Documentation / git-checkout.txton commit Merge branch 'ma/branch-list-paginate' (3b49e1b)
   1git-checkout(1)
   2===============
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-checkout - Switch branches or restore working tree files
   7
   8SYNOPSIS
   9--------
  10[verse]
  11'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [<branch>]
  12'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] --detach [<branch>]
  13'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [--detach] <commit>
  14'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [[-b|-B|--orphan] <new_branch>] [<start_point>]
  15'git checkout' [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] [--] <paths>...
  16'git checkout' [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>...
  17'git checkout' (-p|--patch) [<tree-ish>] [--] [<paths>...]
  18
  19DESCRIPTION
  20-----------
  21Updates files in the working tree to match the version in the index
  22or the specified tree.  If no paths are given, 'git checkout' will
  23also update `HEAD` to set the specified branch as the current
  24branch.
  25
  26'git checkout' <branch>::
  27        To prepare for working on <branch>, switch to it by updating
  28        the index and the files in the working tree, and by pointing
  29        HEAD at the branch. Local modifications to the files in the
  30        working tree are kept, so that they can be committed to the
  31        <branch>.
  32+
  33If <branch> is not found but there does exist a tracking branch in
  34exactly one remote (call it <remote>) with a matching name, treat as
  35equivalent to
  36+
  37------------
  38$ git checkout -b <branch> --track <remote>/<branch>
  39------------
  40+
  41You could omit <branch>, in which case the command degenerates to
  42"check out the current branch", which is a glorified no-op with
  43rather expensive side-effects to show only the tracking information,
  44if exists, for the current branch.
  45
  46'git checkout' -b|-B <new_branch> [<start point>]::
  47
  48        Specifying `-b` causes a new branch to be created as if
  49        linkgit:git-branch[1] were called and then checked out.  In
  50        this case you can use the `--track` or `--no-track` options,
  51        which will be passed to 'git branch'.  As a convenience,
  52        `--track` without `-b` implies branch creation; see the
  53        description of `--track` below.
  54+
  55If `-B` is given, <new_branch> is created if it doesn't exist; otherwise, it
  56is reset. This is the transactional equivalent of
  57+
  58------------
  59$ git branch -f <branch> [<start point>]
  60$ git checkout <branch>
  61------------
  62+
  63that is to say, the branch is not reset/created unless "git checkout" is
  64successful.
  65
  66'git checkout' --detach [<branch>]::
  67'git checkout' [--detach] <commit>::
  68
  69        Prepare to work on top of <commit>, by detaching HEAD at it
  70        (see "DETACHED HEAD" section), and updating the index and the
  71        files in the working tree.  Local modifications to the files
  72        in the working tree are kept, so that the resulting working
  73        tree will be the state recorded in the commit plus the local
  74        modifications.
  75+
  76When the <commit> argument is a branch name, the `--detach` option can
  77be used to detach HEAD at the tip of the branch (`git checkout
  78<branch>` would check out that branch without detaching HEAD).
  79+
  80Omitting <branch> detaches HEAD at the tip of the current branch.
  81
  82'git checkout' [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>...::
  83
  84        Overwrite paths in the working tree by replacing with the
  85        contents in the index or in the <tree-ish> (most often a
  86        commit).  When a <tree-ish> is given, the paths that
  87        match the <pathspec> are updated both in the index and in
  88        the working tree.
  89+
  90The index may contain unmerged entries because of a previous failed merge.
  91By default, if you try to check out such an entry from the index, the
  92checkout operation will fail and nothing will be checked out.
  93Using `-f` will ignore these unmerged entries.  The contents from a
  94specific side of the merge can be checked out of the index by
  95using `--ours` or `--theirs`.  With `-m`, changes made to the working tree
  96file can be discarded to re-create the original conflicted merge result.
  97
  98'git checkout' (-p|--patch) [<tree-ish>] [--] [<pathspec>...]::
  99        This is similar to the "check out paths to the working tree
 100        from either the index or from a tree-ish" mode described
 101        above, but lets you use the interactive interface to show
 102        the "diff" output and choose which hunks to use in the
 103        result.  See below for the description of `--patch` option.
 104
 105
 106OPTIONS
 107-------
 108-q::
 109--quiet::
 110        Quiet, suppress feedback messages.
 111
 112--[no-]progress::
 113        Progress status is reported on the standard error stream
 114        by default when it is attached to a terminal, unless `--quiet`
 115        is specified. This flag enables progress reporting even if not
 116        attached to a terminal, regardless of `--quiet`.
 117
 118-f::
 119--force::
 120        When switching branches, proceed even if the index or the
 121        working tree differs from HEAD.  This is used to throw away
 122        local changes.
 123+
 124When checking out paths from the index, do not fail upon unmerged
 125entries; instead, unmerged entries are ignored.
 126
 127--ours::
 128--theirs::
 129        When checking out paths from the index, check out stage #2
 130        ('ours') or #3 ('theirs') for unmerged paths.
 131+
 132Note that during `git rebase` and `git pull --rebase`, 'ours' and
 133'theirs' may appear swapped; `--ours` gives the version from the
 134branch the changes are rebased onto, while `--theirs` gives the
 135version from the branch that holds your work that is being rebased.
 136+
 137This is because `rebase` is used in a workflow that treats the
 138history at the remote as the shared canonical one, and treats the
 139work done on the branch you are rebasing as the third-party work to
 140be integrated, and you are temporarily assuming the role of the
 141keeper of the canonical history during the rebase.  As the keeper of
 142the canonical history, you need to view the history from the remote
 143as `ours` (i.e. "our shared canonical history"), while what you did
 144on your side branch as `theirs` (i.e. "one contributor's work on top
 145of it").
 146
 147-b <new_branch>::
 148        Create a new branch named <new_branch> and start it at
 149        <start_point>; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for details.
 150
 151-B <new_branch>::
 152        Creates the branch <new_branch> and start it at <start_point>;
 153        if it already exists, then reset it to <start_point>. This is
 154        equivalent to running "git branch" with "-f"; see
 155        linkgit:git-branch[1] for details.
 156
 157-t::
 158--track::
 159        When creating a new branch, set up "upstream" configuration. See
 160        "--track" in linkgit:git-branch[1] for details.
 161+
 162If no `-b` option is given, the name of the new branch will be
 163derived from the remote-tracking branch, by looking at the local part of
 164the refspec configured for the corresponding remote, and then stripping
 165the initial part up to the "*".
 166This would tell us to use "hack" as the local branch when branching
 167off of "origin/hack" (or "remotes/origin/hack", or even
 168"refs/remotes/origin/hack").  If the given name has no slash, or the above
 169guessing results in an empty name, the guessing is aborted.  You can
 170explicitly give a name with `-b` in such a case.
 171
 172--no-track::
 173        Do not set up "upstream" configuration, even if the
 174        branch.autoSetupMerge configuration variable is true.
 175
 176-l::
 177        Create the new branch's reflog; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for
 178        details.
 179
 180--detach::
 181        Rather than checking out a branch to work on it, check out a
 182        commit for inspection and discardable experiments.
 183        This is the default behavior of "git checkout <commit>" when
 184        <commit> is not a branch name.  See the "DETACHED HEAD" section
 185        below for details.
 186
 187--orphan <new_branch>::
 188        Create a new 'orphan' branch, named <new_branch>, started from
 189        <start_point> and switch to it.  The first commit made on this
 190        new branch will have no parents and it will be the root of a new
 191        history totally disconnected from all the other branches and
 192        commits.
 193+
 194The index and the working tree are adjusted as if you had previously run
 195"git checkout <start_point>".  This allows you to start a new history
 196that records a set of paths similar to <start_point> by easily running
 197"git commit -a" to make the root commit.
 198+
 199This can be useful when you want to publish the tree from a commit
 200without exposing its full history. You might want to do this to publish
 201an open source branch of a project whose current tree is "clean", but
 202whose full history contains proprietary or otherwise encumbered bits of
 203code.
 204+
 205If you want to start a disconnected history that records a set of paths
 206that is totally different from the one of <start_point>, then you should
 207clear the index and the working tree right after creating the orphan
 208branch by running "git rm -rf ." from the top level of the working tree.
 209Afterwards you will be ready to prepare your new files, repopulating the
 210working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc.
 211
 212--ignore-skip-worktree-bits::
 213        In sparse checkout mode, `git checkout -- <paths>` would
 214        update only entries matched by <paths> and sparse patterns
 215        in $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout. This option ignores
 216        the sparse patterns and adds back any files in <paths>.
 217
 218-m::
 219--merge::
 220        When switching branches,
 221        if you have local modifications to one or more files that
 222        are different between the current branch and the branch to
 223        which you are switching, the command refuses to switch
 224        branches in order to preserve your modifications in context.
 225        However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current
 226        branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch
 227        is done, and you will be on the new branch.
 228+
 229When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting
 230paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts
 231and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge
 232should result in deletion of the path).
 233+
 234When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate
 235the conflicted merge in the specified paths.
 236
 237--conflict=<style>::
 238        The same as --merge option above, but changes the way the
 239        conflicting hunks are presented, overriding the
 240        merge.conflictStyle configuration variable.  Possible values are
 241        "merge" (default) and "diff3" (in addition to what is shown by
 242        "merge" style, shows the original contents).
 243
 244-p::
 245--patch::
 246        Interactively select hunks in the difference between the
 247        <tree-ish> (or the index, if unspecified) and the working
 248        tree.  The chosen hunks are then applied in reverse to the
 249        working tree (and if a <tree-ish> was specified, the index).
 250+
 251This means that you can use `git checkout -p` to selectively discard
 252edits from your current working tree. See the ``Interactive Mode''
 253section of linkgit:git-add[1] to learn how to operate the `--patch` mode.
 254
 255--ignore-other-worktrees::
 256        `git checkout` refuses when the wanted ref is already checked
 257        out by another worktree. This option makes it check the ref
 258        out anyway. In other words, the ref can be held by more than one
 259        worktree.
 260
 261--[no-]recurse-submodules::
 262        Using --recurse-submodules will update the content of all initialized
 263        submodules according to the commit recorded in the superproject. If
 264        local modifications in a submodule would be overwritten the checkout
 265        will fail unless `-f` is used. If nothing (or --no-recurse-submodules)
 266        is used, the work trees of submodules will not be updated.
 267
 268<branch>::
 269        Branch to checkout; if it refers to a branch (i.e., a name that,
 270        when prepended with "refs/heads/", is a valid ref), then that
 271        branch is checked out. Otherwise, if it refers to a valid
 272        commit, your HEAD becomes "detached" and you are no longer on
 273        any branch (see below for details).
 274+
 275As a special case, the `"@{-N}"` syntax for the N-th last branch/commit
 276checks out branches (instead of detaching).  You may also specify
 277`-` which is synonymous with `"@{-1}"`.
 278+
 279As a further special case, you may use `"A...B"` as a shortcut for the
 280merge base of `A` and `B` if there is exactly one merge base. You can
 281leave out at most one of `A` and `B`, in which case it defaults to `HEAD`.
 282
 283<new_branch>::
 284        Name for the new branch.
 285
 286<start_point>::
 287        The name of a commit at which to start the new branch; see
 288        linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. Defaults to HEAD.
 289
 290<tree-ish>::
 291        Tree to checkout from (when paths are given). If not specified,
 292        the index will be used.
 293
 294
 295
 296DETACHED HEAD
 297-------------
 298HEAD normally refers to a named branch (e.g. 'master'). Meanwhile, each
 299branch refers to a specific commit. Let's look at a repo with three
 300commits, one of them tagged, and with branch 'master' checked out:
 301
 302------------
 303           HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
 304            |
 305            v
 306a---b---c  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'c')
 307    ^
 308    |
 309  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 310------------
 311
 312When a commit is created in this state, the branch is updated to refer to
 313the new commit. Specifically, 'git commit' creates a new commit 'd', whose
 314parent is commit 'c', and then updates branch 'master' to refer to new
 315commit 'd'. HEAD still refers to branch 'master' and so indirectly now refers
 316to commit 'd':
 317
 318------------
 319$ edit; git add; git commit
 320
 321               HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
 322                |
 323                v
 324a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 325    ^
 326    |
 327  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 328------------
 329
 330It is sometimes useful to be able to checkout a commit that is not at
 331the tip of any named branch, or even to create a new commit that is not
 332referenced by a named branch. Let's look at what happens when we
 333checkout commit 'b' (here we show two ways this may be done):
 334
 335------------
 336$ git checkout v2.0  # or
 337$ git checkout master^^
 338
 339   HEAD (refers to commit 'b')
 340    |
 341    v
 342a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 343    ^
 344    |
 345  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 346------------
 347
 348Notice that regardless of which checkout command we use, HEAD now refers
 349directly to commit 'b'. This is known as being in detached HEAD state.
 350It means simply that HEAD refers to a specific commit, as opposed to
 351referring to a named branch. Let's see what happens when we create a commit:
 352
 353------------
 354$ edit; git add; git commit
 355
 356     HEAD (refers to commit 'e')
 357      |
 358      v
 359      e
 360     /
 361a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 362    ^
 363    |
 364  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 365------------
 366
 367There is now a new commit 'e', but it is referenced only by HEAD. We can
 368of course add yet another commit in this state:
 369
 370------------
 371$ edit; git add; git commit
 372
 373         HEAD (refers to commit 'f')
 374          |
 375          v
 376      e---f
 377     /
 378a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 379    ^
 380    |
 381  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 382------------
 383
 384In fact, we can perform all the normal Git operations. But, let's look
 385at what happens when we then checkout master:
 386
 387------------
 388$ git checkout master
 389
 390               HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
 391      e---f     |
 392     /          v
 393a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 394    ^
 395    |
 396  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 397------------
 398
 399It is important to realize that at this point nothing refers to commit
 400'f'. Eventually commit 'f' (and by extension commit 'e') will be deleted
 401by the routine Git garbage collection process, unless we create a reference
 402before that happens. If we have not yet moved away from commit 'f',
 403any of these will create a reference to it:
 404
 405------------
 406$ git checkout -b foo   <1>
 407$ git branch foo        <2>
 408$ git tag foo           <3>
 409------------
 410
 411<1> creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', and then
 412updates HEAD to refer to branch 'foo'. In other words, we'll no longer
 413be in detached HEAD state after this command.
 414
 415<2> similarly creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f',
 416but leaves HEAD detached.
 417
 418<3> creates a new tag 'foo', which refers to commit 'f',
 419leaving HEAD detached.
 420
 421If we have moved away from commit 'f', then we must first recover its object
 422name (typically by using git reflog), and then we can create a reference to
 423it. For example, to see the last two commits to which HEAD referred, we
 424can use either of these commands:
 425
 426------------
 427$ git reflog -2 HEAD # or
 428$ git log -g -2 HEAD
 429------------
 430
 431ARGUMENT DISAMBIGUATION
 432-----------------------
 433
 434When there is only one argument given and it is not `--` (e.g. "git
 435checkout abc"), and when the argument is both a valid `<tree-ish>`
 436(e.g. a branch "abc" exists) and a valid `<pathspec>` (e.g. a file
 437or a directory whose name is "abc" exists), Git would usually ask
 438you to disambiguate.  Because checking out a branch is so common an
 439operation, however, "git checkout abc" takes "abc" as a `<tree-ish>`
 440in such a situation.  Use `git checkout -- <pathspec>` if you want
 441to checkout these paths out of the index.
 442
 443EXAMPLES
 444--------
 445
 446. The following sequence checks out the `master` branch, reverts
 447the `Makefile` to two revisions back, deletes hello.c by
 448mistake, and gets it back from the index.
 449+
 450------------
 451$ git checkout master             <1>
 452$ git checkout master~2 Makefile  <2>
 453$ rm -f hello.c
 454$ git checkout hello.c            <3>
 455------------
 456+
 457<1> switch branch
 458<2> take a file out of another commit
 459<3> restore hello.c from the index
 460+
 461If you want to check out _all_ C source files out of the index,
 462you can say
 463+
 464------------
 465$ git checkout -- '*.c'
 466------------
 467+
 468Note the quotes around `*.c`.  The file `hello.c` will also be
 469checked out, even though it is no longer in the working tree,
 470because the file globbing is used to match entries in the index
 471(not in the working tree by the shell).
 472+
 473If you have an unfortunate branch that is named `hello.c`, this
 474step would be confused as an instruction to switch to that branch.
 475You should instead write:
 476+
 477------------
 478$ git checkout -- hello.c
 479------------
 480
 481. After working in the wrong branch, switching to the correct
 482branch would be done using:
 483+
 484------------
 485$ git checkout mytopic
 486------------
 487+
 488However, your "wrong" branch and correct "mytopic" branch may
 489differ in files that you have modified locally, in which case
 490the above checkout would fail like this:
 491+
 492------------
 493$ git checkout mytopic
 494error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches.
 495------------
 496+
 497You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a
 498three-way merge:
 499+
 500------------
 501$ git checkout -m mytopic
 502Auto-merging frotz
 503------------
 504+
 505After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_
 506registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what
 507changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
 508
 509. When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with
 510the `-m` option, you would see something like this:
 511+
 512------------
 513$ git checkout -m mytopic
 514Auto-merging frotz
 515ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz
 516fatal: merge program failed
 517------------
 518+
 519At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in
 520the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted
 521files.  Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with
 522`git add` as usual:
 523+
 524------------
 525$ edit frotz
 526$ git add frotz
 527------------
 528
 529GIT
 530---
 531Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite