Documentation / git-merge.txton commit Merge branch 'ld/push-porcelain' (66bce02)
   1git-merge(1)
   2============
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-merge - Join two or more development histories together
   7
   8
   9SYNOPSIS
  10--------
  11[verse]
  12'git merge' [-n] [--stat] [--no-commit] [--squash] [-s <strategy>]...
  13        [--[no-]rerere-autoupdate] [-m <msg>] <commit>...
  14'git merge' <msg> HEAD <commit>...
  15
  16DESCRIPTION
  17-----------
  18Incorporates changes from the named commits (since the time their
  19histories diverged from the current branch) into the current
  20branch.  This command is used by 'git pull' to incorporate changes
  21from another repository and can be used by hand to merge changes
  22from one branch into another.
  23
  24Assume the following history exists and the current branch is
  25"`master`":
  26
  27------------
  28          A---B---C topic
  29         /
  30    D---E---F---G master
  31------------
  32
  33Then "`git merge topic`" will replay the changes made on the
  34`topic` branch since it diverged from `master` (i.e., `E`) until
  35its current commit (`C`) on top of `master`, and record the result
  36in a new commit along with the names of the two parent commits and
  37a log message from the user describing the changes.
  38
  39------------
  40          A---B---C topic
  41         /         \
  42    D---E---F---G---H master
  43------------
  44
  45The second syntax (<msg> `HEAD` <commit>...) is supported for
  46historical reasons.  Do not use it from the command line or in
  47new scripts.  It is the same as `git merge -m <msg> <commit>...`.
  48
  49*Warning*: Running 'git merge' with uncommitted changes is
  50discouraged: while possible, it leaves you in a state that is hard to
  51back out of in the case of a conflict.
  52
  53
  54OPTIONS
  55-------
  56include::merge-options.txt[]
  57
  58-m <msg>::
  59        Set the commit message to be used for the merge commit (in
  60        case one is created). The 'git fmt-merge-msg' command can be
  61        used to give a good default for automated 'git merge'
  62        invocations.
  63
  64--rerere-autoupdate::
  65--no-rerere-autoupdate::
  66        Allow the rerere mechanism to update the index with the
  67        result of auto-conflict resolution if possible.
  68
  69<commit>...::
  70        Commits, usually other branch heads, to merge into our branch.
  71        You need at least one <commit>.  Specifying more than one
  72        <commit> obviously means you are trying an Octopus.
  73
  74
  75PRE-MERGE CHECKS
  76----------------
  77
  78Before applying outside changes, you should get your own work in
  79good shape and committed locally, so it will not be clobbered if
  80there are conflicts.  See also linkgit:git-stash[1].
  81'git pull' and 'git merge' will stop without doing anything when
  82local uncommitted changes overlap with files that 'git pull'/'git
  83merge' may need to update.
  84
  85To avoid recording unrelated changes in the merge commit,
  86'git pull' and 'git merge' will also abort if there are any changes
  87registered in the index relative to the `HEAD` commit.  (One
  88exception is when the changed index entries are in the state that
  89would result from the merge already.)
  90
  91If all named commits are already ancestors of `HEAD`, 'git merge'
  92will exit early with the message "Already up-to-date."
  93
  94FAST-FORWARD MERGE
  95------------------
  96
  97Often the current branch head is an ancestor of the named commit.
  98This is the most common case especially when invoked from 'git
  99pull': you are tracking an upstream repository, you have committed
 100no local changes, and now you want to update to a newer upstream
 101revision.  In this case, a new commit is not needed to store the
 102combined history; instead, the `HEAD` (along with the index) is
 103updated to point at the named commit, without creating an extra
 104merge commit.
 105
 106This behavior can be suppressed with the `--no-ff` option.
 107
 108TRUE MERGE
 109----------
 110
 111Except in a fast-forward merge (see above), the branches to be
 112merged must be tied together by a merge commit that has both of them
 113as its parents.
 114
 115A merged version reconciling the changes from all branches to be
 116merged is committed, and your `HEAD`, index, and working tree are
 117updated to it.  It is possible to have modifications in the working
 118tree as long as they do not overlap; the update will preserve them.
 119
 120When it is not obvious how to reconcile the changes, the following
 121happens:
 122
 1231. The `HEAD` pointer stays the same.
 1242. The `MERGE_HEAD` ref is set to point to the other branch head.
 1253. Paths that merged cleanly are updated both in the index file and
 126   in your working tree.
 1274. For conflicting paths, the index file records up to three
 128   versions: stage 1 stores the version from the common ancestor,
 129   stage 2 from `HEAD`, and stage 3 from `MERGE_HEAD` (you
 130   can inspect the stages with `git ls-files -u`).  The working
 131   tree files contain the result of the "merge" program; i.e. 3-way
 132   merge results with familiar conflict markers `<<<` `===` `>>>`.
 1335. No other changes are made.  In particular, the local
 134   modifications you had before you started merge will stay the
 135   same and the index entries for them stay as they were,
 136   i.e. matching `HEAD`.
 137
 138If you tried a merge which resulted in complex conflicts and
 139want to start over, you can recover with `git reset --merge`.
 140
 141HOW CONFLICTS ARE PRESENTED
 142---------------------------
 143
 144During a merge, the working tree files are updated to reflect the result
 145of the merge.  Among the changes made to the common ancestor's version,
 146non-overlapping ones (that is, you changed an area of the file while the
 147other side left that area intact, or vice versa) are incorporated in the
 148final result verbatim.  When both sides made changes to the same area,
 149however, git cannot randomly pick one side over the other, and asks you to
 150resolve it by leaving what both sides did to that area.
 151
 152By default, git uses the same style as that is used by "merge" program
 153from the RCS suite to present such a conflicted hunk, like this:
 154
 155------------
 156Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
 157ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
 158<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
 159Conflict resolution is hard;
 160let's go shopping.
 161=======
 162Git makes conflict resolution easy.
 163>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
 164And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
 165------------
 166
 167The area where a pair of conflicting changes happened is marked with markers
 168`<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>`.  The part before the `=======`
 169is typically your side, and the part afterwards is typically their side.
 170
 171The default format does not show what the original said in the conflicting
 172area.  You cannot tell how many lines are deleted and replaced with
 173Barbie's remark on your side.  The only thing you can tell is that your
 174side wants to say it is hard and you'd prefer to go shopping, while the
 175other side wants to claim it is easy.
 176
 177An alternative style can be used by setting the "merge.conflictstyle"
 178configuration variable to "diff3".  In "diff3" style, the above conflict
 179may look like this:
 180
 181------------
 182Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
 183ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
 184<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
 185Conflict resolution is hard;
 186let's go shopping.
 187|||||||
 188Conflict resolution is hard.
 189=======
 190Git makes conflict resolution easy.
 191>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
 192And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
 193------------
 194
 195In addition to the `<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>` markers, it uses
 196another `|||||||` marker that is followed by the original text.  You can
 197tell that the original just stated a fact, and your side simply gave in to
 198that statement and gave up, while the other side tried to have a more
 199positive attitude.  You can sometimes come up with a better resolution by
 200viewing the original.
 201
 202
 203HOW TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS
 204------------------------
 205
 206After seeing a conflict, you can do two things:
 207
 208 * Decide not to merge.  The only clean-ups you need are to reset
 209   the index file to the `HEAD` commit to reverse 2. and to clean
 210   up working tree changes made by 2. and 3.; `git-reset --hard` can
 211   be used for this.
 212
 213 * Resolve the conflicts.  Git will mark the conflicts in
 214   the working tree.  Edit the files into shape and
 215   'git add' them to the index.  Use 'git commit' to seal the deal.
 216
 217You can work through the conflict with a number of tools:
 218
 219 * Use a mergetool.  `git mergetool` to launch a graphical
 220   mergetool which will work you through the merge.
 221
 222 * Look at the diffs.  `git diff` will show a three-way diff,
 223   highlighting changes from both the `HEAD` and `MERGE_HEAD`
 224   versions.
 225
 226 * Look at the diffs from each branch. `git log --merge -p <path>`
 227   will show diffs first for the `HEAD` version and then the
 228   `MERGE_HEAD` version.
 229
 230 * Look at the originals.  `git show :1:filename` shows the
 231   common ancestor, `git show :2:filename` shows the `HEAD`
 232   version, and `git show :3:filename` shows the `MERGE_HEAD`
 233   version.
 234
 235
 236EXAMPLES
 237--------
 238
 239* Merge branches `fixes` and `enhancements` on top of
 240  the current branch, making an octopus merge:
 241+
 242------------------------------------------------
 243$ git merge fixes enhancements
 244------------------------------------------------
 245
 246* Merge branch `obsolete` into the current branch, using `ours`
 247  merge strategy:
 248+
 249------------------------------------------------
 250$ git merge -s ours obsolete
 251------------------------------------------------
 252
 253* Merge branch `maint` into the current branch, but do not make
 254  a new commit automatically:
 255+
 256------------------------------------------------
 257$ git merge --no-commit maint
 258------------------------------------------------
 259+
 260This can be used when you want to include further changes to the
 261merge, or want to write your own merge commit message.
 262+
 263You should refrain from abusing this option to sneak substantial
 264changes into a merge commit.  Small fixups like bumping
 265release/version name would be acceptable.
 266
 267
 268include::merge-strategies.txt[]
 269
 270CONFIGURATION
 271-------------
 272include::merge-config.txt[]
 273
 274branch.<name>.mergeoptions::
 275        Sets default options for merging into branch <name>. The syntax and
 276        supported options are the same as those of 'git merge', but option
 277        values containing whitespace characters are currently not supported.
 278
 279SEE ALSO
 280--------
 281linkgit:git-fmt-merge-msg[1], linkgit:git-pull[1],
 282linkgit:gitattributes[5],
 283linkgit:git-reset[1],
 284linkgit:git-diff[1], linkgit:git-ls-files[1],
 285linkgit:git-add[1], linkgit:git-rm[1],
 286linkgit:git-mergetool[1]
 287
 288Author
 289------
 290Written by Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
 291
 292
 293Documentation
 294--------------
 295Documentation by Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>.
 296
 297GIT
 298---
 299Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite