1git-checkout(1) 2=============== 3 4NAME 5---- 6git-checkout - Switch branches or restore working tree files 7 8SYNOPSIS 9-------- 10[verse] 11'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [<branch>] 12'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] --detach [<branch>] 13'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [--detach] <commit> 14'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [[-b|-B|--orphan] <new_branch>] [<start_point>] 15'git checkout' [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] [--] <paths>... 16'git checkout' [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>... 17'git checkout' (-p|--patch) [<tree-ish>] [--] [<paths>...] 18 19DESCRIPTION 20----------- 21Updates files in the working tree to match the version in the index 22or the specified tree. If no paths are given, 'git checkout' will 23also update `HEAD` to set the specified branch as the current 24branch. 25 26'git checkout' <branch>:: 27 To prepare for working on <branch>, switch to it by updating 28 the index and the files in the working tree, and by pointing 29 HEAD at the branch. Local modifications to the files in the 30 working tree are kept, so that they can be committed to the 31 <branch>. 32+ 33If <branch> is not found but there does exist a tracking branch in 34exactly one remote (call it <remote>) with a matching name, treat as 35equivalent to 36+ 37------------ 38$ git checkout -b <branch> --track <remote>/<branch> 39------------ 40+ 41You could omit <branch>, in which case the command degenerates to 42"check out the current branch", which is a glorified no-op with 43rather expensive side-effects to show only the tracking information, 44if exists, for the current branch. 45 46'git checkout' -b|-B <new_branch> [<start point>]:: 47 48 Specifying `-b` causes a new branch to be created as if 49 linkgit:git-branch[1] were called and then checked out. In 50 this case you can use the `--track` or `--no-track` options, 51 which will be passed to 'git branch'. As a convenience, 52 `--track` without `-b` implies branch creation; see the 53 description of `--track` below. 54+ 55If `-B` is given, <new_branch> is created if it doesn't exist; otherwise, it 56is reset. This is the transactional equivalent of 57+ 58------------ 59$ git branch -f <branch> [<start point>] 60$ git checkout <branch> 61------------ 62+ 63that is to say, the branch is not reset/created unless "git checkout" is 64successful. 65 66'git checkout' --detach [<branch>]:: 67'git checkout' [--detach] <commit>:: 68 69 Prepare to work on top of <commit>, by detaching HEAD at it 70 (see "DETACHED HEAD" section), and updating the index and the 71 files in the working tree. Local modifications to the files 72 in the working tree are kept, so that the resulting working 73 tree will be the state recorded in the commit plus the local 74 modifications. 75+ 76When the <commit> argument is a branch name, the `--detach` option can 77be used to detach HEAD at the tip of the branch (`git checkout 78<branch>` would check out that branch without detaching HEAD). 79+ 80Omitting <branch> detaches HEAD at the tip of the current branch. 81 82'git checkout' [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>...:: 83 84 Overwrite paths in the working tree by replacing with the 85 contents in the index or in the <tree-ish> (most often a 86 commit). When a <tree-ish> is given, the paths that 87 match the <pathspec> are updated both in the index and in 88 the working tree. 89+ 90The index may contain unmerged entries because of a previous failed merge. 91By default, if you try to check out such an entry from the index, the 92checkout operation will fail and nothing will be checked out. 93Using `-f` will ignore these unmerged entries. The contents from a 94specific side of the merge can be checked out of the index by 95using `--ours` or `--theirs`. With `-m`, changes made to the working tree 96file can be discarded to re-create the original conflicted merge result. 97 98'git checkout' (-p|--patch) [<tree-ish>] [--] [<pathspec>...]:: 99 This is similar to the "check out paths to the working tree 100 from either the index or from a tree-ish" mode described 101 above, but lets you use the interactive interface to show 102 the "diff" output and choose which hunks to use in the 103 result. See below for the description of `--patch` option. 104 105 106OPTIONS 107------- 108-q:: 109--quiet:: 110 Quiet, suppress feedback messages. 111 112--[no-]progress:: 113 Progress status is reported on the standard error stream 114 by default when it is attached to a terminal, unless `--quiet` 115 is specified. This flag enables progress reporting even if not 116 attached to a terminal, regardless of `--quiet`. 117 118-f:: 119--force:: 120 When switching branches, proceed even if the index or the 121 working tree differs from HEAD. This is used to throw away 122 local changes. 123+ 124When checking out paths from the index, do not fail upon unmerged 125entries; instead, unmerged entries are ignored. 126 127--ours:: 128--theirs:: 129 When checking out paths from the index, check out stage #2 130 ('ours') or #3 ('theirs') for unmerged paths. 131+ 132Note that during `git rebase` and `git pull --rebase`, 'ours' and 133'theirs' may appear swapped; `--ours` gives the version from the 134branch the changes are rebased onto, while `--theirs` gives the 135version from the branch that holds your work that is being rebased. 136+ 137This is because `rebase` is used in a workflow that treats the 138history at the remote as the shared canonical one, and treats the 139work done on the branch you are rebasing as the third-party work to 140be integrated, and you are temporarily assuming the role of the 141keeper of the canonical history during the rebase. As the keeper of 142the canonical history, you need to view the history from the remote 143as `ours` (i.e. "our shared canonical history"), while what you did 144on your side branch as `theirs` (i.e. "one contributor's work on top 145of it"). 146 147-b <new_branch>:: 148 Create a new branch named <new_branch> and start it at 149 <start_point>; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. 150 151-B <new_branch>:: 152 Creates the branch <new_branch> and start it at <start_point>; 153 if it already exists, then reset it to <start_point>. This is 154 equivalent to running "git branch" with "-f"; see 155 linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. 156 157-t:: 158--track:: 159 When creating a new branch, set up "upstream" configuration. See 160 "--track" in linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. 161+ 162If no `-b` option is given, the name of the new branch will be 163derived from the remote-tracking branch, by looking at the local part of 164the refspec configured for the corresponding remote, and then stripping 165the initial part up to the "*". 166This would tell us to use "hack" as the local branch when branching 167off of "origin/hack" (or "remotes/origin/hack", or even 168"refs/remotes/origin/hack"). If the given name has no slash, or the above 169guessing results in an empty name, the guessing is aborted. You can 170explicitly give a name with `-b` in such a case. 171 172--no-track:: 173 Do not set up "upstream" configuration, even if the 174 branch.autoSetupMerge configuration variable is true. 175 176-l:: 177 Create the new branch's reflog; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for 178 details. 179 180--detach:: 181 Rather than checking out a branch to work on it, check out a 182 commit for inspection and discardable experiments. 183 This is the default behavior of "git checkout <commit>" when 184 <commit> is not a branch name. See the "DETACHED HEAD" section 185 below for details. 186 187--orphan <new_branch>:: 188 Create a new 'orphan' branch, named <new_branch>, started from 189 <start_point> and switch to it. The first commit made on this 190 new branch will have no parents and it will be the root of a new 191 history totally disconnected from all the other branches and 192 commits. 193+ 194The index and the working tree are adjusted as if you had previously run 195"git checkout <start_point>". This allows you to start a new history 196that records a set of paths similar to <start_point> by easily running 197"git commit -a" to make the root commit. 198+ 199This can be useful when you want to publish the tree from a commit 200without exposing its full history. You might want to do this to publish 201an open source branch of a project whose current tree is "clean", but 202whose full history contains proprietary or otherwise encumbered bits of 203code. 204+ 205If you want to start a disconnected history that records a set of paths 206that is totally different from the one of <start_point>, then you should 207clear the index and the working tree right after creating the orphan 208branch by running "git rm -rf ." from the top level of the working tree. 209Afterwards you will be ready to prepare your new files, repopulating the 210working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. 211 212--ignore-skip-worktree-bits:: 213 In sparse checkout mode, `git checkout -- <paths>` would 214 update only entries matched by <paths> and sparse patterns 215 in $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout. This option ignores 216 the sparse patterns and adds back any files in <paths>. 217 218-m:: 219--merge:: 220 When switching branches, 221 if you have local modifications to one or more files that 222 are different between the current branch and the branch to 223 which you are switching, the command refuses to switch 224 branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. 225 However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current 226 branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch 227 is done, and you will be on the new branch. 228+ 229When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting 230paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts 231and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge 232should result in deletion of the path). 233+ 234When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate 235the conflicted merge in the specified paths. 236 237--conflict=<style>:: 238 The same as --merge option above, but changes the way the 239 conflicting hunks are presented, overriding the 240 merge.conflictStyle configuration variable. Possible values are 241 "merge" (default) and "diff3" (in addition to what is shown by 242 "merge" style, shows the original contents). 243 244-p:: 245--patch:: 246 Interactively select hunks in the difference between the 247 <tree-ish> (or the index, if unspecified) and the working 248 tree. The chosen hunks are then applied in reverse to the 249 working tree (and if a <tree-ish> was specified, the index). 250+ 251This means that you can use `git checkout -p` to selectively discard 252edits from your current working tree. See the ``Interactive Mode'' 253section of linkgit:git-add[1] to learn how to operate the `--patch` mode. 254 255--ignore-other-worktrees:: 256 `git checkout` refuses when the wanted ref is already checked 257 out by another worktree. This option makes it check the ref 258 out anyway. In other words, the ref can be held by more than one 259 worktree. 260 261--[no-]recurse-submodules:: 262 Using --recurse-submodules will update the content of all initialized 263 submodules according to the commit recorded in the superproject. If 264 local modifications in a submodule would be overwritten the checkout 265 will fail unless `-f` is used. If nothing (or --no-recurse-submodules) 266 is used, the work trees of submodules will not be updated. 267 268<branch>:: 269 Branch to checkout; if it refers to a branch (i.e., a name that, 270 when prepended with "refs/heads/", is a valid ref), then that 271 branch is checked out. Otherwise, if it refers to a valid 272 commit, your HEAD becomes "detached" and you are no longer on 273 any branch (see below for details). 274+ 275As a special case, the `"@{-N}"` syntax for the N-th last branch/commit 276checks out branches (instead of detaching). You may also specify 277`-` which is synonymous with `"@{-1}"`. 278+ 279As a further special case, you may use `"A...B"` as a shortcut for the 280merge base of `A` and `B` if there is exactly one merge base. You can 281leave out at most one of `A` and `B`, in which case it defaults to `HEAD`. 282 283<new_branch>:: 284 Name for the new branch. 285 286<start_point>:: 287 The name of a commit at which to start the new branch; see 288 linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. Defaults to HEAD. 289 290<tree-ish>:: 291 Tree to checkout from (when paths are given). If not specified, 292 the index will be used. 293 294 295 296DETACHED HEAD 297------------- 298HEAD normally refers to a named branch (e.g. 'master'). Meanwhile, each 299branch refers to a specific commit. Let's look at a repo with three 300commits, one of them tagged, and with branch 'master' checked out: 301 302------------ 303 HEAD (refers to branch 'master') 304 | 305 v 306a---b---c branch 'master' (refers to commit 'c') 307 ^ 308 | 309 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 310------------ 311 312When a commit is created in this state, the branch is updated to refer to 313the new commit. Specifically, 'git commit' creates a new commit 'd', whose 314parent is commit 'c', and then updates branch 'master' to refer to new 315commit 'd'. HEAD still refers to branch 'master' and so indirectly now refers 316to commit 'd': 317 318------------ 319$ edit; git add; git commit 320 321 HEAD (refers to branch 'master') 322 | 323 v 324a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 325 ^ 326 | 327 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 328------------ 329 330It is sometimes useful to be able to checkout a commit that is not at 331the tip of any named branch, or even to create a new commit that is not 332referenced by a named branch. Let's look at what happens when we 333checkout commit 'b' (here we show two ways this may be done): 334 335------------ 336$ git checkout v2.0 # or 337$ git checkout master^^ 338 339 HEAD (refers to commit 'b') 340 | 341 v 342a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 343 ^ 344 | 345 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 346------------ 347 348Notice that regardless of which checkout command we use, HEAD now refers 349directly to commit 'b'. This is known as being in detached HEAD state. 350It means simply that HEAD refers to a specific commit, as opposed to 351referring to a named branch. Let's see what happens when we create a commit: 352 353------------ 354$ edit; git add; git commit 355 356 HEAD (refers to commit 'e') 357 | 358 v 359 e 360 / 361a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 362 ^ 363 | 364 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 365------------ 366 367There is now a new commit 'e', but it is referenced only by HEAD. We can 368of course add yet another commit in this state: 369 370------------ 371$ edit; git add; git commit 372 373 HEAD (refers to commit 'f') 374 | 375 v 376 e---f 377 / 378a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 379 ^ 380 | 381 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 382------------ 383 384In fact, we can perform all the normal Git operations. But, let's look 385at what happens when we then checkout master: 386 387------------ 388$ git checkout master 389 390 HEAD (refers to branch 'master') 391 e---f | 392 / v 393a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 394 ^ 395 | 396 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 397------------ 398 399It is important to realize that at this point nothing refers to commit 400'f'. Eventually commit 'f' (and by extension commit 'e') will be deleted 401by the routine Git garbage collection process, unless we create a reference 402before that happens. If we have not yet moved away from commit 'f', 403any of these will create a reference to it: 404 405------------ 406$ git checkout -b foo <1> 407$ git branch foo <2> 408$ git tag foo <3> 409------------ 410 411<1> creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', and then 412updates HEAD to refer to branch 'foo'. In other words, we'll no longer 413be in detached HEAD state after this command. 414 415<2> similarly creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', 416but leaves HEAD detached. 417 418<3> creates a new tag 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', 419leaving HEAD detached. 420 421If we have moved away from commit 'f', then we must first recover its object 422name (typically by using git reflog), and then we can create a reference to 423it. For example, to see the last two commits to which HEAD referred, we 424can use either of these commands: 425 426------------ 427$ git reflog -2 HEAD # or 428$ git log -g -2 HEAD 429------------ 430 431ARGUMENT DISAMBIGUATION 432----------------------- 433 434When there is only one argument given and it is not `--` (e.g. "git 435checkout abc"), and when the argument is both a valid `<tree-ish>` 436(e.g. a branch "abc" exists) and a valid `<pathspec>` (e.g. a file 437or a directory whose name is "abc" exists), Git would usually ask 438you to disambiguate. Because checking out a branch is so common an 439operation, however, "git checkout abc" takes "abc" as a `<tree-ish>` 440in such a situation. Use `git checkout -- <pathspec>` if you want 441to checkout these paths out of the index. 442 443EXAMPLES 444-------- 445 446. The following sequence checks out the `master` branch, reverts 447the `Makefile` to two revisions back, deletes hello.c by 448mistake, and gets it back from the index. 449+ 450------------ 451$ git checkout master <1> 452$ git checkout master~2 Makefile <2> 453$ rm -f hello.c 454$ git checkout hello.c <3> 455------------ 456+ 457<1> switch branch 458<2> take a file out of another commit 459<3> restore hello.c from the index 460+ 461If you want to check out _all_ C source files out of the index, 462you can say 463+ 464------------ 465$ git checkout -- '*.c' 466------------ 467+ 468Note the quotes around `*.c`. The file `hello.c` will also be 469checked out, even though it is no longer in the working tree, 470because the file globbing is used to match entries in the index 471(not in the working tree by the shell). 472+ 473If you have an unfortunate branch that is named `hello.c`, this 474step would be confused as an instruction to switch to that branch. 475You should instead write: 476+ 477------------ 478$ git checkout -- hello.c 479------------ 480 481. After working in the wrong branch, switching to the correct 482branch would be done using: 483+ 484------------ 485$ git checkout mytopic 486------------ 487+ 488However, your "wrong" branch and correct "mytopic" branch may 489differ in files that you have modified locally, in which case 490the above checkout would fail like this: 491+ 492------------ 493$ git checkout mytopic 494error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. 495------------ 496+ 497You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a 498three-way merge: 499+ 500------------ 501$ git checkout -m mytopic 502Auto-merging frotz 503------------ 504+ 505After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ 506registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what 507changes you made since the tip of the new branch. 508 509. When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with 510the `-m` option, you would see something like this: 511+ 512------------ 513$ git checkout -m mytopic 514Auto-merging frotz 515ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz 516fatal: merge program failed 517------------ 518+ 519At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in 520the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted 521files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with 522`git add` as usual: 523+ 524------------ 525$ edit frotz 526$ git add frotz 527------------ 528 529GIT 530--- 531Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite