Fix confusing git-update-ref error message

diff --git a/Documentation/git-fsck-objects.txt b/Documentation/git-fsck-objects.txt
index ba251a5152e8b7d3bd2de508a02f3b7c5170949d..5dc9dbdd78af931e7c0a69d2b2425287e0614687 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/git-fsck-objects.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-fsck-objects.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
 git-fsck-objects(1)
 ===================
-v0.1, May 2005
 
 NAME
 ----
@@ -42,22 +41,22 @@ index file and all SHA1 references in .git/refs/* as heads.
        ($GIT_DIR/objects), making sure that it is consistent and
        complete without referring to objects found in alternate
        object pools listed in GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES,
-       nor packed GIT archives found in $GIT_DIR/objects/pack;
+       nor packed git archives found in $GIT_DIR/objects/pack;
        cannot be used with --full.
 
 --full::
        Check not just objects in GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY
        ($GIT_DIR/objects), but also the ones found in alternate
        object pools listed in GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES,
-       and in packed GIT archives found in $GIT_DIR/objects/pack
+       and in packed git archives found in $GIT_DIR/objects/pack
        and corresponding pack subdirectories in alternate
        object pools; cannot be used with --standalone.
 
 --strict::
        Enable more strict checking, namely to catch a file mode
        recorded with g+w bit set, which was created by older
-       versions of GIT.  Existing repositories, including the
-       Linux kernel, GIT itself, and sparse repository have old
+       versions of git.  Existing repositories, including the
+       Linux kernel, git itself, and sparse repository have old
        objects that triggers this check, but it is recommended
        to check new projects with this flag.
 
@@ -81,7 +80,7 @@ Any corrupt objects you will have to find in backups or other archives
 the hopes that somebody else has the object you have corrupted).
 
 Of course, "valid tree" doesn't mean that it wasn't generated by some
-evil person, and the end result might be crap. Git is a revision
+evil person, and the end result might be crap. git is a revision
 tracking system, not a quality assurance system ;)
 
 Extracted Diagnostics