Documentation / git-bisect.txton commit Merge branch 'js/upload-pack' (40e2524)
   1git-bisect(1)
   2=============
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-bisect - Find the change that introduced a bug by binary search
   7
   8
   9SYNOPSIS
  10--------
  11'git bisect' <subcommand> <options>
  12
  13DESCRIPTION
  14-----------
  15The command takes various subcommands, and different options depending
  16on the subcommand:
  17
  18 git bisect start [<bad> [<good>...]] [--] [<paths>...]
  19 git bisect bad [<rev>]
  20 git bisect good [<rev>...]
  21 git bisect skip [<rev>...]
  22 git bisect reset [<branch>]
  23 git bisect visualize
  24 git bisect replay <logfile>
  25 git bisect log
  26 git bisect run <cmd>...
  27
  28This command uses 'git-rev-list --bisect' option to help drive the
  29binary search process to find which change introduced a bug, given an
  30old "good" commit object name and a later "bad" commit object name.
  31
  32Basic bisect commands: start, bad, good
  33~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  34
  35The way you use it is:
  36
  37------------------------------------------------
  38$ git bisect start
  39$ git bisect bad                 # Current version is bad
  40$ git bisect good v2.6.13-rc2    # v2.6.13-rc2 was the last version
  41                                 # tested that was good
  42------------------------------------------------
  43
  44When you give at least one bad and one good versions, it will bisect
  45the revision tree and say something like:
  46
  47------------------------------------------------
  48Bisecting: 675 revisions left to test after this
  49------------------------------------------------
  50
  51and check out the state in the middle. Now, compile that kernel, and
  52boot it. Now, let's say that this booted kernel works fine, then just
  53do
  54
  55------------------------------------------------
  56$ git bisect good                       # this one is good
  57------------------------------------------------
  58
  59which will now say
  60
  61------------------------------------------------
  62Bisecting: 337 revisions left to test after this
  63------------------------------------------------
  64
  65and you continue along, compiling that one, testing it, and depending
  66on whether it is good or bad, you say "git bisect good" or "git bisect
  67bad", and ask for the next bisection.
  68
  69Until you have no more left, and you'll have been left with the first
  70bad kernel rev in "refs/bisect/bad".
  71
  72Bisect reset
  73~~~~~~~~~~~~
  74
  75Oh, and then after you want to reset to the original head, do a
  76
  77------------------------------------------------
  78$ git bisect reset
  79------------------------------------------------
  80
  81to get back to the master branch, instead of being in one of the
  82bisection branches ("git bisect start" will do that for you too,
  83actually: it will reset the bisection state, and before it does that
  84it checks that you're not using some old bisection branch).
  85
  86Bisect visualize
  87~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  88
  89During the bisection process, you can say
  90
  91------------
  92$ git bisect visualize
  93------------
  94
  95to see the currently remaining suspects in `gitk`.
  96
  97Bisect log and bisect replay
  98~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  99
 100The good/bad input is logged, and
 101
 102------------
 103$ git bisect log
 104------------
 105
 106shows what you have done so far. You can truncate its output somewhere
 107and save it in a file, and run
 108
 109------------
 110$ git bisect replay that-file
 111------------
 112
 113if you find later you made a mistake telling good/bad about a
 114revision.
 115
 116Avoiding to test a commit
 117~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 118
 119If in a middle of bisect session, you know what the bisect suggested
 120to try next is not a good one to test (e.g. the change the commit
 121introduces is known not to work in your environment and you know it
 122does not have anything to do with the bug you are chasing), you may
 123want to find a near-by commit and try that instead.
 124
 125It goes something like this:
 126
 127------------
 128$ git bisect good/bad                   # previous round was good/bad.
 129Bisecting: 337 revisions left to test after this
 130$ git bisect visualize                  # oops, that is uninteresting.
 131$ git reset --hard HEAD~3               # try 3 revs before what
 132                                        # was suggested
 133------------
 134
 135Then compile and test the one you chose to try. After that, tell
 136bisect what the result was as usual.
 137
 138Bisect skip
 139~~~~~~~~~~~~
 140
 141Instead of choosing by yourself a nearby commit, you may just want git
 142to do it for you using:
 143
 144------------
 145$ git bisect skip                 # Current version cannot be tested
 146------------
 147
 148But computing the commit to test may be slower afterwards and git may
 149eventually not be able to tell the first bad among a bad and one or
 150more "skip"ped commits.
 151
 152Cutting down bisection by giving more parameters to bisect start
 153~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 154
 155You can further cut down the number of trials if you know what part of
 156the tree is involved in the problem you are tracking down, by giving
 157paths parameters when you say `bisect start`, like this:
 158
 159------------
 160$ git bisect start -- arch/i386 include/asm-i386
 161------------
 162
 163If you know beforehand more than one good commits, you can narrow the
 164bisect space down without doing the whole tree checkout every time you
 165give good commits. You give the bad revision immediately after `start`
 166and then you give all the good revisions you have:
 167
 168------------
 169$ git bisect start v2.6.20-rc6 v2.6.20-rc4 v2.6.20-rc1 --
 170                   # v2.6.20-rc6 is bad
 171                   # v2.6.20-rc4 and v2.6.20-rc1 are good
 172------------
 173
 174Bisect run
 175~~~~~~~~~~
 176
 177If you have a script that can tell if the current source code is good
 178or bad, you can automatically bisect using:
 179
 180------------
 181$ git bisect run my_script
 182------------
 183
 184Note that the "run" script (`my_script` in the above example) should
 185exit with code 0 in case the current source code is good.  Exit with a
 186code between 1 and 127 (inclusive), except 125, if the current
 187source code is bad.
 188
 189Any other exit code will abort the automatic bisect process. (A
 190program that does "exit(-1)" leaves $? = 255, see exit(3) manual page,
 191the value is chopped with "& 0377".)
 192
 193The special exit code 125 should be used when the current source code
 194cannot be tested. If the "run" script exits with this code, the current
 195revision will be skipped, see `git bisect skip` above.
 196
 197You may often find that during bisect you want to have near-constant
 198tweaks (e.g., s/#define DEBUG 0/#define DEBUG 1/ in a header file, or
 199"revision that does not have this commit needs this patch applied to
 200work around other problem this bisection is not interested in")
 201applied to the revision being tested.
 202
 203To cope with such a situation, after the inner git-bisect finds the
 204next revision to test, with the "run" script, you can apply that tweak
 205before compiling, run the real test, and after the test decides if the
 206revision (possibly with the needed tweaks) passed the test, rewind the
 207tree to the pristine state.  Finally the "run" script can exit with
 208the status of the real test to let "git bisect run" command loop to
 209know the outcome.
 210
 211Author
 212------
 213Written by Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
 214
 215Documentation
 216-------------
 217Documentation by Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>.
 218
 219GIT
 220---
 221Part of the gitlink:git[7] suite