Documentation / git-merge.txton commit Merge branch 'maint' (9aae177)
   1git-merge(1)
   2============
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-merge - Join two or more development histories together
   7
   8
   9SYNOPSIS
  10--------
  11[verse]
  12'git-merge' [-n] [--no-commit] [--squash] [-s <strategy>]...
  13        [-m <msg>] <remote> <remote>...
  14
  15DESCRIPTION
  16-----------
  17This is the top-level interface to the merge machinery
  18which drives multiple merge strategy scripts.
  19
  20
  21OPTIONS
  22-------
  23include::merge-options.txt[]
  24
  25<msg>::
  26        The commit message to be used for the merge commit (in case
  27        it is created). The `git-fmt-merge-msg` script can be used
  28        to give a good default for automated `git-merge` invocations.
  29
  30<head>::
  31        Our branch head commit.  This has to be `HEAD`, so new
  32        syntax does not require it
  33
  34<remote>::
  35        Other branch head merged into our branch.  You need at
  36        least one <remote>.  Specifying more than one <remote>
  37        obviously means you are trying an Octopus.
  38
  39include::merge-strategies.txt[]
  40
  41
  42If you tried a merge which resulted in a complex conflicts and
  43would want to start over, you can recover with
  44gitlink:git-reset[1].
  45
  46
  47HOW MERGE WORKS
  48---------------
  49
  50A merge is always between the current `HEAD` and one or more
  51remote branch heads, and the index file must exactly match the
  52tree of `HEAD` commit (i.e. the contents of the last commit) when
  53it happens.  In other words, `git-diff --cached HEAD` must
  54report no changes.
  55
  56[NOTE]
  57This is a bit of lie.  In certain special cases, your index are
  58allowed to be different from the tree of `HEAD` commit.  The most
  59notable case is when your `HEAD` commit is already ahead of what
  60is being merged, in which case your index can have arbitrary
  61difference from your `HEAD` commit.  Otherwise, your index entries
  62are allowed have differences from your `HEAD` commit that match
  63the result of trivial merge (e.g. you received the same patch
  64from external source to produce the same result as what you are
  65merging).  For example, if a path did not exist in the common
  66ancestor and your head commit but exists in the tree you are
  67merging into your repository, and if you already happen to have
  68that path exactly in your index, the merge does not have to
  69fail.
  70
  71Otherwise, merge will refuse to do any harm to your repository
  72(that is, it may fetch the objects from remote, and it may even
  73update the local branch used to keep track of the remote branch
  74with `git pull remote rbranch:lbranch`, but your working tree,
  75`.git/HEAD` pointer and index file are left intact).
  76
  77You may have local modifications in the working tree files.  In
  78other words, `git-diff` is allowed to report changes.
  79However, the merge uses your working tree as the working area,
  80and in order to prevent the merge operation from losing such
  81changes, it makes sure that they do not interfere with the
  82merge. Those complex tables in read-tree documentation define
  83what it means for a path to "interfere with the merge".  And if
  84your local modifications interfere with the merge, again, it
  85stops before touching anything.
  86
  87So in the above two "failed merge" case, you do not have to
  88worry about loss of data --- you simply were not ready to do
  89a merge, so no merge happened at all.  You may want to finish
  90whatever you were in the middle of doing, and retry the same
  91pull after you are done and ready.
  92
  93When things cleanly merge, these things happen:
  94
  951. the results are updated both in the index file and in your
  96   working tree,
  972. index file is written out as a tree,
  983. the tree gets committed, and 
  994. the `HEAD` pointer gets advanced.
 100
 101Because of 2., we require that the original state of the index
 102file to match exactly the current `HEAD` commit; otherwise we
 103will write out your local changes already registered in your
 104index file along with the merge result, which is not good.
 105Because 1. involves only the paths different between your
 106branch and the remote branch you are pulling from during the
 107merge (which is typically a fraction of the whole tree), you can
 108have local modifications in your working tree as long as they do
 109not overlap with what the merge updates.
 110
 111When there are conflicts, these things happen:
 112
 1131. `HEAD` stays the same.
 114
 1152. Cleanly merged paths are updated both in the index file and
 116   in your working tree.
 117
 1183. For conflicting paths, the index file records up to three
 119   versions; stage1 stores the version from the common ancestor,
 120   stage2 from `HEAD`, and stage3 from the remote branch (you
 121   can inspect the stages with `git-ls-files -u`).  The working
 122   tree files have the result of "merge" program; i.e. 3-way
 123   merge result with familiar conflict markers `<<< === >>>`.
 124
 1254. No other changes are done.  In particular, the local
 126   modifications you had before you started merge will stay the
 127   same and the index entries for them stay as they were,
 128   i.e. matching `HEAD`.
 129
 130After seeing a conflict, you can do two things:
 131
 132 * Decide not to merge.  The only clean-up you need are to reset
 133   the index file to the `HEAD` commit to reverse 2. and to clean
 134   up working tree changes made by 2. and 3.; `git-reset` can
 135   be used for this.
 136
 137 * Resolve the conflicts.  `git-diff` would report only the
 138   conflicting paths because of the above 2. and 3..  Edit the
 139   working tree files into a desirable shape, `git-add` or `git-rm`
 140   them, to make the index file contain what the merge result
 141   should be, and run `git-commit` to commit the result.
 142
 143
 144SEE ALSO
 145--------
 146gitlink:git-fmt-merge-msg[1], gitlink:git-pull[1]
 147
 148
 149Author
 150------
 151Written by Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
 152
 153
 154Documentation
 155--------------
 156Documentation by Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>.
 157
 158GIT
 159---
 160Part of the gitlink:git[7] suite