1git-checkout(1) 2=============== 3 4NAME 5---- 6git-checkout - Checkout a branch or paths to the working tree 7 8SYNOPSIS 9-------- 10[verse] 11'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [<branch>] 12'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [--detach] [<commit>] 13'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [[-b|-B|--orphan] <new_branch>] [<start_point>] 14'git checkout' [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] [--] <paths>... 15'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] [<paths>...] 16 17DESCRIPTION 18----------- 19Updates files in the working tree to match the version in the index 20or the specified tree. If no paths are given, 'git checkout' will 21also update `HEAD` to set the specified branch as the current 22branch. 23 24'git checkout' <branch>:: 25 To prepare for working on <branch>, switch to it by updating 26 the index and the files in the working tree, and by pointing 27 HEAD at the branch. Local modifications to the files in the 28 working tree are kept, so that they can be committed to the 29 <branch>. 30+ 31If <branch> is not found but there does exist a tracking branch in 32exactly one remote (call it <remote>) with a matching name, treat as 33equivalent to 34+ 35------------ 36$ git checkout -b <branch> --track <remote>/<branch> 37------------ 38+ 39You could omit <branch>, in which case the command degenerates to 40"check out the current branch", which is a glorified no-op with a 41rather expensive side-effects to show only the tracking information, 42if exists, for the current branch. 43 44'git checkout' -b|-B <new_branch> [<start point>]:: 45 46 Specifying `-b` causes a new branch to be created as if 47 linkgit:git-branch[1] were called and then checked out. In 48 this case you can use the `--track` or `--no-track` options, 49 which will be passed to 'git branch'. As a convenience, 50 `--track` without `-b` implies branch creation; see the 51 description of `--track` below. 52+ 53If `-B` is given, <new_branch> is created if it doesn't exist; otherwise, it 54is reset. This is the transactional equivalent of 55+ 56------------ 57$ git branch -f <branch> [<start point>] 58$ git checkout <branch> 59------------ 60+ 61that is to say, the branch is not reset/created unless "git checkout" is 62successful. 63 64'git checkout' --detach [<branch>]:: 65'git checkout' <commit>:: 66 67 Prepare to work on top of <commit>, by detaching HEAD at it 68 (see "DETACHED HEAD" section), and updating the index and the 69 files in the working tree. Local modifications to the files 70 in the working tree are kept, so that the resulting working 71 tree will be the state recorded in the commit plus the local 72 modifications. 73+ 74Passing `--detach` forces this behavior in the case of a <branch> (without 75the option, giving a branch name to the command would check out the branch, 76instead of detaching HEAD at it), or the current commit, 77if no <branch> is specified. 78 79'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>...:: 80 81 When <paths> or `--patch` are given, 'git checkout' does *not* 82 switch branches. It updates the named paths in the working tree 83 from the index file or from a named <tree-ish> (most often a 84 commit). In this case, the `-b` and `--track` options are 85 meaningless and giving either of them results in an error. The 86 <tree-ish> argument can be used to specify a specific tree-ish 87 (i.e. commit, tag or tree) to update the index for the given 88 paths before updating the working tree. 89+ 90The index may contain unmerged entries because of a previous failed merge. 91By default, if you try to check out such an entry from the index, the 92checkout operation will fail and nothing will be checked out. 93Using `-f` will ignore these unmerged entries. The contents from a 94specific side of the merge can be checked out of the index by 95using `--ours` or `--theirs`. With `-m`, changes made to the working tree 96file can be discarded to re-create the original conflicted merge result. 97 98OPTIONS 99------- 100-q:: 101--quiet:: 102 Quiet, suppress feedback messages. 103 104-f:: 105--force:: 106 When switching branches, proceed even if the index or the 107 working tree differs from HEAD. This is used to throw away 108 local changes. 109+ 110When checking out paths from the index, do not fail upon unmerged 111entries; instead, unmerged entries are ignored. 112 113--ours:: 114--theirs:: 115 When checking out paths from the index, check out stage #2 116 ('ours') or #3 ('theirs') for unmerged paths. 117 118-b <new_branch>:: 119 Create a new branch named <new_branch> and start it at 120 <start_point>; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. 121 122-B <new_branch>:: 123 Creates the branch <new_branch> and start it at <start_point>; 124 if it already exists, then reset it to <start_point>. This is 125 equivalent to running "git branch" with "-f"; see 126 linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. 127 128-t:: 129--track:: 130 When creating a new branch, set up "upstream" configuration. See 131 "--track" in linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. 132+ 133If no '-b' option is given, the name of the new branch will be 134derived from the remote-tracking branch. If "remotes/" or "refs/remotes/" 135is prefixed it is stripped away, and then the part up to the 136next slash (which would be the nickname of the remote) is removed. 137This would tell us to use "hack" as the local branch when branching 138off of "origin/hack" (or "remotes/origin/hack", or even 139"refs/remotes/origin/hack"). If the given name has no slash, or the above 140guessing results in an empty name, the guessing is aborted. You can 141explicitly give a name with '-b' in such a case. 142 143--no-track:: 144 Do not set up "upstream" configuration, even if the 145 branch.autosetupmerge configuration variable is true. 146 147-l:: 148 Create the new branch's reflog; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for 149 details. 150 151--detach:: 152 Rather than checking out a branch to work on it, check out a 153 commit for inspection and discardable experiments. 154 This is the default behavior of "git checkout <commit>" when 155 <commit> is not a branch name. See the "DETACHED HEAD" section 156 below for details. 157 158--orphan <new_branch>:: 159 Create a new 'orphan' branch, named <new_branch>, started from 160 <start_point> and switch to it. The first commit made on this 161 new branch will have no parents and it will be the root of a new 162 history totally disconnected from all the other branches and 163 commits. 164+ 165The index and the working tree are adjusted as if you had previously run 166"git checkout <start_point>". This allows you to start a new history 167that records a set of paths similar to <start_point> by easily running 168"git commit -a" to make the root commit. 169+ 170This can be useful when you want to publish the tree from a commit 171without exposing its full history. You might want to do this to publish 172an open source branch of a project whose current tree is "clean", but 173whose full history contains proprietary or otherwise encumbered bits of 174code. 175+ 176If you want to start a disconnected history that records a set of paths 177that is totally different from the one of <start_point>, then you should 178clear the index and the working tree right after creating the orphan 179branch by running "git rm -rf ." from the top level of the working tree. 180Afterwards you will be ready to prepare your new files, repopulating the 181working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. 182 183-m:: 184--merge:: 185 When switching branches, 186 if you have local modifications to one or more files that 187 are different between the current branch and the branch to 188 which you are switching, the command refuses to switch 189 branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. 190 However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current 191 branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch 192 is done, and you will be on the new branch. 193+ 194When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting 195paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts 196and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge 197should result in deletion of the path). 198+ 199When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate 200the conflicted merge in the specified paths. 201 202--conflict=<style>:: 203 The same as --merge option above, but changes the way the 204 conflicting hunks are presented, overriding the 205 merge.conflictstyle configuration variable. Possible values are 206 "merge" (default) and "diff3" (in addition to what is shown by 207 "merge" style, shows the original contents). 208 209-p:: 210--patch:: 211 Interactively select hunks in the difference between the 212 <tree-ish> (or the index, if unspecified) and the working 213 tree. The chosen hunks are then applied in reverse to the 214 working tree (and if a <tree-ish> was specified, the index). 215+ 216This means that you can use `git checkout -p` to selectively discard 217edits from your current working tree. See the ``Interactive Mode'' 218section of linkgit:git-add[1] to learn how to operate the `--patch` mode. 219 220<branch>:: 221 Branch to checkout; if it refers to a branch (i.e., a name that, 222 when prepended with "refs/heads/", is a valid ref), then that 223 branch is checked out. Otherwise, if it refers to a valid 224 commit, your HEAD becomes "detached" and you are no longer on 225 any branch (see below for details). 226+ 227As a special case, the `"@{-N}"` syntax for the N-th last branch 228checks out the branch (instead of detaching). You may also specify 229`-` which is synonymous with `"@{-1}"`. 230+ 231As a further special case, you may use `"A...B"` as a shortcut for the 232merge base of `A` and `B` if there is exactly one merge base. You can 233leave out at most one of `A` and `B`, in which case it defaults to `HEAD`. 234 235<new_branch>:: 236 Name for the new branch. 237 238<start_point>:: 239 The name of a commit at which to start the new branch; see 240 linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. Defaults to HEAD. 241 242<tree-ish>:: 243 Tree to checkout from (when paths are given). If not specified, 244 the index will be used. 245 246 247 248DETACHED HEAD 249------------- 250HEAD normally refers to a named branch (e.g. 'master'). Meanwhile, each 251branch refers to a specific commit. Let's look at a repo with three 252commits, one of them tagged, and with branch 'master' checked out: 253 254------------ 255 HEAD (refers to branch 'master') 256 | 257 v 258a---b---c branch 'master' (refers to commit 'c') 259 ^ 260 | 261 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 262------------ 263 264When a commit is created in this state, the branch is updated to refer to 265the new commit. Specifically, 'git commit' creates a new commit 'd', whose 266parent is commit 'c', and then updates branch 'master' to refer to new 267commit 'd'. HEAD still refers to branch 'master' and so indirectly now refers 268to commit 'd': 269 270------------ 271$ edit; git add; git commit 272 273 HEAD (refers to branch 'master') 274 | 275 v 276a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 277 ^ 278 | 279 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 280------------ 281 282It is sometimes useful to be able to checkout a commit that is not at 283the tip of any named branch, or even to create a new commit that is not 284referenced by a named branch. Let's look at what happens when we 285checkout commit 'b' (here we show two ways this may be done): 286 287------------ 288$ git checkout v2.0 # or 289$ git checkout master^^ 290 291 HEAD (refers to commit 'b') 292 | 293 v 294a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 295 ^ 296 | 297 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 298------------ 299 300Notice that regardless of which checkout command we use, HEAD now refers 301directly to commit 'b'. This is known as being in detached HEAD state. 302It means simply that HEAD refers to a specific commit, as opposed to 303referring to a named branch. Let's see what happens when we create a commit: 304 305------------ 306$ edit; git add; git commit 307 308 HEAD (refers to commit 'e') 309 | 310 v 311 e 312 / 313a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 314 ^ 315 | 316 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 317------------ 318 319There is now a new commit 'e', but it is referenced only by HEAD. We can 320of course add yet another commit in this state: 321 322------------ 323$ edit; git add; git commit 324 325 HEAD (refers to commit 'f') 326 | 327 v 328 e---f 329 / 330a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 331 ^ 332 | 333 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 334------------ 335 336In fact, we can perform all the normal Git operations. But, let's look 337at what happens when we then checkout master: 338 339------------ 340$ git checkout master 341 342 HEAD (refers to branch 'master') 343 e---f | 344 / v 345a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 346 ^ 347 | 348 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 349------------ 350 351It is important to realize that at this point nothing refers to commit 352'f'. Eventually commit 'f' (and by extension commit 'e') will be deleted 353by the routine Git garbage collection process, unless we create a reference 354before that happens. If we have not yet moved away from commit 'f', 355any of these will create a reference to it: 356 357------------ 358$ git checkout -b foo <1> 359$ git branch foo <2> 360$ git tag foo <3> 361------------ 362 363<1> creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', and then 364updates HEAD to refer to branch 'foo'. In other words, we'll no longer 365be in detached HEAD state after this command. 366 367<2> similarly creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', 368but leaves HEAD detached. 369 370<3> creates a new tag 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', 371leaving HEAD detached. 372 373If we have moved away from commit 'f', then we must first recover its object 374name (typically by using git reflog), and then we can create a reference to 375it. For example, to see the last two commits to which HEAD referred, we 376can use either of these commands: 377 378------------ 379$ git reflog -2 HEAD # or 380$ git log -g -2 HEAD 381------------ 382 383EXAMPLES 384-------- 385 386. The following sequence checks out the `master` branch, reverts 387the `Makefile` to two revisions back, deletes hello.c by 388mistake, and gets it back from the index. 389+ 390------------ 391$ git checkout master <1> 392$ git checkout master~2 Makefile <2> 393$ rm -f hello.c 394$ git checkout hello.c <3> 395------------ 396+ 397<1> switch branch 398<2> take a file out of another commit 399<3> restore hello.c from the index 400+ 401If you want to check out _all_ C source files out of the index, 402you can say 403+ 404------------ 405$ git checkout -- '*.c' 406------------ 407+ 408Note the quotes around `*.c`. The file `hello.c` will also be 409checked out, even though it is no longer in the working tree, 410because the file globbing is used to match entries in the index 411(not in the working tree by the shell). 412+ 413If you have an unfortunate branch that is named `hello.c`, this 414step would be confused as an instruction to switch to that branch. 415You should instead write: 416+ 417------------ 418$ git checkout -- hello.c 419------------ 420 421. After working in the wrong branch, switching to the correct 422branch would be done using: 423+ 424------------ 425$ git checkout mytopic 426------------ 427+ 428However, your "wrong" branch and correct "mytopic" branch may 429differ in files that you have modified locally, in which case 430the above checkout would fail like this: 431+ 432------------ 433$ git checkout mytopic 434error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. 435------------ 436+ 437You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a 438three-way merge: 439+ 440------------ 441$ git checkout -m mytopic 442Auto-merging frotz 443------------ 444+ 445After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ 446registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what 447changes you made since the tip of the new branch. 448 449. When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with 450the `-m` option, you would see something like this: 451+ 452------------ 453$ git checkout -m mytopic 454Auto-merging frotz 455ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz 456fatal: merge program failed 457------------ 458+ 459At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in 460the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted 461files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with 462`git add` as usual: 463+ 464------------ 465$ edit frotz 466$ git add frotz 467------------ 468 469GIT 470--- 471Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite