Documentation / git-merge.txton commit Fix typos / spelling in comments (3ea3c21)
   1git-merge(1)
   2============
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-merge - Join two or more development histories together
   7
   8
   9SYNOPSIS
  10--------
  11[verse]
  12'git merge' [-n] [--stat] [--no-commit] [--squash] [-s <strategy>]...
  13        [-m <msg>] <remote> <remote>...
  14'git merge' <msg> HEAD <remote>...
  15
  16DESCRIPTION
  17-----------
  18This is the top-level interface to the merge machinery
  19which drives multiple merge strategy scripts.
  20
  21The second syntax (<msg> `HEAD` <remote>) is supported for
  22historical reasons.  Do not use it from the command line or in
  23new scripts.  It is the same as `git merge -m <msg> <remote>`.
  24
  25
  26OPTIONS
  27-------
  28include::merge-options.txt[]
  29
  30-m <msg>::
  31        The commit message to be used for the merge commit (in case
  32        it is created). The 'git-fmt-merge-msg' script can be used
  33        to give a good default for automated 'git-merge' invocations.
  34
  35<remote>...::
  36        Other branch heads to merge into our branch.  You need at
  37        least one <remote>.  Specifying more than one <remote>
  38        obviously means you are trying an Octopus.
  39
  40include::merge-strategies.txt[]
  41
  42
  43If you tried a merge which resulted in complex conflicts and
  44want to start over, you can recover with 'git-reset'.
  45
  46CONFIGURATION
  47-------------
  48include::merge-config.txt[]
  49
  50branch.<name>.mergeoptions::
  51        Sets default options for merging into branch <name>. The syntax and
  52        supported options are equal to that of 'git-merge', but option values
  53        containing whitespace characters are currently not supported.
  54
  55HOW MERGE WORKS
  56---------------
  57
  58A merge is always between the current `HEAD` and one or more
  59commits (usually, branch head or tag), and the index file must
  60match the tree of `HEAD` commit (i.e. the contents of the last commit)
  61when it starts out.  In other words, `git diff --cached HEAD` must
  62report no changes.  (One exception is when the changed index
  63entries are already in the same state that would result from
  64the merge anyway.)
  65
  66Three kinds of merge can happen:
  67
  68* The merged commit is already contained in `HEAD`. This is the
  69  simplest case, called "Already up-to-date."
  70
  71* `HEAD` is already contained in the merged commit. This is the
  72  most common case especially when invoked from 'git pull':
  73  you are tracking an upstream repository, have committed no local
  74  changes and now you want to update to a newer upstream revision.
  75  Your `HEAD` (and the index) is updated to point at the merged
  76  commit, without creating an extra merge commit.  This is
  77  called "Fast-forward".
  78
  79* Both the merged commit and `HEAD` are independent and must be
  80  tied together by a merge commit that has both of them as its parents.
  81  The rest of this section describes this "True merge" case.
  82
  83The chosen merge strategy merges the two commits into a single
  84new source tree.
  85When things merge cleanly, this is what happens:
  86
  871. The results are updated both in the index file and in your
  88   working tree;
  892. Index file is written out as a tree;
  903. The tree gets committed; and
  914. The `HEAD` pointer gets advanced.
  92
  93Because of 2., we require that the original state of the index
  94file matches exactly the current `HEAD` commit; otherwise we
  95will write out your local changes already registered in your
  96index file along with the merge result, which is not good.
  97Because 1. involves only those paths differing between your
  98branch and the remote branch you are pulling from during the
  99merge (which is typically a fraction of the whole tree), you can
 100have local modifications in your working tree as long as they do
 101not overlap with what the merge updates.
 102
 103When there are conflicts, the following happens:
 104
 1051. `HEAD` stays the same.
 106
 1072. Cleanly merged paths are updated both in the index file and
 108   in your working tree.
 109
 1103. For conflicting paths, the index file records up to three
 111   versions; stage1 stores the version from the common ancestor,
 112   stage2 from `HEAD`, and stage3 from the remote branch (you
 113   can inspect the stages with `git ls-files -u`).  The working
 114   tree files contain the result of the "merge" program; i.e. 3-way
 115   merge results with familiar conflict markers `<<< === >>>`.
 116
 1174. No other changes are done.  In particular, the local
 118   modifications you had before you started merge will stay the
 119   same and the index entries for them stay as they were,
 120   i.e. matching `HEAD`.
 121
 122HOW CONFLICTS ARE PRESENTED
 123---------------------------
 124
 125During a merge, the working tree files are updated to reflect the result
 126of the merge.  Among the changes made to the common ancestor's version,
 127non-overlapping ones (that is, you changed an area of the file while the
 128other side left that area intact, or vice versa) are incorporated in the
 129final result verbatim.  When both sides made changes to the same area,
 130however, git cannot randomly pick one side over the other, and asks you to
 131resolve it by leaving what both sides did to that area.
 132
 133By default, git uses the same style as that is used by "merge" program
 134from the RCS suite to present such a conflicted hunk, like this:
 135
 136------------
 137Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
 138ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
 139<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
 140Conflict resolution is hard;
 141let's go shopping.
 142=======
 143Git makes conflict resolution easy.
 144>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
 145And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
 146------------
 147
 148The area where a pair of conflicting changes happened is marked with markers
 149`<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>`.  The part before the `=======`
 150is typically your side, and the part afterwards is typically their side.
 151
 152The default format does not show what the original said in the conflicting
 153area.  You cannot tell how many lines are deleted and replaced with
 154Barbie's remark on your side.  The only thing you can tell is that your
 155side wants to say it is hard and you'd prefer to go shopping, while the
 156other side wants to claim it is easy.
 157
 158An alternative style can be used by setting the "merge.conflictstyle"
 159configuration variable to "diff3".  In "diff3" style, the above conflict
 160may look like this:
 161
 162------------
 163Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
 164ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
 165<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
 166Conflict resolution is hard;
 167let's go shopping.
 168|||||||
 169Conflict resolution is hard.
 170=======
 171Git makes conflict resolution easy.
 172>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
 173And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
 174------------
 175
 176In addition to the `<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>` markers, it uses
 177another `|||||||` marker that is followed by the original text.  You can
 178tell that the original just stated a fact, and your side simply gave in to
 179that statement and gave up, while the other side tried to have a more
 180positive attitude.  You can sometimes come up with a better resolution by
 181viewing the original.
 182
 183
 184HOW TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS
 185------------------------
 186
 187After seeing a conflict, you can do two things:
 188
 189 * Decide not to merge.  The only clean-ups you need are to reset
 190   the index file to the `HEAD` commit to reverse 2. and to clean
 191   up working tree changes made by 2. and 3.; 'git-reset --hard' can
 192   be used for this.
 193
 194 * Resolve the conflicts.  Git will mark the conflicts in
 195   the working tree.  Edit the files into shape and
 196   'git-add' them to the index.  Use 'git-commit' to seal the deal.
 197
 198You can work through the conflict with a number of tools:
 199
 200 * Use a mergetool.  'git mergetool' to launch a graphical
 201   mergetool which will work you through the merge.
 202
 203 * Look at the diffs.  'git diff' will show a three-way diff,
 204   highlighting changes from both the HEAD and remote versions.
 205
 206 * Look at the diffs on their own. 'git log --merge -p <path>'
 207   will show diffs first for the HEAD version and then the
 208   remote version.
 209
 210 * Look at the originals.  'git show :1:filename' shows the
 211   common ancestor, 'git show :2:filename' shows the HEAD
 212   version and 'git show :3:filename' shows the remote version.
 213
 214SEE ALSO
 215--------
 216linkgit:git-fmt-merge-msg[1], linkgit:git-pull[1],
 217linkgit:gitattributes[5],
 218linkgit:git-reset[1],
 219linkgit:git-diff[1], linkgit:git-ls-files[1],
 220linkgit:git-add[1], linkgit:git-rm[1],
 221linkgit:git-mergetool[1]
 222
 223Author
 224------
 225Written by Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
 226
 227
 228Documentation
 229--------------
 230Documentation by Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>.
 231
 232GIT
 233---
 234Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite