git-gc --auto: run "repack -A -d -l" as necessary.
This teaches "git-gc --auto" to consolidate many packs into one
without losing unreachable objects in them by using "repack -A"
when there are too many packfiles that are not marked with *.keep
in the repository. gc.autopacklimit configuration can be used
to set the maximum number of packs a repository is allowed to
have before this mechanism kicks in.
git-gc --auto: restructure the way "repack" command line is built.
We used to build the command line to run repack outside of
need_to_gc() but with the next patch we would want to tweak the
command line depending on the nature of need.
git-gc --auto: protect ourselves from accumulated cruft
Deciding to run "repack -d -l" when there are too many
loose objects would backfire when there are too many loose
objects that are unreachable, because repacking that way would
never improve the situation. Detect that case by checking the
number of loose objects again after automatic garbage collection
runs, and issue an warning to run "prune" manually.
This new option is meant to be used in conjunction with the
options "git repack -a -d" usually invokes the underlying
pack-objects with. When this option is given, objects unreachable
from the refs in packs named with --unpacked= option are added
to the resulting pack, in addition to the reachable objects that
are not in packs marked with *.keep files.
This implements a new option "git gc --auto". When gc.auto is
set to a positive value, and the object database has accumulated
roughly that many number of loose objects, this runs a
lightweight version of "git gc". The primary difference from
the full "git gc" is that it does not pass "-a" option to "git
repack", which means we do not try to repack _everything_, but
only repack incrementally. We still do "git prune-packed". The
default threshold is arbitrarily set by yours truly to:
- not trigger it for fully unpacked git v0.99 history;
- do trigger it for fully unpacked git v1.0.0 history;
- not trigger it for incremental update to git v1.0.0 starting
from fully packed git v0.99 history.
This patch does not add invocation of the "auto repacking". It
is left to key Porcelain commands that could produce tons of
loose objects to add a call to "git gc --auto" after they are
done their work.
Merge branch 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git/git-p4
* 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git/git-p4:
git-p4: Added support for automatically importing newly appearing perforce branches.
git-p4: Cleanup; moved the (duplicated) code for turning a branch into a git ref (for example foo -> refs/remotes/p4/<project>/foo) into a separate method.
git-p4: Cleanup; moved the code for the initial #head or revision import into a separate function, out of P4Sync.run.
git-p4: Cleanup; Turn self.revision into a function local variable (it's not used anywhere outside the function).
git-p4: Cleanup; moved the code to import a list of p4 changes using fast-import into a separate member function of P4Sync.
git-p4: Cleanup; moved the code for getting a sorted list of p4 changes for a list of given depot paths into a standalone method.
git-p4: After submission to p4 always synchronize from p4 again (into refs/remotes). Whether to rebase HEAD or not is still left as question to the end-user.
git-p4: Always call 'p4 sync ...' before submitting to Perforce.
* maint:
Include a git-push example for creating a remote branch
Cleanup unnecessary file modifications in t1400-update-ref
Makefile: Add cache-tree.h to the headers list
Don't allow contrib/workdir/git-new-workdir to trash existing dirs
git-apply: do not read past the end of buffer
Include a git-push example for creating a remote branch
Many users get confused when `git push origin master:foo` works
when foo already exists on the remote repository but are confused
when foo doesn't exist as a branch and this form does not create
the branch foo.
This new example highlights the trick of including refs/heads/
in front of the desired branch name to create a branch.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cleanup unnecessary file modifications in t1400-update-ref
Kristian Høgsberg pointed out that the two file modifications
we were doing during the 'creating initial files' step are not even
used within the test suite. This was actually confusing as we do
not even need these changes for the tests to pass. All that really
matters here is the specific commit dates are used so that these
appear in the branch's reflog, and that the dates are different so
that the branch will update when asked and the reflog entry is
also updated. There is no need for the file modification.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Don't allow contrib/workdir/git-new-workdir to trash existing dirs
Recently I found that doing a sequence like the following:
git-new-workdir a b
...
git-new-workdir a b
by accident will cause a (and now also b) to have an infinite cycle
in its refs directory. This is caused by git-new-workdir trying
to create the "refs" symlink over again, only during the second
time it is being created within a's refs directory and is now also
pointing back at a's refs.
This causes confusion in git as suddenly branches are named things
like "refs/refs/refs/refs/refs/refs/refs/heads/foo" instead of the
more commonly accepted "refs/heads/foo". Plenty of commands start
to see ambiguous ref names and others just take ages to compute.
git-clone has the same safety check, so git-new-workdir should
behave just like it.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the preimage we are patching is shorter than what the patch
text expects, we tried to match the buffer contents at the
"original" line with the fragment in full, without checking we
have enough data to match in the preimage. This caused the size
of a later memmove() to wrap around and attempt to scribble
almost the entire address space. Not good.
The code that follows the part this patch touches tries to match
the fragment with line offsets. Curiously, that code does not
have the problem --- it guards against reading past the end of
the preimage.
A function intended to be called from builtins updating refs
by locking them before write, specially those that came from
scripts using "git update-ref".
[jc: with minor fixups]
Signed-off-by: Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-p4: Added support for automatically importing newly appearing perforce branches.
If a change in a p4 "branch" appears that hasn't seen any previous commit and
that has a known branch mapping we now try to import it properly. First we
find the p4 change of the source branch that the new p4 branch is based on. Then
we using git rev-list --bisect to locate the corresponding git commit to that change.
Finally we import all changes in the new p4 branch up to the current change and resume
with the regular import.
git-p4: Cleanup; moved the (duplicated) code for turning a branch into a git ref (for example foo -> refs/remotes/p4/<project>/foo) into a separate method.
git-p4: After submission to p4 always synchronize from p4 again (into refs/remotes). Whether to rebase HEAD or not is still left as question to the end-user.
Allows username and password to be given using --smtp-user
and --smtp-pass. SSL use is flagged by --smtp-ssl. These are
backed by corresponding defaults in the git configuration file.
This implements Junio's 'mail identity' suggestion in a slightly
more generalised manner. --identity=$identity, backed by
sendemail.identity indicates that the configuration subsection
[sendemail "$identity"] should take priority over the [sendemail]
section for all configuration values.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Stockwell <doug@11011.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
HPA noticed that yum does not like the newer git RPM set; it turns out
that we do not ship git-p4 anymore but existing installations do not
realize the package is gone if we do not tell anything about it.
David Kastrup suggests using Obsoletes in the spec file of the new
RPM to replace the old package, so here is a try.
git-diff: resurrect the traditional empty "diff --git" behaviour
The warning message to suggest "Consider running git-status" from
"git-diff" that we experimented with during the 1.5.3 cycle turns
out to be a bad idea. It robbed cache-dirty information from people
who valued it, while still asking users to run "update-index --refresh".
It was hoped that the new behaviour would at least have some educational
value, but not showing the cache-dirty paths like before meant that the
user would not even know easily which paths were cache-dirty, and it
made the need to refresh the index look like even more unnecessary chore.
This commit reinstates the traditional behaviour, but with a twist.
By default, the empty "diff --git" output is totally squelched out
from "git diff" output. At the end of the command, it automatically
runs "update-index --refresh" as needed, without even bothering the
user. In other words, people who do not care about the cache-dirtyness
do not even have to see the warning.
The traditional behaviour to see the stat-dirty output and to bypassing
the overhead of content comparison can be specified by setting the
configuration variable diff.autorefreshindex to false.
git-tag: Fix -l option to use better shell style globs.
This patch removes certain behaviour of "git tag -l foo", currently
listing every tag name having "foo" as a substring. The same
thing now could be achieved doing "git tag -l '*foo*'".
This feature was added recently when git-tag.sh got the -n option
for showing tag annotations, because that commit also replaced the
old "grep pattern" behaviour with a more preferable "shell pattern"
behaviour (although slightly modified as you can see).
Thus, the following builtin-tag.c implemented it in order to
ensure that tests were passing unchanged with both programs.
Since common "shell patterns" match names with a given substring
_only_ when * is inserted before and after (as in "*substring*"), and
the "plain" behaviour cannot be achieved easily with the current
implementation, this is mostly the right thing to do, in order to
make it more flexible and consistent.
Tests for "git tag" were also changed to reflect this.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-svn: fix dcommit clobbering upstream when committing multiple changes
Although dcommit could detect if the first commit in the series
would conflict with the HEAD revision in SVN, it could not
detect conflicts in further commits it made.
Now we rebase each uncommitted change after each revision is
committed to SVN to ensure that we are up-to-date. git-rebase
will bail out on conflict errors if our next change cannot be
applied and committed to SVN cleanly, preventing accidental
clobbering of changes on the SVN-side.
--no-rebase users will have trouble with this, and are thus
warned if they are committing more than one commit. Fixing this
for (hopefully uncommon) --no-rebase users would be more complex
and will probably happen at a later date.
Thanks to David Watson for finding this and the original test.
If the configuration of the user has "diff.color = true", the
output from "log" we invoke internally added color codes, which
broke the parser.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Tested-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
filter-branch: introduce convenience function "skip_commit"
With this function, a commit filter can leave out unwanted commits
(such as temporary commits). It does _not_ undo the changeset
corresponding to that commit, but it _skips_ the revision. IOW
no tree object is changed by this.
If you like to commit early and often, but want to filter out all
intermediate commits, marked by "@@@" in the commit message, you can
now do this with
filter-branch: fix remnants of old syntax in documentation
Some time ago, filter-branch's syntax changed so that more than one
ref can be rewritten at the same time. This involved the removal of
the ref name for the result; instead, the refs are rewritten in-place.
This updates the last leftovers in the documentation to reflect the
new behavior.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Lately I have been doing a lot of calls to `git tag -d` and also to
`git tag -v`. In both such cases being able to complete the names
of existing tags saves the fingers some typing effort. We now look
for the -d or -v option to git-tag in the bash completion support
and offer up existing tag names as possible choices for these.
When creating a new tag we now also offer bash completion support
for the second argument to git-tag (the object to be tagged) as this
can often be a specific existing branch name and is not necessarily
the current HEAD.
If the -f option is being used to recreate an existing tag we now
also offer completion support on the existing tag names for the
first argument of git-tag, helping to the user to reselect the
prior tag name that they are trying to replace.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Make "git-log --" without paths behave the same as "git-log" without --
"git log" family of commands, even when run from a subdirectory,
do not limit the revision range with the current directory as
the path limiter, but with double-dash without any paths after
it, i.e. "git log --" do so. It was a mistake to have a
difference between "git log --" and "git log" introduced in
commit ae563542bf10fa8c33abd2a354e4b28aca4264d7 (First cut at
libifying revlist generation).
When appending the "git-archimport-id:" line to the end of log entries,
git-archimport would use two blank lines as a separator when there was no
body in the arch log (only a Summary: line), and zero blank lines when there
was a body (making it hard to see the break between the actual log message
and the git-archimport-id: line).
This patch makes git-archimport generate one blank line as a separator in all
cases.
The code favoring shallower deltas when size is equal was triggered
only when previous delta was also cached. There should be no relation
between cached deltas and same sized deltas.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
gitk: Fix bug causing undefined variable error when cherry-picking
When "Show nearby tags" is turned off and the user did a cherry-pick,
we were trying to access variables relating to the descendent/ancestor
tag & head computations in addnewchild though they hadn't been set.
This makes sure we don't do that. Reported by Johannes Sixt.
git-add: Make the "tried to add ignored file" error message less confusing
Currently the error message seems to imply (at least to me) that only
the listed files were withheld and the rest of the files was added to the
index, even though that's obviously not the case.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
gitweb: Fix escaping HTML of project owner in 'projects_list' and
'summary' views
This for example allows to put email address in the project owner
field in the projects index file (when $projects_list points to
a file, and not to a directory), in the form of:
Noticed-by: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"format-patch --root rev" is the way to show everything.
We used to trigger the special case "things not in origin"
semantics only when one and only one positive ref is given, and
no number (e.g. "git format-patch -4 origin") was specified, and
used the general revision range semantics for everything else.
This narrows the special case a bit more, by making:
git format-patch --root this_version
to show everything that leads to the named commit.
More importantly, document the two different semantics better.
The generic revision range semantics came later and bolted on
without being clearly documented.
git-merge: do up-to-date check also for all strategies
This clarifies the logic to omit fast-forward check and omit
trivial merge before running the specified strategy.
The "index_merge" variable started out as a flag to say "do not
do anything clever", but when recursive was changed to skip the
trivial merge, the semantics were changed and the variable alone
does not make sense anymore.
This splits the variable into two, allow_fast_forward (which is
almost always true, and avoids making a merge commit when the
other commit is a descendant of our branch, but is set to false
for ours and subtree) and allow_trivial_merge (which is false
for ours, recursive and subtree).
Unlike the earlier implementation, the "ours" strategy allows an
up-to-date condition. When we are up-to-date, the result will
be our commit, and by definition, we will have our tree as the
result.
git --bare cmd: do not unconditionally nuke GIT_DIR
"GIT_DIR=some.where git --bare cmd" and worse yet
"git --git-dir=some.where --bare cmd" were very confusing. They
both ignored git-dir specified, and instead made $cwd as GIT_DIR.
This changes --bare not to override existing GIT_DIR.
This has been like this for a long time. Let's hope nobody sane
relied on this insane behaviour.
Here is my attempt to fix this with a minimally intrusive patch.
* As "git --bare init" cannot tell if it was called with --bare or
just "GIT_DIR=. git init", I added an explicit assignment of
is_bare_repository_cfg on the codepath for "git --bare".
* GIT_WORK_TREE alone without GIT_DIR does not make any sense,
nor GIT_WORK_TREE with an explicit "git --bare". Catch that
mistake. It might make sense to move this check to "git.c"
side as well, but I tried to shoot for the minimum change for
now.
* Some scripts, especially from the olden days, rely on
traditional GIT_DIR behaviour in "git init". Namely, these
are some notable patterns:
(create a bare repository)
- mkdir some.git && cd some.git && GIT_DIR=. git init
- mkdir some.git && cd some.git && git --bare init
This comes with a new test script and also passes the existing
test suite, but there may be cases that are still broken with
the current tip of master and this patch does not yet fix. I'd
appreciate help in straightening this mess out.
Uwe Kleine-König noticed that under certain circumstances, name-rev
picked a non-optimal tag. Jeff King analyzed that name-rev only
takes into account the number of merge traversals, and then the
_last_ number in the description.
As an easy way to fix it, use a weighting factor for merge traversals:
A merge traversal is now made 65535 times more expensive than a
first-parent traversal.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git-gui:
git-gui: Correct 'git gui blame' in a subdirectory
git-gui: Do not offer to stage three-way diff hunks into the index
git-gui: Refactor diff pane popup support for future improvements
git-gui: Fix "unoptimized loading" to not cause git-gui to crash
git-gui: Paper bag fix "Stage Hunk For Commit" in diff context menu
git-gui: Allow git-merge to use branch names in conflict markers
git-gui: Fix window manager problems on ion3
When nothing to git-commit, honor the git-status color setting.
Instead of disabling color all of the time during a git-commit, allow
the user's config preference in the situation where there is nothing
to commit. In this situation, the status is printed to the terminal
and not sent to COMMIT_EDITMSG, so honoring the status color setting
is expected.
Signed-off-by: Brian Hetro <whee@smaertness.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, searchbox is CSS'd to have position: absolute, which has the
unfortunate consequence that if the viewport is too small and can't fit
into the page width together with the navbar, it gets overlapped and part
of the navbar gets obscured. This makes searchbox float: right instead,
thus the navbar simply gets wrapped.
Discovered and fix pointed out by Michael Olson <mwolson@gnu.org>.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'master' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/git
* 'master' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/git:
Documentation/user-manual.txt: fix a few omissions of gitlink commands.
user-manual: fix incorrect header level
user-manual: use pithier example commit
user-manual: introduce the word "commit" earlier
user-manual: minor editing for conciseness
user-manual: edit "ignoring files" for conciseness
Documentation/user-manual.txt: fix a few omissions of gitlink commands.
user-manual: edit "ignoring files" for conciseness
The immediate motivation for writing this section was to explain the
various places ignore patterns could be used. However, I still think
.gitignore is the case most people will want to learn about first. It
also makes it a bit more concrete to introduce ignore patterns in the
context of .gitignore first. And the existance of gitignore(5) relieves
the pressure to explain it all here.
So, stick to the .gitignore example, with only a brief mention of the
others, explain the syntax only by example, and leave the rest to
gitignore(5).
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Cc: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
The usage string for the executable was missing --refresh. In
addition, the documentation referred to "file", but the usage string
referred to "filepattern". Updated the documentation to
"filepattern", as git-add does handle patterns.
Signed-off-by: Brian Hetro <whee@smaertness.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Don't segfault if we failed to inflate a packed delta
Under some types of packfile corruption the zlib stream holding the
data for a delta within a packfile may fail to inflate, due to say
a CRC failure within the compressed data itself. When this occurs
the unpack_compressed_entry function will return NULL as a signal to
the caller that the data is not available. Unfortunately we then
tried to use that NULL as though it referenced a memory location
where a delta was stored and tried to apply it to the delta base.
Loading a byte from the NULL address typically causes a SIGSEGV.
cate on #git noticed this failure in `git fsck --full` where the
call to verify_pack() first noticed that the packfile was corrupt
by finding that the packfile's SHA-1 did not match the raw data of
the file. After finding this fsck went ahead and tried to verify
every object within the packfile, even though the packfile was
already known to be bad. If we are going to shovel bad data at
the delta unpacking code, we better handle it correctly.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>