1git-checkout(1) 2=============== 3 4NAME 5---- 6git-checkout - Checkout a branch or paths to the working tree 7 8SYNOPSIS 9-------- 10[verse] 11'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [<branch>] 12'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] --detach [<branch>] 13'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [--detach] <commit> 14'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [[-b|-B|--orphan] <new_branch>] [<start_point>] 15'git checkout' [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] [--] <paths>... 16'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] [<paths>...] 17 18DESCRIPTION 19----------- 20Updates files in the working tree to match the version in the index 21or the specified tree. If no paths are given, 'git checkout' will 22also update `HEAD` to set the specified branch as the current 23branch. 24 25'git checkout' <branch>:: 26 To prepare for working on <branch>, switch to it by updating 27 the index and the files in the working tree, and by pointing 28 HEAD at the branch. Local modifications to the files in the 29 working tree are kept, so that they can be committed to the 30 <branch>. 31+ 32If <branch> is not found but there does exist a tracking branch in 33exactly one remote (call it <remote>) with a matching name, treat as 34equivalent to 35+ 36------------ 37$ git checkout -b <branch> --track <remote>/<branch> 38------------ 39+ 40You could omit <branch>, in which case the command degenerates to 41"check out the current branch", which is a glorified no-op with a 42rather expensive side-effects to show only the tracking information, 43if exists, for the current branch. 44 45'git checkout' -b|-B <new_branch> [<start point>]:: 46 47 Specifying `-b` causes a new branch to be created as if 48 linkgit:git-branch[1] were called and then checked out. In 49 this case you can use the `--track` or `--no-track` options, 50 which will be passed to 'git branch'. As a convenience, 51 `--track` without `-b` implies branch creation; see the 52 description of `--track` below. 53+ 54If `-B` is given, <new_branch> is created if it doesn't exist; otherwise, it 55is reset. This is the transactional equivalent of 56+ 57------------ 58$ git branch -f <branch> [<start point>] 59$ git checkout <branch> 60------------ 61+ 62that is to say, the branch is not reset/created unless "git checkout" is 63successful. 64 65'git checkout' --detach [<branch>]:: 66'git checkout' [--detach] <commit>:: 67 68 Prepare to work on top of <commit>, by detaching HEAD at it 69 (see "DETACHED HEAD" section), and updating the index and the 70 files in the working tree. Local modifications to the files 71 in the working tree are kept, so that the resulting working 72 tree will be the state recorded in the commit plus the local 73 modifications. 74+ 75When the <commit> argument is a branch name, the `--detach` option can 76be used to detach HEAD at the tip of the branch (`git checkout 77<branch>` would check out that branch without detaching HEAD). 78+ 79Omitting <branch> detaches HEAD at the tip of the current branch. 80 81'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>...:: 82 83 When <paths> or `--patch` are given, 'git checkout' does *not* 84 switch branches. It updates the named paths in the working tree 85 from the index file or from a named <tree-ish> (most often a 86 commit). In this case, the `-b` and `--track` options are 87 meaningless and giving either of them results in an error. The 88 <tree-ish> argument can be used to specify a specific tree-ish 89 (i.e. commit, tag or tree) to update the index for the given 90 paths before updating the working tree. 91+ 92The index may contain unmerged entries because of a previous failed merge. 93By default, if you try to check out such an entry from the index, the 94checkout operation will fail and nothing will be checked out. 95Using `-f` will ignore these unmerged entries. The contents from a 96specific side of the merge can be checked out of the index by 97using `--ours` or `--theirs`. With `-m`, changes made to the working tree 98file can be discarded to re-create the original conflicted merge result. 99 100OPTIONS 101------- 102-q:: 103--quiet:: 104 Quiet, suppress feedback messages. 105 106-f:: 107--force:: 108 When switching branches, proceed even if the index or the 109 working tree differs from HEAD. This is used to throw away 110 local changes. 111+ 112When checking out paths from the index, do not fail upon unmerged 113entries; instead, unmerged entries are ignored. 114 115--ours:: 116--theirs:: 117 When checking out paths from the index, check out stage #2 118 ('ours') or #3 ('theirs') for unmerged paths. 119 120-b <new_branch>:: 121 Create a new branch named <new_branch> and start it at 122 <start_point>; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. 123 124-B <new_branch>:: 125 Creates the branch <new_branch> and start it at <start_point>; 126 if it already exists, then reset it to <start_point>. This is 127 equivalent to running "git branch" with "-f"; see 128 linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. 129 130-t:: 131--track:: 132 When creating a new branch, set up "upstream" configuration. See 133 "--track" in linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. 134+ 135If no '-b' option is given, the name of the new branch will be 136derived from the remote-tracking branch, by looking at the local part of 137the refspec configured for the corresponding remote, and then stripping 138the initial part up to the "*". 139This would tell us to use "hack" as the local branch when branching 140off of "origin/hack" (or "remotes/origin/hack", or even 141"refs/remotes/origin/hack"). If the given name has no slash, or the above 142guessing results in an empty name, the guessing is aborted. You can 143explicitly give a name with '-b' in such a case. 144 145--no-track:: 146 Do not set up "upstream" configuration, even if the 147 branch.autosetupmerge configuration variable is true. 148 149-l:: 150 Create the new branch's reflog; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for 151 details. 152 153--detach:: 154 Rather than checking out a branch to work on it, check out a 155 commit for inspection and discardable experiments. 156 This is the default behavior of "git checkout <commit>" when 157 <commit> is not a branch name. See the "DETACHED HEAD" section 158 below for details. 159 160--orphan <new_branch>:: 161 Create a new 'orphan' branch, named <new_branch>, started from 162 <start_point> and switch to it. The first commit made on this 163 new branch will have no parents and it will be the root of a new 164 history totally disconnected from all the other branches and 165 commits. 166+ 167The index and the working tree are adjusted as if you had previously run 168"git checkout <start_point>". This allows you to start a new history 169that records a set of paths similar to <start_point> by easily running 170"git commit -a" to make the root commit. 171+ 172This can be useful when you want to publish the tree from a commit 173without exposing its full history. You might want to do this to publish 174an open source branch of a project whose current tree is "clean", but 175whose full history contains proprietary or otherwise encumbered bits of 176code. 177+ 178If you want to start a disconnected history that records a set of paths 179that is totally different from the one of <start_point>, then you should 180clear the index and the working tree right after creating the orphan 181branch by running "git rm -rf ." from the top level of the working tree. 182Afterwards you will be ready to prepare your new files, repopulating the 183working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. 184 185--ignore-skip-worktree-bits:: 186 In sparse checkout mode, `git checkout -- <paths>` would 187 update only entries matched by <paths> and sparse patterns 188 in $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout. This option ignores 189 the sparse patterns and adds back any files in <paths>. 190 191-m:: 192--merge:: 193 When switching branches, 194 if you have local modifications to one or more files that 195 are different between the current branch and the branch to 196 which you are switching, the command refuses to switch 197 branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. 198 However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current 199 branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch 200 is done, and you will be on the new branch. 201+ 202When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting 203paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts 204and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge 205should result in deletion of the path). 206+ 207When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate 208the conflicted merge in the specified paths. 209 210--conflict=<style>:: 211 The same as --merge option above, but changes the way the 212 conflicting hunks are presented, overriding the 213 merge.conflictstyle configuration variable. Possible values are 214 "merge" (default) and "diff3" (in addition to what is shown by 215 "merge" style, shows the original contents). 216 217-p:: 218--patch:: 219 Interactively select hunks in the difference between the 220 <tree-ish> (or the index, if unspecified) and the working 221 tree. The chosen hunks are then applied in reverse to the 222 working tree (and if a <tree-ish> was specified, the index). 223+ 224This means that you can use `git checkout -p` to selectively discard 225edits from your current working tree. See the ``Interactive Mode'' 226section of linkgit:git-add[1] to learn how to operate the `--patch` mode. 227 228<branch>:: 229 Branch to checkout; if it refers to a branch (i.e., a name that, 230 when prepended with "refs/heads/", is a valid ref), then that 231 branch is checked out. Otherwise, if it refers to a valid 232 commit, your HEAD becomes "detached" and you are no longer on 233 any branch (see below for details). 234+ 235As a special case, the `"@{-N}"` syntax for the N-th last branch 236checks out the branch (instead of detaching). You may also specify 237`-` which is synonymous with `"@{-1}"`. 238+ 239As a further special case, you may use `"A...B"` as a shortcut for the 240merge base of `A` and `B` if there is exactly one merge base. You can 241leave out at most one of `A` and `B`, in which case it defaults to `HEAD`. 242 243<new_branch>:: 244 Name for the new branch. 245 246<start_point>:: 247 The name of a commit at which to start the new branch; see 248 linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. Defaults to HEAD. 249 250<tree-ish>:: 251 Tree to checkout from (when paths are given). If not specified, 252 the index will be used. 253 254 255 256DETACHED HEAD 257------------- 258HEAD normally refers to a named branch (e.g. 'master'). Meanwhile, each 259branch refers to a specific commit. Let's look at a repo with three 260commits, one of them tagged, and with branch 'master' checked out: 261 262------------ 263 HEAD (refers to branch 'master') 264 | 265 v 266a---b---c branch 'master' (refers to commit 'c') 267 ^ 268 | 269 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 270------------ 271 272When a commit is created in this state, the branch is updated to refer to 273the new commit. Specifically, 'git commit' creates a new commit 'd', whose 274parent is commit 'c', and then updates branch 'master' to refer to new 275commit 'd'. HEAD still refers to branch 'master' and so indirectly now refers 276to commit 'd': 277 278------------ 279$ edit; git add; git commit 280 281 HEAD (refers to branch 'master') 282 | 283 v 284a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 285 ^ 286 | 287 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 288------------ 289 290It is sometimes useful to be able to checkout a commit that is not at 291the tip of any named branch, or even to create a new commit that is not 292referenced by a named branch. Let's look at what happens when we 293checkout commit 'b' (here we show two ways this may be done): 294 295------------ 296$ git checkout v2.0 # or 297$ git checkout master^^ 298 299 HEAD (refers to commit 'b') 300 | 301 v 302a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 303 ^ 304 | 305 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 306------------ 307 308Notice that regardless of which checkout command we use, HEAD now refers 309directly to commit 'b'. This is known as being in detached HEAD state. 310It means simply that HEAD refers to a specific commit, as opposed to 311referring to a named branch. Let's see what happens when we create a commit: 312 313------------ 314$ edit; git add; git commit 315 316 HEAD (refers to commit 'e') 317 | 318 v 319 e 320 / 321a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 322 ^ 323 | 324 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 325------------ 326 327There is now a new commit 'e', but it is referenced only by HEAD. We can 328of course add yet another commit in this state: 329 330------------ 331$ edit; git add; git commit 332 333 HEAD (refers to commit 'f') 334 | 335 v 336 e---f 337 / 338a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 339 ^ 340 | 341 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 342------------ 343 344In fact, we can perform all the normal Git operations. But, let's look 345at what happens when we then checkout master: 346 347------------ 348$ git checkout master 349 350 HEAD (refers to branch 'master') 351 e---f | 352 / v 353a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 354 ^ 355 | 356 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 357------------ 358 359It is important to realize that at this point nothing refers to commit 360'f'. Eventually commit 'f' (and by extension commit 'e') will be deleted 361by the routine Git garbage collection process, unless we create a reference 362before that happens. If we have not yet moved away from commit 'f', 363any of these will create a reference to it: 364 365------------ 366$ git checkout -b foo <1> 367$ git branch foo <2> 368$ git tag foo <3> 369------------ 370 371<1> creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', and then 372updates HEAD to refer to branch 'foo'. In other words, we'll no longer 373be in detached HEAD state after this command. 374 375<2> similarly creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', 376but leaves HEAD detached. 377 378<3> creates a new tag 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', 379leaving HEAD detached. 380 381If we have moved away from commit 'f', then we must first recover its object 382name (typically by using git reflog), and then we can create a reference to 383it. For example, to see the last two commits to which HEAD referred, we 384can use either of these commands: 385 386------------ 387$ git reflog -2 HEAD # or 388$ git log -g -2 HEAD 389------------ 390 391EXAMPLES 392-------- 393 394. The following sequence checks out the `master` branch, reverts 395the `Makefile` to two revisions back, deletes hello.c by 396mistake, and gets it back from the index. 397+ 398------------ 399$ git checkout master <1> 400$ git checkout master~2 Makefile <2> 401$ rm -f hello.c 402$ git checkout hello.c <3> 403------------ 404+ 405<1> switch branch 406<2> take a file out of another commit 407<3> restore hello.c from the index 408+ 409If you want to check out _all_ C source files out of the index, 410you can say 411+ 412------------ 413$ git checkout -- '*.c' 414------------ 415+ 416Note the quotes around `*.c`. The file `hello.c` will also be 417checked out, even though it is no longer in the working tree, 418because the file globbing is used to match entries in the index 419(not in the working tree by the shell). 420+ 421If you have an unfortunate branch that is named `hello.c`, this 422step would be confused as an instruction to switch to that branch. 423You should instead write: 424+ 425------------ 426$ git checkout -- hello.c 427------------ 428 429. After working in the wrong branch, switching to the correct 430branch would be done using: 431+ 432------------ 433$ git checkout mytopic 434------------ 435+ 436However, your "wrong" branch and correct "mytopic" branch may 437differ in files that you have modified locally, in which case 438the above checkout would fail like this: 439+ 440------------ 441$ git checkout mytopic 442error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. 443------------ 444+ 445You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a 446three-way merge: 447+ 448------------ 449$ git checkout -m mytopic 450Auto-merging frotz 451------------ 452+ 453After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ 454registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what 455changes you made since the tip of the new branch. 456 457. When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with 458the `-m` option, you would see something like this: 459+ 460------------ 461$ git checkout -m mytopic 462Auto-merging frotz 463ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz 464fatal: merge program failed 465------------ 466+ 467At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in 468the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted 469files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with 470`git add` as usual: 471+ 472------------ 473$ edit frotz 474$ git add frotz 475------------ 476 477GIT 478--- 479Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite