SYNOPSIS
--------
-'git-rebase' [-v] [--merge] [-C<n>] [--onto <newbase>] <upstream> [<branch>]
-
+[verse]
+'git-rebase' [-i | --interactive] [-v | --verbose] [--merge] [-C<n>]
+ [-p | --preserve-merges] [--onto <newbase>] <upstream> [<branch>]
'git-rebase' --continue | --skip | --abort
DESCRIPTION
-----------
-git-rebase replaces <branch> with a new branch of the same name. When
-the --onto option is provided the new branch starts out with a HEAD equal
-to <newbase>, otherwise it is equal to <upstream>. It then attempts to
-create a new commit for each commit from the original <branch> that does
-not exist in the <upstream> branch.
+If <branch> is specified, git-rebase will perform an automatic
+`git checkout <branch>` before doing anything else. Otherwise
+it remains on the current branch.
+
+All changes made by commits in the current branch but that are not
+in <upstream> are saved to a temporary area. This is the same set
+of commits that would be shown by `git log <upstream>..HEAD`.
+
+The current branch is reset to <upstream>, or <newbase> if the
+--onto option was supplied. This has the exact same effect as
+`git reset --hard <upstream>` (or <newbase>).
+
+The commits that were previously saved into the temporary area are
+then reapplied to the current branch, one by one, in order.
It is possible that a merge failure will prevent this process from being
completely automatic. You will have to resolve any such merge failure
original <branch> and remove the .dotest working files, use the command
`git rebase --abort` instead.
-Note that if <branch> is not specified on the command line, the currently
-checked out branch is used.
-
Assume the following history exists and the current branch is "topic":
------------
typically this would be done with
- git update-index <filename>
+ git add <filename>
After resolving the conflict manually and updating the index with the
context exist they all must match. By default no context is
ever ignored.
+-i, \--interactive::
+ Make a list of the commits which are about to be rebased. Let the
+ user edit that list before rebasing.
+
+-p, \--preserve-merges::
+ Instead of ignoring merges, try to recreate them. This option
+ only works in interactive mode.
+
include::merge-strategies.txt[]
NOTES
You must be in the top directory of your project to start (or continue)
a rebase. Upon completion, <branch> will be the current branch.
-Author
+INTERACTIVE MODE
+----------------
+
+Rebasing interactively means that you have a chance to edit the commits
+which are rebased. You can reorder the commits, and you can
+remove them (weeding out bad or otherwise unwanted patches).
+
+The interactive mode is meant for this type of workflow:
+
+1. have a wonderful idea
+2. hack on the code
+3. prepare a series for submission
+4. submit
+
+where point 2. consists of several instances of
+
+a. regular use
+ 1. finish something worthy of a commit
+ 2. commit
+b. independent fixup
+ 1. realize that something does not work
+ 2. fix that
+ 3. commit it
+
+Sometimes the thing fixed in b.2. cannot be amended to the not-quite
+perfect commit it fixes, because that commit is buried deeply in a
+patch series. That is exactly what interactive rebase is for: use it
+after plenty of "a"s and "b"s, by rearranging and editing
+commits, and squashing multiple commits into one.
+
+Start it with the last commit you want to retain as-is:
+
+ git rebase -i <after-this-commit>
+
+An editor will be fired up with all the commits in your current branch
+(ignoring merge commits), which come after the given commit. You can
+reorder the commits in this list to your heart's content, and you can
+remove them. The list looks more or less like this:
+
+-------------------------------------------
+pick deadbee The oneline of this commit
+pick fa1afe1 The oneline of the next commit
+...
+-------------------------------------------
+
+The oneline descriptions are purely for your pleasure; `git-rebase` will
+not look at them but at the commit names ("deadbee" and "fa1afe1" in this
+example), so do not delete or edit the names.
+
+By replacing the command "pick" with the command "edit", you can tell
+`git-rebase` to stop after applying that commit, so that you can edit
+the files and/or the commit message, amend the commit, and continue
+rebasing.
+
+If you want to fold two or more commits into one, replace the command
+"pick" with "squash" for the second and subsequent commit. If the
+commits had different authors, it will attribute the squashed commit to
+the author of the last commit.
+
+In both cases, or when a "pick" does not succeed (because of merge
+errors), the loop will stop to let you fix things, and you can continue
+the loop with `git rebase --continue`.
+
+For example, if you want to reorder the last 5 commits, such that what
+was HEAD~4 becomes the new HEAD. To achieve that, you would call
+`git-rebase` like this:
+
+----------------------
+$ git rebase -i HEAD~5
+----------------------
+
+And move the first patch to the end of the list.
+
+You might want to preserve merges, if you have a history like this:
+
+------------------
+ X
+ \
+ A---M---B
+ /
+---o---O---P---Q
+------------------
+
+Suppose you want to rebase the side branch starting at "A" to "Q". Make
+sure that the current HEAD is "B", and call
+
+-----------------------------
+$ git rebase -i -p --onto Q O
+-----------------------------
+
+Authors
------
-Written by Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
+Written by Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> and
+Johannes E. Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Documentation
--------------
GIT
---
Part of the gitlink:git[7] suite
-