Documentation / git-checkout.txton commit git-sh-i18n.sh: add GIT_GETTEXT_POISON support (64a4295)
   1git-checkout(1)
   2===============
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-checkout - Checkout a branch or paths to the working tree
   7
   8SYNOPSIS
   9--------
  10[verse]
  11'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [<branch>]
  12'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [--detach] [<commit>]
  13'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [[-b|-B|--orphan] <new_branch>] [<start_point>]
  14'git checkout' [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] [--] <paths>...
  15'git checkout' --patch [<tree-ish>] [--] [<paths>...]
  16
  17DESCRIPTION
  18-----------
  19Updates files in the working tree to match the version in the index
  20or the specified tree.  If no paths are given, 'git checkout' will
  21also update `HEAD` to set the specified branch as the current
  22branch.
  23
  24'git checkout' [<branch>]::
  25'git checkout' -b|-B <new_branch> [<start point>]::
  26'git checkout' [--detach] [<commit>]::
  27
  28        This form switches branches by updating the index, working
  29        tree, and HEAD to reflect the specified branch or commit.
  30+
  31If `-b` is given, a new branch is created as if linkgit:git-branch[1]
  32were called and then checked out; in this case you can
  33use the `--track` or `--no-track` options, which will be passed to
  34'git branch'.  As a convenience, `--track` without `-b` implies branch
  35creation; see the description of `--track` below.
  36+
  37If `-B` is given, <new_branch> is created if it doesn't exist; otherwise, it
  38is reset. This is the transactional equivalent of
  39+
  40------------
  41$ git branch -f <branch> [<start point>]
  42$ git checkout <branch>
  43------------
  44+
  45that is to say, the branch is not reset/created unless "git checkout" is
  46successful.
  47
  48'git checkout' [--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>...::
  49
  50        When <paths> or `--patch` are given, 'git checkout' does *not*
  51        switch branches.  It updates the named paths in the working tree
  52        from the index file or from a named <tree-ish> (most often a
  53        commit).  In this case, the `-b` and `--track` options are
  54        meaningless and giving either of them results in an error.  The
  55        <tree-ish> argument can be used to specify a specific tree-ish
  56        (i.e.  commit, tag or tree) to update the index for the given
  57        paths before updating the working tree.
  58+
  59The index may contain unmerged entries because of a previous failed merge.
  60By default, if you try to check out such an entry from the index, the
  61checkout operation will fail and nothing will be checked out.
  62Using `-f` will ignore these unmerged entries.  The contents from a
  63specific side of the merge can be checked out of the index by
  64using `--ours` or `--theirs`.  With `-m`, changes made to the working tree
  65file can be discarded to re-create the original conflicted merge result.
  66
  67OPTIONS
  68-------
  69-q::
  70--quiet::
  71        Quiet, suppress feedback messages.
  72
  73-f::
  74--force::
  75        When switching branches, proceed even if the index or the
  76        working tree differs from HEAD.  This is used to throw away
  77        local changes.
  78+
  79When checking out paths from the index, do not fail upon unmerged
  80entries; instead, unmerged entries are ignored.
  81
  82--ours::
  83--theirs::
  84        When checking out paths from the index, check out stage #2
  85        ('ours') or #3 ('theirs') for unmerged paths.
  86
  87-b::
  88        Create a new branch named <new_branch> and start it at
  89        <start_point>; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for details.
  90
  91-B::
  92        Creates the branch <new_branch> and start it at <start_point>;
  93        if it already exists, then reset it to <start_point>. This is
  94        equivalent to running "git branch" with "-f"; see
  95        linkgit:git-branch[1] for details.
  96
  97-t::
  98--track::
  99        When creating a new branch, set up "upstream" configuration. See
 100        "--track" in linkgit:git-branch[1] for details.
 101+
 102If no '-b' option is given, the name of the new branch will be
 103derived from the remote-tracking branch.  If "remotes/" or "refs/remotes/"
 104is prefixed it is stripped away, and then the part up to the
 105next slash (which would be the nickname of the remote) is removed.
 106This would tell us to use "hack" as the local branch when branching
 107off of "origin/hack" (or "remotes/origin/hack", or even
 108"refs/remotes/origin/hack").  If the given name has no slash, or the above
 109guessing results in an empty name, the guessing is aborted.  You can
 110explicitly give a name with '-b' in such a case.
 111
 112--no-track::
 113        Do not set up "upstream" configuration, even if the
 114        branch.autosetupmerge configuration variable is true.
 115
 116-l::
 117        Create the new branch's reflog; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for
 118        details.
 119
 120--detach::
 121        Rather than checking out a branch to work on it, check out a
 122        commit for inspection and discardable experiments.
 123        This is the default behavior of "git checkout <commit>" when
 124        <commit> is not a branch name.  See the "DETACHED HEAD" section
 125        below for details.
 126
 127--orphan::
 128        Create a new 'orphan' branch, named <new_branch>, started from
 129        <start_point> and switch to it.  The first commit made on this
 130        new branch will have no parents and it will be the root of a new
 131        history totally disconnected from all the other branches and
 132        commits.
 133+
 134The index and the working tree are adjusted as if you had previously run
 135"git checkout <start_point>".  This allows you to start a new history
 136that records a set of paths similar to <start_point> by easily running
 137"git commit -a" to make the root commit.
 138+
 139This can be useful when you want to publish the tree from a commit
 140without exposing its full history. You might want to do this to publish
 141an open source branch of a project whose current tree is "clean", but
 142whose full history contains proprietary or otherwise encumbered bits of
 143code.
 144+
 145If you want to start a disconnected history that records a set of paths
 146that is totally different from the one of <start_point>, then you should
 147clear the index and the working tree right after creating the orphan
 148branch by running "git rm -rf ." from the top level of the working tree.
 149Afterwards you will be ready to prepare your new files, repopulating the
 150working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc.
 151
 152-m::
 153--merge::
 154        When switching branches,
 155        if you have local modifications to one or more files that
 156        are different between the current branch and the branch to
 157        which you are switching, the command refuses to switch
 158        branches in order to preserve your modifications in context.
 159        However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current
 160        branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch
 161        is done, and you will be on the new branch.
 162+
 163When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting
 164paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts
 165and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge
 166should result in deletion of the path).
 167+
 168When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate
 169the conflicted merge in the specified paths.
 170
 171--conflict=<style>::
 172        The same as --merge option above, but changes the way the
 173        conflicting hunks are presented, overriding the
 174        merge.conflictstyle configuration variable.  Possible values are
 175        "merge" (default) and "diff3" (in addition to what is shown by
 176        "merge" style, shows the original contents).
 177
 178-p::
 179--patch::
 180        Interactively select hunks in the difference between the
 181        <tree-ish> (or the index, if unspecified) and the working
 182        tree.  The chosen hunks are then applied in reverse to the
 183        working tree (and if a <tree-ish> was specified, the index).
 184+
 185This means that you can use `git checkout -p` to selectively discard
 186edits from your current working tree.
 187
 188<branch>::
 189        Branch to checkout; if it refers to a branch (i.e., a name that,
 190        when prepended with "refs/heads/", is a valid ref), then that
 191        branch is checked out. Otherwise, if it refers to a valid
 192        commit, your HEAD becomes "detached" and you are no longer on
 193        any branch (see below for details).
 194+
 195As a special case, the `"@\{-N\}"` syntax for the N-th last branch
 196checks out the branch (instead of detaching).  You may also specify
 197`-` which is synonymous with `"@\{-1\}"`.
 198+
 199As a further special case, you may use `"A\...B"` as a shortcut for the
 200merge base of `A` and `B` if there is exactly one merge base. You can
 201leave out at most one of `A` and `B`, in which case it defaults to `HEAD`.
 202
 203<new_branch>::
 204        Name for the new branch.
 205
 206<start_point>::
 207        The name of a commit at which to start the new branch; see
 208        linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. Defaults to HEAD.
 209
 210<tree-ish>::
 211        Tree to checkout from (when paths are given). If not specified,
 212        the index will be used.
 213
 214
 215
 216DETACHED HEAD
 217-------------
 218HEAD normally refers to a named branch (e.g. 'master'). Meanwhile, each
 219branch refers to a specific commit. Let's look at a repo with three
 220commits, one of them tagged, and with branch 'master' checked out:
 221
 222------------
 223           HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
 224            |
 225            v
 226a---b---c  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'c')
 227    ^
 228    |
 229  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 230------------
 231
 232When a commit is created in this state, the branch is updated to refer to
 233the new commit. Specifically, 'git commit' creates a new commit 'd', whose
 234parent is commit 'c', and then updates branch 'master' to refer to new
 235commit 'd'. HEAD still refers to branch 'master' and so indirectly now refers
 236to commit 'd':
 237
 238------------
 239$ edit; git add; git commit
 240
 241               HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
 242                |
 243                v
 244a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 245    ^
 246    |
 247  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 248------------
 249
 250It is sometimes useful to be able to checkout a commit that is not at
 251the tip of any named branch, or even to create a new commit that is not
 252referenced by a named branch. Let's look at what happens when we
 253checkout commit 'b' (here we show two ways this may be done):
 254
 255------------
 256$ git checkout v2.0  # or
 257$ git checkout master^^
 258
 259   HEAD (refers to commit 'b')
 260    |
 261    v
 262a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 263    ^
 264    |
 265  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 266------------
 267
 268Notice that regardless of which checkout command we use, HEAD now refers
 269directly to commit 'b'. This is known as being in detached HEAD state.
 270It means simply that HEAD refers to a specific commit, as opposed to
 271referring to a named branch. Let's see what happens when we create a commit:
 272
 273------------
 274$ edit; git add; git commit
 275
 276     HEAD (refers to commit 'e')
 277      |
 278      v
 279      e
 280     /
 281a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 282    ^
 283    |
 284  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 285------------
 286
 287There is now a new commit 'e', but it is referenced only by HEAD. We can
 288of course add yet another commit in this state:
 289
 290------------
 291$ edit; git add; git commit
 292
 293         HEAD (refers to commit 'f')
 294          |
 295          v
 296      e---f
 297     /
 298a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 299    ^
 300    |
 301  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 302------------
 303
 304In fact, we can perform all the normal git operations. But, let's look
 305at what happens when we then checkout master:
 306
 307------------
 308$ git checkout master
 309
 310               HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
 311      e---f     |
 312     /          v
 313a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 314    ^
 315    |
 316  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 317------------
 318
 319It is important to realize that at this point nothing refers to commit
 320'f'. Eventually commit 'f' (and by extension commit 'e') will be deleted
 321by the routine git garbage collection process, unless we create a reference
 322before that happens. If we have not yet moved away from commit 'f',
 323any of these will create a reference to it:
 324
 325------------
 326$ git checkout -b foo   <1>
 327$ git branch foo        <2>
 328$ git tag foo           <3>
 329------------
 330
 331<1> creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', and then
 332updates HEAD to refer to branch 'foo'. In other words, we'll no longer
 333be in detached HEAD state after this command.
 334
 335<2> similarly creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f',
 336but leaves HEAD detached.
 337
 338<3> creates a new tag 'foo', which refers to commit 'f',
 339leaving HEAD detached.
 340
 341If we have moved away from commit 'f', then we must first recover its object
 342name (typically by using git reflog), and then we can create a reference to
 343it. For example, to see the last two commits to which HEAD referred, we
 344can use either of these commands:
 345
 346------------
 347$ git reflog -2 HEAD # or
 348$ git log -g -2 HEAD
 349------------
 350
 351EXAMPLES
 352--------
 353
 354. The following sequence checks out the `master` branch, reverts
 355the `Makefile` to two revisions back, deletes hello.c by
 356mistake, and gets it back from the index.
 357+
 358------------
 359$ git checkout master             <1>
 360$ git checkout master~2 Makefile  <2>
 361$ rm -f hello.c
 362$ git checkout hello.c            <3>
 363------------
 364+
 365<1> switch branch
 366<2> take a file out of another commit
 367<3> restore hello.c from the index
 368+
 369If you have an unfortunate branch that is named `hello.c`, this
 370step would be confused as an instruction to switch to that branch.
 371You should instead write:
 372+
 373------------
 374$ git checkout -- hello.c
 375------------
 376
 377. After working in the wrong branch, switching to the correct
 378branch would be done using:
 379+
 380------------
 381$ git checkout mytopic
 382------------
 383+
 384However, your "wrong" branch and correct "mytopic" branch may
 385differ in files that you have modified locally, in which case
 386the above checkout would fail like this:
 387+
 388------------
 389$ git checkout mytopic
 390error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches.
 391------------
 392+
 393You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a
 394three-way merge:
 395+
 396------------
 397$ git checkout -m mytopic
 398Auto-merging frotz
 399------------
 400+
 401After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_
 402registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what
 403changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
 404
 405. When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with
 406the `-m` option, you would see something like this:
 407+
 408------------
 409$ git checkout -m mytopic
 410Auto-merging frotz
 411ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz
 412fatal: merge program failed
 413------------
 414+
 415At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in
 416the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted
 417files.  Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with
 418`git add` as usual:
 419+
 420------------
 421$ edit frotz
 422$ git add frotz
 423------------
 424
 425GIT
 426---
 427Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite