Documentation / git-checkout.txton commit Merge 'kn/for-each-tag-branch' into kn/for-each-tag (a123b19)
   1git-checkout(1)
   2===============
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-checkout - Switch branches or restore working tree files
   7
   8SYNOPSIS
   9--------
  10[verse]
  11'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [<branch>]
  12'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] --detach [<branch>]
  13'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [--detach] <commit>
  14'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [[-b|-B|--orphan] <new_branch>] [<start_point>]
  15'git checkout' [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] [--] <paths>...
  16'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] [<paths>...]
  17
  18DESCRIPTION
  19-----------
  20Updates files in the working tree to match the version in the index
  21or the specified tree.  If no paths are given, 'git checkout' will
  22also update `HEAD` to set the specified branch as the current
  23branch.
  24
  25'git checkout' <branch>::
  26        To prepare for working on <branch>, switch to it by updating
  27        the index and the files in the working tree, and by pointing
  28        HEAD at the branch. Local modifications to the files in the
  29        working tree are kept, so that they can be committed to the
  30        <branch>.
  31+
  32If <branch> is not found but there does exist a tracking branch in
  33exactly one remote (call it <remote>) with a matching name, treat as
  34equivalent to
  35+
  36------------
  37$ git checkout -b <branch> --track <remote>/<branch>
  38------------
  39+
  40You could omit <branch>, in which case the command degenerates to
  41"check out the current branch", which is a glorified no-op with a
  42rather expensive side-effects to show only the tracking information,
  43if exists, for the current branch.
  44
  45'git checkout' -b|-B <new_branch> [<start point>]::
  46
  47        Specifying `-b` causes a new branch to be created as if
  48        linkgit:git-branch[1] were called and then checked out.  In
  49        this case you can use the `--track` or `--no-track` options,
  50        which will be passed to 'git branch'.  As a convenience,
  51        `--track` without `-b` implies branch creation; see the
  52        description of `--track` below.
  53+
  54If `-B` is given, <new_branch> is created if it doesn't exist; otherwise, it
  55is reset. This is the transactional equivalent of
  56+
  57------------
  58$ git branch -f <branch> [<start point>]
  59$ git checkout <branch>
  60------------
  61+
  62that is to say, the branch is not reset/created unless "git checkout" is
  63successful.
  64
  65'git checkout' --detach [<branch>]::
  66'git checkout' [--detach] <commit>::
  67
  68        Prepare to work on top of <commit>, by detaching HEAD at it
  69        (see "DETACHED HEAD" section), and updating the index and the
  70        files in the working tree.  Local modifications to the files
  71        in the working tree are kept, so that the resulting working
  72        tree will be the state recorded in the commit plus the local
  73        modifications.
  74+
  75When the <commit> argument is a branch name, the `--detach` option can
  76be used to detach HEAD at the tip of the branch (`git checkout
  77<branch>` would check out that branch without detaching HEAD).
  78+
  79Omitting <branch> detaches HEAD at the tip of the current branch.
  80
  81'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>...::
  82
  83        When <paths> or `--patch` are given, 'git checkout' does *not*
  84        switch branches.  It updates the named paths in the working tree
  85        from the index file or from a named <tree-ish> (most often a
  86        commit).  In this case, the `-b` and `--track` options are
  87        meaningless and giving either of them results in an error.  The
  88        <tree-ish> argument can be used to specify a specific tree-ish
  89        (i.e.  commit, tag or tree) to update the index for the given
  90        paths before updating the working tree.
  91+
  92'git checkout' with <paths> or `--patch` is used to restore modified or
  93deleted paths to their original contents from the index or replace paths
  94with the contents from a named <tree-ish> (most often a commit-ish).
  95+
  96The index may contain unmerged entries because of a previous failed merge.
  97By default, if you try to check out such an entry from the index, the
  98checkout operation will fail and nothing will be checked out.
  99Using `-f` will ignore these unmerged entries.  The contents from a
 100specific side of the merge can be checked out of the index by
 101using `--ours` or `--theirs`.  With `-m`, changes made to the working tree
 102file can be discarded to re-create the original conflicted merge result.
 103
 104OPTIONS
 105-------
 106-q::
 107--quiet::
 108        Quiet, suppress feedback messages.
 109
 110-f::
 111--force::
 112        When switching branches, proceed even if the index or the
 113        working tree differs from HEAD.  This is used to throw away
 114        local changes.
 115+
 116When checking out paths from the index, do not fail upon unmerged
 117entries; instead, unmerged entries are ignored.
 118
 119--ours::
 120--theirs::
 121        When checking out paths from the index, check out stage #2
 122        ('ours') or #3 ('theirs') for unmerged paths.
 123+
 124Note that during `git rebase` and `git pull --rebase`, 'ours' and
 125'theirs' may appear swapped; `--ours` gives the version from the
 126branch the changes are rebased onto, while `--theirs` gives the
 127version from the branch that holds your work that is being rebased.
 128+
 129This is because `rebase` is used in a workflow that treats the
 130history at the remote as the shared canonical one, and treats the
 131work done on the branch you are rebasing as the third-party work to
 132be integrated, and you are temporarily assuming the role of the
 133keeper of the canonical history during the rebase.  As the keeper of
 134the canonical history, you need to view the history from the remote
 135as `ours` (i.e. "our shared canonical history"), while what you did
 136on your side branch as `theirs` (i.e. "one contributor's work on top
 137of it").
 138
 139-b <new_branch>::
 140        Create a new branch named <new_branch> and start it at
 141        <start_point>; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for details.
 142
 143-B <new_branch>::
 144        Creates the branch <new_branch> and start it at <start_point>;
 145        if it already exists, then reset it to <start_point>. This is
 146        equivalent to running "git branch" with "-f"; see
 147        linkgit:git-branch[1] for details.
 148
 149-t::
 150--track::
 151        When creating a new branch, set up "upstream" configuration. See
 152        "--track" in linkgit:git-branch[1] for details.
 153+
 154If no '-b' option is given, the name of the new branch will be
 155derived from the remote-tracking branch, by looking at the local part of
 156the refspec configured for the corresponding remote, and then stripping
 157the initial part up to the "*".
 158This would tell us to use "hack" as the local branch when branching
 159off of "origin/hack" (or "remotes/origin/hack", or even
 160"refs/remotes/origin/hack").  If the given name has no slash, or the above
 161guessing results in an empty name, the guessing is aborted.  You can
 162explicitly give a name with '-b' in such a case.
 163
 164--no-track::
 165        Do not set up "upstream" configuration, even if the
 166        branch.autoSetupMerge configuration variable is true.
 167
 168-l::
 169        Create the new branch's reflog; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for
 170        details.
 171
 172--detach::
 173        Rather than checking out a branch to work on it, check out a
 174        commit for inspection and discardable experiments.
 175        This is the default behavior of "git checkout <commit>" when
 176        <commit> is not a branch name.  See the "DETACHED HEAD" section
 177        below for details.
 178
 179--orphan <new_branch>::
 180        Create a new 'orphan' branch, named <new_branch>, started from
 181        <start_point> and switch to it.  The first commit made on this
 182        new branch will have no parents and it will be the root of a new
 183        history totally disconnected from all the other branches and
 184        commits.
 185+
 186The index and the working tree are adjusted as if you had previously run
 187"git checkout <start_point>".  This allows you to start a new history
 188that records a set of paths similar to <start_point> by easily running
 189"git commit -a" to make the root commit.
 190+
 191This can be useful when you want to publish the tree from a commit
 192without exposing its full history. You might want to do this to publish
 193an open source branch of a project whose current tree is "clean", but
 194whose full history contains proprietary or otherwise encumbered bits of
 195code.
 196+
 197If you want to start a disconnected history that records a set of paths
 198that is totally different from the one of <start_point>, then you should
 199clear the index and the working tree right after creating the orphan
 200branch by running "git rm -rf ." from the top level of the working tree.
 201Afterwards you will be ready to prepare your new files, repopulating the
 202working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc.
 203
 204--ignore-skip-worktree-bits::
 205        In sparse checkout mode, `git checkout -- <paths>` would
 206        update only entries matched by <paths> and sparse patterns
 207        in $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout. This option ignores
 208        the sparse patterns and adds back any files in <paths>.
 209
 210-m::
 211--merge::
 212        When switching branches,
 213        if you have local modifications to one or more files that
 214        are different between the current branch and the branch to
 215        which you are switching, the command refuses to switch
 216        branches in order to preserve your modifications in context.
 217        However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current
 218        branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch
 219        is done, and you will be on the new branch.
 220+
 221When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting
 222paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts
 223and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge
 224should result in deletion of the path).
 225+
 226When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate
 227the conflicted merge in the specified paths.
 228
 229--conflict=<style>::
 230        The same as --merge option above, but changes the way the
 231        conflicting hunks are presented, overriding the
 232        merge.conflictStyle configuration variable.  Possible values are
 233        "merge" (default) and "diff3" (in addition to what is shown by
 234        "merge" style, shows the original contents).
 235
 236-p::
 237--patch::
 238        Interactively select hunks in the difference between the
 239        <tree-ish> (or the index, if unspecified) and the working
 240        tree.  The chosen hunks are then applied in reverse to the
 241        working tree (and if a <tree-ish> was specified, the index).
 242+
 243This means that you can use `git checkout -p` to selectively discard
 244edits from your current working tree. See the ``Interactive Mode''
 245section of linkgit:git-add[1] to learn how to operate the `--patch` mode.
 246
 247--ignore-other-worktrees::
 248        `git checkout` refuses when the wanted ref is already checked
 249        out by another worktree. This option makes it check the ref
 250        out anyway. In other words, the ref can be held by more than one
 251        worktree.
 252
 253<branch>::
 254        Branch to checkout; if it refers to a branch (i.e., a name that,
 255        when prepended with "refs/heads/", is a valid ref), then that
 256        branch is checked out. Otherwise, if it refers to a valid
 257        commit, your HEAD becomes "detached" and you are no longer on
 258        any branch (see below for details).
 259+
 260As a special case, the `"@{-N}"` syntax for the N-th last branch/commit
 261checks out branches (instead of detaching).  You may also specify
 262`-` which is synonymous with `"@{-1}"`.
 263+
 264As a further special case, you may use `"A...B"` as a shortcut for the
 265merge base of `A` and `B` if there is exactly one merge base. You can
 266leave out at most one of `A` and `B`, in which case it defaults to `HEAD`.
 267
 268<new_branch>::
 269        Name for the new branch.
 270
 271<start_point>::
 272        The name of a commit at which to start the new branch; see
 273        linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. Defaults to HEAD.
 274
 275<tree-ish>::
 276        Tree to checkout from (when paths are given). If not specified,
 277        the index will be used.
 278
 279
 280
 281DETACHED HEAD
 282-------------
 283HEAD normally refers to a named branch (e.g. 'master'). Meanwhile, each
 284branch refers to a specific commit. Let's look at a repo with three
 285commits, one of them tagged, and with branch 'master' checked out:
 286
 287------------
 288           HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
 289            |
 290            v
 291a---b---c  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'c')
 292    ^
 293    |
 294  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 295------------
 296
 297When a commit is created in this state, the branch is updated to refer to
 298the new commit. Specifically, 'git commit' creates a new commit 'd', whose
 299parent is commit 'c', and then updates branch 'master' to refer to new
 300commit 'd'. HEAD still refers to branch 'master' and so indirectly now refers
 301to commit 'd':
 302
 303------------
 304$ edit; git add; git commit
 305
 306               HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
 307                |
 308                v
 309a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 310    ^
 311    |
 312  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 313------------
 314
 315It is sometimes useful to be able to checkout a commit that is not at
 316the tip of any named branch, or even to create a new commit that is not
 317referenced by a named branch. Let's look at what happens when we
 318checkout commit 'b' (here we show two ways this may be done):
 319
 320------------
 321$ git checkout v2.0  # or
 322$ git checkout master^^
 323
 324   HEAD (refers to commit 'b')
 325    |
 326    v
 327a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 328    ^
 329    |
 330  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 331------------
 332
 333Notice that regardless of which checkout command we use, HEAD now refers
 334directly to commit 'b'. This is known as being in detached HEAD state.
 335It means simply that HEAD refers to a specific commit, as opposed to
 336referring to a named branch. Let's see what happens when we create a commit:
 337
 338------------
 339$ edit; git add; git commit
 340
 341     HEAD (refers to commit 'e')
 342      |
 343      v
 344      e
 345     /
 346a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 347    ^
 348    |
 349  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 350------------
 351
 352There is now a new commit 'e', but it is referenced only by HEAD. We can
 353of course add yet another commit in this state:
 354
 355------------
 356$ edit; git add; git commit
 357
 358         HEAD (refers to commit 'f')
 359          |
 360          v
 361      e---f
 362     /
 363a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 364    ^
 365    |
 366  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 367------------
 368
 369In fact, we can perform all the normal Git operations. But, let's look
 370at what happens when we then checkout master:
 371
 372------------
 373$ git checkout master
 374
 375               HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
 376      e---f     |
 377     /          v
 378a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 379    ^
 380    |
 381  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 382------------
 383
 384It is important to realize that at this point nothing refers to commit
 385'f'. Eventually commit 'f' (and by extension commit 'e') will be deleted
 386by the routine Git garbage collection process, unless we create a reference
 387before that happens. If we have not yet moved away from commit 'f',
 388any of these will create a reference to it:
 389
 390------------
 391$ git checkout -b foo   <1>
 392$ git branch foo        <2>
 393$ git tag foo           <3>
 394------------
 395
 396<1> creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', and then
 397updates HEAD to refer to branch 'foo'. In other words, we'll no longer
 398be in detached HEAD state after this command.
 399
 400<2> similarly creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f',
 401but leaves HEAD detached.
 402
 403<3> creates a new tag 'foo', which refers to commit 'f',
 404leaving HEAD detached.
 405
 406If we have moved away from commit 'f', then we must first recover its object
 407name (typically by using git reflog), and then we can create a reference to
 408it. For example, to see the last two commits to which HEAD referred, we
 409can use either of these commands:
 410
 411------------
 412$ git reflog -2 HEAD # or
 413$ git log -g -2 HEAD
 414------------
 415
 416EXAMPLES
 417--------
 418
 419. The following sequence checks out the `master` branch, reverts
 420the `Makefile` to two revisions back, deletes hello.c by
 421mistake, and gets it back from the index.
 422+
 423------------
 424$ git checkout master             <1>
 425$ git checkout master~2 Makefile  <2>
 426$ rm -f hello.c
 427$ git checkout hello.c            <3>
 428------------
 429+
 430<1> switch branch
 431<2> take a file out of another commit
 432<3> restore hello.c from the index
 433+
 434If you want to check out _all_ C source files out of the index,
 435you can say
 436+
 437------------
 438$ git checkout -- '*.c'
 439------------
 440+
 441Note the quotes around `*.c`.  The file `hello.c` will also be
 442checked out, even though it is no longer in the working tree,
 443because the file globbing is used to match entries in the index
 444(not in the working tree by the shell).
 445+
 446If you have an unfortunate branch that is named `hello.c`, this
 447step would be confused as an instruction to switch to that branch.
 448You should instead write:
 449+
 450------------
 451$ git checkout -- hello.c
 452------------
 453
 454. After working in the wrong branch, switching to the correct
 455branch would be done using:
 456+
 457------------
 458$ git checkout mytopic
 459------------
 460+
 461However, your "wrong" branch and correct "mytopic" branch may
 462differ in files that you have modified locally, in which case
 463the above checkout would fail like this:
 464+
 465------------
 466$ git checkout mytopic
 467error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches.
 468------------
 469+
 470You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a
 471three-way merge:
 472+
 473------------
 474$ git checkout -m mytopic
 475Auto-merging frotz
 476------------
 477+
 478After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_
 479registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what
 480changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
 481
 482. When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with
 483the `-m` option, you would see something like this:
 484+
 485------------
 486$ git checkout -m mytopic
 487Auto-merging frotz
 488ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz
 489fatal: merge program failed
 490------------
 491+
 492At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in
 493the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted
 494files.  Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with
 495`git add` as usual:
 496+
 497------------
 498$ edit frotz
 499$ git add frotz
 500------------
 501
 502GIT
 503---
 504Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite