Documentation / git-merge.txton commit docs: give more hints about how "add -e" works (5df4d67)
   1git-merge(1)
   2============
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-merge - Join two or more development histories together
   7
   8
   9SYNOPSIS
  10--------
  11[verse]
  12'git merge' [-n] [--stat] [--no-commit] [--squash]
  13        [-s <strategy>] [-X <strategy-option>]
  14        [--[no-]rerere-autoupdate] [-m <msg>] <commit>...
  15'git merge' <msg> HEAD <commit>...
  16
  17DESCRIPTION
  18-----------
  19Incorporates changes from the named commits (since the time their
  20histories diverged from the current branch) into the current
  21branch.  This command is used by 'git pull' to incorporate changes
  22from another repository and can be used by hand to merge changes
  23from one branch into another.
  24
  25Assume the following history exists and the current branch is
  26"`master`":
  27
  28------------
  29          A---B---C topic
  30         /
  31    D---E---F---G master
  32------------
  33
  34Then "`git merge topic`" will replay the changes made on the
  35`topic` branch since it diverged from `master` (i.e., `E`) until
  36its current commit (`C`) on top of `master`, and record the result
  37in a new commit along with the names of the two parent commits and
  38a log message from the user describing the changes.
  39
  40------------
  41          A---B---C topic
  42         /         \
  43    D---E---F---G---H master
  44------------
  45
  46The second syntax (<msg> `HEAD` <commit>...) is supported for
  47historical reasons.  Do not use it from the command line or in
  48new scripts.  It is the same as `git merge -m <msg> <commit>...`.
  49
  50*Warning*: Running 'git merge' with uncommitted changes is
  51discouraged: while possible, it leaves you in a state that is hard to
  52back out of in the case of a conflict.
  53
  54
  55OPTIONS
  56-------
  57include::merge-options.txt[]
  58
  59-m <msg>::
  60        Set the commit message to be used for the merge commit (in
  61        case one is created).
  62
  63        If `--log` is specified, a shortlog of the commits being merged
  64        will be appended to the specified message.
  65
  66        The 'git fmt-merge-msg' command can be
  67        used to give a good default for automated 'git merge'
  68        invocations.
  69
  70--rerere-autoupdate::
  71--no-rerere-autoupdate::
  72        Allow the rerere mechanism to update the index with the
  73        result of auto-conflict resolution if possible.
  74
  75<commit>...::
  76        Commits, usually other branch heads, to merge into our branch.
  77        You need at least one <commit>.  Specifying more than one
  78        <commit> obviously means you are trying an Octopus.
  79
  80
  81PRE-MERGE CHECKS
  82----------------
  83
  84Before applying outside changes, you should get your own work in
  85good shape and committed locally, so it will not be clobbered if
  86there are conflicts.  See also linkgit:git-stash[1].
  87'git pull' and 'git merge' will stop without doing anything when
  88local uncommitted changes overlap with files that 'git pull'/'git
  89merge' may need to update.
  90
  91To avoid recording unrelated changes in the merge commit,
  92'git pull' and 'git merge' will also abort if there are any changes
  93registered in the index relative to the `HEAD` commit.  (One
  94exception is when the changed index entries are in the state that
  95would result from the merge already.)
  96
  97If all named commits are already ancestors of `HEAD`, 'git merge'
  98will exit early with the message "Already up-to-date."
  99
 100FAST-FORWARD MERGE
 101------------------
 102
 103Often the current branch head is an ancestor of the named commit.
 104This is the most common case especially when invoked from 'git
 105pull': you are tracking an upstream repository, you have committed
 106no local changes, and now you want to update to a newer upstream
 107revision.  In this case, a new commit is not needed to store the
 108combined history; instead, the `HEAD` (along with the index) is
 109updated to point at the named commit, without creating an extra
 110merge commit.
 111
 112This behavior can be suppressed with the `--no-ff` option.
 113
 114TRUE MERGE
 115----------
 116
 117Except in a fast-forward merge (see above), the branches to be
 118merged must be tied together by a merge commit that has both of them
 119as its parents.
 120
 121A merged version reconciling the changes from all branches to be
 122merged is committed, and your `HEAD`, index, and working tree are
 123updated to it.  It is possible to have modifications in the working
 124tree as long as they do not overlap; the update will preserve them.
 125
 126When it is not obvious how to reconcile the changes, the following
 127happens:
 128
 1291. The `HEAD` pointer stays the same.
 1302. The `MERGE_HEAD` ref is set to point to the other branch head.
 1313. Paths that merged cleanly are updated both in the index file and
 132   in your working tree.
 1334. For conflicting paths, the index file records up to three
 134   versions: stage 1 stores the version from the common ancestor,
 135   stage 2 from `HEAD`, and stage 3 from `MERGE_HEAD` (you
 136   can inspect the stages with `git ls-files -u`).  The working
 137   tree files contain the result of the "merge" program; i.e. 3-way
 138   merge results with familiar conflict markers `<<<` `===` `>>>`.
 1395. No other changes are made.  In particular, the local
 140   modifications you had before you started merge will stay the
 141   same and the index entries for them stay as they were,
 142   i.e. matching `HEAD`.
 143
 144If you tried a merge which resulted in complex conflicts and
 145want to start over, you can recover with `git reset --merge`.
 146
 147HOW CONFLICTS ARE PRESENTED
 148---------------------------
 149
 150During a merge, the working tree files are updated to reflect the result
 151of the merge.  Among the changes made to the common ancestor's version,
 152non-overlapping ones (that is, you changed an area of the file while the
 153other side left that area intact, or vice versa) are incorporated in the
 154final result verbatim.  When both sides made changes to the same area,
 155however, git cannot randomly pick one side over the other, and asks you to
 156resolve it by leaving what both sides did to that area.
 157
 158By default, git uses the same style as that is used by "merge" program
 159from the RCS suite to present such a conflicted hunk, like this:
 160
 161------------
 162Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
 163ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
 164<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
 165Conflict resolution is hard;
 166let's go shopping.
 167=======
 168Git makes conflict resolution easy.
 169>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
 170And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
 171------------
 172
 173The area where a pair of conflicting changes happened is marked with markers
 174`<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>`.  The part before the `=======`
 175is typically your side, and the part afterwards is typically their side.
 176
 177The default format does not show what the original said in the conflicting
 178area.  You cannot tell how many lines are deleted and replaced with
 179Barbie's remark on your side.  The only thing you can tell is that your
 180side wants to say it is hard and you'd prefer to go shopping, while the
 181other side wants to claim it is easy.
 182
 183An alternative style can be used by setting the "merge.conflictstyle"
 184configuration variable to "diff3".  In "diff3" style, the above conflict
 185may look like this:
 186
 187------------
 188Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
 189ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
 190<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
 191Conflict resolution is hard;
 192let's go shopping.
 193|||||||
 194Conflict resolution is hard.
 195=======
 196Git makes conflict resolution easy.
 197>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
 198And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
 199------------
 200
 201In addition to the `<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>` markers, it uses
 202another `|||||||` marker that is followed by the original text.  You can
 203tell that the original just stated a fact, and your side simply gave in to
 204that statement and gave up, while the other side tried to have a more
 205positive attitude.  You can sometimes come up with a better resolution by
 206viewing the original.
 207
 208
 209HOW TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS
 210------------------------
 211
 212After seeing a conflict, you can do two things:
 213
 214 * Decide not to merge.  The only clean-ups you need are to reset
 215   the index file to the `HEAD` commit to reverse 2. and to clean
 216   up working tree changes made by 2. and 3.; `git-reset --hard` can
 217   be used for this.
 218
 219 * Resolve the conflicts.  Git will mark the conflicts in
 220   the working tree.  Edit the files into shape and
 221   'git add' them to the index.  Use 'git commit' to seal the deal.
 222
 223You can work through the conflict with a number of tools:
 224
 225 * Use a mergetool.  `git mergetool` to launch a graphical
 226   mergetool which will work you through the merge.
 227
 228 * Look at the diffs.  `git diff` will show a three-way diff,
 229   highlighting changes from both the `HEAD` and `MERGE_HEAD`
 230   versions.
 231
 232 * Look at the diffs from each branch. `git log --merge -p <path>`
 233   will show diffs first for the `HEAD` version and then the
 234   `MERGE_HEAD` version.
 235
 236 * Look at the originals.  `git show :1:filename` shows the
 237   common ancestor, `git show :2:filename` shows the `HEAD`
 238   version, and `git show :3:filename` shows the `MERGE_HEAD`
 239   version.
 240
 241
 242EXAMPLES
 243--------
 244
 245* Merge branches `fixes` and `enhancements` on top of
 246  the current branch, making an octopus merge:
 247+
 248------------------------------------------------
 249$ git merge fixes enhancements
 250------------------------------------------------
 251
 252* Merge branch `obsolete` into the current branch, using `ours`
 253  merge strategy:
 254+
 255------------------------------------------------
 256$ git merge -s ours obsolete
 257------------------------------------------------
 258
 259* Merge branch `maint` into the current branch, but do not make
 260  a new commit automatically:
 261+
 262------------------------------------------------
 263$ git merge --no-commit maint
 264------------------------------------------------
 265+
 266This can be used when you want to include further changes to the
 267merge, or want to write your own merge commit message.
 268+
 269You should refrain from abusing this option to sneak substantial
 270changes into a merge commit.  Small fixups like bumping
 271release/version name would be acceptable.
 272
 273
 274include::merge-strategies.txt[]
 275
 276CONFIGURATION
 277-------------
 278include::merge-config.txt[]
 279
 280branch.<name>.mergeoptions::
 281        Sets default options for merging into branch <name>. The syntax and
 282        supported options are the same as those of 'git merge', but option
 283        values containing whitespace characters are currently not supported.
 284
 285SEE ALSO
 286--------
 287linkgit:git-fmt-merge-msg[1], linkgit:git-pull[1],
 288linkgit:gitattributes[5],
 289linkgit:git-reset[1],
 290linkgit:git-diff[1], linkgit:git-ls-files[1],
 291linkgit:git-add[1], linkgit:git-rm[1],
 292linkgit:git-mergetool[1]
 293
 294Author
 295------
 296Written by Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
 297
 298
 299Documentation
 300--------------
 301Documentation by Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>.
 302
 303GIT
 304---
 305Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite