
+
+Smoke testing
+-------------
+
+The Git test suite has support for smoke testing. Smoke testing is
+when you submit the results of a test run to a central server for
+analysis and aggregation.
+
+Running a smoke tester is an easy and valuable way of contributing to
+Git development, particularly if you have access to an uncommon OS on
+obscure hardware.
+
+After building Git you can generate a smoke report like this in the
+"t" directory:
+
+ make clean smoke
+
+You can also pass arguments via the environment. This should make it
+faster:
+
+ GIT_TEST_OPTS='--root=/dev/shm' TEST_JOBS=10 make clean smoke
+
+The "smoke" target will run the Git test suite with Perl's
+"TAP::Harness" module, and package up the results in a .tar.gz archive
+with "TAP::Harness::Archive". The former is included with Perl v5.10.1
+or later, but you'll need to install the latter from the CPAN. See the
+"Test coverage" section above for how you might do that.
+
+Once the "smoke" target finishes you'll see a message like this:
+
+ TAP Archive created at <path to git>/t/test-results/git-smoke.tar.gz
+
+To upload the smoke report you need to have curl(1) installed, then
+do:
+
+ make smoke_report
+
+To upload the report anonymously. Hopefully that'll return something
+like "Reported #7 added.".
+
+If you're going to be uploading reports frequently please request a
+user account by E-Mailing gitsmoke@v.nix.is. Once you have a username
+and password you'll be able to do:
+
+ SMOKE_USERNAME=<username> SMOKE_PASSWORD=<password> make smoke_report
+
+You can also add an additional comment to attach to the report, and/or
+a comma separated list of tags:
+
+ SMOKE_USERNAME=<username> SMOKE_PASSWORD=<password> \
+ SMOKE_COMMENT=<comment> SMOKE_TAGS=<tags> \
+ make smoke_report
+
+Once the report is uploaded it'll be made available at
+http://smoke.git.nix.is, here's an overview of Recent Smoke Reports
+for Git:
+
+ http://smoke.git.nix.is/app/projects/smoke_reports/1
+
+The reports will also be mirrored to GitHub every few hours:
+
+ http://github.com/gitsmoke/smoke-reports
+
+The Smolder SQLite database is also mirrored and made available for
+download:
+
+ http://github.com/gitsmoke/smoke-database
+
+Note that the database includes hashed (with crypt()) user passwords
+and E-Mail addresses. Don't use a valuable password for the smoke
+service if you have an account, or an E-Mail address you don't want to
+be publicly known. The user accounts are just meant to be convenient
+labels, they're not meant to be secure.