Documentation / git-bisect.txton commit Fix some documentation typos. (02ff625)
   1git-bisect(1)
   2=============
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-bisect - Find the change that introduced a bug by binary search
   7
   8
   9SYNOPSIS
  10--------
  11'git bisect' <subcommand> <options>
  12
  13DESCRIPTION
  14-----------
  15The command takes various subcommands, and different options depending
  16on the subcommand:
  17
  18 git bisect start [<bad> [<good>...]] [--] [<paths>...]
  19 git bisect bad [<rev>]
  20 git bisect good [<rev>...]
  21 git bisect skip [<rev>...]
  22 git bisect reset [<branch>]
  23 git bisect visualize
  24 git bisect replay <logfile>
  25 git bisect log
  26 git bisect run <cmd>...
  27
  28This command uses 'git-rev-list --bisect' option to help drive the
  29binary search process to find which change introduced a bug, given an
  30old "good" commit object name and a later "bad" commit object name.
  31
  32Basic bisect commands: start, bad, good
  33~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  34
  35The way you use it is:
  36
  37------------------------------------------------
  38$ git bisect start
  39$ git bisect bad                 # Current version is bad
  40$ git bisect good v2.6.13-rc2    # v2.6.13-rc2 was the last version
  41                                 # tested that was good
  42------------------------------------------------
  43
  44When you give at least one bad and one good versions, it will bisect
  45the revision tree and say something like:
  46
  47------------------------------------------------
  48Bisecting: 675 revisions left to test after this
  49------------------------------------------------
  50
  51and check out the state in the middle. Now, compile that kernel, and
  52boot it. Now, let's say that this booted kernel works fine, then just
  53do
  54
  55------------------------------------------------
  56$ git bisect good                       # this one is good
  57------------------------------------------------
  58
  59which will now say
  60
  61------------------------------------------------
  62Bisecting: 337 revisions left to test after this
  63------------------------------------------------
  64
  65and you continue along, compiling that one, testing it, and depending
  66on whether it is good or bad, you say "git bisect good" or "git bisect
  67bad", and ask for the next bisection.
  68
  69Until you have no more left, and you'll have been left with the first
  70bad kernel rev in "refs/bisect/bad".
  71
  72Bisect reset
  73~~~~~~~~~~~~
  74
  75Oh, and then after you want to reset to the original head, do a
  76
  77------------------------------------------------
  78$ git bisect reset
  79------------------------------------------------
  80
  81to get back to the master branch, instead of being in one of the
  82bisection branches ("git bisect start" will do that for you too,
  83actually: it will reset the bisection state, and before it does that
  84it checks that you're not using some old bisection branch).
  85
  86Bisect visualize
  87~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  88
  89During the bisection process, you can say
  90
  91------------
  92$ git bisect visualize
  93------------
  94
  95to see the currently remaining suspects in `gitk`.  `visualize` is a bit
  96too long to type and `view` is provided as a synonym.
  97
  98If `DISPLAY` environment variable is not set, `git log` is used
  99instead.  You can even give command line options such as `-p` and
 100`--stat`.
 101
 102------------
 103$ git bisect view --stat
 104------------
 105
 106Bisect log and bisect replay
 107~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 108
 109The good/bad input is logged, and
 110
 111------------
 112$ git bisect log
 113------------
 114
 115shows what you have done so far. You can truncate its output somewhere
 116and save it in a file, and run
 117
 118------------
 119$ git bisect replay that-file
 120------------
 121
 122if you find later you made a mistake telling good/bad about a
 123revision.
 124
 125Avoiding to test a commit
 126~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 127
 128If in a middle of bisect session, you know what the bisect suggested
 129to try next is not a good one to test (e.g. the change the commit
 130introduces is known not to work in your environment and you know it
 131does not have anything to do with the bug you are chasing), you may
 132want to find a near-by commit and try that instead.
 133
 134It goes something like this:
 135
 136------------
 137$ git bisect good/bad                   # previous round was good/bad.
 138Bisecting: 337 revisions left to test after this
 139$ git bisect visualize                  # oops, that is uninteresting.
 140$ git reset --hard HEAD~3               # try 3 revs before what
 141                                        # was suggested
 142------------
 143
 144Then compile and test the one you chose to try. After that, tell
 145bisect what the result was as usual.
 146
 147Bisect skip
 148~~~~~~~~~~~~
 149
 150Instead of choosing by yourself a nearby commit, you may just want git
 151to do it for you using:
 152
 153------------
 154$ git bisect skip                 # Current version cannot be tested
 155------------
 156
 157But computing the commit to test may be slower afterwards and git may
 158eventually not be able to tell the first bad among a bad and one or
 159more "skip"ped commits.
 160
 161Cutting down bisection by giving more parameters to bisect start
 162~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 163
 164You can further cut down the number of trials if you know what part of
 165the tree is involved in the problem you are tracking down, by giving
 166paths parameters when you say `bisect start`, like this:
 167
 168------------
 169$ git bisect start -- arch/i386 include/asm-i386
 170------------
 171
 172If you know beforehand more than one good commits, you can narrow the
 173bisect space down without doing the whole tree checkout every time you
 174give good commits. You give the bad revision immediately after `start`
 175and then you give all the good revisions you have:
 176
 177------------
 178$ git bisect start v2.6.20-rc6 v2.6.20-rc4 v2.6.20-rc1 --
 179                   # v2.6.20-rc6 is bad
 180                   # v2.6.20-rc4 and v2.6.20-rc1 are good
 181------------
 182
 183Bisect run
 184~~~~~~~~~~
 185
 186If you have a script that can tell if the current source code is good
 187or bad, you can automatically bisect using:
 188
 189------------
 190$ git bisect run my_script
 191------------
 192
 193Note that the "run" script (`my_script` in the above example) should
 194exit with code 0 in case the current source code is good.  Exit with a
 195code between 1 and 127 (inclusive), except 125, if the current
 196source code is bad.
 197
 198Any other exit code will abort the automatic bisect process. (A
 199program that does "exit(-1)" leaves $? = 255, see exit(3) manual page,
 200the value is chopped with "& 0377".)
 201
 202The special exit code 125 should be used when the current source code
 203cannot be tested. If the "run" script exits with this code, the current
 204revision will be skipped, see `git bisect skip` above.
 205
 206You may often find that during bisect you want to have near-constant
 207tweaks (e.g., s/#define DEBUG 0/#define DEBUG 1/ in a header file, or
 208"revision that does not have this commit needs this patch applied to
 209work around other problem this bisection is not interested in")
 210applied to the revision being tested.
 211
 212To cope with such a situation, after the inner git-bisect finds the
 213next revision to test, with the "run" script, you can apply that tweak
 214before compiling, run the real test, and after the test decides if the
 215revision (possibly with the needed tweaks) passed the test, rewind the
 216tree to the pristine state.  Finally the "run" script can exit with
 217the status of the real test to let "git bisect run" command loop to
 218know the outcome.
 219
 220Author
 221------
 222Written by Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
 223
 224Documentation
 225-------------
 226Documentation by Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>.
 227
 228GIT
 229---
 230Part of the gitlink:git[7] suite