Documentation / git-merge.txton commit Add branch management for releases to gitworkflows (382e543)
   1git-merge(1)
   2============
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-merge - Join two or more development histories together
   7
   8
   9SYNOPSIS
  10--------
  11[verse]
  12'git merge' [-n] [--stat] [--no-commit] [--squash] [-s <strategy>]...
  13        [-m <msg>] <remote>...
  14'git merge' <msg> HEAD <remote>...
  15
  16DESCRIPTION
  17-----------
  18This is the top-level interface to the merge machinery
  19which drives multiple merge strategy scripts.
  20
  21The second syntax (<msg> `HEAD` <remote>) is supported for
  22historical reasons.  Do not use it from the command line or in
  23new scripts.  It is the same as `git merge -m <msg> <remote>`.
  24
  25
  26OPTIONS
  27-------
  28include::merge-options.txt[]
  29
  30-m <msg>::
  31        Set the commit message to be used for the merge commit (in
  32        case one is created). The 'git fmt-merge-msg' command can be
  33        used to give a good default for automated 'git merge'
  34        invocations.
  35
  36<remote>...::
  37        Other branch heads to merge into our branch.  You need at
  38        least one <remote>.  Specifying more than one <remote>
  39        obviously means you are trying an Octopus.
  40
  41include::merge-strategies.txt[]
  42
  43
  44If you tried a merge which resulted in complex conflicts and
  45want to start over, you can recover with 'git-reset'.
  46
  47CONFIGURATION
  48-------------
  49include::merge-config.txt[]
  50
  51branch.<name>.mergeoptions::
  52        Sets default options for merging into branch <name>. The syntax and
  53        supported options are the same as those of 'git merge', but option
  54        values containing whitespace characters are currently not supported.
  55
  56HOW MERGE WORKS
  57---------------
  58
  59A merge is always between the current `HEAD` and one or more
  60commits (usually, branch head or tag), and the index file must
  61match the tree of `HEAD` commit (i.e. the contents of the last commit)
  62when it starts out.  In other words, `git diff --cached HEAD` must
  63report no changes.  (One exception is when the changed index
  64entries are already in the same state that would result from
  65the merge anyway.)
  66
  67Three kinds of merge can happen:
  68
  69* The merged commit is already contained in `HEAD`. This is the
  70  simplest case, called "Already up-to-date."
  71
  72* `HEAD` is already contained in the merged commit. This is the
  73  most common case especially when invoked from 'git pull':
  74  you are tracking an upstream repository, have committed no local
  75  changes and now you want to update to a newer upstream revision.
  76  Your `HEAD` (and the index) is updated to point at the merged
  77  commit, without creating an extra merge commit.  This is
  78  called "Fast-forward".
  79
  80* Both the merged commit and `HEAD` are independent and must be
  81  tied together by a merge commit that has both of them as its parents.
  82  The rest of this section describes this "True merge" case.
  83
  84The chosen merge strategy merges the two commits into a single
  85new source tree.
  86When things merge cleanly, this is what happens:
  87
  881. The results are updated both in the index file and in your
  89   working tree;
  902. Index file is written out as a tree;
  913. The tree gets committed; and
  924. The `HEAD` pointer gets advanced.
  93
  94Because of 2., we require that the original state of the index
  95file matches exactly the current `HEAD` commit; otherwise we
  96will write out your local changes already registered in your
  97index file along with the merge result, which is not good.
  98Because 1. involves only those paths differing between your
  99branch and the remote branch you are pulling from during the
 100merge (which is typically a fraction of the whole tree), you can
 101have local modifications in your working tree as long as they do
 102not overlap with what the merge updates.
 103
 104When there are conflicts, the following happens:
 105
 1061. `HEAD` stays the same.
 107
 1082. Cleanly merged paths are updated both in the index file and
 109   in your working tree.
 110
 1113. For conflicting paths, the index file records up to three
 112   versions; stage1 stores the version from the common ancestor,
 113   stage2 from `HEAD`, and stage3 from the remote branch (you
 114   can inspect the stages with `git ls-files -u`).  The working
 115   tree files contain the result of the "merge" program; i.e. 3-way
 116   merge results with familiar conflict markers `<<< === >>>`.
 117
 1184. No other changes are done.  In particular, the local
 119   modifications you had before you started merge will stay the
 120   same and the index entries for them stay as they were,
 121   i.e. matching `HEAD`.
 122
 123HOW CONFLICTS ARE PRESENTED
 124---------------------------
 125
 126During a merge, the working tree files are updated to reflect the result
 127of the merge.  Among the changes made to the common ancestor's version,
 128non-overlapping ones (that is, you changed an area of the file while the
 129other side left that area intact, or vice versa) are incorporated in the
 130final result verbatim.  When both sides made changes to the same area,
 131however, git cannot randomly pick one side over the other, and asks you to
 132resolve it by leaving what both sides did to that area.
 133
 134By default, git uses the same style as that is used by "merge" program
 135from the RCS suite to present such a conflicted hunk, like this:
 136
 137------------
 138Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
 139ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
 140<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
 141Conflict resolution is hard;
 142let's go shopping.
 143=======
 144Git makes conflict resolution easy.
 145>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
 146And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
 147------------
 148
 149The area where a pair of conflicting changes happened is marked with markers
 150`<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>`.  The part before the `=======`
 151is typically your side, and the part afterwards is typically their side.
 152
 153The default format does not show what the original said in the conflicting
 154area.  You cannot tell how many lines are deleted and replaced with
 155Barbie's remark on your side.  The only thing you can tell is that your
 156side wants to say it is hard and you'd prefer to go shopping, while the
 157other side wants to claim it is easy.
 158
 159An alternative style can be used by setting the "merge.conflictstyle"
 160configuration variable to "diff3".  In "diff3" style, the above conflict
 161may look like this:
 162
 163------------
 164Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
 165ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
 166<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
 167Conflict resolution is hard;
 168let's go shopping.
 169|||||||
 170Conflict resolution is hard.
 171=======
 172Git makes conflict resolution easy.
 173>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
 174And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
 175------------
 176
 177In addition to the `<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>` markers, it uses
 178another `|||||||` marker that is followed by the original text.  You can
 179tell that the original just stated a fact, and your side simply gave in to
 180that statement and gave up, while the other side tried to have a more
 181positive attitude.  You can sometimes come up with a better resolution by
 182viewing the original.
 183
 184
 185HOW TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS
 186------------------------
 187
 188After seeing a conflict, you can do two things:
 189
 190 * Decide not to merge.  The only clean-ups you need are to reset
 191   the index file to the `HEAD` commit to reverse 2. and to clean
 192   up working tree changes made by 2. and 3.; 'git-reset --hard' can
 193   be used for this.
 194
 195 * Resolve the conflicts.  Git will mark the conflicts in
 196   the working tree.  Edit the files into shape and
 197   'git-add' them to the index.  Use 'git-commit' to seal the deal.
 198
 199You can work through the conflict with a number of tools:
 200
 201 * Use a mergetool.  'git mergetool' to launch a graphical
 202   mergetool which will work you through the merge.
 203
 204 * Look at the diffs.  'git diff' will show a three-way diff,
 205   highlighting changes from both the HEAD and remote versions.
 206
 207 * Look at the diffs on their own. 'git log --merge -p <path>'
 208   will show diffs first for the HEAD version and then the
 209   remote version.
 210
 211 * Look at the originals.  'git show :1:filename' shows the
 212   common ancestor, 'git show :2:filename' shows the HEAD
 213   version and 'git show :3:filename' shows the remote version.
 214
 215SEE ALSO
 216--------
 217linkgit:git-fmt-merge-msg[1], linkgit:git-pull[1],
 218linkgit:gitattributes[5],
 219linkgit:git-reset[1],
 220linkgit:git-diff[1], linkgit:git-ls-files[1],
 221linkgit:git-add[1], linkgit:git-rm[1],
 222linkgit:git-mergetool[1]
 223
 224Author
 225------
 226Written by Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
 227
 228
 229Documentation
 230--------------
 231Documentation by Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>.
 232
 233GIT
 234---
 235Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite