Documentation / git-tag.txton commit Git 2.12.5 (9752ad0)
   1git-tag(1)
   2==========
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-tag - Create, list, delete or verify a tag object signed with GPG
   7
   8
   9SYNOPSIS
  10--------
  11[verse]
  12'git tag' [-a | -s | -u <keyid>] [-f] [-m <msg> | -F <file>]
  13        <tagname> [<commit> | <object>]
  14'git tag' -d <tagname>...
  15'git tag' [-n[<num>]] -l [--contains <commit>] [--points-at <object>]
  16        [--column[=<options>] | --no-column] [--create-reflog] [--sort=<key>]
  17        [--format=<format>] [--[no-]merged [<commit>]] [<pattern>...]
  18'git tag' -v [--format=<format>] <tagname>...
  19
  20DESCRIPTION
  21-----------
  22
  23Add a tag reference in `refs/tags/`, unless `-d/-l/-v` is given
  24to delete, list or verify tags.
  25
  26Unless `-f` is given, the named tag must not yet exist.
  27
  28If one of `-a`, `-s`, or `-u <keyid>` is passed, the command
  29creates a 'tag' object, and requires a tag message.  Unless
  30`-m <msg>` or `-F <file>` is given, an editor is started for the user to type
  31in the tag message.
  32
  33If `-m <msg>` or `-F <file>` is given and `-a`, `-s`, and `-u <keyid>`
  34are absent, `-a` is implied.
  35
  36Otherwise just a tag reference for the SHA-1 object name of the commit object is
  37created (i.e. a lightweight tag).
  38
  39A GnuPG signed tag object will be created when `-s` or `-u
  40<keyid>` is used.  When `-u <keyid>` is not used, the
  41committer identity for the current user is used to find the
  42GnuPG key for signing.  The configuration variable `gpg.program`
  43is used to specify custom GnuPG binary.
  44
  45Tag objects (created with `-a`, `-s`, or `-u`) are called "annotated"
  46tags; they contain a creation date, the tagger name and e-mail, a
  47tagging message, and an optional GnuPG signature. Whereas a
  48"lightweight" tag is simply a name for an object (usually a commit
  49object).
  50
  51Annotated tags are meant for release while lightweight tags are meant
  52for private or temporary object labels. For this reason, some git
  53commands for naming objects (like `git describe`) will ignore
  54lightweight tags by default.
  55
  56
  57OPTIONS
  58-------
  59-a::
  60--annotate::
  61        Make an unsigned, annotated tag object
  62
  63-s::
  64--sign::
  65        Make a GPG-signed tag, using the default e-mail address's key.
  66
  67-u <keyid>::
  68--local-user=<keyid>::
  69        Make a GPG-signed tag, using the given key.
  70
  71-f::
  72--force::
  73        Replace an existing tag with the given name (instead of failing)
  74
  75-d::
  76--delete::
  77        Delete existing tags with the given names.
  78
  79-v::
  80--verify::
  81        Verify the GPG signature of the given tag names.
  82
  83-n<num>::
  84        <num> specifies how many lines from the annotation, if any,
  85        are printed when using -l.
  86        The default is not to print any annotation lines.
  87        If no number is given to `-n`, only the first line is printed.
  88        If the tag is not annotated, the commit message is displayed instead.
  89
  90-l <pattern>::
  91--list <pattern>::
  92        List tags with names that match the given pattern (or all if no
  93        pattern is given).  Running "git tag" without arguments also
  94        lists all tags. The pattern is a shell wildcard (i.e., matched
  95        using fnmatch(3)).  Multiple patterns may be given; if any of
  96        them matches, the tag is shown.
  97
  98--sort=<key>::
  99        Sort based on the key given.  Prefix `-` to sort in
 100        descending order of the value. You may use the --sort=<key> option
 101        multiple times, in which case the last key becomes the primary
 102        key. Also supports "version:refname" or "v:refname" (tag
 103        names are treated as versions). The "version:refname" sort
 104        order can also be affected by the "versionsort.suffix"
 105        configuration variable.
 106        The keys supported are the same as those in `git for-each-ref`.
 107        Sort order defaults to the value configured for the `tag.sort`
 108        variable if it exists, or lexicographic order otherwise. See
 109        linkgit:git-config[1].
 110
 111-i::
 112--ignore-case::
 113        Sorting and filtering tags are case insensitive.
 114
 115--column[=<options>]::
 116--no-column::
 117        Display tag listing in columns. See configuration variable
 118        column.tag for option syntax.`--column` and `--no-column`
 119        without options are equivalent to 'always' and 'never' respectively.
 120+
 121This option is only applicable when listing tags without annotation lines.
 122
 123--contains [<commit>]::
 124        Only list tags which contain the specified commit (HEAD if not
 125        specified).
 126
 127--points-at <object>::
 128        Only list tags of the given object.
 129
 130-m <msg>::
 131--message=<msg>::
 132        Use the given tag message (instead of prompting).
 133        If multiple `-m` options are given, their values are
 134        concatenated as separate paragraphs.
 135        Implies `-a` if none of `-a`, `-s`, or `-u <keyid>`
 136        is given.
 137
 138-F <file>::
 139--file=<file>::
 140        Take the tag message from the given file.  Use '-' to
 141        read the message from the standard input.
 142        Implies `-a` if none of `-a`, `-s`, or `-u <keyid>`
 143        is given.
 144
 145--cleanup=<mode>::
 146        This option sets how the tag message is cleaned up.
 147        The  '<mode>' can be one of 'verbatim', 'whitespace' and 'strip'.  The
 148        'strip' mode is default. The 'verbatim' mode does not change message at
 149        all, 'whitespace' removes just leading/trailing whitespace lines and
 150        'strip' removes both whitespace and commentary.
 151
 152--create-reflog::
 153        Create a reflog for the tag. To globally enable reflogs for tags, see
 154        `core.logAllRefUpdates` in linkgit:git-config[1].
 155        The negated form `--no-create-reflog` only overrides an earlier
 156        `--create-reflog`, but currently does not negate the setting of
 157        `core.logallrefupdates`.
 158
 159<tagname>::
 160        The name of the tag to create, delete, or describe.
 161        The new tag name must pass all checks defined by
 162        linkgit:git-check-ref-format[1].  Some of these checks
 163        may restrict the characters allowed in a tag name.
 164
 165<commit>::
 166<object>::
 167        The object that the new tag will refer to, usually a commit.
 168        Defaults to HEAD.
 169
 170<format>::
 171        A string that interpolates `%(fieldname)` from the object
 172        pointed at by a ref being shown.  The format is the same as
 173        that of linkgit:git-for-each-ref[1].  When unspecified,
 174        defaults to `%(refname:strip=2)`.
 175
 176--[no-]merged [<commit>]::
 177        Only list tags whose tips are reachable, or not reachable
 178        if `--no-merged` is used, from the specified commit (`HEAD`
 179        if not specified).
 180
 181CONFIGURATION
 182-------------
 183By default, 'git tag' in sign-with-default mode (-s) will use your
 184committer identity (of the form `Your Name <your@email.address>`) to
 185find a key.  If you want to use a different default key, you can specify
 186it in the repository configuration as follows:
 187
 188-------------------------------------
 189[user]
 190    signingKey = <gpg-keyid>
 191-------------------------------------
 192
 193
 194DISCUSSION
 195----------
 196
 197On Re-tagging
 198~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 199
 200What should you do when you tag a wrong commit and you would
 201want to re-tag?
 202
 203If you never pushed anything out, just re-tag it. Use "-f" to
 204replace the old one. And you're done.
 205
 206But if you have pushed things out (or others could just read
 207your repository directly), then others will have already seen
 208the old tag. In that case you can do one of two things:
 209
 210. The sane thing.
 211Just admit you screwed up, and use a different name. Others have
 212already seen one tag-name, and if you keep the same name, you
 213may be in the situation that two people both have "version X",
 214but they actually have 'different' "X"'s.  So just call it "X.1"
 215and be done with it.
 216
 217. The insane thing.
 218You really want to call the new version "X" too, 'even though'
 219others have already seen the old one. So just use 'git tag -f'
 220again, as if you hadn't already published the old one.
 221
 222However, Git does *not* (and it should not) change tags behind
 223users back. So if somebody already got the old tag, doing a
 224'git pull' on your tree shouldn't just make them overwrite the old
 225one.
 226
 227If somebody got a release tag from you, you cannot just change
 228the tag for them by updating your own one. This is a big
 229security issue, in that people MUST be able to trust their
 230tag-names.  If you really want to do the insane thing, you need
 231to just fess up to it, and tell people that you messed up. You
 232can do that by making a very public announcement saying:
 233
 234------------
 235Ok, I messed up, and I pushed out an earlier version tagged as X. I
 236then fixed something, and retagged the *fixed* tree as X again.
 237
 238If you got the wrong tag, and want the new one, please delete
 239the old one and fetch the new one by doing:
 240
 241        git tag -d X
 242        git fetch origin tag X
 243
 244to get my updated tag.
 245
 246You can test which tag you have by doing
 247
 248        git rev-parse X
 249
 250which should return 0123456789abcdef.. if you have the new version.
 251
 252Sorry for the inconvenience.
 253------------
 254
 255Does this seem a bit complicated?  It *should* be. There is no
 256way that it would be correct to just "fix" it automatically.
 257People need to know that their tags might have been changed.
 258
 259
 260On Automatic following
 261~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 262
 263If you are following somebody else's tree, you are most likely
 264using remote-tracking branches (eg. `refs/remotes/origin/master`).
 265You usually want the tags from the other end.
 266
 267On the other hand, if you are fetching because you would want a
 268one-shot merge from somebody else, you typically do not want to
 269get tags from there.  This happens more often for people near
 270the toplevel but not limited to them.  Mere mortals when pulling
 271from each other do not necessarily want to automatically get
 272private anchor point tags from the other person.
 273
 274Often, "please pull" messages on the mailing list just provide
 275two pieces of information: a repo URL and a branch name; this
 276is designed to be easily cut&pasted at the end of a 'git fetch'
 277command line:
 278
 279------------
 280Linus, please pull from
 281
 282        git://git..../proj.git master
 283
 284to get the following updates...
 285------------
 286
 287becomes:
 288
 289------------
 290$ git pull git://git..../proj.git master
 291------------
 292
 293In such a case, you do not want to automatically follow the other
 294person's tags.
 295
 296One important aspect of Git is its distributed nature, which
 297largely means there is no inherent "upstream" or
 298"downstream" in the system.  On the face of it, the above
 299example might seem to indicate that the tag namespace is owned
 300by the upper echelon of people and that tags only flow downwards, but
 301that is not the case.  It only shows that the usage pattern
 302determines who are interested in whose tags.
 303
 304A one-shot pull is a sign that a commit history is now crossing
 305the boundary between one circle of people (e.g. "people who are
 306primarily interested in the networking part of the kernel") who may
 307have their own set of tags (e.g. "this is the third release
 308candidate from the networking group to be proposed for general
 309consumption with 2.6.21 release") to another circle of people
 310(e.g. "people who integrate various subsystem improvements").
 311The latter are usually not interested in the detailed tags used
 312internally in the former group (that is what "internal" means).
 313That is why it is desirable not to follow tags automatically in
 314this case.
 315
 316It may well be that among networking people, they may want to
 317exchange the tags internal to their group, but in that workflow
 318they are most likely tracking each other's progress by
 319having remote-tracking branches.  Again, the heuristic to automatically
 320follow such tags is a good thing.
 321
 322
 323On Backdating Tags
 324~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 325
 326If you have imported some changes from another VCS and would like
 327to add tags for major releases of your work, it is useful to be able
 328to specify the date to embed inside of the tag object; such data in
 329the tag object affects, for example, the ordering of tags in the
 330gitweb interface.
 331
 332To set the date used in future tag objects, set the environment
 333variable GIT_COMMITTER_DATE (see the later discussion of possible
 334values; the most common form is "YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM").
 335
 336For example:
 337
 338------------
 339$ GIT_COMMITTER_DATE="2006-10-02 10:31" git tag -s v1.0.1
 340------------
 341
 342include::date-formats.txt[]
 343
 344SEE ALSO
 345--------
 346linkgit:git-check-ref-format[1].
 347linkgit:git-config[1].
 348
 349GIT
 350---
 351Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite