Documentation / git-bisect.txton commit gitweb: Better processing format string in custom links in navbar (2b11e05)
   1git-bisect(1)
   2=============
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-bisect - Find the change that introduced a bug by binary search
   7
   8
   9SYNOPSIS
  10--------
  11'git bisect' <subcommand> <options>
  12
  13DESCRIPTION
  14-----------
  15The command takes various subcommands, and different options depending
  16on the subcommand:
  17
  18 git bisect help
  19 git bisect start [<bad> [<good>...]] [--] [<paths>...]
  20 git bisect bad [<rev>]
  21 git bisect good [<rev>...]
  22 git bisect skip [<rev>...]
  23 git bisect reset [<branch>]
  24 git bisect visualize
  25 git bisect replay <logfile>
  26 git bisect log
  27 git bisect run <cmd>...
  28
  29This command uses 'git-rev-list --bisect' to help drive the
  30binary search process to find which change introduced a bug, given an
  31old "good" commit object name and a later "bad" commit object name.
  32
  33Getting help
  34~~~~~~~~~~~~
  35
  36Use "git bisect" to get a short usage description, and "git bisect
  37help" or "git bisect -h" to get a long usage description.
  38
  39Basic bisect commands: start, bad, good
  40~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  41
  42The way you use it is:
  43
  44------------------------------------------------
  45$ git bisect start
  46$ git bisect bad                 # Current version is bad
  47$ git bisect good v2.6.13-rc2    # v2.6.13-rc2 was the last version
  48                                 # tested that was good
  49------------------------------------------------
  50
  51When you give at least one bad and one good versions, it will bisect
  52the revision tree and say something like:
  53
  54------------------------------------------------
  55Bisecting: 675 revisions left to test after this
  56------------------------------------------------
  57
  58and check out the state in the middle. Now, compile that kernel, and
  59boot it. Now, let's say that this booted kernel works fine, then just
  60do
  61
  62------------------------------------------------
  63$ git bisect good                       # this one is good
  64------------------------------------------------
  65
  66which will now say
  67
  68------------------------------------------------
  69Bisecting: 337 revisions left to test after this
  70------------------------------------------------
  71
  72and you continue along, compiling that one, testing it, and depending
  73on whether it is good or bad, you say "git bisect good" or "git bisect
  74bad", and ask for the next bisection.
  75
  76Until you have no more left, and you'll have been left with the first
  77bad kernel rev in "refs/bisect/bad".
  78
  79Bisect reset
  80~~~~~~~~~~~~
  81
  82Oh, and then after you want to reset to the original head, do a
  83
  84------------------------------------------------
  85$ git bisect reset
  86------------------------------------------------
  87
  88to get back to the original branch, instead of being on the bisection
  89commit ("git bisect start" will do that for you too, actually: it will
  90reset the bisection state).
  91
  92Bisect visualize
  93~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  94
  95During the bisection process, you can say
  96
  97------------
  98$ git bisect visualize
  99------------
 100
 101to see the currently remaining suspects in 'gitk'.  `visualize` is a bit
 102too long to type and `view` is provided as a synonym.
 103
 104If 'DISPLAY' environment variable is not set, 'git-log' is used
 105instead.  You can even give command line options such as `-p` and
 106`--stat`.
 107
 108------------
 109$ git bisect view --stat
 110------------
 111
 112Bisect log and bisect replay
 113~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 114
 115The good/bad input is logged, and
 116
 117------------
 118$ git bisect log
 119------------
 120
 121shows what you have done so far. You can truncate its output somewhere
 122and save it in a file, and run
 123
 124------------
 125$ git bisect replay that-file
 126------------
 127
 128if you find later you made a mistake telling good/bad about a
 129revision.
 130
 131Avoiding to test a commit
 132~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 133
 134If in a middle of bisect session, you know what the bisect suggested
 135to try next is not a good one to test (e.g. the change the commit
 136introduces is known not to work in your environment and you know it
 137does not have anything to do with the bug you are chasing), you may
 138want to find a near-by commit and try that instead.
 139
 140It goes something like this:
 141
 142------------
 143$ git bisect good/bad                   # previous round was good/bad.
 144Bisecting: 337 revisions left to test after this
 145$ git bisect visualize                  # oops, that is uninteresting.
 146$ git reset --hard HEAD~3               # try 3 revs before what
 147                                        # was suggested
 148------------
 149
 150Then compile and test the one you chose to try. After that, tell
 151bisect what the result was as usual.
 152
 153Bisect skip
 154~~~~~~~~~~~~
 155
 156Instead of choosing by yourself a nearby commit, you may just want git
 157to do it for you using:
 158
 159------------
 160$ git bisect skip                 # Current version cannot be tested
 161------------
 162
 163But computing the commit to test may be slower afterwards and git may
 164eventually not be able to tell the first bad among a bad and one or
 165more "skip"ped commits.
 166
 167Cutting down bisection by giving more parameters to bisect start
 168~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 169
 170You can further cut down the number of trials if you know what part of
 171the tree is involved in the problem you are tracking down, by giving
 172paths parameters when you say `bisect start`, like this:
 173
 174------------
 175$ git bisect start -- arch/i386 include/asm-i386
 176------------
 177
 178If you know beforehand more than one good commits, you can narrow the
 179bisect space down without doing the whole tree checkout every time you
 180give good commits. You give the bad revision immediately after `start`
 181and then you give all the good revisions you have:
 182
 183------------
 184$ git bisect start v2.6.20-rc6 v2.6.20-rc4 v2.6.20-rc1 --
 185                   # v2.6.20-rc6 is bad
 186                   # v2.6.20-rc4 and v2.6.20-rc1 are good
 187------------
 188
 189Bisect run
 190~~~~~~~~~~
 191
 192If you have a script that can tell if the current source code is good
 193or bad, you can automatically bisect using:
 194
 195------------
 196$ git bisect run my_script
 197------------
 198
 199Note that the "run" script (`my_script` in the above example) should
 200exit with code 0 in case the current source code is good.  Exit with a
 201code between 1 and 127 (inclusive), except 125, if the current
 202source code is bad.
 203
 204Any other exit code will abort the automatic bisect process. (A
 205program that does "exit(-1)" leaves $? = 255, see exit(3) manual page,
 206the value is chopped with "& 0377".)
 207
 208The special exit code 125 should be used when the current source code
 209cannot be tested. If the "run" script exits with this code, the current
 210revision will be skipped, see `git bisect skip` above.
 211
 212You may often find that during bisect you want to have near-constant
 213tweaks (e.g., s/#define DEBUG 0/#define DEBUG 1/ in a header file, or
 214"revision that does not have this commit needs this patch applied to
 215work around other problem this bisection is not interested in")
 216applied to the revision being tested.
 217
 218To cope with such a situation, after the inner 'git-bisect' finds the
 219next revision to test, with the "run" script, you can apply that tweak
 220before compiling, run the real test, and after the test decides if the
 221revision (possibly with the needed tweaks) passed the test, rewind the
 222tree to the pristine state.  Finally the "run" script can exit with
 223the status of the real test to let the "git bisect run" command loop to
 224determine the outcome.
 225
 226EXAMPLES
 227--------
 228
 229* Automatically bisect a broken build between v1.2 and HEAD:
 230+
 231------------
 232$ git bisect start HEAD v1.2 --      # HEAD is bad, v1.2 is good
 233$ git bisect run make                # "make" builds the app
 234------------
 235
 236* Automatically bisect a broken test suite:
 237+
 238------------
 239$ cat ~/test.sh
 240#!/bin/sh
 241make || exit 125                   # this "skip"s broken builds
 242make test                          # "make test" runs the test suite
 243$ git bisect start v1.3 v1.1 --    # v1.3 is bad, v1.1 is good
 244$ git bisect run ~/test.sh
 245------------
 246+
 247Here we use a "test.sh" custom script. In this script, if "make"
 248fails, we "skip" the current commit.
 249+
 250It's safer to use a custom script outside the repo to prevent
 251interactions between the bisect, make and test processes and the
 252script.
 253+
 254And "make test" should "exit 0", if the test suite passes, and
 255"exit 1" (for example) otherwise.
 256
 257* Automatically bisect a broken test case:
 258+
 259------------
 260$ cat ~/test.sh
 261#!/bin/sh
 262make || exit 125                     # this "skip"s broken builds
 263~/check_test_case.sh                 # does the test case passes ?
 264$ git bisect start HEAD HEAD~10 --   # culprit is among the last 10
 265$ git bisect run ~/test.sh
 266------------
 267+
 268Here "check_test_case.sh" should "exit 0", if the test case passes,
 269and "exit 1" (for example) otherwise.
 270+
 271It's safer if both "test.sh" and "check_test_case.sh" scripts are
 272outside the repo to prevent interactions between the bisect, make and
 273test processes and the scripts.
 274
 275Author
 276------
 277Written by Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
 278
 279Documentation
 280-------------
 281Documentation by Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>.
 282
 283GIT
 284---
 285Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite