1git-checkout(1) 2=============== 3 4NAME 5---- 6git-checkout - Checkout a branch or paths to the working tree 7 8SYNOPSIS 9-------- 10[verse] 11'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [<branch>] 12'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [--detach] [<commit>] 13'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [[-b|-B|--orphan] <new_branch>] [<start_point>] 14'git checkout' [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] [--] <paths>... 15'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] [<paths>...] 16 17DESCRIPTION 18----------- 19Updates files in the working tree to match the version in the index 20or the specified tree. If no paths are given, 'git checkout' will 21also update `HEAD` to set the specified branch as the current 22branch. 23 24'git checkout' [<branch>]:: 25'git checkout' -b|-B <new_branch> [<start point>]:: 26'git checkout' [--detach] [<commit>]:: 27 28 This form switches branches by updating the index, working 29 tree, and HEAD to reflect the specified branch or commit. 30+ 31If `-b` is given, a new branch is created as if linkgit:git-branch[1] 32were called and then checked out; in this case you can 33use the `--track` or `--no-track` options, which will be passed to 34'git branch'. As a convenience, `--track` without `-b` implies branch 35creation; see the description of `--track` below. 36+ 37If `-B` is given, <new_branch> is created if it doesn't exist; otherwise, it 38is reset. This is the transactional equivalent of 39+ 40------------ 41$ git branch -f <branch> [<start point>] 42$ git checkout <branch> 43------------ 44+ 45that is to say, the branch is not reset/created unless "git checkout" is 46successful. 47 48'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>...:: 49 50 When <paths> or `--patch` are given, 'git checkout' does *not* 51 switch branches. It updates the named paths in the working tree 52 from the index file or from a named <tree-ish> (most often a 53 commit). In this case, the `-b` and `--track` options are 54 meaningless and giving either of them results in an error. The 55 <tree-ish> argument can be used to specify a specific tree-ish 56 (i.e. commit, tag or tree) to update the index for the given 57 paths before updating the working tree. 58+ 59The index may contain unmerged entries because of a previous failed merge. 60By default, if you try to check out such an entry from the index, the 61checkout operation will fail and nothing will be checked out. 62Using `-f` will ignore these unmerged entries. The contents from a 63specific side of the merge can be checked out of the index by 64using `--ours` or `--theirs`. With `-m`, changes made to the working tree 65file can be discarded to re-create the original conflicted merge result. 66 67OPTIONS 68------- 69-q:: 70--quiet:: 71 Quiet, suppress feedback messages. 72 73-f:: 74--force:: 75 When switching branches, proceed even if the index or the 76 working tree differs from HEAD. This is used to throw away 77 local changes. 78+ 79When checking out paths from the index, do not fail upon unmerged 80entries; instead, unmerged entries are ignored. 81 82--ours:: 83--theirs:: 84 When checking out paths from the index, check out stage #2 85 ('ours') or #3 ('theirs') for unmerged paths. 86 87-b <new_branch>:: 88 Create a new branch named <new_branch> and start it at 89 <start_point>; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. 90 91-B <new_branch>:: 92 Creates the branch <new_branch> and start it at <start_point>; 93 if it already exists, then reset it to <start_point>. This is 94 equivalent to running "git branch" with "-f"; see 95 linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. 96 97-t:: 98--track:: 99 When creating a new branch, set up "upstream" configuration. See 100 "--track" in linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. 101+ 102If no '-b' option is given, the name of the new branch will be 103derived from the remote-tracking branch. If "remotes/" or "refs/remotes/" 104is prefixed it is stripped away, and then the part up to the 105next slash (which would be the nickname of the remote) is removed. 106This would tell us to use "hack" as the local branch when branching 107off of "origin/hack" (or "remotes/origin/hack", or even 108"refs/remotes/origin/hack"). If the given name has no slash, or the above 109guessing results in an empty name, the guessing is aborted. You can 110explicitly give a name with '-b' in such a case. 111 112--no-track:: 113 Do not set up "upstream" configuration, even if the 114 branch.autosetupmerge configuration variable is true. 115 116-l:: 117 Create the new branch's reflog; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for 118 details. 119 120--detach:: 121 Rather than checking out a branch to work on it, check out a 122 commit for inspection and discardable experiments. 123 This is the default behavior of "git checkout <commit>" when 124 <commit> is not a branch name. See the "DETACHED HEAD" section 125 below for details. 126 127--orphan <new_branch>:: 128 Create a new 'orphan' branch, named <new_branch>, started from 129 <start_point> and switch to it. The first commit made on this 130 new branch will have no parents and it will be the root of a new 131 history totally disconnected from all the other branches and 132 commits. 133+ 134The index and the working tree are adjusted as if you had previously run 135"git checkout <start_point>". This allows you to start a new history 136that records a set of paths similar to <start_point> by easily running 137"git commit -a" to make the root commit. 138+ 139This can be useful when you want to publish the tree from a commit 140without exposing its full history. You might want to do this to publish 141an open source branch of a project whose current tree is "clean", but 142whose full history contains proprietary or otherwise encumbered bits of 143code. 144+ 145If you want to start a disconnected history that records a set of paths 146that is totally different from the one of <start_point>, then you should 147clear the index and the working tree right after creating the orphan 148branch by running "git rm -rf ." from the top level of the working tree. 149Afterwards you will be ready to prepare your new files, repopulating the 150working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. 151 152-m:: 153--merge:: 154 When switching branches, 155 if you have local modifications to one or more files that 156 are different between the current branch and the branch to 157 which you are switching, the command refuses to switch 158 branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. 159 However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current 160 branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch 161 is done, and you will be on the new branch. 162+ 163When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting 164paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts 165and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge 166should result in deletion of the path). 167+ 168When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate 169the conflicted merge in the specified paths. 170 171--conflict=<style>:: 172 The same as --merge option above, but changes the way the 173 conflicting hunks are presented, overriding the 174 merge.conflictstyle configuration variable. Possible values are 175 "merge" (default) and "diff3" (in addition to what is shown by 176 "merge" style, shows the original contents). 177 178-p:: 179--patch:: 180 Interactively select hunks in the difference between the 181 <tree-ish> (or the index, if unspecified) and the working 182 tree. The chosen hunks are then applied in reverse to the 183 working tree (and if a <tree-ish> was specified, the index). 184+ 185This means that you can use `git checkout -p` to selectively discard 186edits from your current working tree. See the ``Interactive Mode'' 187section of linkgit:git-add[1] to learn how to operate the `--patch` mode. 188 189<branch>:: 190 Branch to checkout; if it refers to a branch (i.e., a name that, 191 when prepended with "refs/heads/", is a valid ref), then that 192 branch is checked out. Otherwise, if it refers to a valid 193 commit, your HEAD becomes "detached" and you are no longer on 194 any branch (see below for details). 195+ 196As a special case, the `"@{-N}"` syntax for the N-th last branch 197checks out the branch (instead of detaching). You may also specify 198`-` which is synonymous with `"@{-1}"`. 199+ 200As a further special case, you may use `"A...B"` as a shortcut for the 201merge base of `A` and `B` if there is exactly one merge base. You can 202leave out at most one of `A` and `B`, in which case it defaults to `HEAD`. 203 204<new_branch>:: 205 Name for the new branch. 206 207<start_point>:: 208 The name of a commit at which to start the new branch; see 209 linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. Defaults to HEAD. 210 211<tree-ish>:: 212 Tree to checkout from (when paths are given). If not specified, 213 the index will be used. 214 215 216 217DETACHED HEAD 218------------- 219HEAD normally refers to a named branch (e.g. 'master'). Meanwhile, each 220branch refers to a specific commit. Let's look at a repo with three 221commits, one of them tagged, and with branch 'master' checked out: 222 223------------ 224 HEAD (refers to branch 'master') 225 | 226 v 227a---b---c branch 'master' (refers to commit 'c') 228 ^ 229 | 230 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 231------------ 232 233When a commit is created in this state, the branch is updated to refer to 234the new commit. Specifically, 'git commit' creates a new commit 'd', whose 235parent is commit 'c', and then updates branch 'master' to refer to new 236commit 'd'. HEAD still refers to branch 'master' and so indirectly now refers 237to commit 'd': 238 239------------ 240$ edit; git add; git commit 241 242 HEAD (refers to branch 'master') 243 | 244 v 245a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 246 ^ 247 | 248 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 249------------ 250 251It is sometimes useful to be able to checkout a commit that is not at 252the tip of any named branch, or even to create a new commit that is not 253referenced by a named branch. Let's look at what happens when we 254checkout commit 'b' (here we show two ways this may be done): 255 256------------ 257$ git checkout v2.0 # or 258$ git checkout master^^ 259 260 HEAD (refers to commit 'b') 261 | 262 v 263a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 264 ^ 265 | 266 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 267------------ 268 269Notice that regardless of which checkout command we use, HEAD now refers 270directly to commit 'b'. This is known as being in detached HEAD state. 271It means simply that HEAD refers to a specific commit, as opposed to 272referring to a named branch. Let's see what happens when we create a commit: 273 274------------ 275$ edit; git add; git commit 276 277 HEAD (refers to commit 'e') 278 | 279 v 280 e 281 / 282a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 283 ^ 284 | 285 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 286------------ 287 288There is now a new commit 'e', but it is referenced only by HEAD. We can 289of course add yet another commit in this state: 290 291------------ 292$ edit; git add; git commit 293 294 HEAD (refers to commit 'f') 295 | 296 v 297 e---f 298 / 299a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 300 ^ 301 | 302 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 303------------ 304 305In fact, we can perform all the normal git operations. But, let's look 306at what happens when we then checkout master: 307 308------------ 309$ git checkout master 310 311 HEAD (refers to branch 'master') 312 e---f | 313 / v 314a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 315 ^ 316 | 317 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 318------------ 319 320It is important to realize that at this point nothing refers to commit 321'f'. Eventually commit 'f' (and by extension commit 'e') will be deleted 322by the routine git garbage collection process, unless we create a reference 323before that happens. If we have not yet moved away from commit 'f', 324any of these will create a reference to it: 325 326------------ 327$ git checkout -b foo <1> 328$ git branch foo <2> 329$ git tag foo <3> 330------------ 331 332<1> creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', and then 333updates HEAD to refer to branch 'foo'. In other words, we'll no longer 334be in detached HEAD state after this command. 335 336<2> similarly creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', 337but leaves HEAD detached. 338 339<3> creates a new tag 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', 340leaving HEAD detached. 341 342If we have moved away from commit 'f', then we must first recover its object 343name (typically by using git reflog), and then we can create a reference to 344it. For example, to see the last two commits to which HEAD referred, we 345can use either of these commands: 346 347------------ 348$ git reflog -2 HEAD # or 349$ git log -g -2 HEAD 350------------ 351 352EXAMPLES 353-------- 354 355. The following sequence checks out the `master` branch, reverts 356the `Makefile` to two revisions back, deletes hello.c by 357mistake, and gets it back from the index. 358+ 359------------ 360$ git checkout master <1> 361$ git checkout master~2 Makefile <2> 362$ rm -f hello.c 363$ git checkout hello.c <3> 364------------ 365+ 366<1> switch branch 367<2> take a file out of another commit 368<3> restore hello.c from the index 369+ 370If you want to check out _all_ C source files out of the index, 371you can say 372+ 373------------ 374$ git checkout -- '*.c' 375------------ 376+ 377Note the quotes around `*.c`. The file `hello.c` will also be 378checked out, even though it is no longer in the working tree, 379because the file globbing is used to match entries in the index 380(not in the working tree by the shell). 381+ 382If you have an unfortunate branch that is named `hello.c`, this 383step would be confused as an instruction to switch to that branch. 384You should instead write: 385+ 386------------ 387$ git checkout -- hello.c 388------------ 389 390. After working in the wrong branch, switching to the correct 391branch would be done using: 392+ 393------------ 394$ git checkout mytopic 395------------ 396+ 397However, your "wrong" branch and correct "mytopic" branch may 398differ in files that you have modified locally, in which case 399the above checkout would fail like this: 400+ 401------------ 402$ git checkout mytopic 403error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. 404------------ 405+ 406You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a 407three-way merge: 408+ 409------------ 410$ git checkout -m mytopic 411Auto-merging frotz 412------------ 413+ 414After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ 415registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what 416changes you made since the tip of the new branch. 417 418. When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with 419the `-m` option, you would see something like this: 420+ 421------------ 422$ git checkout -m mytopic 423Auto-merging frotz 424ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz 425fatal: merge program failed 426------------ 427+ 428At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in 429the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted 430files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with 431`git add` as usual: 432+ 433------------ 434$ edit frotz 435$ git add frotz 436------------ 437 438GIT 439--- 440Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite