1git-checkout(1) 2=============== 3 4NAME 5---- 6git-checkout - Switch branches or restore working tree files 7 8SYNOPSIS 9-------- 10[verse] 11'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [<branch>] 12'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] --detach [<branch>] 13'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [--detach] <commit> 14'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [[-b|-B|--orphan] <new_branch>] [<start_point>] 15'git checkout' [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] [--] <paths>... 16'git checkout' [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>... 17'git checkout' (-p|--patch) [<tree-ish>] [--] [<paths>...] 18 19DESCRIPTION 20----------- 21Updates files in the working tree to match the version in the index 22or the specified tree. If no paths are given, 'git checkout' will 23also update `HEAD` to set the specified branch as the current 24branch. 25 26'git checkout' <branch>:: 27 To prepare for working on <branch>, switch to it by updating 28 the index and the files in the working tree, and by pointing 29 HEAD at the branch. Local modifications to the files in the 30 working tree are kept, so that they can be committed to the 31 <branch>. 32+ 33If <branch> is not found but there does exist a tracking branch in 34exactly one remote (call it <remote>) with a matching name, treat as 35equivalent to 36+ 37------------ 38$ git checkout -b <branch> --track <remote>/<branch> 39------------ 40+ 41If the branch exists in multiple remotes and one of them is named by 42the `checkout.defaultRemote` configuration variable, we'll use that 43one for the purposes of disambiguation, even if the `<branch>` isn't 44unique across all remotes. Set it to 45e.g. `checkout.defaultRemote=origin` to always checkout remote 46branches from there if `<branch>` is ambiguous but exists on the 47'origin' remote. See also `checkout.defaultRemote` in 48linkgit:git-config[1]. 49+ 50You could omit <branch>, in which case the command degenerates to 51"check out the current branch", which is a glorified no-op with 52rather expensive side-effects to show only the tracking information, 53if exists, for the current branch. 54 55'git checkout' -b|-B <new_branch> [<start point>]:: 56 57 Specifying `-b` causes a new branch to be created as if 58 linkgit:git-branch[1] were called and then checked out. In 59 this case you can use the `--track` or `--no-track` options, 60 which will be passed to 'git branch'. As a convenience, 61 `--track` without `-b` implies branch creation; see the 62 description of `--track` below. 63+ 64If `-B` is given, <new_branch> is created if it doesn't exist; otherwise, it 65is reset. This is the transactional equivalent of 66+ 67------------ 68$ git branch -f <branch> [<start point>] 69$ git checkout <branch> 70------------ 71+ 72that is to say, the branch is not reset/created unless "git checkout" is 73successful. 74 75'git checkout' --detach [<branch>]:: 76'git checkout' [--detach] <commit>:: 77 78 Prepare to work on top of <commit>, by detaching HEAD at it 79 (see "DETACHED HEAD" section), and updating the index and the 80 files in the working tree. Local modifications to the files 81 in the working tree are kept, so that the resulting working 82 tree will be the state recorded in the commit plus the local 83 modifications. 84+ 85When the <commit> argument is a branch name, the `--detach` option can 86be used to detach HEAD at the tip of the branch (`git checkout 87<branch>` would check out that branch without detaching HEAD). 88+ 89Omitting <branch> detaches HEAD at the tip of the current branch. 90 91'git checkout' [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>...:: 92 93 Overwrite paths in the working tree by replacing with the 94 contents in the index or in the <tree-ish> (most often a 95 commit). When a <tree-ish> is given, the paths that 96 match the <pathspec> are updated both in the index and in 97 the working tree. 98+ 99The index may contain unmerged entries because of a previous failed merge. 100By default, if you try to check out such an entry from the index, the 101checkout operation will fail and nothing will be checked out. 102Using `-f` will ignore these unmerged entries. The contents from a 103specific side of the merge can be checked out of the index by 104using `--ours` or `--theirs`. With `-m`, changes made to the working tree 105file can be discarded to re-create the original conflicted merge result. 106 107'git checkout' (-p|--patch) [<tree-ish>] [--] [<pathspec>...]:: 108 This is similar to the "check out paths to the working tree 109 from either the index or from a tree-ish" mode described 110 above, but lets you use the interactive interface to show 111 the "diff" output and choose which hunks to use in the 112 result. See below for the description of `--patch` option. 113 114 115OPTIONS 116------- 117-q:: 118--quiet:: 119 Quiet, suppress feedback messages. 120 121--[no-]progress:: 122 Progress status is reported on the standard error stream 123 by default when it is attached to a terminal, unless `--quiet` 124 is specified. This flag enables progress reporting even if not 125 attached to a terminal, regardless of `--quiet`. 126 127-f:: 128--force:: 129 When switching branches, proceed even if the index or the 130 working tree differs from HEAD. This is used to throw away 131 local changes. 132+ 133When checking out paths from the index, do not fail upon unmerged 134entries; instead, unmerged entries are ignored. 135 136--ours:: 137--theirs:: 138 When checking out paths from the index, check out stage #2 139 ('ours') or #3 ('theirs') for unmerged paths. 140+ 141Note that during `git rebase` and `git pull --rebase`, 'ours' and 142'theirs' may appear swapped; `--ours` gives the version from the 143branch the changes are rebased onto, while `--theirs` gives the 144version from the branch that holds your work that is being rebased. 145+ 146This is because `rebase` is used in a workflow that treats the 147history at the remote as the shared canonical one, and treats the 148work done on the branch you are rebasing as the third-party work to 149be integrated, and you are temporarily assuming the role of the 150keeper of the canonical history during the rebase. As the keeper of 151the canonical history, you need to view the history from the remote 152as `ours` (i.e. "our shared canonical history"), while what you did 153on your side branch as `theirs` (i.e. "one contributor's work on top 154of it"). 155 156-b <new_branch>:: 157 Create a new branch named <new_branch> and start it at 158 <start_point>; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. 159 160-B <new_branch>:: 161 Creates the branch <new_branch> and start it at <start_point>; 162 if it already exists, then reset it to <start_point>. This is 163 equivalent to running "git branch" with "-f"; see 164 linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. 165 166-t:: 167--track:: 168 When creating a new branch, set up "upstream" configuration. See 169 "--track" in linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. 170+ 171If no `-b` option is given, the name of the new branch will be 172derived from the remote-tracking branch, by looking at the local part of 173the refspec configured for the corresponding remote, and then stripping 174the initial part up to the "*". 175This would tell us to use "hack" as the local branch when branching 176off of "origin/hack" (or "remotes/origin/hack", or even 177"refs/remotes/origin/hack"). If the given name has no slash, or the above 178guessing results in an empty name, the guessing is aborted. You can 179explicitly give a name with `-b` in such a case. 180 181--no-track:: 182 Do not set up "upstream" configuration, even if the 183 branch.autoSetupMerge configuration variable is true. 184 185-l:: 186 Create the new branch's reflog; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for 187 details. 188 189--detach:: 190 Rather than checking out a branch to work on it, check out a 191 commit for inspection and discardable experiments. 192 This is the default behavior of "git checkout <commit>" when 193 <commit> is not a branch name. See the "DETACHED HEAD" section 194 below for details. 195 196--orphan <new_branch>:: 197 Create a new 'orphan' branch, named <new_branch>, started from 198 <start_point> and switch to it. The first commit made on this 199 new branch will have no parents and it will be the root of a new 200 history totally disconnected from all the other branches and 201 commits. 202+ 203The index and the working tree are adjusted as if you had previously run 204"git checkout <start_point>". This allows you to start a new history 205that records a set of paths similar to <start_point> by easily running 206"git commit -a" to make the root commit. 207+ 208This can be useful when you want to publish the tree from a commit 209without exposing its full history. You might want to do this to publish 210an open source branch of a project whose current tree is "clean", but 211whose full history contains proprietary or otherwise encumbered bits of 212code. 213+ 214If you want to start a disconnected history that records a set of paths 215that is totally different from the one of <start_point>, then you should 216clear the index and the working tree right after creating the orphan 217branch by running "git rm -rf ." from the top level of the working tree. 218Afterwards you will be ready to prepare your new files, repopulating the 219working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. 220 221--ignore-skip-worktree-bits:: 222 In sparse checkout mode, `git checkout -- <paths>` would 223 update only entries matched by <paths> and sparse patterns 224 in $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout. This option ignores 225 the sparse patterns and adds back any files in <paths>. 226 227-m:: 228--merge:: 229 When switching branches, 230 if you have local modifications to one or more files that 231 are different between the current branch and the branch to 232 which you are switching, the command refuses to switch 233 branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. 234 However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current 235 branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch 236 is done, and you will be on the new branch. 237+ 238When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting 239paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts 240and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge 241should result in deletion of the path). 242+ 243When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate 244the conflicted merge in the specified paths. 245+ 246When switching branches with `--merge`, staged changes may be lost. 247 248--conflict=<style>:: 249 The same as --merge option above, but changes the way the 250 conflicting hunks are presented, overriding the 251 merge.conflictStyle configuration variable. Possible values are 252 "merge" (default) and "diff3" (in addition to what is shown by 253 "merge" style, shows the original contents). 254 255-p:: 256--patch:: 257 Interactively select hunks in the difference between the 258 <tree-ish> (or the index, if unspecified) and the working 259 tree. The chosen hunks are then applied in reverse to the 260 working tree (and if a <tree-ish> was specified, the index). 261+ 262This means that you can use `git checkout -p` to selectively discard 263edits from your current working tree. See the ``Interactive Mode'' 264section of linkgit:git-add[1] to learn how to operate the `--patch` mode. 265+ 266Note that this option uses the no overlay mode by default (see also 267`--[no-]overlay`), and currently doesn't support overlay mode. 268 269--ignore-other-worktrees:: 270 `git checkout` refuses when the wanted ref is already checked 271 out by another worktree. This option makes it check the ref 272 out anyway. In other words, the ref can be held by more than one 273 worktree. 274 275--[no-]recurse-submodules:: 276 Using --recurse-submodules will update the content of all initialized 277 submodules according to the commit recorded in the superproject. If 278 local modifications in a submodule would be overwritten the checkout 279 will fail unless `-f` is used. If nothing (or --no-recurse-submodules) 280 is used, the work trees of submodules will not be updated. 281 Just like linkgit:git-submodule[1], this will detach the 282 submodules HEAD. 283 284--no-guess:: 285 Do not attempt to create a branch if a remote tracking branch 286 of the same name exists. 287 288--[no-]overlay:: 289 In the default overlay mode, `git checkout` never 290 removes files from the index or the working tree. When 291 specifying `--no-overlay`, files that appear in the index and 292 working tree, but not in <tree-ish> are removed, to make them 293 match <tree-ish> exactly. 294 295<branch>:: 296 Branch to checkout; if it refers to a branch (i.e., a name that, 297 when prepended with "refs/heads/", is a valid ref), then that 298 branch is checked out. Otherwise, if it refers to a valid 299 commit, your HEAD becomes "detached" and you are no longer on 300 any branch (see below for details). 301+ 302You can use the `"@{-N}"` syntax to refer to the N-th last 303branch/commit checked out using "git checkout" operation. You may 304also specify `-` which is synonymous to `"@{-1}"`. 305+ 306As a special case, you may use `"A...B"` as a shortcut for the 307merge base of `A` and `B` if there is exactly one merge base. You can 308leave out at most one of `A` and `B`, in which case it defaults to `HEAD`. 309 310<new_branch>:: 311 Name for the new branch. 312 313<start_point>:: 314 The name of a commit at which to start the new branch; see 315 linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. Defaults to HEAD. 316 317<tree-ish>:: 318 Tree to checkout from (when paths are given). If not specified, 319 the index will be used. 320 321 322 323DETACHED HEAD 324------------- 325HEAD normally refers to a named branch (e.g. 'master'). Meanwhile, each 326branch refers to a specific commit. Let's look at a repo with three 327commits, one of them tagged, and with branch 'master' checked out: 328 329------------ 330 HEAD (refers to branch 'master') 331 | 332 v 333a---b---c branch 'master' (refers to commit 'c') 334 ^ 335 | 336 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 337------------ 338 339When a commit is created in this state, the branch is updated to refer to 340the new commit. Specifically, 'git commit' creates a new commit 'd', whose 341parent is commit 'c', and then updates branch 'master' to refer to new 342commit 'd'. HEAD still refers to branch 'master' and so indirectly now refers 343to commit 'd': 344 345------------ 346$ edit; git add; git commit 347 348 HEAD (refers to branch 'master') 349 | 350 v 351a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 352 ^ 353 | 354 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 355------------ 356 357It is sometimes useful to be able to checkout a commit that is not at 358the tip of any named branch, or even to create a new commit that is not 359referenced by a named branch. Let's look at what happens when we 360checkout commit 'b' (here we show two ways this may be done): 361 362------------ 363$ git checkout v2.0 # or 364$ git checkout master^^ 365 366 HEAD (refers to commit 'b') 367 | 368 v 369a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 370 ^ 371 | 372 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 373------------ 374 375Notice that regardless of which checkout command we use, HEAD now refers 376directly to commit 'b'. This is known as being in detached HEAD state. 377It means simply that HEAD refers to a specific commit, as opposed to 378referring to a named branch. Let's see what happens when we create a commit: 379 380------------ 381$ edit; git add; git commit 382 383 HEAD (refers to commit 'e') 384 | 385 v 386 e 387 / 388a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 389 ^ 390 | 391 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 392------------ 393 394There is now a new commit 'e', but it is referenced only by HEAD. We can 395of course add yet another commit in this state: 396 397------------ 398$ edit; git add; git commit 399 400 HEAD (refers to commit 'f') 401 | 402 v 403 e---f 404 / 405a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 406 ^ 407 | 408 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 409------------ 410 411In fact, we can perform all the normal Git operations. But, let's look 412at what happens when we then checkout master: 413 414------------ 415$ git checkout master 416 417 HEAD (refers to branch 'master') 418 e---f | 419 / v 420a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd') 421 ^ 422 | 423 tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b') 424------------ 425 426It is important to realize that at this point nothing refers to commit 427'f'. Eventually commit 'f' (and by extension commit 'e') will be deleted 428by the routine Git garbage collection process, unless we create a reference 429before that happens. If we have not yet moved away from commit 'f', 430any of these will create a reference to it: 431 432------------ 433$ git checkout -b foo <1> 434$ git branch foo <2> 435$ git tag foo <3> 436------------ 437 438<1> creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', and then 439 updates HEAD to refer to branch 'foo'. In other words, we'll no longer 440 be in detached HEAD state after this command. 441 442<2> similarly creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', 443 but leaves HEAD detached. 444 445<3> creates a new tag 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', 446 leaving HEAD detached. 447 448If we have moved away from commit 'f', then we must first recover its object 449name (typically by using git reflog), and then we can create a reference to 450it. For example, to see the last two commits to which HEAD referred, we 451can use either of these commands: 452 453------------ 454$ git reflog -2 HEAD # or 455$ git log -g -2 HEAD 456------------ 457 458ARGUMENT DISAMBIGUATION 459----------------------- 460 461When there is only one argument given and it is not `--` (e.g. "git 462checkout abc"), and when the argument is both a valid `<tree-ish>` 463(e.g. a branch "abc" exists) and a valid `<pathspec>` (e.g. a file 464or a directory whose name is "abc" exists), Git would usually ask 465you to disambiguate. Because checking out a branch is so common an 466operation, however, "git checkout abc" takes "abc" as a `<tree-ish>` 467in such a situation. Use `git checkout -- <pathspec>` if you want 468to checkout these paths out of the index. 469 470EXAMPLES 471-------- 472 473. The following sequence checks out the `master` branch, reverts 474 the `Makefile` to two revisions back, deletes hello.c by 475 mistake, and gets it back from the index. 476+ 477------------ 478$ git checkout master <1> 479$ git checkout master~2 Makefile <2> 480$ rm -f hello.c 481$ git checkout hello.c <3> 482------------ 483+ 484<1> switch branch 485<2> take a file out of another commit 486<3> restore hello.c from the index 487+ 488If you want to check out _all_ C source files out of the index, 489you can say 490+ 491------------ 492$ git checkout -- '*.c' 493------------ 494+ 495Note the quotes around `*.c`. The file `hello.c` will also be 496checked out, even though it is no longer in the working tree, 497because the file globbing is used to match entries in the index 498(not in the working tree by the shell). 499+ 500If you have an unfortunate branch that is named `hello.c`, this 501step would be confused as an instruction to switch to that branch. 502You should instead write: 503+ 504------------ 505$ git checkout -- hello.c 506------------ 507 508. After working in the wrong branch, switching to the correct 509 branch would be done using: 510+ 511------------ 512$ git checkout mytopic 513------------ 514+ 515However, your "wrong" branch and correct "mytopic" branch may 516differ in files that you have modified locally, in which case 517the above checkout would fail like this: 518+ 519------------ 520$ git checkout mytopic 521error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. 522------------ 523+ 524You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a 525three-way merge: 526+ 527------------ 528$ git checkout -m mytopic 529Auto-merging frotz 530------------ 531+ 532After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ 533registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what 534changes you made since the tip of the new branch. 535 536. When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with 537 the `-m` option, you would see something like this: 538+ 539------------ 540$ git checkout -m mytopic 541Auto-merging frotz 542ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz 543fatal: merge program failed 544------------ 545+ 546At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in 547the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted 548files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with 549`git add` as usual: 550+ 551------------ 552$ edit frotz 553$ git add frotz 554------------ 555 556GIT 557--- 558Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite