From 26d59efc3fba2afc4e03ed8e95f5e43d455c6948 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Lorimer Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 18:05:15 +1000 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] [english] practice language analysis essay --- english/language-analysis.md | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/english/language-analysis.md b/english/language-analysis.md index 4ad06cf..9d153f6 100644 --- a/english/language-analysis.md +++ b/english/language-analysis.md @@ -21,3 +21,9 @@ - **Euphemisms** - used to soften harsh phrases - **Dyphemism** - negative expressions (humiliating/disapproving) - **Ad hominem** - personal attack + +## Practice responses + +### *Pill testing: an indulgence for the elites* - Blake Young + +Young begins his piece with a blunt and firm statement, clearly affirming his contention in the first few words. This establishes a bold and confident tone for the author, intended to intimidate readers whilst also presenting a shocking and grabbing statement. Following this, the author expands by discussing general background information of the issue, which adds credibility to the later arguments. The addition context contributed by the second paragraph also broadens the potential audience by engaging those who are less educated or interested in the issue. The author then makes extensive use of metaphors to describe the "strange noise", and then makes a somehwat discriminating generalisation about the "doctors' wives of the leafy suburbs". In the next sentence, he clarifies this, intentionally enclosing the "war on drugs" in quote marks. This is meant to be diminuitive and demeaning towards the opposing idea. -- 2.43.2