Documentation / technical / racy-git.txton commit clone: use --progress to force progress reporting (5a518ad)
   1Use of index and Racy git problem
   2=================================
   3
   4Background
   5----------
   6
   7The index is one of the most important data structures in git.
   8It represents a virtual working tree state by recording list of
   9paths and their object names and serves as a staging area to
  10write out the next tree object to be committed.  The state is
  11"virtual" in the sense that it does not necessarily have to, and
  12often does not, match the files in the working tree.
  13
  14There are cases git needs to examine the differences between the
  15virtual working tree state in the index and the files in the
  16working tree.  The most obvious case is when the user asks `git
  17diff` (or its low level implementation, `git diff-files`) or
  18`git-ls-files --modified`.  In addition, git internally checks
  19if the files in the working tree are different from what are
  20recorded in the index to avoid stomping on local changes in them
  21during patch application, switching branches, and merging.
  22
  23In order to speed up this comparison between the files in the
  24working tree and the index entries, the index entries record the
  25information obtained from the filesystem via `lstat(2)` system
  26call when they were last updated.  When checking if they differ,
  27git first runs `lstat(2)` on the files and compares the result
  28with this information (this is what was originally done by the
  29`ce_match_stat()` function, but the current code does it in
  30`ce_match_stat_basic()` function).  If some of these "cached
  31stat information" fields do not match, git can tell that the
  32files are modified without even looking at their contents.
  33
  34Note: not all members in `struct stat` obtained via `lstat(2)`
  35are used for this comparison.  For example, `st_atime` obviously
  36is not useful.  Currently, git compares the file type (regular
  37files vs symbolic links) and executable bits (only for regular
  38files) from `st_mode` member, `st_mtime` and `st_ctime`
  39timestamps, `st_uid`, `st_gid`, `st_ino`, and `st_size` members.
  40With a `USE_STDEV` compile-time option, `st_dev` is also
  41compared, but this is not enabled by default because this member
  42is not stable on network filesystems.  With `USE_NSEC`
  43compile-time option, `st_mtim.tv_nsec` and `st_ctim.tv_nsec`
  44members are also compared, but this is not enabled by default
  45because in-core timestamps can have finer granularity than
  46on-disk timestamps, resulting in meaningless changes when an
  47inode is evicted from the inode cache.  See commit 8ce13b0
  48of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git
  49([PATCH] Sync in core time granuality with filesystems,
  502005-01-04).
  51
  52Racy git
  53--------
  54
  55There is one slight problem with the optimization based on the
  56cached stat information.  Consider this sequence:
  57
  58  : modify 'foo'
  59  $ git update-index 'foo'
  60  : modify 'foo' again, in-place, without changing its size
  61
  62The first `update-index` computes the object name of the
  63contents of file `foo` and updates the index entry for `foo`
  64along with the `struct stat` information.  If the modification
  65that follows it happens very fast so that the file's `st_mtime`
  66timestamp does not change, after this sequence, the cached stat
  67information the index entry records still exactly match what you
  68would see in the filesystem, even though the file `foo` is now
  69different.
  70This way, git can incorrectly think files in the working tree
  71are unmodified even though they actually are.  This is called
  72the "racy git" problem (discovered by Pasky), and the entries
  73that appear clean when they may not be because of this problem
  74are called "racily clean".
  75
  76To avoid this problem, git does two things:
  77
  78. When the cached stat information says the file has not been
  79  modified, and the `st_mtime` is the same as (or newer than)
  80  the timestamp of the index file itself (which is the time `git
  81  update-index foo` finished running in the above example), it
  82  also compares the contents with the object registered in the
  83  index entry to make sure they match.
  84
  85. When the index file is updated that contains racily clean
  86  entries, cached `st_size` information is truncated to zero
  87  before writing a new version of the index file.
  88
  89Because the index file itself is written after collecting all
  90the stat information from updated paths, `st_mtime` timestamp of
  91it is usually the same as or newer than any of the paths the
  92index contains.  And no matter how quick the modification that
  93follows `git update-index foo` finishes, the resulting
  94`st_mtime` timestamp on `foo` cannot get a value earlier
  95than the index file.  Therefore, index entries that can be
  96racily clean are limited to the ones that have the same
  97timestamp as the index file itself.
  98
  99The callers that want to check if an index entry matches the
 100corresponding file in the working tree continue to call
 101`ce_match_stat()`, but with this change, `ce_match_stat()` uses
 102`ce_modified_check_fs()` to see if racily clean ones are
 103actually clean after comparing the cached stat information using
 104`ce_match_stat_basic()`.
 105
 106The problem the latter solves is this sequence:
 107
 108  $ git update-index 'foo'
 109  : modify 'foo' in-place without changing its size
 110  : wait for enough time
 111  $ git update-index 'bar'
 112
 113Without the latter, the timestamp of the index file gets a newer
 114value, and falsely clean entry `foo` would not be caught by the
 115timestamp comparison check done with the former logic anymore.
 116The latter makes sure that the cached stat information for `foo`
 117would never match with the file in the working tree, so later
 118checks by `ce_match_stat_basic()` would report that the index entry
 119does not match the file and git does not have to fall back on more
 120expensive `ce_modified_check_fs()`.
 121
 122
 123Runtime penalty
 124---------------
 125
 126The runtime penalty of falling back to `ce_modified_check_fs()`
 127from `ce_match_stat()` can be very expensive when there are many
 128racily clean entries.  An obvious way to artificially create
 129this situation is to give the same timestamp to all the files in
 130the working tree in a large project, run `git update-index` on
 131them, and give the same timestamp to the index file:
 132
 133  $ date >.datestamp
 134  $ git ls-files | xargs touch -r .datestamp
 135  $ git ls-files | git update-index --stdin
 136  $ touch -r .datestamp .git/index
 137
 138This will make all index entries racily clean.  The linux-2.6
 139project, for example, there are over 20,000 files in the working
 140tree.  On my Athlon 64 X2 3800+, after the above:
 141
 142  $ /usr/bin/time git diff-files
 143  1.68user 0.54system 0:02.22elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
 144  0inputs+0outputs (0major+67111minor)pagefaults 0swaps
 145  $ git update-index MAINTAINERS
 146  $ /usr/bin/time git diff-files
 147  0.02user 0.12system 0:00.14elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
 148  0inputs+0outputs (0major+935minor)pagefaults 0swaps
 149
 150Running `git update-index` in the middle checked the racily
 151clean entries, and left the cached `st_mtime` for all the paths
 152intact because they were actually clean (so this step took about
 153the same amount of time as the first `git diff-files`).  After
 154that, they are not racily clean anymore but are truly clean, so
 155the second invocation of `git diff-files` fully took advantage
 156of the cached stat information.
 157
 158
 159Avoiding runtime penalty
 160------------------------
 161
 162In order to avoid the above runtime penalty, post 1.4.2 git used
 163to have a code that made sure the index file
 164got timestamp newer than the youngest files in the index when
 165there are many young files with the same timestamp as the
 166resulting index file would otherwise would have by waiting
 167before finishing writing the index file out.
 168
 169I suspected that in practice the situation where many paths in the
 170index are all racily clean was quite rare.  The only code paths
 171that can record recent timestamp for large number of paths are:
 172
 173. Initial `git add .` of a large project.
 174
 175. `git checkout` of a large project from an empty index into an
 176  unpopulated working tree.
 177
 178Note: switching branches with `git checkout` keeps the cached
 179stat information of existing working tree files that are the
 180same between the current branch and the new branch, which are
 181all older than the resulting index file, and they will not
 182become racily clean.  Only the files that are actually checked
 183out can become racily clean.
 184
 185In a large project where raciness avoidance cost really matters,
 186however, the initial computation of all object names in the
 187index takes more than one second, and the index file is written
 188out after all that happens.  Therefore the timestamp of the
 189index file will be more than one seconds later than the
 190youngest file in the working tree.  This means that in these
 191cases there actually will not be any racily clean entry in
 192the resulting index.
 193
 194Based on this discussion, the current code does not use the
 195"workaround" to avoid the runtime penalty that does not exist in
 196practice anymore.  This was done with commit 0fc82cff on Aug 15,
 1972006.