Documentation / git-merge.txton commit Merge branch 'jn/gitweb-caching-prep' (921296d)
   1git-merge(1)
   2============
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-merge - Join two or more development histories together
   7
   8
   9SYNOPSIS
  10--------
  11[verse]
  12'git merge' [-n] [--stat] [--no-commit] [--squash]
  13        [-s <strategy>] [-X <strategy-option>]
  14        [--[no-]rerere-autoupdate] [-m <msg>] <commit>...
  15'git merge' <msg> HEAD <commit>...
  16
  17DESCRIPTION
  18-----------
  19Incorporates changes from the named commits (since the time their
  20histories diverged from the current branch) into the current
  21branch.  This command is used by 'git pull' to incorporate changes
  22from another repository and can be used by hand to merge changes
  23from one branch into another.
  24
  25Assume the following history exists and the current branch is
  26"`master`":
  27
  28------------
  29          A---B---C topic
  30         /
  31    D---E---F---G master
  32------------
  33
  34Then "`git merge topic`" will replay the changes made on the
  35`topic` branch since it diverged from `master` (i.e., `E`) until
  36its current commit (`C`) on top of `master`, and record the result
  37in a new commit along with the names of the two parent commits and
  38a log message from the user describing the changes.
  39
  40------------
  41          A---B---C topic
  42         /         \
  43    D---E---F---G---H master
  44------------
  45
  46The second syntax (<msg> `HEAD` <commit>...) is supported for
  47historical reasons.  Do not use it from the command line or in
  48new scripts.  It is the same as `git merge -m <msg> <commit>...`.
  49
  50*Warning*: Running 'git merge' with uncommitted changes is
  51discouraged: while possible, it leaves you in a state that is hard to
  52back out of in the case of a conflict.
  53
  54
  55OPTIONS
  56-------
  57include::merge-options.txt[]
  58
  59-m <msg>::
  60        Set the commit message to be used for the merge commit (in
  61        case one is created). The 'git fmt-merge-msg' command can be
  62        used to give a good default for automated 'git merge'
  63        invocations.
  64
  65--rerere-autoupdate::
  66--no-rerere-autoupdate::
  67        Allow the rerere mechanism to update the index with the
  68        result of auto-conflict resolution if possible.
  69
  70<commit>...::
  71        Commits, usually other branch heads, to merge into our branch.
  72        You need at least one <commit>.  Specifying more than one
  73        <commit> obviously means you are trying an Octopus.
  74
  75
  76PRE-MERGE CHECKS
  77----------------
  78
  79Before applying outside changes, you should get your own work in
  80good shape and committed locally, so it will not be clobbered if
  81there are conflicts.  See also linkgit:git-stash[1].
  82'git pull' and 'git merge' will stop without doing anything when
  83local uncommitted changes overlap with files that 'git pull'/'git
  84merge' may need to update.
  85
  86To avoid recording unrelated changes in the merge commit,
  87'git pull' and 'git merge' will also abort if there are any changes
  88registered in the index relative to the `HEAD` commit.  (One
  89exception is when the changed index entries are in the state that
  90would result from the merge already.)
  91
  92If all named commits are already ancestors of `HEAD`, 'git merge'
  93will exit early with the message "Already up-to-date."
  94
  95FAST-FORWARD MERGE
  96------------------
  97
  98Often the current branch head is an ancestor of the named commit.
  99This is the most common case especially when invoked from 'git
 100pull': you are tracking an upstream repository, you have committed
 101no local changes, and now you want to update to a newer upstream
 102revision.  In this case, a new commit is not needed to store the
 103combined history; instead, the `HEAD` (along with the index) is
 104updated to point at the named commit, without creating an extra
 105merge commit.
 106
 107This behavior can be suppressed with the `--no-ff` option.
 108
 109TRUE MERGE
 110----------
 111
 112Except in a fast-forward merge (see above), the branches to be
 113merged must be tied together by a merge commit that has both of them
 114as its parents.
 115
 116A merged version reconciling the changes from all branches to be
 117merged is committed, and your `HEAD`, index, and working tree are
 118updated to it.  It is possible to have modifications in the working
 119tree as long as they do not overlap; the update will preserve them.
 120
 121When it is not obvious how to reconcile the changes, the following
 122happens:
 123
 1241. The `HEAD` pointer stays the same.
 1252. The `MERGE_HEAD` ref is set to point to the other branch head.
 1263. Paths that merged cleanly are updated both in the index file and
 127   in your working tree.
 1284. For conflicting paths, the index file records up to three
 129   versions: stage 1 stores the version from the common ancestor,
 130   stage 2 from `HEAD`, and stage 3 from `MERGE_HEAD` (you
 131   can inspect the stages with `git ls-files -u`).  The working
 132   tree files contain the result of the "merge" program; i.e. 3-way
 133   merge results with familiar conflict markers `<<<` `===` `>>>`.
 1345. No other changes are made.  In particular, the local
 135   modifications you had before you started merge will stay the
 136   same and the index entries for them stay as they were,
 137   i.e. matching `HEAD`.
 138
 139If you tried a merge which resulted in complex conflicts and
 140want to start over, you can recover with `git reset --merge`.
 141
 142HOW CONFLICTS ARE PRESENTED
 143---------------------------
 144
 145During a merge, the working tree files are updated to reflect the result
 146of the merge.  Among the changes made to the common ancestor's version,
 147non-overlapping ones (that is, you changed an area of the file while the
 148other side left that area intact, or vice versa) are incorporated in the
 149final result verbatim.  When both sides made changes to the same area,
 150however, git cannot randomly pick one side over the other, and asks you to
 151resolve it by leaving what both sides did to that area.
 152
 153By default, git uses the same style as that is used by "merge" program
 154from the RCS suite to present such a conflicted hunk, like this:
 155
 156------------
 157Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
 158ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
 159<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
 160Conflict resolution is hard;
 161let's go shopping.
 162=======
 163Git makes conflict resolution easy.
 164>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
 165And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
 166------------
 167
 168The area where a pair of conflicting changes happened is marked with markers
 169`<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>`.  The part before the `=======`
 170is typically your side, and the part afterwards is typically their side.
 171
 172The default format does not show what the original said in the conflicting
 173area.  You cannot tell how many lines are deleted and replaced with
 174Barbie's remark on your side.  The only thing you can tell is that your
 175side wants to say it is hard and you'd prefer to go shopping, while the
 176other side wants to claim it is easy.
 177
 178An alternative style can be used by setting the "merge.conflictstyle"
 179configuration variable to "diff3".  In "diff3" style, the above conflict
 180may look like this:
 181
 182------------
 183Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
 184ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
 185<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
 186Conflict resolution is hard;
 187let's go shopping.
 188|||||||
 189Conflict resolution is hard.
 190=======
 191Git makes conflict resolution easy.
 192>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
 193And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
 194------------
 195
 196In addition to the `<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>` markers, it uses
 197another `|||||||` marker that is followed by the original text.  You can
 198tell that the original just stated a fact, and your side simply gave in to
 199that statement and gave up, while the other side tried to have a more
 200positive attitude.  You can sometimes come up with a better resolution by
 201viewing the original.
 202
 203
 204HOW TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS
 205------------------------
 206
 207After seeing a conflict, you can do two things:
 208
 209 * Decide not to merge.  The only clean-ups you need are to reset
 210   the index file to the `HEAD` commit to reverse 2. and to clean
 211   up working tree changes made by 2. and 3.; `git-reset --hard` can
 212   be used for this.
 213
 214 * Resolve the conflicts.  Git will mark the conflicts in
 215   the working tree.  Edit the files into shape and
 216   'git add' them to the index.  Use 'git commit' to seal the deal.
 217
 218You can work through the conflict with a number of tools:
 219
 220 * Use a mergetool.  `git mergetool` to launch a graphical
 221   mergetool which will work you through the merge.
 222
 223 * Look at the diffs.  `git diff` will show a three-way diff,
 224   highlighting changes from both the `HEAD` and `MERGE_HEAD`
 225   versions.
 226
 227 * Look at the diffs from each branch. `git log --merge -p <path>`
 228   will show diffs first for the `HEAD` version and then the
 229   `MERGE_HEAD` version.
 230
 231 * Look at the originals.  `git show :1:filename` shows the
 232   common ancestor, `git show :2:filename` shows the `HEAD`
 233   version, and `git show :3:filename` shows the `MERGE_HEAD`
 234   version.
 235
 236
 237EXAMPLES
 238--------
 239
 240* Merge branches `fixes` and `enhancements` on top of
 241  the current branch, making an octopus merge:
 242+
 243------------------------------------------------
 244$ git merge fixes enhancements
 245------------------------------------------------
 246
 247* Merge branch `obsolete` into the current branch, using `ours`
 248  merge strategy:
 249+
 250------------------------------------------------
 251$ git merge -s ours obsolete
 252------------------------------------------------
 253
 254* Merge branch `maint` into the current branch, but do not make
 255  a new commit automatically:
 256+
 257------------------------------------------------
 258$ git merge --no-commit maint
 259------------------------------------------------
 260+
 261This can be used when you want to include further changes to the
 262merge, or want to write your own merge commit message.
 263+
 264You should refrain from abusing this option to sneak substantial
 265changes into a merge commit.  Small fixups like bumping
 266release/version name would be acceptable.
 267
 268
 269include::merge-strategies.txt[]
 270
 271CONFIGURATION
 272-------------
 273include::merge-config.txt[]
 274
 275branch.<name>.mergeoptions::
 276        Sets default options for merging into branch <name>. The syntax and
 277        supported options are the same as those of 'git merge', but option
 278        values containing whitespace characters are currently not supported.
 279
 280SEE ALSO
 281--------
 282linkgit:git-fmt-merge-msg[1], linkgit:git-pull[1],
 283linkgit:gitattributes[5],
 284linkgit:git-reset[1],
 285linkgit:git-diff[1], linkgit:git-ls-files[1],
 286linkgit:git-add[1], linkgit:git-rm[1],
 287linkgit:git-mergetool[1]
 288
 289Author
 290------
 291Written by Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
 292
 293
 294Documentation
 295--------------
 296Documentation by Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>.
 297
 298GIT
 299---
 300Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite