Documentation / technical / racy-git.txton commit Merge branch 'po/doc-branch-desc' (a265435)
   1Use of index and Racy Git problem
   2=================================
   3
   4Background
   5----------
   6
   7The index is one of the most important data structures in Git.
   8It represents a virtual working tree state by recording list of
   9paths and their object names and serves as a staging area to
  10write out the next tree object to be committed.  The state is
  11"virtual" in the sense that it does not necessarily have to, and
  12often does not, match the files in the working tree.
  13
  14There are cases Git needs to examine the differences between the
  15virtual working tree state in the index and the files in the
  16working tree.  The most obvious case is when the user asks `git
  17diff` (or its low level implementation, `git diff-files`) or
  18`git-ls-files --modified`.  In addition, Git internally checks
  19if the files in the working tree are different from what are
  20recorded in the index to avoid stomping on local changes in them
  21during patch application, switching branches, and merging.
  22
  23In order to speed up this comparison between the files in the
  24working tree and the index entries, the index entries record the
  25information obtained from the filesystem via `lstat(2)` system
  26call when they were last updated.  When checking if they differ,
  27Git first runs `lstat(2)` on the files and compares the result
  28with this information (this is what was originally done by the
  29`ce_match_stat()` function, but the current code does it in
  30`ce_match_stat_basic()` function).  If some of these "cached
  31stat information" fields do not match, Git can tell that the
  32files are modified without even looking at their contents.
  33
  34Note: not all members in `struct stat` obtained via `lstat(2)`
  35are used for this comparison.  For example, `st_atime` obviously
  36is not useful.  Currently, Git compares the file type (regular
  37files vs symbolic links) and executable bits (only for regular
  38files) from `st_mode` member, `st_mtime` and `st_ctime`
  39timestamps, `st_uid`, `st_gid`, `st_ino`, and `st_size` members.
  40With a `USE_STDEV` compile-time option, `st_dev` is also
  41compared, but this is not enabled by default because this member
  42is not stable on network filesystems.  With `USE_NSEC`
  43compile-time option, `st_mtim.tv_nsec` and `st_ctim.tv_nsec`
  44members are also compared. On Linux, this is not enabled by default
  45because in-core timestamps can have finer granularity than
  46on-disk timestamps, resulting in meaningless changes when an
  47inode is evicted from the inode cache.  See commit 8ce13b0
  48of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git
  49([PATCH] Sync in core time granularity with filesystems,
  502005-01-04). This patch is included in kernel 2.6.11 and newer, but
  51only fixes the issue for file systems with exactly 1 ns or 1 s
  52resolution. Other file systems are still broken in current Linux
  53kernels (e.g. CEPH, CIFS, NTFS, UDF), see
  54https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/9/714
  55
  56Racy Git
  57--------
  58
  59There is one slight problem with the optimization based on the
  60cached stat information.  Consider this sequence:
  61
  62  : modify 'foo'
  63  $ git update-index 'foo'
  64  : modify 'foo' again, in-place, without changing its size
  65
  66The first `update-index` computes the object name of the
  67contents of file `foo` and updates the index entry for `foo`
  68along with the `struct stat` information.  If the modification
  69that follows it happens very fast so that the file's `st_mtime`
  70timestamp does not change, after this sequence, the cached stat
  71information the index entry records still exactly match what you
  72would see in the filesystem, even though the file `foo` is now
  73different.
  74This way, Git can incorrectly think files in the working tree
  75are unmodified even though they actually are.  This is called
  76the "racy Git" problem (discovered by Pasky), and the entries
  77that appear clean when they may not be because of this problem
  78are called "racily clean".
  79
  80To avoid this problem, Git does two things:
  81
  82. When the cached stat information says the file has not been
  83  modified, and the `st_mtime` is the same as (or newer than)
  84  the timestamp of the index file itself (which is the time `git
  85  update-index foo` finished running in the above example), it
  86  also compares the contents with the object registered in the
  87  index entry to make sure they match.
  88
  89. When the index file is updated that contains racily clean
  90  entries, cached `st_size` information is truncated to zero
  91  before writing a new version of the index file.
  92
  93Because the index file itself is written after collecting all
  94the stat information from updated paths, `st_mtime` timestamp of
  95it is usually the same as or newer than any of the paths the
  96index contains.  And no matter how quick the modification that
  97follows `git update-index foo` finishes, the resulting
  98`st_mtime` timestamp on `foo` cannot get a value earlier
  99than the index file.  Therefore, index entries that can be
 100racily clean are limited to the ones that have the same
 101timestamp as the index file itself.
 102
 103The callers that want to check if an index entry matches the
 104corresponding file in the working tree continue to call
 105`ce_match_stat()`, but with this change, `ce_match_stat()` uses
 106`ce_modified_check_fs()` to see if racily clean ones are
 107actually clean after comparing the cached stat information using
 108`ce_match_stat_basic()`.
 109
 110The problem the latter solves is this sequence:
 111
 112  $ git update-index 'foo'
 113  : modify 'foo' in-place without changing its size
 114  : wait for enough time
 115  $ git update-index 'bar'
 116
 117Without the latter, the timestamp of the index file gets a newer
 118value, and falsely clean entry `foo` would not be caught by the
 119timestamp comparison check done with the former logic anymore.
 120The latter makes sure that the cached stat information for `foo`
 121would never match with the file in the working tree, so later
 122checks by `ce_match_stat_basic()` would report that the index entry
 123does not match the file and Git does not have to fall back on more
 124expensive `ce_modified_check_fs()`.
 125
 126
 127Runtime penalty
 128---------------
 129
 130The runtime penalty of falling back to `ce_modified_check_fs()`
 131from `ce_match_stat()` can be very expensive when there are many
 132racily clean entries.  An obvious way to artificially create
 133this situation is to give the same timestamp to all the files in
 134the working tree in a large project, run `git update-index` on
 135them, and give the same timestamp to the index file:
 136
 137  $ date >.datestamp
 138  $ git ls-files | xargs touch -r .datestamp
 139  $ git ls-files | git update-index --stdin
 140  $ touch -r .datestamp .git/index
 141
 142This will make all index entries racily clean.  The linux project, for
 143example, there are over 20,000 files in the working tree.  On my
 144Athlon 64 X2 3800+, after the above:
 145
 146  $ /usr/bin/time git diff-files
 147  1.68user 0.54system 0:02.22elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
 148  0inputs+0outputs (0major+67111minor)pagefaults 0swaps
 149  $ git update-index MAINTAINERS
 150  $ /usr/bin/time git diff-files
 151  0.02user 0.12system 0:00.14elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
 152  0inputs+0outputs (0major+935minor)pagefaults 0swaps
 153
 154Running `git update-index` in the middle checked the racily
 155clean entries, and left the cached `st_mtime` for all the paths
 156intact because they were actually clean (so this step took about
 157the same amount of time as the first `git diff-files`).  After
 158that, they are not racily clean anymore but are truly clean, so
 159the second invocation of `git diff-files` fully took advantage
 160of the cached stat information.
 161
 162
 163Avoiding runtime penalty
 164------------------------
 165
 166In order to avoid the above runtime penalty, post 1.4.2 Git used
 167to have a code that made sure the index file
 168got timestamp newer than the youngest files in the index when
 169there are many young files with the same timestamp as the
 170resulting index file would otherwise would have by waiting
 171before finishing writing the index file out.
 172
 173I suspected that in practice the situation where many paths in the
 174index are all racily clean was quite rare.  The only code paths
 175that can record recent timestamp for large number of paths are:
 176
 177. Initial `git add .` of a large project.
 178
 179. `git checkout` of a large project from an empty index into an
 180  unpopulated working tree.
 181
 182Note: switching branches with `git checkout` keeps the cached
 183stat information of existing working tree files that are the
 184same between the current branch and the new branch, which are
 185all older than the resulting index file, and they will not
 186become racily clean.  Only the files that are actually checked
 187out can become racily clean.
 188
 189In a large project where raciness avoidance cost really matters,
 190however, the initial computation of all object names in the
 191index takes more than one second, and the index file is written
 192out after all that happens.  Therefore the timestamp of the
 193index file will be more than one seconds later than the
 194youngest file in the working tree.  This means that in these
 195cases there actually will not be any racily clean entry in
 196the resulting index.
 197
 198Based on this discussion, the current code does not use the
 199"workaround" to avoid the runtime penalty that does not exist in
 200practice anymore.  This was done with commit 0fc82cff on Aug 15,
 2012006.