1git-checkout(1) 2=============== 3 4NAME 5---- 6git-checkout - Checkout a branch or paths to the working tree 7 8SYNOPSIS 9-------- 10[verse] 11'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [<branch>] 12'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] --detach [<branch>] 13'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [--detach] <commit> 14'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [[-b|-B|--orphan] <new_branch>] [<start_point>] 15'git checkout' [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] [--] <paths>... 16'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] [<paths>...] 17 18DESCRIPTION 19----------- 20Updates files in the working tree to match the version in the index 21or the specified tree. If no paths are given, 'git checkout' will 22also update `HEAD` to set the specified branch as the current 23branch. 24 25'git checkout' <branch>:: 26 To prepare for working on <branch>, switch to it by updating 27 the index and the files in the working tree, and by pointing 28 HEAD at the branch. Local modifications to the files in the 29 working tree are kept, so that they can be committed to the 30 <branch>. 31+ 32If <branch> is not found but there does exist a tracking branch in 33exactly one remote (call it <remote>) with a matching name, treat as 34equivalent to 35+ 36------------ 37$ git checkout -b <branch> --track <remote>/<branch> 38------------ 39+ 40You could omit <branch>, in which case the command degenerates to 41"check out the current branch", which is a glorified no-op with a 42rather expensive side-effects to show only the tracking information, 43if exists, for the current branch. 44 45'git checkout' -b|-B <new_branch> [<start point>]:: 46 47 Specifying `-b` causes a new branch to be created as if 48 linkgit:git-branch[1] were called and then checked out. In 49 this case you can use the `--track` or `--no-track` options, 50 which will be passed to 'git branch'. As a convenience, 51 `--track` without `-b` implies branch creation; see the 52 description of `--track` below. 53+ 54If `-B` is given, <new_branch> is created if it doesn't exist; otherwise, it 55is reset. This is the transactional equivalent of 56+ 57------------ 58$ git branch -f <branch> [<start point>] 59$ git checkout <branch> 60------------ 61+ 62that is to say, the branch is not reset/created unless "git checkout" is 63successful. 64 65'git checkout' --detach [<branch>]:: 66'git checkout' [--detach] <commit>:: 67 68 Prepare to work on top of <commit>, by detaching HEAD at it 69 (see "DETACHED HEAD" section), and updating the index and the 70 files in the working tree. Local modifications to the files 71 in the working tree are kept, so that the resulting working 72 tree will be the state recorded in the commit plus the local 73 modifications. 74+ 75When the <commit> argument is a branch name, the `--detach` option can 76be used to detach HEAD at the tip of the branch (`git checkout 77<branch>` would check out that branch without detaching HEAD). 78+ 79Omitting <branch> detaches HEAD at the tip of the current branch. 80 81'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>...:: 82 83 When <paths> or `--patch` are given, 'git checkout' does *not* 84 switch branches. It updates the named paths in the working tree 85 from the index file or from a named <tree-ish> (most often a 86 commit). In this case, the `-b` and `--track` options are 87 meaningless and giving either of them results in an error. The 88 <tree-ish> argument can be used to specify a specific tree-ish 89 (i.e. commit, tag or tree) to update the index for the given 90 paths before updating the working tree. 91+ 92The index may contain unmerged entries because of a previous failed merge. 93By default, if you try to check out such an entry from the index, the 94checkout operation will fail and nothing will be checked out. 95Using `-f` will ignore these unmerged entries. The contents from a 96specific side of the merge can be checked out of the index by 97using `--ours` or `--theirs`. With `-m`, changes made to the working tree 98file can be discarded to re-create the original conflicted merge result. 99 100OPTIONS 101------- 102-q:: 103--quiet:: 104 Quiet, suppress feedback messages. 105 106-f:: 107--force:: 108 When switching branches, proceed even if the index or the 109 working tree differs from HEAD. This is used to throw away 110 local changes. 111+ 112When checking out paths from the index, do not fail upon unmerged 113entries; instead, unmerged entries are ignored. 114+ 115By default, checking out a branch already checked out in another worktree 116is disallowed. This overrides that safeguard. 117 118--ours:: 119--theirs:: 120 When checking out paths from the index, check out stage #2 121 ('ours') or #3 ('theirs') for unmerged paths. 122 123-b <new_branch>:: 124 Create a new branch named <new_branch> and start it at 125 <start_point>; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. 126 127-B <new_branch>:: 128 Creates the branch <new_branch> and start it at <start_point>; 129 if it already exists, then reset it to <start_point>. This is 130 equivalent to running "git branch" with "-f"; see 131 linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. 132 133-t:: 134--track:: 135 When creating a new branch, set up "upstream" configuration. See 136 "--track" in linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. 137+ 138If no '-b' option is given, the name of the new branch will be 139derived from the remote-tracking branch, by looking at the local part of 140the refspec configured for the corresponding remote, and then stripping 141the initial part up to the "*". 142This would tell us to use "hack" as the local branch when branching 143off of "origin/hack" (or "remotes/origin/hack", or even 144"refs/remotes/origin/hack"). If the given name has no slash, or the above 145guessing results in an empty name, the guessing is aborted. You can 146explicitly give a name with '-b' in such a case. 147 148--no-track:: 149 Do not set up "upstream" configuration, even if the 150 branch.autosetupmerge configuration variable is true. 151 152-l:: 153 Create the new branch's reflog; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for 154 details. 155 156--detach:: 157 Rather than checking out a branch to work on it, check out a 158 commit for inspection and discardable experiments. 159 This is the default behavior of "git checkout <commit>" when 160 <commit> is not a branch name. See the "DETACHED HEAD" section 161 below for details. 162 163--orphan <new_branch>:: 164 Create a new 'orphan' branch, named <new_branch>, started from 165 <start_point> and switch to it. The first commit made on this 166 new branch will have no parents and it will be the root of a new 167 history totally disconnected from all the other branches and 168 commits. 169+ 170The index and the working tree are adjusted as if you had previously run 171"git checkout <start_point>". This allows you to start a new history 172that records a set of paths similar to <start_point> by easily running 173"git commit -a" to make the root commit. 174+ 175This can be useful when you want to publish the tree from a commit 176without exposing its full history. You might want to do this to publish 177an open source branch of a project whose current tree is "clean", but 178whose full history contains proprietary or otherwise encumbered bits of 179code. 180+ 181If you want to start a disconnected history that records a set of paths 182that is totally different from the one of <start_point>, then you should 183clear the index and the working tree right after creating the orphan 184branch by running "git rm -rf ." from the top level of the working tree. 185Afterwards you will be ready to prepare your new files, repopulating the 186working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. 187 188--ignore-skip-worktree-bits:: 189 In sparse checkout mode, `git checkout -- <paths>` would 190 update only entries matched by <paths> and sparse patterns 191 in $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout. This option ignores 192 the sparse patterns and adds back any files in <paths>. 193 194-m:: 195--merge:: 196 When switching branches, 197 if you have local modifications to one or more files that 198 are different between the current branch and the branch to 199 which you are switching, the command refuses to switch 200 branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. 201 However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current 202 branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch 203 is done, and you will be on the new branch. 204+ 205When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting 206paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts 207and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge 208should result in deletion of the path). 209+ 210When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate 211the conflicted merge in the specified paths. 212 213--conflict=<style>:: 214 The same as --merge option above, but changes the way the 215 conflicting hunks are presented, overriding the 216 merge.conflictstyle configuration variable. Possible values are 217 "merge" (default) and "diff3" (in addition to what is shown by 218 "merge" style, shows the original contents). 219 220-p:: 221--patch:: 222 Interactively select hunks in the difference between the 223 <tree-ish> (or the index, if unspecified) and the working 224 tree. The chosen hunks are then applied in reverse to the 225 working tree (and if a <tree-ish> was specified, the index). 226+ 227This means that you can use `git checkout -p` to selectively discard 228edits from your current working tree. See the ``Interactive Mode'' 229section of linkgit:git-add[1] to learn how to operate the `--patch` mode. 230 231<branch>:: 232 Branch to checkout; if it refers to a branch (i.e., a name that, 233 when prepended with "refs/heads/", is a valid ref), then that 234 branch is checked out. Otherwise, if it refers to a valid 235 commit, your HEAD becomes "detached" and you are no longer on 236 any branch (see below for details). 237+ 238As a special case, the `"@{-N}"` syntax for the N-th last branch/commit 239checks out branches (instead of detaching). You may also specify 240`-` which is synonymous with `"@{-1}"`. 241+ 242As a further special case, you may use `"A...B"` as a shortcut for the 243merge base of `A` and `B` if there is exactly one merge base. You can 244leave out at most one of `A` and `B`, in which case it defaults to `HEAD`. 245 246<new_branch>:: 247 Name for the new branch. 248 249<start_point>:: 250 The name of a commit at which to start the new branch; see 251 linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. Defaults to HEAD. 252 253<tree-ish>:: 254 Tree to checkout from (when paths are given). If not specified, 255 the index will be used. 256 257 258 259DETACHED HEAD 260------------- 261HEAD normally refers to a named branch (e.g. 'master'). Meanwhile, each 262branch refers to a specific commit. Let's look at a repo with three 263commits, one of them tagged, and with branch 'master' checked out: 264 265------------ 266 HEAD (refers to branch 'master') 267 | 268 v 269a---b---c branch 'master' (refers to commit 'c') 270 ^ 271 | 272 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 273------------ 274 275When a commit is created in this state, the branch is updated to refer to 276the new commit. Specifically, 'git commit' creates a new commit 'd', whose 277parent is commit 'c', and then updates branch 'master' to refer to new 278commit 'd'. HEAD still refers to branch 'master' and so indirectly now refers 279to commit 'd': 280 281------------ 282$ edit; git add; git commit 283 284 HEAD (refers to branch 'master') 285 | 286 v 287a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 288 ^ 289 | 290 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 291------------ 292 293It is sometimes useful to be able to checkout a commit that is not at 294the tip of any named branch, or even to create a new commit that is not 295referenced by a named branch. Let's look at what happens when we 296checkout commit 'b' (here we show two ways this may be done): 297 298------------ 299$ git checkout v2.0 # or 300$ git checkout master^^ 301 302 HEAD (refers to commit 'b') 303 | 304 v 305a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 306 ^ 307 | 308 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 309------------ 310 311Notice that regardless of which checkout command we use, HEAD now refers 312directly to commit 'b'. This is known as being in detached HEAD state. 313It means simply that HEAD refers to a specific commit, as opposed to 314referring to a named branch. Let's see what happens when we create a commit: 315 316------------ 317$ edit; git add; git commit 318 319 HEAD (refers to commit 'e') 320 | 321 v 322 e 323 / 324a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 325 ^ 326 | 327 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 328------------ 329 330There is now a new commit 'e', but it is referenced only by HEAD. We can 331of course add yet another commit in this state: 332 333------------ 334$ edit; git add; git commit 335 336 HEAD (refers to commit 'f') 337 | 338 v 339 e---f 340 / 341a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 342 ^ 343 | 344 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 345------------ 346 347In fact, we can perform all the normal Git operations. But, let's look 348at what happens when we then checkout master: 349 350------------ 351$ git checkout master 352 353 HEAD (refers to branch 'master') 354 e---f | 355 / v 356a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 357 ^ 358 | 359 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 360------------ 361 362It is important to realize that at this point nothing refers to commit 363'f'. Eventually commit 'f' (and by extension commit 'e') will be deleted 364by the routine Git garbage collection process, unless we create a reference 365before that happens. If we have not yet moved away from commit 'f', 366any of these will create a reference to it: 367 368------------ 369$ git checkout -b foo <1> 370$ git branch foo <2> 371$ git tag foo <3> 372------------ 373 374<1> creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', and then 375updates HEAD to refer to branch 'foo'. In other words, we'll no longer 376be in detached HEAD state after this command. 377 378<2> similarly creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', 379but leaves HEAD detached. 380 381<3> creates a new tag 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', 382leaving HEAD detached. 383 384If we have moved away from commit 'f', then we must first recover its object 385name (typically by using git reflog), and then we can create a reference to 386it. For example, to see the last two commits to which HEAD referred, we 387can use either of these commands: 388 389------------ 390$ git reflog -2 HEAD # or 391$ git log -g -2 HEAD 392------------ 393 394EXAMPLES 395-------- 396 397. The following sequence checks out the `master` branch, reverts 398the `Makefile` to two revisions back, deletes hello.c by 399mistake, and gets it back from the index. 400+ 401------------ 402$ git checkout master <1> 403$ git checkout master~2 Makefile <2> 404$ rm -f hello.c 405$ git checkout hello.c <3> 406------------ 407+ 408<1> switch branch 409<2> take a file out of another commit 410<3> restore hello.c from the index 411+ 412If you want to check out _all_ C source files out of the index, 413you can say 414+ 415------------ 416$ git checkout -- '*.c' 417------------ 418+ 419Note the quotes around `*.c`. The file `hello.c` will also be 420checked out, even though it is no longer in the working tree, 421because the file globbing is used to match entries in the index 422(not in the working tree by the shell). 423+ 424If you have an unfortunate branch that is named `hello.c`, this 425step would be confused as an instruction to switch to that branch. 426You should instead write: 427+ 428------------ 429$ git checkout -- hello.c 430------------ 431 432. After working in the wrong branch, switching to the correct 433branch would be done using: 434+ 435------------ 436$ git checkout mytopic 437------------ 438+ 439However, your "wrong" branch and correct "mytopic" branch may 440differ in files that you have modified locally, in which case 441the above checkout would fail like this: 442+ 443------------ 444$ git checkout mytopic 445error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. 446------------ 447+ 448You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a 449three-way merge: 450+ 451------------ 452$ git checkout -m mytopic 453Auto-merging frotz 454------------ 455+ 456After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ 457registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what 458changes you made since the tip of the new branch. 459 460. When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with 461the `-m` option, you would see something like this: 462+ 463------------ 464$ git checkout -m mytopic 465Auto-merging frotz 466ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz 467fatal: merge program failed 468------------ 469+ 470At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in 471the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted 472files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with 473`git add` as usual: 474+ 475------------ 476$ edit frotz 477$ git add frotz 478------------ 479 480GIT 481--- 482Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite