Documentation / git-merge.txton commit Merge branch 'jk/strip-suffix' (6e40947)
   1git-merge(1)
   2============
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-merge - Join two or more development histories together
   7
   8
   9SYNOPSIS
  10--------
  11[verse]
  12'git merge' [-n] [--stat] [--no-commit] [--squash] [--[no-]edit]
  13        [-s <strategy>] [-X <strategy-option>] [-S[<key-id>]]
  14        [--[no-]rerere-autoupdate] [-m <msg>] [<commit>...]
  15'git merge' <msg> HEAD <commit>...
  16'git merge' --abort
  17
  18DESCRIPTION
  19-----------
  20Incorporates changes from the named commits (since the time their
  21histories diverged from the current branch) into the current
  22branch.  This command is used by 'git pull' to incorporate changes
  23from another repository and can be used by hand to merge changes
  24from one branch into another.
  25
  26Assume the following history exists and the current branch is
  27"`master`":
  28
  29------------
  30          A---B---C topic
  31         /
  32    D---E---F---G master
  33------------
  34
  35Then "`git merge topic`" will replay the changes made on the
  36`topic` branch since it diverged from `master` (i.e., `E`) until
  37its current commit (`C`) on top of `master`, and record the result
  38in a new commit along with the names of the two parent commits and
  39a log message from the user describing the changes.
  40
  41------------
  42          A---B---C topic
  43         /         \
  44    D---E---F---G---H master
  45------------
  46
  47The second syntax (<msg> `HEAD` <commit>...) is supported for
  48historical reasons.  Do not use it from the command line or in
  49new scripts.  It is the same as `git merge -m <msg> <commit>...`.
  50
  51The third syntax ("`git merge --abort`") can only be run after the
  52merge has resulted in conflicts. 'git merge --abort' will abort the
  53merge process and try to reconstruct the pre-merge state. However,
  54if there were uncommitted changes when the merge started (and
  55especially if those changes were further modified after the merge
  56was started), 'git merge --abort' will in some cases be unable to
  57reconstruct the original (pre-merge) changes. Therefore:
  58
  59*Warning*: Running 'git merge' with non-trivial uncommitted changes is
  60discouraged: while possible, it may leave you in a state that is hard to
  61back out of in the case of a conflict.
  62
  63
  64OPTIONS
  65-------
  66include::merge-options.txt[]
  67
  68-S[<keyid>]::
  69--gpg-sign[=<keyid>]::
  70        GPG-sign the resulting merge commit.
  71
  72-m <msg>::
  73        Set the commit message to be used for the merge commit (in
  74        case one is created).
  75+
  76If `--log` is specified, a shortlog of the commits being merged
  77will be appended to the specified message.
  78+
  79The 'git fmt-merge-msg' command can be
  80used to give a good default for automated 'git merge'
  81invocations.
  82
  83--[no-]rerere-autoupdate::
  84        Allow the rerere mechanism to update the index with the
  85        result of auto-conflict resolution if possible.
  86
  87--abort::
  88        Abort the current conflict resolution process, and
  89        try to reconstruct the pre-merge state.
  90+
  91If there were uncommitted worktree changes present when the merge
  92started, 'git merge --abort' will in some cases be unable to
  93reconstruct these changes. It is therefore recommended to always
  94commit or stash your changes before running 'git merge'.
  95+
  96'git merge --abort' is equivalent to 'git reset --merge' when
  97`MERGE_HEAD` is present.
  98
  99<commit>...::
 100        Commits, usually other branch heads, to merge into our branch.
 101        Specifying more than one commit will create a merge with
 102        more than two parents (affectionately called an Octopus merge).
 103+
 104If no commit is given from the command line, merge the remote-tracking
 105branches that the current branch is configured to use as its upstream.
 106See also the configuration section of this manual page.
 107
 108
 109PRE-MERGE CHECKS
 110----------------
 111
 112Before applying outside changes, you should get your own work in
 113good shape and committed locally, so it will not be clobbered if
 114there are conflicts.  See also linkgit:git-stash[1].
 115'git pull' and 'git merge' will stop without doing anything when
 116local uncommitted changes overlap with files that 'git pull'/'git
 117merge' may need to update.
 118
 119To avoid recording unrelated changes in the merge commit,
 120'git pull' and 'git merge' will also abort if there are any changes
 121registered in the index relative to the `HEAD` commit.  (One
 122exception is when the changed index entries are in the state that
 123would result from the merge already.)
 124
 125If all named commits are already ancestors of `HEAD`, 'git merge'
 126will exit early with the message "Already up-to-date."
 127
 128FAST-FORWARD MERGE
 129------------------
 130
 131Often the current branch head is an ancestor of the named commit.
 132This is the most common case especially when invoked from 'git
 133pull': you are tracking an upstream repository, you have committed
 134no local changes, and now you want to update to a newer upstream
 135revision.  In this case, a new commit is not needed to store the
 136combined history; instead, the `HEAD` (along with the index) is
 137updated to point at the named commit, without creating an extra
 138merge commit.
 139
 140This behavior can be suppressed with the `--no-ff` option.
 141
 142TRUE MERGE
 143----------
 144
 145Except in a fast-forward merge (see above), the branches to be
 146merged must be tied together by a merge commit that has both of them
 147as its parents.
 148
 149A merged version reconciling the changes from all branches to be
 150merged is committed, and your `HEAD`, index, and working tree are
 151updated to it.  It is possible to have modifications in the working
 152tree as long as they do not overlap; the update will preserve them.
 153
 154When it is not obvious how to reconcile the changes, the following
 155happens:
 156
 1571. The `HEAD` pointer stays the same.
 1582. The `MERGE_HEAD` ref is set to point to the other branch head.
 1593. Paths that merged cleanly are updated both in the index file and
 160   in your working tree.
 1614. For conflicting paths, the index file records up to three
 162   versions: stage 1 stores the version from the common ancestor,
 163   stage 2 from `HEAD`, and stage 3 from `MERGE_HEAD` (you
 164   can inspect the stages with `git ls-files -u`).  The working
 165   tree files contain the result of the "merge" program; i.e. 3-way
 166   merge results with familiar conflict markers `<<<` `===` `>>>`.
 1675. No other changes are made.  In particular, the local
 168   modifications you had before you started merge will stay the
 169   same and the index entries for them stay as they were,
 170   i.e. matching `HEAD`.
 171
 172If you tried a merge which resulted in complex conflicts and
 173want to start over, you can recover with `git merge --abort`.
 174
 175MERGING TAG
 176-----------
 177
 178When merging an annotated (and possibly signed) tag, Git always
 179creates a merge commit even if a fast-forward merge is possible, and
 180the commit message template is prepared with the tag message.
 181Additionally, if the tag is signed, the signature check is reported
 182as a comment in the message template. See also linkgit:git-tag[1].
 183
 184When you want to just integrate with the work leading to the commit
 185that happens to be tagged, e.g. synchronizing with an upstream
 186release point, you may not want to make an unnecessary merge commit.
 187
 188In such a case, you can "unwrap" the tag yourself before feeding it
 189to `git merge`, or pass `--ff-only` when you do not have any work on
 190your own. e.g.
 191
 192----
 193git fetch origin
 194git merge v1.2.3^0
 195git merge --ff-only v1.2.3
 196----
 197
 198
 199HOW CONFLICTS ARE PRESENTED
 200---------------------------
 201
 202During a merge, the working tree files are updated to reflect the result
 203of the merge.  Among the changes made to the common ancestor's version,
 204non-overlapping ones (that is, you changed an area of the file while the
 205other side left that area intact, or vice versa) are incorporated in the
 206final result verbatim.  When both sides made changes to the same area,
 207however, Git cannot randomly pick one side over the other, and asks you to
 208resolve it by leaving what both sides did to that area.
 209
 210By default, Git uses the same style as the one used by the "merge" program
 211from the RCS suite to present such a conflicted hunk, like this:
 212
 213------------
 214Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
 215ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
 216<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
 217Conflict resolution is hard;
 218let's go shopping.
 219=======
 220Git makes conflict resolution easy.
 221>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
 222And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
 223------------
 224
 225The area where a pair of conflicting changes happened is marked with markers
 226`<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>`.  The part before the `=======`
 227is typically your side, and the part afterwards is typically their side.
 228
 229The default format does not show what the original said in the conflicting
 230area.  You cannot tell how many lines are deleted and replaced with
 231Barbie's remark on your side.  The only thing you can tell is that your
 232side wants to say it is hard and you'd prefer to go shopping, while the
 233other side wants to claim it is easy.
 234
 235An alternative style can be used by setting the "merge.conflictstyle"
 236configuration variable to "diff3".  In "diff3" style, the above conflict
 237may look like this:
 238
 239------------
 240Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
 241ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
 242<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
 243Conflict resolution is hard;
 244let's go shopping.
 245|||||||
 246Conflict resolution is hard.
 247=======
 248Git makes conflict resolution easy.
 249>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
 250And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
 251------------
 252
 253In addition to the `<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>` markers, it uses
 254another `|||||||` marker that is followed by the original text.  You can
 255tell that the original just stated a fact, and your side simply gave in to
 256that statement and gave up, while the other side tried to have a more
 257positive attitude.  You can sometimes come up with a better resolution by
 258viewing the original.
 259
 260
 261HOW TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS
 262------------------------
 263
 264After seeing a conflict, you can do two things:
 265
 266 * Decide not to merge.  The only clean-ups you need are to reset
 267   the index file to the `HEAD` commit to reverse 2. and to clean
 268   up working tree changes made by 2. and 3.; `git merge --abort`
 269   can be used for this.
 270
 271 * Resolve the conflicts.  Git will mark the conflicts in
 272   the working tree.  Edit the files into shape and
 273   'git add' them to the index.  Use 'git commit' to seal the deal.
 274
 275You can work through the conflict with a number of tools:
 276
 277 * Use a mergetool.  `git mergetool` to launch a graphical
 278   mergetool which will work you through the merge.
 279
 280 * Look at the diffs.  `git diff` will show a three-way diff,
 281   highlighting changes from both the `HEAD` and `MERGE_HEAD`
 282   versions.
 283
 284 * Look at the diffs from each branch. `git log --merge -p <path>`
 285   will show diffs first for the `HEAD` version and then the
 286   `MERGE_HEAD` version.
 287
 288 * Look at the originals.  `git show :1:filename` shows the
 289   common ancestor, `git show :2:filename` shows the `HEAD`
 290   version, and `git show :3:filename` shows the `MERGE_HEAD`
 291   version.
 292
 293
 294EXAMPLES
 295--------
 296
 297* Merge branches `fixes` and `enhancements` on top of
 298  the current branch, making an octopus merge:
 299+
 300------------------------------------------------
 301$ git merge fixes enhancements
 302------------------------------------------------
 303
 304* Merge branch `obsolete` into the current branch, using `ours`
 305  merge strategy:
 306+
 307------------------------------------------------
 308$ git merge -s ours obsolete
 309------------------------------------------------
 310
 311* Merge branch `maint` into the current branch, but do not make
 312  a new commit automatically:
 313+
 314------------------------------------------------
 315$ git merge --no-commit maint
 316------------------------------------------------
 317+
 318This can be used when you want to include further changes to the
 319merge, or want to write your own merge commit message.
 320+
 321You should refrain from abusing this option to sneak substantial
 322changes into a merge commit.  Small fixups like bumping
 323release/version name would be acceptable.
 324
 325
 326include::merge-strategies.txt[]
 327
 328CONFIGURATION
 329-------------
 330include::merge-config.txt[]
 331
 332branch.<name>.mergeoptions::
 333        Sets default options for merging into branch <name>. The syntax and
 334        supported options are the same as those of 'git merge', but option
 335        values containing whitespace characters are currently not supported.
 336
 337SEE ALSO
 338--------
 339linkgit:git-fmt-merge-msg[1], linkgit:git-pull[1],
 340linkgit:gitattributes[5],
 341linkgit:git-reset[1],
 342linkgit:git-diff[1], linkgit:git-ls-files[1],
 343linkgit:git-add[1], linkgit:git-rm[1],
 344linkgit:git-mergetool[1]
 345
 346GIT
 347---
 348Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite