sequencer: make refs generated by the `label` command worktree-local
This allows for rebases to be run in parallel in separate worktrees
(think: interrupted in the middle of one rebase, being asked to perform
a different rebase, adding a separate worktree just for that job).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Once upon a time, this here developer thought: wouldn't it be nice if,
say, Git for Windows' patches on top of core Git could be represented as
a thicket of branches, and be rebased on top of core Git in order to
maintain a cherry-pick'able set of patch series?
The original attempt to answer this was: git rebase --preserve-merges.
However, that experiment was never intended as an interactive option,
and it only piggy-backed on git rebase --interactive because that
command's implementation looked already very, very familiar: it was
designed by the same person who designed --preserve-merges: yours truly.
Some time later, some other developer (I am looking at you, Andreas!
;-)) decided that it would be a good idea to allow --preserve-merges to
be combined with --interactive (with caveats!) and the Git maintainer
(well, the interim Git maintainer during Junio's absence, that is)
agreed, and that is when the glamor of the --preserve-merges design
started to fall apart rather quickly and unglamorously.
The reason? In --preserve-merges mode, the parents of a merge commit (or
for that matter, of *any* commit) were not stated explicitly, but were
*implied* by the commit name passed to the `pick` command.
This made it impossible, for example, to reorder commits. Not to mention
to flatten the branch topology or, deity forbid, to split topic branches
into two.
Alas, these shortcomings also prevented that mode (whose original
purpose was to serve Git for Windows' needs, with the additional hope
that it may be useful to others, too) from serving Git for Windows'
needs.
Five years later, when it became really untenable to have one unwieldy,
big hodge-podge patch series of partly related, partly unrelated patches
in Git for Windows that was rebased onto core Git's tags from time to
time (earning the undeserved wrath of the developer of the ill-fated
git-remote-hg series that first obsoleted Git for Windows' competing
approach, only to be abandoned without maintainer later) was really
untenable, the "Git garden shears" were born [*1*/*2*]: a script,
piggy-backing on top of the interactive rebase, that would first
determine the branch topology of the patches to be rebased, create a
pseudo todo list for further editing, transform the result into a real
todo list (making heavy use of the `exec` command to "implement" the
missing todo list commands) and finally recreate the patch series on
top of the new base commit.
That was in 2013. And it took about three weeks to come up with the
design and implement it as an out-of-tree script. Needless to say, the
implementation needed quite a few years to stabilize, all the while the
design itself proved itself sound.
With this patch, the goodness of the Git garden shears comes to `git
rebase -i` itself. Passing the `--recreate-merges` option will generate
a todo list that can be understood readily, and where it is obvious
how to reorder commits. New branches can be introduced by inserting
`label` commands and calling `merge <label>`. And once this mode will
have become stable and universally accepted, we can deprecate the design
mistake that was `--preserve-merges`.
Link *1*:
https://github.com/msysgit/msysgit/blob/master/share/msysGit/shears.sh
Link *2*:
https://github.com/git-for-windows/build-extra/blob/master/shears.sh
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
rebase-helper --make-script: introduce a flag to recreate merges
The sequencer just learned new commands intended to recreate branch
structure (similar in spirit to --preserve-merges, but with a
substantially less-broken design).
Let's allow the rebase--helper to generate todo lists making use of
these commands, triggered by the new --recreate-merges option. For a
commit topology like this (where the HEAD points to C):
- A - B - C
\ /
D
the generated todo list would look like this:
# branch D
pick 0123 A
label branch-point
pick 1234 D
label D
reset branch-point
pick 2345 B
merge -C 3456 D # C
To keep things simple, we first only implement support for merge commits
with exactly two parents, leaving support for octopus merges to a later
patch in this patch series.
As a special, hard-coded label, all merge-recreating todo lists start with
the command `label onto` so that we can later always refer to the revision
onto which everything is rebased.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
sequencer: fast-forward merge commits, if possible
Just like with regular `pick` commands, if we are trying to recreate a
merge commit, we now test whether the parents of said commit match HEAD
and the commits to be merged, and fast-forward if possible.
This is not only faster, but also avoids unnecessary proliferation of
new objects.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This patch is part of the effort to reimplement `--preserve-merges` with
a substantially improved design, a design that has been developed in the
Git for Windows project to maintain the dozens of Windows-specific patch
series on top of upstream Git.
The previous patch implemented the `label` and `reset` commands to label
commits and to reset to labeled commits. This patch adds the `merge`
command, with the following syntax:
merge [-C <commit>] <rev> # <oneline>
The <commit> parameter in this instance is the *original* merge commit,
whose author and message will be used for the merge commit that is about
to be created.
The <rev> parameter refers to the (possibly rewritten) revision to
merge. Let's see an example of a todo list:
reset onto
pick cafecafe And now for something completely different
merge -C baaabaaa abc # Merge the branch 'abc' into master
To edit the merge commit's message (a "reword" for merges, if you will),
use `-c` (lower-case) instead of `-C`; this convention was borrowed from
`git commit` that also supports `-c` and `-C` with similar meanings.
To create *new* merges, i.e. without copying the commit message from an
existing commit, simply omit the `-C <commit>` parameter (which will
open an editor for the merge message):
merge abc
This comes in handy when splitting a branch into two or more branches.
Note: this patch only adds support for recursive merges, to keep things
simple. Support for octopus merges will be added later in a separate
patch series, support for merges using strategies other than the
recursive merge is left for the future.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
sequencer: introduce new commands to reset the revision
In the upcoming commits, we will teach the sequencer to recreate merges.
This will be done in a very different way from the unfortunate design of
`git rebase --preserve-merges` (which does not allow for reordering
commits, or changing the branch topology).
The main idea is to introduce new todo list commands, to support
labeling the current revision with a given name, resetting the current
revision to a previous state, and merging labeled revisions.
This idea was developed in Git for Windows' Git garden shears (that are
used to maintain the "thicket of branches" on top of upstream Git), and
this patch is part of the effort to make it available to a wider
audience, as well as to make the entire process more robust (by
implementing it in a safe and portable language rather than a Unix shell
script).
This commit implements the commands to label, and to reset to, given
revisions. The syntax is:
label <name>
reset <name>
Internally, the `label <name>` command creates the ref
`refs/rewritten/<name>`. This makes it possible to work with the labeled
revisions interactively, or in a scripted fashion (e.g. via the todo
list command `exec`).
These temporary refs are removed upon sequencer_remove_state(), so that
even a `git rebase --abort` cleans them up.
We disallow '#' as label because that character will be used as separator
in the upcoming `merge` command.
Later in this patch series, we will mark the `refs/rewritten/` refs as
worktree-local, to allow for interactive rebases to be run in parallel in
worktrees linked to the same repository.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Up to now each command took a commit as its first argument and ignored
the rest of the line (usually the subject of the commit)
Now that we are about to introduce commands that take different
arguments, clarify each command by giving the argument list.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
sequencer: make rearrange_squash() a bit more obvious
There are some commands that have to be skipped from rearranging by virtue
of not handling any commits.
However, the logic was not quite obvious: it skipped commands based on
their position in the enum todo_command.
Instead, let's make it explicit that we skip all commands that do not
handle any commit. With one exception: the `drop` command, because it,
well, drops the commit and is therefore not eligible to rearranging.
Note: this is a bit academic at the moment because the only time we call
`rearrange_squash()` is directly after generating the todo list, when we
have nothing but `pick` commands anyway.
However, the upcoming `merge` command *will* want to be handled by that
function, and it *can* handle commits.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
sequencer: avoid using errno clobbered by rollback_lock_file()
As pointed out in a review of the `--recreate-merges` patch series,
`rollback_lock_file()` clobbers errno. Therefore, we have to report the
error message that uses errno before calling said function.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 89a70b80 ("t0302 & t3900: add forgotten quotes", 2018-01-03), quotes
were added to protect against spaces in $HOME. In the test_when_finished
command, two files are deleted which must be quoted individually.
[jc: with \$HOME in the test_when_finished command quoted, as
pointed out by j6t].
Signed-off-by: Beat Bolli <dev+git@drbeat.li> Helped-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git merge -s recursive" did not correctly abort when the index is
dirty, if the merged tree happened to be the same as the current
HEAD, which has been fixed.
* ew/empty-merge-with-dirty-index:
merge-recursive: do not look at the index during recursive merge
mingw: handle GITPERLLIB in t0021 in a Windows-compatible way
Git's assumption that all path lists are colon-separated is not only
wrong on Windows, it is not even an assumption that is compatible with
POSIX.
In the interest of time, let's not try to fix this properly but simply
work around the obvious breakage on Windows, where the MSYS2 Bash used
by Git for Windows to interpret the Git's Unix shell scripts will
automagically convert path lists in the environment to
semicolon-separated lists of Windows paths (with drive letter and the
corresponding colon and all that jazz).
In other words, we simply look whether there is a semicolon in
GITPERLLIB and split by semicolons if found instead of colons. This is
not fool-proof, of course, as the path list could consist of a single
path. But that is not the case in Git for Windows' test suite, there are
always two paths in GITPERLLIB.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Avoid repeatedly testing the same tree in TravisCI that have been
tested successfully already.
* sg/travis-skip-identical-test:
travis-ci: record and skip successfully built trees
travis-ci: create the cache directory early in the build process
travis-ci: print the "tip of branch is exactly at tag" message in color
* sg/travis-fixes:
travis-ci: only print test failures if there are test results available
travis-ci: save prove state for the 32 bit Linux build
travis-ci: don't install default addon packages for the 32 bit Linux build
travis-ci: fine tune the use of 'set -x' in 'ci/*' scripts
Merge branch 'js/misc-git-gui-stuff' of ../git-gui
* 'js/misc-git-gui-stuff' of ../git-gui:
git-gui: allow Ctrl+T to toggle multiple paths
git-gui: fix exception when trying to stage with empty file list
git-gui: avoid exception upon Ctrl+T in an empty list
git gui: fix staging a second line to a 1-line file
It is possible to select multiple files in the "Unstaged Changes" and
the "Staged Changes" lists. But when hitting Ctrl+T, surprisingly only
one entry is handled, not all selected ones.
Let's just use the same code path as for the "Stage To Commit" and the
"Unstage From Commit" menu items.
This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/1012
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-gui: avoid exception upon Ctrl+T in an empty list
Previously unstaged files can be staged by clicking on them and then
pressing Ctrl+T. Conveniently, the next unstaged file is selected
automatically so that the unstaged files can be staged by repeatedly
pressing Ctrl+T.
When a user hits Ctrl+T one time too many, though, Git GUI used to throw
this exception:
expected number but got ""
expected number but got ""
while executing
"expr {int([lindex [$w tag ranges in_diff] 0])}"
(procedure "toggle_or_diff" line 13)
invoked from within
"toggle_or_diff toggle .vpane.files.workdir.list "
(command bound to event)
Let's just avoid that by skipping the operation when there are no more
files to stage.
This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/1060
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git gui: fix staging a second line to a 1-line file
When a 1-line file is augmented by a second line, and the user tries to
stage that single line via the "Stage Line" context menu item, we do not
want to see "apply: corrupt patch at line 5".
The reason for this error was that the hunk header looks like this:
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
but the existing code expects the original range always to contain a
comma. This problem is easily fixed by cutting the string "1 +1,2"
(that Git GUI formerly mistook for the starting line) at the space.
This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/515
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive: do not look at the index during recursive merge
When merging another branch into ours, if their tree is the same as
the common ancestor's, we can declare that our tree represents the
result of three-way merge. In such a case, the recursive merge
backend incorrectly used to create a commit out of our index, even
when the index has changes.
A recent fix attempted to prevent this by adding a comparison
between "our" tree and the index, but forgot that this check must be
restricted only to the outermost merge. Inner merges performed by
the recursive backend across merge bases are by definition made from
scratch without having any local changes added to the index. The
call to index_has_changes() during an inner merge is working on the
index that has no relation to the merge being performed, preventing
legitimate merges from getting carried out.
Fix it by limiting the check to the outermost merge.
c3a9ad3117 ("oidset: add iterator methods to oidset", 2017-11-21)
introduced a 'oidset_init()' function in oidset.h, which has void as
return type, but returns an expression.
This makes the solaris compiler fail with:
"oidset.h", line 30: void function cannot return value
As the return type is void, and even the return type of the expression
we're trying to return (oidmap_init) is void just remove the return
statement to fix the compiler error.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* js/sequencer-cleanups:
sequencer: do not invent whitespace when transforming OIDs
sequencer: report when noop has an argument
sequencer: remove superfluous conditional
sequencer: strip bogus LF at end of error messages
rebase: do not continue when the todo list generation failed
"git merge -s recursive" did not correctly abort when the index is
dirty, if the merged tree happened to be the same as the current
HEAD, which has been fixed.
* ew/empty-merge-with-dirty-index:
merge-recursive: avoid incorporating uncommitted changes in a merge
move index_has_changes() from builtin/am.c to merge.c for reuse
t6044: recursive can silently incorporate dirty changes in a merge
It has been reported that strategy arguments are not passed to `git
merge` correctly when rebasing interactively, preserving merges.
The reason is that the strategy arguments are already quoted, and then
quoted again.
This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/1321
Original-patch-by: Kim Gybels <kgybels@infogroep.be> Also-reported-by: Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey.kornilov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
docs/diff-options: clarify scope of diff-filter types
The same document for "--diff-filter" is included by many
programs in the diff family. Because it mentions all
possible types (added, removed, etc), this may imply to the
reader that all types can be generated by a particular
command. But this isn't necessarily the case; "diff-files"
cannot generally produce an "Added" entry, since the diff is
limited to what is already in the index.
Let's make it clear that the list here is the full one, and
does not imply anything about what a particular invocation
may produce.
Note that conditionally including items (e.g., omitting
"Added" in the git-diff-files manpage) isn't the right
solution here for two reasons:
- The problem isn't diff-files, but doing an index to
working tree diff. "git diff" can do the same diff, but
also has other modes where "Added" does show up.
- The direction of the diff matters. Doing "diff-files -R"
can get you Added entries (but not Deleted ones).
So it's best just to explain that the set of available types
depends on the specific diff invocation.
Reported-by: John Cheng <johnlicheng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
http: fix v1 protocol tests with apache httpd < 2.4
The apache config used by tests was updated to use the SetEnvIf
directive to set the Git-Protocol header in 19113a26b6 ("http: tell
server that the client understands v1", 2017-10-16).
Setting the Git-Protocol header is restricted to httpd >= 2.4, but
mod_setenvif and the SetEnvIf directive work with lower versions, at
least as far back as 2.0, according to the httpd documentation:
When cleaning up files in the $HOME directory, it really makes sense to
quote the path, especially in Git's test suite, where the HOME directory
is *guaranteed* to contain spaces in its name.
It would appear that those two tests pass even without cleaning up the
files, but really more by pure chance than by design (the cleanup seems
not actually to be necessary).
However, if anybody would have a left-over `trash/` directory in Git's
`t/` directory, these tests would fail, because they would all of a
sudden try to delete that directory, but without the `-r` (recursive)
flag. That is how this issue was found.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allow the test suite to pass in a directory whose name contains spaces
It is totally legitimate to clone Git's source code anywhere, including
into, say, directories whose name (or the name of its absolute path)
contains spaces.
However, a couple of tests failed to anticipate this, for lack of
quoting (or in one instance, for failure to expect more than one space
in the absolute path of the TEST_DIRECTORY). This can be easily verified
by calling these commands in your current clone:
git clone . with\ spaces
cd with\ spaces
make -j15 test
Let's fix this.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 7c117184d7 ("bisect: fix off-by-one error in
`best_bisection_sorted()`", 2017-11-05) the more careful logic dealing
with freeing p->next in 50e62a8e70 ("rev-list: implement
--bisect-all", 2007-10-22) was removed.
Restore the more careful check to avoid segfaulting. Ideally this
would come with a test case, but we don't have steps to reproduce
this, only a backtrace from gdb pointing to this being the issue.
Reported-by: Yasushi SHOJI <yasushi.shoji@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Acked-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
049e64aa50 ("Documentation: convert SubmittingPatches to AsciiDoc",
2017-11-12) changed the `git blame` and `git shortlog` examples given in
the section on sending your patches.
In order to italicize the `$path` argument the commands are enclosed in
plus characters as opposed to backticks. The difference between the
quoting methods is that backtick enclosed text is not subject to further
expansion. This formatting makes reading SubmittingPatches in a git
clone a little more difficult. In addition to the underscores around
`$path` the `--` chars in `git shortlog --no-merges` must be replaced
with `{litdd}`.
Use backticks to quote these commands. The italicized `$path` is lost
from the html version but the commands can be read (and copied) more
easily by users reading the text version. These readers are more likely
to use the commands while submitting patches. Make it easier for them.
Signed-off-by: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
travis-ci: check that all build artifacts are .gitignore-d
Every once in a while our explicit .gitignore files get out of sync
when our build process learns to create new artifacts, like test
helper executables, but the .gitignore files are not updated
accordingly.
Use Travis CI to help catch such issues earlier: check that there are
no untracked files at the end of any build jobs building Git (i.e. the
64 bit Clang and GCC Linux and OSX build jobs, plus the GETTEXT_POISON
and 32 bit Linux build jobs) or its documentation, and fail the build
job if there are any present.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
travis-ci: don't store P4 and Git LFS in the working tree
The Clang and GCC 64 bit Linux build jobs download and store the P4
and Git LFS executables under the current directory, which is the
working tree that we are about to build and test. This means that Git
commands like 'status' or 'ls-files' would list these files as
untracked. The next commit is about to make sure that there are no
untracked files present after the build, and the downloaded
executables in the working tree are interfering with those upcoming
checks.
Therefore, let's download P4 and Git LFS in the home directory,
outside of the working tree.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
travis-ci: record and skip successfully built trees
Travis CI dutifully builds and tests each new branch tip, even if its
tree has previously been successfully built and tested. This happens
often enough in contributors' workflows, when a work-in-progress
branch is rebased changing e.g. only commit messages or the order or
number of commits while leaving the resulting code intact, and is then
pushed to a Travis CI-enabled GitHub fork.
This is wasting Travis CI's resources and is sometimes scary-annoying
when the new tip commit with a tree identical to the previous,
successfully tested one is suddenly reported in red, because one of
the OSX build jobs happened to exceed the time limit yet again.
So extend our Travis CI build scripts to skip building commits whose
trees have previously been successfully built and tested. Use the
Travis CI cache feature to keep a record of the object names of trees
that tested successfully, in a plain and simple flat text file, one
line per tree object name. Append the current tree's object name at
the end of every successful build job to this file, along with a bit
of additional info about the build job (commit object name, Travis CI
job number and id). Limit the size of this file to 1000 records, to
prevent it from growing too large for git/git's forever living
integration branches. Check, using a simple grep invocation, in each
build job whether the current commit's tree is already in there, and
skip the build if it is. Include a message in the skipped build job's
trace log, containing the URL to the build job successfully testing
that tree for the first time and instructions on how to force a
re-build. Catch the case when a build job, which successfully built
and tested a particular tree for the first time, is restarted and omit
the URL of the previous build job's trace log, as in this case it's
the same build job and the trace log has just been overwritten.
Note: this won't kick in if two identical trees are on two different
branches, because Travis CI caches are not shared between build jobs
of different branches.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
travis-ci: create the cache directory early in the build process
It seems that Travis CI creates the cache directory for us anyway,
even when a previous cache doesn't exist for the current build job.
Alas, this behavior is not explicitly documented, therefore we don't
rely on it and create the cache directory ourselves in those build
jobs that read/write cached data (currently only the prove state).
In the following commit we'll start to cache additional data in every
build job, and will access the cache much earlier in the build
process.
Therefore move creating the cache directory to 'ci/lib-travisci.sh' to
make sure that it exists at the very beginning of every build job.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
travis-ci: print the "tip of branch is exactly at tag" message in color
To make this info message stand out from the regular build job trace
output.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git describe" was taught to dig trees deeper to find a
<commit-ish>:<path> that refers to a given blob object.
* sb/describe-blob:
builtin/describe.c: describe a blob
builtin/describe.c: factor out describe_commit
builtin/describe.c: print debug statements earlier
builtin/describe.c: rename `oid` to avoid variable shadowing
revision.h: introduce blob/tree walking in order of the commits
list-objects.c: factor out traverse_trees_and_blobs
t6120: fix typo in test name
"git merge" learned to pay attention to merge.verifySignatures
configuration variable and pretend as if '--verify-signatures'
option was given from the command line.
* hi/merge-verify-sig-config:
t5573, t7612: clean up after unexpected success of 'pull' and 'merge'
t: add tests for pull --verify-signatures
merge: add config option for verifySignatures
Error messages from "git rebase" have been somewhat cleaned up.
* ks/rebase-error-messages:
rebase: rebasing can also be done when HEAD is detached
rebase: distinguish user input by quoting it
rebase: consistently use branch_name variable