Documentation / git-tag.txton commit glossary: remove outdated/misleading/irrelevant entries (79de455)
   1git-tag(1)
   2==========
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-tag - Create, list, delete or verify a tag object signed with GPG
   7
   8
   9SYNOPSIS
  10--------
  11[verse]
  12'git tag' [-a | -s | -u <key-id>] [-f] [-m <msg> | -F <file>]
  13        <tagname> [<commit> | <object>]
  14'git tag' -d <tagname>...
  15'git tag' [-n[<num>]] -l [--contains <commit>] [--points-at <object>]
  16        [--column[=<options>] | --no-column] [<pattern>...]
  17        [<pattern>...]
  18'git tag' -v <tagname>...
  19
  20DESCRIPTION
  21-----------
  22
  23Add a tag reference in `refs/tags/`, unless `-d/-l/-v` is given
  24to delete, list or verify tags.
  25
  26Unless `-f` is given, the named tag must not yet exist.
  27
  28If one of `-a`, `-s`, or `-u <key-id>` is passed, the command
  29creates a 'tag' object, and requires a tag message.  Unless
  30`-m <msg>` or `-F <file>` is given, an editor is started for the user to type
  31in the tag message.
  32
  33If `-m <msg>` or `-F <file>` is given and `-a`, `-s`, and `-u <key-id>`
  34are absent, `-a` is implied.
  35
  36Otherwise just a tag reference for the SHA1 object name of the commit object is
  37created (i.e. a lightweight tag).
  38
  39A GnuPG signed tag object will be created when `-s` or `-u
  40<key-id>` is used.  When `-u <key-id>` is not used, the
  41committer identity for the current user is used to find the
  42GnuPG key for signing.  The configuration variable `gpg.program`
  43is used to specify custom GnuPG binary.
  44
  45
  46OPTIONS
  47-------
  48-a::
  49--annotate::
  50        Make an unsigned, annotated tag object
  51
  52-s::
  53--sign::
  54        Make a GPG-signed tag, using the default e-mail address's key.
  55
  56-u <key-id>::
  57--local-user=<key-id>::
  58        Make a GPG-signed tag, using the given key.
  59
  60-f::
  61--force::
  62        Replace an existing tag with the given name (instead of failing)
  63
  64-d::
  65--delete::
  66        Delete existing tags with the given names.
  67
  68-v::
  69--verify::
  70        Verify the gpg signature of the given tag names.
  71
  72-n<num>::
  73        <num> specifies how many lines from the annotation, if any,
  74        are printed when using -l.
  75        The default is not to print any annotation lines.
  76        If no number is given to `-n`, only the first line is printed.
  77        If the tag is not annotated, the commit message is displayed instead.
  78
  79-l <pattern>::
  80--list <pattern>::
  81        List tags with names that match the given pattern (or all if no
  82        pattern is given).  Running "git tag" without arguments also
  83        lists all tags. The pattern is a shell wildcard (i.e., matched
  84        using fnmatch(3)).  Multiple patterns may be given; if any of
  85        them matches, the tag is shown.
  86
  87--column[=<options>]::
  88--no-column::
  89        Display tag listing in columns. See configuration variable
  90        column.tag for option syntax.`--column` and `--no-column`
  91        without options are equivalent to 'always' and 'never' respectively.
  92+
  93This option is only applicable when listing tags without annotation lines.
  94
  95--contains <commit>::
  96        Only list tags which contain the specified commit.
  97
  98--points-at <object>::
  99        Only list tags of the given object.
 100
 101-m <msg>::
 102--message=<msg>::
 103        Use the given tag message (instead of prompting).
 104        If multiple `-m` options are given, their values are
 105        concatenated as separate paragraphs.
 106        Implies `-a` if none of `-a`, `-s`, or `-u <key-id>`
 107        is given.
 108
 109-F <file>::
 110--file=<file>::
 111        Take the tag message from the given file.  Use '-' to
 112        read the message from the standard input.
 113        Implies `-a` if none of `-a`, `-s`, or `-u <key-id>`
 114        is given.
 115
 116--cleanup=<mode>::
 117        This option sets how the tag message is cleaned up.
 118        The  '<mode>' can be one of 'verbatim', 'whitespace' and 'strip'.  The
 119        'strip' mode is default. The 'verbatim' mode does not change message at
 120        all, 'whitespace' removes just leading/trailing whitespace lines and
 121        'strip' removes both whitespace and commentary.
 122
 123<tagname>::
 124        The name of the tag to create, delete, or describe.
 125        The new tag name must pass all checks defined by
 126        linkgit:git-check-ref-format[1].  Some of these checks
 127        may restrict the characters allowed in a tag name.
 128
 129<commit>::
 130<object>::
 131        The object that the new tag will refer to, usually a commit.
 132        Defaults to HEAD.
 133
 134
 135CONFIGURATION
 136-------------
 137By default, 'git tag' in sign-with-default mode (-s) will use your
 138committer identity (of the form "Your Name <\your@email.address>") to
 139find a key.  If you want to use a different default key, you can specify
 140it in the repository configuration as follows:
 141
 142-------------------------------------
 143[user]
 144    signingkey = <gpg-key-id>
 145-------------------------------------
 146
 147
 148DISCUSSION
 149----------
 150
 151On Re-tagging
 152~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 153
 154What should you do when you tag a wrong commit and you would
 155want to re-tag?
 156
 157If you never pushed anything out, just re-tag it. Use "-f" to
 158replace the old one. And you're done.
 159
 160But if you have pushed things out (or others could just read
 161your repository directly), then others will have already seen
 162the old tag. In that case you can do one of two things:
 163
 164. The sane thing.
 165Just admit you screwed up, and use a different name. Others have
 166already seen one tag-name, and if you keep the same name, you
 167may be in the situation that two people both have "version X",
 168but they actually have 'different' "X"'s.  So just call it "X.1"
 169and be done with it.
 170
 171. The insane thing.
 172You really want to call the new version "X" too, 'even though'
 173others have already seen the old one. So just use 'git tag -f'
 174again, as if you hadn't already published the old one.
 175
 176However, Git does *not* (and it should not) change tags behind
 177users back. So if somebody already got the old tag, doing a
 178'git pull' on your tree shouldn't just make them overwrite the old
 179one.
 180
 181If somebody got a release tag from you, you cannot just change
 182the tag for them by updating your own one. This is a big
 183security issue, in that people MUST be able to trust their
 184tag-names.  If you really want to do the insane thing, you need
 185to just fess up to it, and tell people that you messed up. You
 186can do that by making a very public announcement saying:
 187
 188------------
 189Ok, I messed up, and I pushed out an earlier version tagged as X. I
 190then fixed something, and retagged the *fixed* tree as X again.
 191
 192If you got the wrong tag, and want the new one, please delete
 193the old one and fetch the new one by doing:
 194
 195        git tag -d X
 196        git fetch origin tag X
 197
 198to get my updated tag.
 199
 200You can test which tag you have by doing
 201
 202        git rev-parse X
 203
 204which should return 0123456789abcdef.. if you have the new version.
 205
 206Sorry for the inconvenience.
 207------------
 208
 209Does this seem a bit complicated?  It *should* be. There is no
 210way that it would be correct to just "fix" it automatically.
 211People need to know that their tags might have been changed.
 212
 213
 214On Automatic following
 215~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 216
 217If you are following somebody else's tree, you are most likely
 218using remote-tracking branches (`refs/heads/origin` in traditional
 219layout, or `refs/remotes/origin/master` in the separate-remote
 220layout).  You usually want the tags from the other end.
 221
 222On the other hand, if you are fetching because you would want a
 223one-shot merge from somebody else, you typically do not want to
 224get tags from there.  This happens more often for people near
 225the toplevel but not limited to them.  Mere mortals when pulling
 226from each other do not necessarily want to automatically get
 227private anchor point tags from the other person.
 228
 229Often, "please pull" messages on the mailing list just provide
 230two pieces of information: a repo URL and a branch name; this
 231is designed to be easily cut&pasted at the end of a 'git fetch'
 232command line:
 233
 234------------
 235Linus, please pull from
 236
 237        git://git..../proj.git master
 238
 239to get the following updates...
 240------------
 241
 242becomes:
 243
 244------------
 245$ git pull git://git..../proj.git master
 246------------
 247
 248In such a case, you do not want to automatically follow the other
 249person's tags.
 250
 251One important aspect of Git is its distributed nature, which
 252largely means there is no inherent "upstream" or
 253"downstream" in the system.  On the face of it, the above
 254example might seem to indicate that the tag namespace is owned
 255by the upper echelon of people and that tags only flow downwards, but
 256that is not the case.  It only shows that the usage pattern
 257determines who are interested in whose tags.
 258
 259A one-shot pull is a sign that a commit history is now crossing
 260the boundary between one circle of people (e.g. "people who are
 261primarily interested in the networking part of the kernel") who may
 262have their own set of tags (e.g. "this is the third release
 263candidate from the networking group to be proposed for general
 264consumption with 2.6.21 release") to another circle of people
 265(e.g. "people who integrate various subsystem improvements").
 266The latter are usually not interested in the detailed tags used
 267internally in the former group (that is what "internal" means).
 268That is why it is desirable not to follow tags automatically in
 269this case.
 270
 271It may well be that among networking people, they may want to
 272exchange the tags internal to their group, but in that workflow
 273they are most likely tracking each other's progress by
 274having remote-tracking branches.  Again, the heuristic to automatically
 275follow such tags is a good thing.
 276
 277
 278On Backdating Tags
 279~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 280
 281If you have imported some changes from another VCS and would like
 282to add tags for major releases of your work, it is useful to be able
 283to specify the date to embed inside of the tag object; such data in
 284the tag object affects, for example, the ordering of tags in the
 285gitweb interface.
 286
 287To set the date used in future tag objects, set the environment
 288variable GIT_COMMITTER_DATE (see the later discussion of possible
 289values; the most common form is "YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM").
 290
 291For example:
 292
 293------------
 294$ GIT_COMMITTER_DATE="2006-10-02 10:31" git tag -s v1.0.1
 295------------
 296
 297include::date-formats.txt[]
 298
 299SEE ALSO
 300--------
 301linkgit:git-check-ref-format[1].
 302
 303GIT
 304---
 305Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite