1git-merge(1) 2============ 3 4NAME 5---- 6git-merge - Join two or more development histories together 7 8 9SYNOPSIS 10-------- 11[verse] 12'git merge' [-n] [--stat] [--no-commit] [--squash] [--[no-]edit] 13 [-s <strategy>] [-X <strategy-option>] [-S[<keyid>]] 14 [--[no-]rerere-autoupdate] [-m <msg>] [<commit>...] 15'git merge' <msg> HEAD <commit>... 16'git merge' --abort 17 18DESCRIPTION 19----------- 20Incorporates changes from the named commits (since the time their 21histories diverged from the current branch) into the current 22branch. This command is used by 'git pull' to incorporate changes 23from another repository and can be used by hand to merge changes 24from one branch into another. 25 26Assume the following history exists and the current branch is 27"`master`": 28 29------------ 30 A---B---C topic 31 / 32 D---E---F---G master 33------------ 34 35Then "`git merge topic`" will replay the changes made on the 36`topic` branch since it diverged from `master` (i.e., `E`) until 37its current commit (`C`) on top of `master`, and record the result 38in a new commit along with the names of the two parent commits and 39a log message from the user describing the changes. 40 41------------ 42 A---B---C topic 43 / \ 44 D---E---F---G---H master 45------------ 46 47The second syntax (<msg> `HEAD` <commit>...) is supported for 48historical reasons. Do not use it from the command line or in 49new scripts. It is the same as `git merge -m <msg> <commit>...`. 50 51The third syntax ("`git merge --abort`") can only be run after the 52merge has resulted in conflicts. 'git merge --abort' will abort the 53merge process and try to reconstruct the pre-merge state. However, 54if there were uncommitted changes when the merge started (and 55especially if those changes were further modified after the merge 56was started), 'git merge --abort' will in some cases be unable to 57reconstruct the original (pre-merge) changes. Therefore: 58 59*Warning*: Running 'git merge' with non-trivial uncommitted changes is 60discouraged: while possible, it may leave you in a state that is hard to 61back out of in the case of a conflict. 62 63 64OPTIONS 65------- 66include::merge-options.txt[] 67 68-S[<keyid>]:: 69--gpg-sign[=<keyid>]:: 70 GPG-sign the resulting merge commit. 71 72-m <msg>:: 73 Set the commit message to be used for the merge commit (in 74 case one is created). 75+ 76If `--log` is specified, a shortlog of the commits being merged 77will be appended to the specified message. 78+ 79The 'git fmt-merge-msg' command can be 80used to give a good default for automated 'git merge' 81invocations. 82 83--[no-]rerere-autoupdate:: 84 Allow the rerere mechanism to update the index with the 85 result of auto-conflict resolution if possible. 86 87--abort:: 88 Abort the current conflict resolution process, and 89 try to reconstruct the pre-merge state. 90+ 91If there were uncommitted worktree changes present when the merge 92started, 'git merge --abort' will in some cases be unable to 93reconstruct these changes. It is therefore recommended to always 94commit or stash your changes before running 'git merge'. 95+ 96'git merge --abort' is equivalent to 'git reset --merge' when 97`MERGE_HEAD` is present. 98 99<commit>...:: 100 Commits, usually other branch heads, to merge into our branch. 101 Specifying more than one commit will create a merge with 102 more than two parents (affectionately called an Octopus merge). 103+ 104If no commit is given from the command line, and if `merge.defaultToUpstream` 105configuration variable is set, merge the remote-tracking branches 106that the current branch is configured to use as its upstream. 107See also the configuration section of this manual page. 108 109 110PRE-MERGE CHECKS 111---------------- 112 113Before applying outside changes, you should get your own work in 114good shape and committed locally, so it will not be clobbered if 115there are conflicts. See also linkgit:git-stash[1]. 116'git pull' and 'git merge' will stop without doing anything when 117local uncommitted changes overlap with files that 'git pull'/'git 118merge' may need to update. 119 120To avoid recording unrelated changes in the merge commit, 121'git pull' and 'git merge' will also abort if there are any changes 122registered in the index relative to the `HEAD` commit. (One 123exception is when the changed index entries are in the state that 124would result from the merge already.) 125 126If all named commits are already ancestors of `HEAD`, 'git merge' 127will exit early with the message "Already up-to-date." 128 129FAST-FORWARD MERGE 130------------------ 131 132Often the current branch head is an ancestor of the named commit. 133This is the most common case especially when invoked from 'git 134pull': you are tracking an upstream repository, you have committed 135no local changes, and now you want to update to a newer upstream 136revision. In this case, a new commit is not needed to store the 137combined history; instead, the `HEAD` (along with the index) is 138updated to point at the named commit, without creating an extra 139merge commit. 140 141This behavior can be suppressed with the `--no-ff` option. 142 143TRUE MERGE 144---------- 145 146Except in a fast-forward merge (see above), the branches to be 147merged must be tied together by a merge commit that has both of them 148as its parents. 149 150A merged version reconciling the changes from all branches to be 151merged is committed, and your `HEAD`, index, and working tree are 152updated to it. It is possible to have modifications in the working 153tree as long as they do not overlap; the update will preserve them. 154 155When it is not obvious how to reconcile the changes, the following 156happens: 157 1581. The `HEAD` pointer stays the same. 1592. The `MERGE_HEAD` ref is set to point to the other branch head. 1603. Paths that merged cleanly are updated both in the index file and 161 in your working tree. 1624. For conflicting paths, the index file records up to three 163 versions: stage 1 stores the version from the common ancestor, 164 stage 2 from `HEAD`, and stage 3 from `MERGE_HEAD` (you 165 can inspect the stages with `git ls-files -u`). The working 166 tree files contain the result of the "merge" program; i.e. 3-way 167 merge results with familiar conflict markers `<<<` `===` `>>>`. 1685. No other changes are made. In particular, the local 169 modifications you had before you started merge will stay the 170 same and the index entries for them stay as they were, 171 i.e. matching `HEAD`. 172 173If you tried a merge which resulted in complex conflicts and 174want to start over, you can recover with `git merge --abort`. 175 176MERGING TAG 177----------- 178 179When merging an annotated (and possibly signed) tag, Git always 180creates a merge commit even if a fast-forward merge is possible, and 181the commit message template is prepared with the tag message. 182Additionally, if the tag is signed, the signature check is reported 183as a comment in the message template. See also linkgit:git-tag[1]. 184 185When you want to just integrate with the work leading to the commit 186that happens to be tagged, e.g. synchronizing with an upstream 187release point, you may not want to make an unnecessary merge commit. 188 189In such a case, you can "unwrap" the tag yourself before feeding it 190to `git merge`, or pass `--ff-only` when you do not have any work on 191your own. e.g. 192 193---- 194git fetch origin 195git merge v1.2.3^0 196git merge --ff-only v1.2.3 197---- 198 199 200HOW CONFLICTS ARE PRESENTED 201--------------------------- 202 203During a merge, the working tree files are updated to reflect the result 204of the merge. Among the changes made to the common ancestor's version, 205non-overlapping ones (that is, you changed an area of the file while the 206other side left that area intact, or vice versa) are incorporated in the 207final result verbatim. When both sides made changes to the same area, 208however, Git cannot randomly pick one side over the other, and asks you to 209resolve it by leaving what both sides did to that area. 210 211By default, Git uses the same style as the one used by the "merge" program 212from the RCS suite to present such a conflicted hunk, like this: 213 214------------ 215Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common 216ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed. 217<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt 218Conflict resolution is hard; 219let's go shopping. 220======= 221Git makes conflict resolution easy. 222>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt 223And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified. 224------------ 225 226The area where a pair of conflicting changes happened is marked with markers 227`<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>`. The part before the `=======` 228is typically your side, and the part afterwards is typically their side. 229 230The default format does not show what the original said in the conflicting 231area. You cannot tell how many lines are deleted and replaced with 232Barbie's remark on your side. The only thing you can tell is that your 233side wants to say it is hard and you'd prefer to go shopping, while the 234other side wants to claim it is easy. 235 236An alternative style can be used by setting the "merge.conflictstyle" 237configuration variable to "diff3". In "diff3" style, the above conflict 238may look like this: 239 240------------ 241Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common 242ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed. 243<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt 244Conflict resolution is hard; 245let's go shopping. 246||||||| 247Conflict resolution is hard. 248======= 249Git makes conflict resolution easy. 250>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt 251And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified. 252------------ 253 254In addition to the `<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>` markers, it uses 255another `|||||||` marker that is followed by the original text. You can 256tell that the original just stated a fact, and your side simply gave in to 257that statement and gave up, while the other side tried to have a more 258positive attitude. You can sometimes come up with a better resolution by 259viewing the original. 260 261 262HOW TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS 263------------------------ 264 265After seeing a conflict, you can do two things: 266 267 * Decide not to merge. The only clean-ups you need are to reset 268 the index file to the `HEAD` commit to reverse 2. and to clean 269 up working tree changes made by 2. and 3.; `git merge --abort` 270 can be used for this. 271 272 * Resolve the conflicts. Git will mark the conflicts in 273 the working tree. Edit the files into shape and 274 'git add' them to the index. Use 'git commit' to seal the deal. 275 276You can work through the conflict with a number of tools: 277 278 * Use a mergetool. `git mergetool` to launch a graphical 279 mergetool which will work you through the merge. 280 281 * Look at the diffs. `git diff` will show a three-way diff, 282 highlighting changes from both the `HEAD` and `MERGE_HEAD` 283 versions. 284 285 * Look at the diffs from each branch. `git log --merge -p <path>` 286 will show diffs first for the `HEAD` version and then the 287 `MERGE_HEAD` version. 288 289 * Look at the originals. `git show :1:filename` shows the 290 common ancestor, `git show :2:filename` shows the `HEAD` 291 version, and `git show :3:filename` shows the `MERGE_HEAD` 292 version. 293 294 295EXAMPLES 296-------- 297 298* Merge branches `fixes` and `enhancements` on top of 299 the current branch, making an octopus merge: 300+ 301------------------------------------------------ 302$ git merge fixes enhancements 303------------------------------------------------ 304 305* Merge branch `obsolete` into the current branch, using `ours` 306 merge strategy: 307+ 308------------------------------------------------ 309$ git merge -s ours obsolete 310------------------------------------------------ 311 312* Merge branch `maint` into the current branch, but do not make 313 a new commit automatically: 314+ 315------------------------------------------------ 316$ git merge --no-commit maint 317------------------------------------------------ 318+ 319This can be used when you want to include further changes to the 320merge, or want to write your own merge commit message. 321+ 322You should refrain from abusing this option to sneak substantial 323changes into a merge commit. Small fixups like bumping 324release/version name would be acceptable. 325 326 327include::merge-strategies.txt[] 328 329CONFIGURATION 330------------- 331include::merge-config.txt[] 332 333branch.<name>.mergeoptions:: 334 Sets default options for merging into branch <name>. The syntax and 335 supported options are the same as those of 'git merge', but option 336 values containing whitespace characters are currently not supported. 337 338SEE ALSO 339-------- 340linkgit:git-fmt-merge-msg[1], linkgit:git-pull[1], 341linkgit:gitattributes[5], 342linkgit:git-reset[1], 343linkgit:git-diff[1], linkgit:git-ls-files[1], 344linkgit:git-add[1], linkgit:git-rm[1], 345linkgit:git-mergetool[1] 346 347GIT 348--- 349Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite