Documentation / git-checkout.txton commit checkout: retire --ignore-other-worktrees in favor of --force (0d1a151)
   1git-checkout(1)
   2===============
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-checkout - Checkout a branch or paths to the working tree
   7
   8SYNOPSIS
   9--------
  10[verse]
  11'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [<branch>]
  12'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] --detach [<branch>]
  13'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [--detach] <commit>
  14'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [[-b|-B|--orphan] <new_branch>] [<start_point>]
  15'git checkout' [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] [--] <paths>...
  16'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] [<paths>...]
  17
  18DESCRIPTION
  19-----------
  20Updates files in the working tree to match the version in the index
  21or the specified tree.  If no paths are given, 'git checkout' will
  22also update `HEAD` to set the specified branch as the current
  23branch.
  24
  25'git checkout' <branch>::
  26        To prepare for working on <branch>, switch to it by updating
  27        the index and the files in the working tree, and by pointing
  28        HEAD at the branch. Local modifications to the files in the
  29        working tree are kept, so that they can be committed to the
  30        <branch>.
  31+
  32If <branch> is not found but there does exist a tracking branch in
  33exactly one remote (call it <remote>) with a matching name, treat as
  34equivalent to
  35+
  36------------
  37$ git checkout -b <branch> --track <remote>/<branch>
  38------------
  39+
  40You could omit <branch>, in which case the command degenerates to
  41"check out the current branch", which is a glorified no-op with a
  42rather expensive side-effects to show only the tracking information,
  43if exists, for the current branch.
  44
  45'git checkout' -b|-B <new_branch> [<start point>]::
  46
  47        Specifying `-b` causes a new branch to be created as if
  48        linkgit:git-branch[1] were called and then checked out.  In
  49        this case you can use the `--track` or `--no-track` options,
  50        which will be passed to 'git branch'.  As a convenience,
  51        `--track` without `-b` implies branch creation; see the
  52        description of `--track` below.
  53+
  54If `-B` is given, <new_branch> is created if it doesn't exist; otherwise, it
  55is reset. This is the transactional equivalent of
  56+
  57------------
  58$ git branch -f <branch> [<start point>]
  59$ git checkout <branch>
  60------------
  61+
  62that is to say, the branch is not reset/created unless "git checkout" is
  63successful.
  64
  65'git checkout' --detach [<branch>]::
  66'git checkout' [--detach] <commit>::
  67
  68        Prepare to work on top of <commit>, by detaching HEAD at it
  69        (see "DETACHED HEAD" section), and updating the index and the
  70        files in the working tree.  Local modifications to the files
  71        in the working tree are kept, so that the resulting working
  72        tree will be the state recorded in the commit plus the local
  73        modifications.
  74+
  75When the <commit> argument is a branch name, the `--detach` option can
  76be used to detach HEAD at the tip of the branch (`git checkout
  77<branch>` would check out that branch without detaching HEAD).
  78+
  79Omitting <branch> detaches HEAD at the tip of the current branch.
  80
  81'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>...::
  82
  83        When <paths> or `--patch` are given, 'git checkout' does *not*
  84        switch branches.  It updates the named paths in the working tree
  85        from the index file or from a named <tree-ish> (most often a
  86        commit).  In this case, the `-b` and `--track` options are
  87        meaningless and giving either of them results in an error.  The
  88        <tree-ish> argument can be used to specify a specific tree-ish
  89        (i.e.  commit, tag or tree) to update the index for the given
  90        paths before updating the working tree.
  91+
  92The index may contain unmerged entries because of a previous failed merge.
  93By default, if you try to check out such an entry from the index, the
  94checkout operation will fail and nothing will be checked out.
  95Using `-f` will ignore these unmerged entries.  The contents from a
  96specific side of the merge can be checked out of the index by
  97using `--ours` or `--theirs`.  With `-m`, changes made to the working tree
  98file can be discarded to re-create the original conflicted merge result.
  99
 100OPTIONS
 101-------
 102-q::
 103--quiet::
 104        Quiet, suppress feedback messages.
 105
 106-f::
 107--force::
 108        When switching branches, proceed even if the index or the
 109        working tree differs from HEAD.  This is used to throw away
 110        local changes.
 111+
 112When checking out paths from the index, do not fail upon unmerged
 113entries; instead, unmerged entries are ignored.
 114+
 115By default, checking out a branch already checked out in another worktree
 116is disallowed. This overrides that safeguard.
 117
 118--ours::
 119--theirs::
 120        When checking out paths from the index, check out stage #2
 121        ('ours') or #3 ('theirs') for unmerged paths.
 122
 123-b <new_branch>::
 124        Create a new branch named <new_branch> and start it at
 125        <start_point>; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for details.
 126
 127-B <new_branch>::
 128        Creates the branch <new_branch> and start it at <start_point>;
 129        if it already exists, then reset it to <start_point>. This is
 130        equivalent to running "git branch" with "-f"; see
 131        linkgit:git-branch[1] for details.
 132
 133-t::
 134--track::
 135        When creating a new branch, set up "upstream" configuration. See
 136        "--track" in linkgit:git-branch[1] for details.
 137+
 138If no '-b' option is given, the name of the new branch will be
 139derived from the remote-tracking branch, by looking at the local part of
 140the refspec configured for the corresponding remote, and then stripping
 141the initial part up to the "*".
 142This would tell us to use "hack" as the local branch when branching
 143off of "origin/hack" (or "remotes/origin/hack", or even
 144"refs/remotes/origin/hack").  If the given name has no slash, or the above
 145guessing results in an empty name, the guessing is aborted.  You can
 146explicitly give a name with '-b' in such a case.
 147
 148--no-track::
 149        Do not set up "upstream" configuration, even if the
 150        branch.autosetupmerge configuration variable is true.
 151
 152-l::
 153        Create the new branch's reflog; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for
 154        details.
 155
 156--detach::
 157        Rather than checking out a branch to work on it, check out a
 158        commit for inspection and discardable experiments.
 159        This is the default behavior of "git checkout <commit>" when
 160        <commit> is not a branch name.  See the "DETACHED HEAD" section
 161        below for details.
 162
 163--orphan <new_branch>::
 164        Create a new 'orphan' branch, named <new_branch>, started from
 165        <start_point> and switch to it.  The first commit made on this
 166        new branch will have no parents and it will be the root of a new
 167        history totally disconnected from all the other branches and
 168        commits.
 169+
 170The index and the working tree are adjusted as if you had previously run
 171"git checkout <start_point>".  This allows you to start a new history
 172that records a set of paths similar to <start_point> by easily running
 173"git commit -a" to make the root commit.
 174+
 175This can be useful when you want to publish the tree from a commit
 176without exposing its full history. You might want to do this to publish
 177an open source branch of a project whose current tree is "clean", but
 178whose full history contains proprietary or otherwise encumbered bits of
 179code.
 180+
 181If you want to start a disconnected history that records a set of paths
 182that is totally different from the one of <start_point>, then you should
 183clear the index and the working tree right after creating the orphan
 184branch by running "git rm -rf ." from the top level of the working tree.
 185Afterwards you will be ready to prepare your new files, repopulating the
 186working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc.
 187
 188--ignore-skip-worktree-bits::
 189        In sparse checkout mode, `git checkout -- <paths>` would
 190        update only entries matched by <paths> and sparse patterns
 191        in $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout. This option ignores
 192        the sparse patterns and adds back any files in <paths>.
 193
 194-m::
 195--merge::
 196        When switching branches,
 197        if you have local modifications to one or more files that
 198        are different between the current branch and the branch to
 199        which you are switching, the command refuses to switch
 200        branches in order to preserve your modifications in context.
 201        However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current
 202        branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch
 203        is done, and you will be on the new branch.
 204+
 205When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting
 206paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts
 207and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge
 208should result in deletion of the path).
 209+
 210When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate
 211the conflicted merge in the specified paths.
 212
 213--conflict=<style>::
 214        The same as --merge option above, but changes the way the
 215        conflicting hunks are presented, overriding the
 216        merge.conflictstyle configuration variable.  Possible values are
 217        "merge" (default) and "diff3" (in addition to what is shown by
 218        "merge" style, shows the original contents).
 219
 220-p::
 221--patch::
 222        Interactively select hunks in the difference between the
 223        <tree-ish> (or the index, if unspecified) and the working
 224        tree.  The chosen hunks are then applied in reverse to the
 225        working tree (and if a <tree-ish> was specified, the index).
 226+
 227This means that you can use `git checkout -p` to selectively discard
 228edits from your current working tree. See the ``Interactive Mode''
 229section of linkgit:git-add[1] to learn how to operate the `--patch` mode.
 230
 231<branch>::
 232        Branch to checkout; if it refers to a branch (i.e., a name that,
 233        when prepended with "refs/heads/", is a valid ref), then that
 234        branch is checked out. Otherwise, if it refers to a valid
 235        commit, your HEAD becomes "detached" and you are no longer on
 236        any branch (see below for details).
 237+
 238As a special case, the `"@{-N}"` syntax for the N-th last branch/commit
 239checks out branches (instead of detaching).  You may also specify
 240`-` which is synonymous with `"@{-1}"`.
 241+
 242As a further special case, you may use `"A...B"` as a shortcut for the
 243merge base of `A` and `B` if there is exactly one merge base. You can
 244leave out at most one of `A` and `B`, in which case it defaults to `HEAD`.
 245
 246<new_branch>::
 247        Name for the new branch.
 248
 249<start_point>::
 250        The name of a commit at which to start the new branch; see
 251        linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. Defaults to HEAD.
 252
 253<tree-ish>::
 254        Tree to checkout from (when paths are given). If not specified,
 255        the index will be used.
 256
 257
 258
 259DETACHED HEAD
 260-------------
 261HEAD normally refers to a named branch (e.g. 'master'). Meanwhile, each
 262branch refers to a specific commit. Let's look at a repo with three
 263commits, one of them tagged, and with branch 'master' checked out:
 264
 265------------
 266           HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
 267            |
 268            v
 269a---b---c  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'c')
 270    ^
 271    |
 272  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 273------------
 274
 275When a commit is created in this state, the branch is updated to refer to
 276the new commit. Specifically, 'git commit' creates a new commit 'd', whose
 277parent is commit 'c', and then updates branch 'master' to refer to new
 278commit 'd'. HEAD still refers to branch 'master' and so indirectly now refers
 279to commit 'd':
 280
 281------------
 282$ edit; git add; git commit
 283
 284               HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
 285                |
 286                v
 287a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 288    ^
 289    |
 290  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 291------------
 292
 293It is sometimes useful to be able to checkout a commit that is not at
 294the tip of any named branch, or even to create a new commit that is not
 295referenced by a named branch. Let's look at what happens when we
 296checkout commit 'b' (here we show two ways this may be done):
 297
 298------------
 299$ git checkout v2.0  # or
 300$ git checkout master^^
 301
 302   HEAD (refers to commit 'b')
 303    |
 304    v
 305a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 306    ^
 307    |
 308  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 309------------
 310
 311Notice that regardless of which checkout command we use, HEAD now refers
 312directly to commit 'b'. This is known as being in detached HEAD state.
 313It means simply that HEAD refers to a specific commit, as opposed to
 314referring to a named branch. Let's see what happens when we create a commit:
 315
 316------------
 317$ edit; git add; git commit
 318
 319     HEAD (refers to commit 'e')
 320      |
 321      v
 322      e
 323     /
 324a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 325    ^
 326    |
 327  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 328------------
 329
 330There is now a new commit 'e', but it is referenced only by HEAD. We can
 331of course add yet another commit in this state:
 332
 333------------
 334$ edit; git add; git commit
 335
 336         HEAD (refers to commit 'f')
 337          |
 338          v
 339      e---f
 340     /
 341a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 342    ^
 343    |
 344  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 345------------
 346
 347In fact, we can perform all the normal Git operations. But, let's look
 348at what happens when we then checkout master:
 349
 350------------
 351$ git checkout master
 352
 353               HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
 354      e---f     |
 355     /          v
 356a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 357    ^
 358    |
 359  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 360------------
 361
 362It is important to realize that at this point nothing refers to commit
 363'f'. Eventually commit 'f' (and by extension commit 'e') will be deleted
 364by the routine Git garbage collection process, unless we create a reference
 365before that happens. If we have not yet moved away from commit 'f',
 366any of these will create a reference to it:
 367
 368------------
 369$ git checkout -b foo   <1>
 370$ git branch foo        <2>
 371$ git tag foo           <3>
 372------------
 373
 374<1> creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', and then
 375updates HEAD to refer to branch 'foo'. In other words, we'll no longer
 376be in detached HEAD state after this command.
 377
 378<2> similarly creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f',
 379but leaves HEAD detached.
 380
 381<3> creates a new tag 'foo', which refers to commit 'f',
 382leaving HEAD detached.
 383
 384If we have moved away from commit 'f', then we must first recover its object
 385name (typically by using git reflog), and then we can create a reference to
 386it. For example, to see the last two commits to which HEAD referred, we
 387can use either of these commands:
 388
 389------------
 390$ git reflog -2 HEAD # or
 391$ git log -g -2 HEAD
 392------------
 393
 394EXAMPLES
 395--------
 396
 397. The following sequence checks out the `master` branch, reverts
 398the `Makefile` to two revisions back, deletes hello.c by
 399mistake, and gets it back from the index.
 400+
 401------------
 402$ git checkout master             <1>
 403$ git checkout master~2 Makefile  <2>
 404$ rm -f hello.c
 405$ git checkout hello.c            <3>
 406------------
 407+
 408<1> switch branch
 409<2> take a file out of another commit
 410<3> restore hello.c from the index
 411+
 412If you want to check out _all_ C source files out of the index,
 413you can say
 414+
 415------------
 416$ git checkout -- '*.c'
 417------------
 418+
 419Note the quotes around `*.c`.  The file `hello.c` will also be
 420checked out, even though it is no longer in the working tree,
 421because the file globbing is used to match entries in the index
 422(not in the working tree by the shell).
 423+
 424If you have an unfortunate branch that is named `hello.c`, this
 425step would be confused as an instruction to switch to that branch.
 426You should instead write:
 427+
 428------------
 429$ git checkout -- hello.c
 430------------
 431
 432. After working in the wrong branch, switching to the correct
 433branch would be done using:
 434+
 435------------
 436$ git checkout mytopic
 437------------
 438+
 439However, your "wrong" branch and correct "mytopic" branch may
 440differ in files that you have modified locally, in which case
 441the above checkout would fail like this:
 442+
 443------------
 444$ git checkout mytopic
 445error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches.
 446------------
 447+
 448You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a
 449three-way merge:
 450+
 451------------
 452$ git checkout -m mytopic
 453Auto-merging frotz
 454------------
 455+
 456After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_
 457registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what
 458changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
 459
 460. When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with
 461the `-m` option, you would see something like this:
 462+
 463------------
 464$ git checkout -m mytopic
 465Auto-merging frotz
 466ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz
 467fatal: merge program failed
 468------------
 469+
 470At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in
 471the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted
 472files.  Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with
 473`git add` as usual:
 474+
 475------------
 476$ edit frotz
 477$ git add frotz
 478------------
 479
 480GIT
 481---
 482Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite