From c52ff85d97c698c902870305a010e2303e297b87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Elijah Newren Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 23:20:13 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] merge-recursive: Fix rename/rename(1to2) resolution for virtual merge base When renaming one file to two files, we really should be doing a content merge. Also, in the recursive case, undoing the renames and recording the merged file in the index with the source of the rename (while deleting both destinations) allows the renames to be re-detected in the non-recursive merge and will result in fewer spurious conflicts. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- merge-recursive.c | 30 +++++++++++++----------------- t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh | 2 +- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c index dcfb7228a5..f64cfc582a 100644 --- a/merge-recursive.c +++ b/merge-recursive.c @@ -984,17 +984,6 @@ static void conflict_rename_rename_1to2(struct merge_options *o, src, pair1->two->path, branch1, src, pair2->two->path, branch2, o->call_depth ? " (left unresolved)" : ""); - if (o->call_depth) { - /* - * FIXME: Why remove file from cache, and then - * immediately readd it? Why not just overwrite using - * update_file only? Also...this is buggy for - * rename/add-source situations... - */ - remove_file_from_cache(src); - update_file(o, 0, pair1->one->sha1, pair1->one->mode, src); - } - if (dir_in_way(ren1_dst, !o->call_depth)) { dst_name1 = del[delp++] = unique_path(o, ren1_dst, branch1); output(o, 1, "%s is a directory in %s adding as %s instead", @@ -1006,14 +995,21 @@ static void conflict_rename_rename_1to2(struct merge_options *o, ren2_dst, branch1, dst_name2); } if (o->call_depth) { - remove_file_from_cache(dst_name1); - remove_file_from_cache(dst_name2); + struct merge_file_info mfi; + mfi = merge_file(o, src, + pair1->one->sha1, pair1->one->mode, + pair1->two->sha1, pair1->two->mode, + pair2->two->sha1, pair2->two->mode, + branch1, branch2); /* - * Uncomment to leave the conflicting names in the resulting tree - * - * update_file(o, 0, pair1->two->sha1, pair1->two->mode, dst_name1); - * update_file(o, 0, pair2->two->sha1, pair2->two->mode, dst_name2); + * FIXME: For rename/add-source conflicts (if we could detect + * such), this is wrong. We should instead find a unique + * pathname and then either rename the add-source file to that + * unique path, or use that unique path instead of src here. */ + update_file(o, 0, mfi.sha, mfi.mode, src); + remove_file_from_cache(ren1_dst); + remove_file_from_cache(ren2_dst); } else { update_stages(ren1_dst, NULL, pair1->two, NULL); update_stages(ren2_dst, NULL, NULL, pair2->two); diff --git a/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh b/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh index 314fdaeb18..5a7af0ce91 100755 --- a/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh +++ b/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh @@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup rename/rename(1to2)/modify followed by what looks lik git tag E ' -test_expect_failure 'handle rename/rename(1to2)/modify followed by what looks like rename/rename(2to1)/modify' ' +test_expect_success 'handle rename/rename(1to2)/modify followed by what looks like rename/rename(2to1)/modify' ' git checkout D^0 && git merge -s recursive E^0 && -- 2.47.1