Documentation / git-checkout.txton commit diff: recurse into nested submodules for inline diff (5a52214)
   1git-checkout(1)
   2===============
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-checkout - Switch branches or restore working tree files
   7
   8SYNOPSIS
   9--------
  10[verse]
  11'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [<branch>]
  12'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] --detach [<branch>]
  13'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [--detach] <commit>
  14'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [[-b|-B|--orphan] <new_branch>] [<start_point>]
  15'git checkout' [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] [--] <paths>...
  16'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] [<paths>...]
  17
  18DESCRIPTION
  19-----------
  20Updates files in the working tree to match the version in the index
  21or the specified tree.  If no paths are given, 'git checkout' will
  22also update `HEAD` to set the specified branch as the current
  23branch.
  24
  25'git checkout' <branch>::
  26        To prepare for working on <branch>, switch to it by updating
  27        the index and the files in the working tree, and by pointing
  28        HEAD at the branch. Local modifications to the files in the
  29        working tree are kept, so that they can be committed to the
  30        <branch>.
  31+
  32If <branch> is not found but there does exist a tracking branch in
  33exactly one remote (call it <remote>) with a matching name, treat as
  34equivalent to
  35+
  36------------
  37$ git checkout -b <branch> --track <remote>/<branch>
  38------------
  39+
  40You could omit <branch>, in which case the command degenerates to
  41"check out the current branch", which is a glorified no-op with a
  42rather expensive side-effects to show only the tracking information,
  43if exists, for the current branch.
  44
  45'git checkout' -b|-B <new_branch> [<start point>]::
  46
  47        Specifying `-b` causes a new branch to be created as if
  48        linkgit:git-branch[1] were called and then checked out.  In
  49        this case you can use the `--track` or `--no-track` options,
  50        which will be passed to 'git branch'.  As a convenience,
  51        `--track` without `-b` implies branch creation; see the
  52        description of `--track` below.
  53+
  54If `-B` is given, <new_branch> is created if it doesn't exist; otherwise, it
  55is reset. This is the transactional equivalent of
  56+
  57------------
  58$ git branch -f <branch> [<start point>]
  59$ git checkout <branch>
  60------------
  61+
  62that is to say, the branch is not reset/created unless "git checkout" is
  63successful.
  64
  65'git checkout' --detach [<branch>]::
  66'git checkout' [--detach] <commit>::
  67
  68        Prepare to work on top of <commit>, by detaching HEAD at it
  69        (see "DETACHED HEAD" section), and updating the index and the
  70        files in the working tree.  Local modifications to the files
  71        in the working tree are kept, so that the resulting working
  72        tree will be the state recorded in the commit plus the local
  73        modifications.
  74+
  75When the <commit> argument is a branch name, the `--detach` option can
  76be used to detach HEAD at the tip of the branch (`git checkout
  77<branch>` would check out that branch without detaching HEAD).
  78+
  79Omitting <branch> detaches HEAD at the tip of the current branch.
  80
  81'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>...::
  82
  83        When <paths> or `--patch` are given, 'git checkout' does *not*
  84        switch branches.  It updates the named paths in the working tree
  85        from the index file or from a named <tree-ish> (most often a
  86        commit).  In this case, the `-b` and `--track` options are
  87        meaningless and giving either of them results in an error.  The
  88        <tree-ish> argument can be used to specify a specific tree-ish
  89        (i.e.  commit, tag or tree) to update the index for the given
  90        paths before updating the working tree.
  91+
  92'git checkout' with <paths> or `--patch` is used to restore modified or
  93deleted paths to their original contents from the index or replace paths
  94with the contents from a named <tree-ish> (most often a commit-ish).
  95+
  96The index may contain unmerged entries because of a previous failed merge.
  97By default, if you try to check out such an entry from the index, the
  98checkout operation will fail and nothing will be checked out.
  99Using `-f` will ignore these unmerged entries.  The contents from a
 100specific side of the merge can be checked out of the index by
 101using `--ours` or `--theirs`.  With `-m`, changes made to the working tree
 102file can be discarded to re-create the original conflicted merge result.
 103
 104OPTIONS
 105-------
 106-q::
 107--quiet::
 108        Quiet, suppress feedback messages.
 109
 110--[no-]progress::
 111        Progress status is reported on the standard error stream
 112        by default when it is attached to a terminal, unless `--quiet`
 113        is specified. This flag enables progress reporting even if not
 114        attached to a terminal, regardless of `--quiet`.
 115
 116-f::
 117--force::
 118        When switching branches, proceed even if the index or the
 119        working tree differs from HEAD.  This is used to throw away
 120        local changes.
 121+
 122When checking out paths from the index, do not fail upon unmerged
 123entries; instead, unmerged entries are ignored.
 124
 125--ours::
 126--theirs::
 127        When checking out paths from the index, check out stage #2
 128        ('ours') or #3 ('theirs') for unmerged paths.
 129+
 130Note that during `git rebase` and `git pull --rebase`, 'ours' and
 131'theirs' may appear swapped; `--ours` gives the version from the
 132branch the changes are rebased onto, while `--theirs` gives the
 133version from the branch that holds your work that is being rebased.
 134+
 135This is because `rebase` is used in a workflow that treats the
 136history at the remote as the shared canonical one, and treats the
 137work done on the branch you are rebasing as the third-party work to
 138be integrated, and you are temporarily assuming the role of the
 139keeper of the canonical history during the rebase.  As the keeper of
 140the canonical history, you need to view the history from the remote
 141as `ours` (i.e. "our shared canonical history"), while what you did
 142on your side branch as `theirs` (i.e. "one contributor's work on top
 143of it").
 144
 145-b <new_branch>::
 146        Create a new branch named <new_branch> and start it at
 147        <start_point>; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for details.
 148
 149-B <new_branch>::
 150        Creates the branch <new_branch> and start it at <start_point>;
 151        if it already exists, then reset it to <start_point>. This is
 152        equivalent to running "git branch" with "-f"; see
 153        linkgit:git-branch[1] for details.
 154
 155-t::
 156--track::
 157        When creating a new branch, set up "upstream" configuration. See
 158        "--track" in linkgit:git-branch[1] for details.
 159+
 160If no `-b` option is given, the name of the new branch will be
 161derived from the remote-tracking branch, by looking at the local part of
 162the refspec configured for the corresponding remote, and then stripping
 163the initial part up to the "*".
 164This would tell us to use "hack" as the local branch when branching
 165off of "origin/hack" (or "remotes/origin/hack", or even
 166"refs/remotes/origin/hack").  If the given name has no slash, or the above
 167guessing results in an empty name, the guessing is aborted.  You can
 168explicitly give a name with `-b` in such a case.
 169
 170--no-track::
 171        Do not set up "upstream" configuration, even if the
 172        branch.autoSetupMerge configuration variable is true.
 173
 174-l::
 175        Create the new branch's reflog; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for
 176        details.
 177
 178--detach::
 179        Rather than checking out a branch to work on it, check out a
 180        commit for inspection and discardable experiments.
 181        This is the default behavior of "git checkout <commit>" when
 182        <commit> is not a branch name.  See the "DETACHED HEAD" section
 183        below for details.
 184
 185--orphan <new_branch>::
 186        Create a new 'orphan' branch, named <new_branch>, started from
 187        <start_point> and switch to it.  The first commit made on this
 188        new branch will have no parents and it will be the root of a new
 189        history totally disconnected from all the other branches and
 190        commits.
 191+
 192The index and the working tree are adjusted as if you had previously run
 193"git checkout <start_point>".  This allows you to start a new history
 194that records a set of paths similar to <start_point> by easily running
 195"git commit -a" to make the root commit.
 196+
 197This can be useful when you want to publish the tree from a commit
 198without exposing its full history. You might want to do this to publish
 199an open source branch of a project whose current tree is "clean", but
 200whose full history contains proprietary or otherwise encumbered bits of
 201code.
 202+
 203If you want to start a disconnected history that records a set of paths
 204that is totally different from the one of <start_point>, then you should
 205clear the index and the working tree right after creating the orphan
 206branch by running "git rm -rf ." from the top level of the working tree.
 207Afterwards you will be ready to prepare your new files, repopulating the
 208working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc.
 209
 210--ignore-skip-worktree-bits::
 211        In sparse checkout mode, `git checkout -- <paths>` would
 212        update only entries matched by <paths> and sparse patterns
 213        in $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout. This option ignores
 214        the sparse patterns and adds back any files in <paths>.
 215
 216-m::
 217--merge::
 218        When switching branches,
 219        if you have local modifications to one or more files that
 220        are different between the current branch and the branch to
 221        which you are switching, the command refuses to switch
 222        branches in order to preserve your modifications in context.
 223        However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current
 224        branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch
 225        is done, and you will be on the new branch.
 226+
 227When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting
 228paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts
 229and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge
 230should result in deletion of the path).
 231+
 232When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate
 233the conflicted merge in the specified paths.
 234
 235--conflict=<style>::
 236        The same as --merge option above, but changes the way the
 237        conflicting hunks are presented, overriding the
 238        merge.conflictStyle configuration variable.  Possible values are
 239        "merge" (default) and "diff3" (in addition to what is shown by
 240        "merge" style, shows the original contents).
 241
 242-p::
 243--patch::
 244        Interactively select hunks in the difference between the
 245        <tree-ish> (or the index, if unspecified) and the working
 246        tree.  The chosen hunks are then applied in reverse to the
 247        working tree (and if a <tree-ish> was specified, the index).
 248+
 249This means that you can use `git checkout -p` to selectively discard
 250edits from your current working tree. See the ``Interactive Mode''
 251section of linkgit:git-add[1] to learn how to operate the `--patch` mode.
 252
 253--ignore-other-worktrees::
 254        `git checkout` refuses when the wanted ref is already checked
 255        out by another worktree. This option makes it check the ref
 256        out anyway. In other words, the ref can be held by more than one
 257        worktree.
 258
 259<branch>::
 260        Branch to checkout; if it refers to a branch (i.e., a name that,
 261        when prepended with "refs/heads/", is a valid ref), then that
 262        branch is checked out. Otherwise, if it refers to a valid
 263        commit, your HEAD becomes "detached" and you are no longer on
 264        any branch (see below for details).
 265+
 266As a special case, the `"@{-N}"` syntax for the N-th last branch/commit
 267checks out branches (instead of detaching).  You may also specify
 268`-` which is synonymous with `"@{-1}"`.
 269+
 270As a further special case, you may use `"A...B"` as a shortcut for the
 271merge base of `A` and `B` if there is exactly one merge base. You can
 272leave out at most one of `A` and `B`, in which case it defaults to `HEAD`.
 273
 274<new_branch>::
 275        Name for the new branch.
 276
 277<start_point>::
 278        The name of a commit at which to start the new branch; see
 279        linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. Defaults to HEAD.
 280
 281<tree-ish>::
 282        Tree to checkout from (when paths are given). If not specified,
 283        the index will be used.
 284
 285
 286
 287DETACHED HEAD
 288-------------
 289HEAD normally refers to a named branch (e.g. 'master'). Meanwhile, each
 290branch refers to a specific commit. Let's look at a repo with three
 291commits, one of them tagged, and with branch 'master' checked out:
 292
 293------------
 294           HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
 295            |
 296            v
 297a---b---c  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'c')
 298    ^
 299    |
 300  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 301------------
 302
 303When a commit is created in this state, the branch is updated to refer to
 304the new commit. Specifically, 'git commit' creates a new commit 'd', whose
 305parent is commit 'c', and then updates branch 'master' to refer to new
 306commit 'd'. HEAD still refers to branch 'master' and so indirectly now refers
 307to commit 'd':
 308
 309------------
 310$ edit; git add; git commit
 311
 312               HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
 313                |
 314                v
 315a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 316    ^
 317    |
 318  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 319------------
 320
 321It is sometimes useful to be able to checkout a commit that is not at
 322the tip of any named branch, or even to create a new commit that is not
 323referenced by a named branch. Let's look at what happens when we
 324checkout commit 'b' (here we show two ways this may be done):
 325
 326------------
 327$ git checkout v2.0  # or
 328$ git checkout master^^
 329
 330   HEAD (refers to commit 'b')
 331    |
 332    v
 333a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 334    ^
 335    |
 336  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 337------------
 338
 339Notice that regardless of which checkout command we use, HEAD now refers
 340directly to commit 'b'. This is known as being in detached HEAD state.
 341It means simply that HEAD refers to a specific commit, as opposed to
 342referring to a named branch. Let's see what happens when we create a commit:
 343
 344------------
 345$ edit; git add; git commit
 346
 347     HEAD (refers to commit 'e')
 348      |
 349      v
 350      e
 351     /
 352a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 353    ^
 354    |
 355  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 356------------
 357
 358There is now a new commit 'e', but it is referenced only by HEAD. We can
 359of course add yet another commit in this state:
 360
 361------------
 362$ edit; git add; git commit
 363
 364         HEAD (refers to commit 'f')
 365          |
 366          v
 367      e---f
 368     /
 369a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 370    ^
 371    |
 372  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 373------------
 374
 375In fact, we can perform all the normal Git operations. But, let's look
 376at what happens when we then checkout master:
 377
 378------------
 379$ git checkout master
 380
 381               HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
 382      e---f     |
 383     /          v
 384a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 385    ^
 386    |
 387  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 388------------
 389
 390It is important to realize that at this point nothing refers to commit
 391'f'. Eventually commit 'f' (and by extension commit 'e') will be deleted
 392by the routine Git garbage collection process, unless we create a reference
 393before that happens. If we have not yet moved away from commit 'f',
 394any of these will create a reference to it:
 395
 396------------
 397$ git checkout -b foo   <1>
 398$ git branch foo        <2>
 399$ git tag foo           <3>
 400------------
 401
 402<1> creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', and then
 403updates HEAD to refer to branch 'foo'. In other words, we'll no longer
 404be in detached HEAD state after this command.
 405
 406<2> similarly creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f',
 407but leaves HEAD detached.
 408
 409<3> creates a new tag 'foo', which refers to commit 'f',
 410leaving HEAD detached.
 411
 412If we have moved away from commit 'f', then we must first recover its object
 413name (typically by using git reflog), and then we can create a reference to
 414it. For example, to see the last two commits to which HEAD referred, we
 415can use either of these commands:
 416
 417------------
 418$ git reflog -2 HEAD # or
 419$ git log -g -2 HEAD
 420------------
 421
 422EXAMPLES
 423--------
 424
 425. The following sequence checks out the `master` branch, reverts
 426the `Makefile` to two revisions back, deletes hello.c by
 427mistake, and gets it back from the index.
 428+
 429------------
 430$ git checkout master             <1>
 431$ git checkout master~2 Makefile  <2>
 432$ rm -f hello.c
 433$ git checkout hello.c            <3>
 434------------
 435+
 436<1> switch branch
 437<2> take a file out of another commit
 438<3> restore hello.c from the index
 439+
 440If you want to check out _all_ C source files out of the index,
 441you can say
 442+
 443------------
 444$ git checkout -- '*.c'
 445------------
 446+
 447Note the quotes around `*.c`.  The file `hello.c` will also be
 448checked out, even though it is no longer in the working tree,
 449because the file globbing is used to match entries in the index
 450(not in the working tree by the shell).
 451+
 452If you have an unfortunate branch that is named `hello.c`, this
 453step would be confused as an instruction to switch to that branch.
 454You should instead write:
 455+
 456------------
 457$ git checkout -- hello.c
 458------------
 459
 460. After working in the wrong branch, switching to the correct
 461branch would be done using:
 462+
 463------------
 464$ git checkout mytopic
 465------------
 466+
 467However, your "wrong" branch and correct "mytopic" branch may
 468differ in files that you have modified locally, in which case
 469the above checkout would fail like this:
 470+
 471------------
 472$ git checkout mytopic
 473error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches.
 474------------
 475+
 476You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a
 477three-way merge:
 478+
 479------------
 480$ git checkout -m mytopic
 481Auto-merging frotz
 482------------
 483+
 484After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_
 485registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what
 486changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
 487
 488. When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with
 489the `-m` option, you would see something like this:
 490+
 491------------
 492$ git checkout -m mytopic
 493Auto-merging frotz
 494ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz
 495fatal: merge program failed
 496------------
 497+
 498At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in
 499the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted
 500files.  Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with
 501`git add` as usual:
 502+
 503------------
 504$ edit frotz
 505$ git add frotz
 506------------
 507
 508GIT
 509---
 510Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite