Documentation / git-checkout.txton commit checkout: retire --to option (b979d95)
   1git-checkout(1)
   2===============
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-checkout - Checkout a branch or paths to the working tree
   7
   8SYNOPSIS
   9--------
  10[verse]
  11'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [<branch>]
  12'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] --detach [<branch>]
  13'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [--detach] <commit>
  14'git checkout' [-q] [-f] [-m] [[-b|-B|--orphan] <new_branch>] [<start_point>]
  15'git checkout' [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] [--] <paths>...
  16'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] [<paths>...]
  17
  18DESCRIPTION
  19-----------
  20Updates files in the working tree to match the version in the index
  21or the specified tree.  If no paths are given, 'git checkout' will
  22also update `HEAD` to set the specified branch as the current
  23branch.
  24
  25'git checkout' <branch>::
  26        To prepare for working on <branch>, switch to it by updating
  27        the index and the files in the working tree, and by pointing
  28        HEAD at the branch. Local modifications to the files in the
  29        working tree are kept, so that they can be committed to the
  30        <branch>.
  31+
  32If <branch> is not found but there does exist a tracking branch in
  33exactly one remote (call it <remote>) with a matching name, treat as
  34equivalent to
  35+
  36------------
  37$ git checkout -b <branch> --track <remote>/<branch>
  38------------
  39+
  40You could omit <branch>, in which case the command degenerates to
  41"check out the current branch", which is a glorified no-op with a
  42rather expensive side-effects to show only the tracking information,
  43if exists, for the current branch.
  44
  45'git checkout' -b|-B <new_branch> [<start point>]::
  46
  47        Specifying `-b` causes a new branch to be created as if
  48        linkgit:git-branch[1] were called and then checked out.  In
  49        this case you can use the `--track` or `--no-track` options,
  50        which will be passed to 'git branch'.  As a convenience,
  51        `--track` without `-b` implies branch creation; see the
  52        description of `--track` below.
  53+
  54If `-B` is given, <new_branch> is created if it doesn't exist; otherwise, it
  55is reset. This is the transactional equivalent of
  56+
  57------------
  58$ git branch -f <branch> [<start point>]
  59$ git checkout <branch>
  60------------
  61+
  62that is to say, the branch is not reset/created unless "git checkout" is
  63successful.
  64
  65'git checkout' --detach [<branch>]::
  66'git checkout' [--detach] <commit>::
  67
  68        Prepare to work on top of <commit>, by detaching HEAD at it
  69        (see "DETACHED HEAD" section), and updating the index and the
  70        files in the working tree.  Local modifications to the files
  71        in the working tree are kept, so that the resulting working
  72        tree will be the state recorded in the commit plus the local
  73        modifications.
  74+
  75When the <commit> argument is a branch name, the `--detach` option can
  76be used to detach HEAD at the tip of the branch (`git checkout
  77<branch>` would check out that branch without detaching HEAD).
  78+
  79Omitting <branch> detaches HEAD at the tip of the current branch.
  80
  81'git checkout' [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>...::
  82
  83        When <paths> or `--patch` are given, 'git checkout' does *not*
  84        switch branches.  It updates the named paths in the working tree
  85        from the index file or from a named <tree-ish> (most often a
  86        commit).  In this case, the `-b` and `--track` options are
  87        meaningless and giving either of them results in an error.  The
  88        <tree-ish> argument can be used to specify a specific tree-ish
  89        (i.e.  commit, tag or tree) to update the index for the given
  90        paths before updating the working tree.
  91+
  92The index may contain unmerged entries because of a previous failed merge.
  93By default, if you try to check out such an entry from the index, the
  94checkout operation will fail and nothing will be checked out.
  95Using `-f` will ignore these unmerged entries.  The contents from a
  96specific side of the merge can be checked out of the index by
  97using `--ours` or `--theirs`.  With `-m`, changes made to the working tree
  98file can be discarded to re-create the original conflicted merge result.
  99
 100OPTIONS
 101-------
 102-q::
 103--quiet::
 104        Quiet, suppress feedback messages.
 105
 106-f::
 107--force::
 108        When switching branches, proceed even if the index or the
 109        working tree differs from HEAD.  This is used to throw away
 110        local changes.
 111+
 112When checking out paths from the index, do not fail upon unmerged
 113entries; instead, unmerged entries are ignored.
 114
 115--ours::
 116--theirs::
 117        When checking out paths from the index, check out stage #2
 118        ('ours') or #3 ('theirs') for unmerged paths.
 119
 120-b <new_branch>::
 121        Create a new branch named <new_branch> and start it at
 122        <start_point>; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for details.
 123
 124-B <new_branch>::
 125        Creates the branch <new_branch> and start it at <start_point>;
 126        if it already exists, then reset it to <start_point>. This is
 127        equivalent to running "git branch" with "-f"; see
 128        linkgit:git-branch[1] for details.
 129
 130-t::
 131--track::
 132        When creating a new branch, set up "upstream" configuration. See
 133        "--track" in linkgit:git-branch[1] for details.
 134+
 135If no '-b' option is given, the name of the new branch will be
 136derived from the remote-tracking branch, by looking at the local part of
 137the refspec configured for the corresponding remote, and then stripping
 138the initial part up to the "*".
 139This would tell us to use "hack" as the local branch when branching
 140off of "origin/hack" (or "remotes/origin/hack", or even
 141"refs/remotes/origin/hack").  If the given name has no slash, or the above
 142guessing results in an empty name, the guessing is aborted.  You can
 143explicitly give a name with '-b' in such a case.
 144
 145--no-track::
 146        Do not set up "upstream" configuration, even if the
 147        branch.autosetupmerge configuration variable is true.
 148
 149-l::
 150        Create the new branch's reflog; see linkgit:git-branch[1] for
 151        details.
 152
 153--detach::
 154        Rather than checking out a branch to work on it, check out a
 155        commit for inspection and discardable experiments.
 156        This is the default behavior of "git checkout <commit>" when
 157        <commit> is not a branch name.  See the "DETACHED HEAD" section
 158        below for details.
 159
 160--orphan <new_branch>::
 161        Create a new 'orphan' branch, named <new_branch>, started from
 162        <start_point> and switch to it.  The first commit made on this
 163        new branch will have no parents and it will be the root of a new
 164        history totally disconnected from all the other branches and
 165        commits.
 166+
 167The index and the working tree are adjusted as if you had previously run
 168"git checkout <start_point>".  This allows you to start a new history
 169that records a set of paths similar to <start_point> by easily running
 170"git commit -a" to make the root commit.
 171+
 172This can be useful when you want to publish the tree from a commit
 173without exposing its full history. You might want to do this to publish
 174an open source branch of a project whose current tree is "clean", but
 175whose full history contains proprietary or otherwise encumbered bits of
 176code.
 177+
 178If you want to start a disconnected history that records a set of paths
 179that is totally different from the one of <start_point>, then you should
 180clear the index and the working tree right after creating the orphan
 181branch by running "git rm -rf ." from the top level of the working tree.
 182Afterwards you will be ready to prepare your new files, repopulating the
 183working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc.
 184
 185--ignore-skip-worktree-bits::
 186        In sparse checkout mode, `git checkout -- <paths>` would
 187        update only entries matched by <paths> and sparse patterns
 188        in $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout. This option ignores
 189        the sparse patterns and adds back any files in <paths>.
 190
 191-m::
 192--merge::
 193        When switching branches,
 194        if you have local modifications to one or more files that
 195        are different between the current branch and the branch to
 196        which you are switching, the command refuses to switch
 197        branches in order to preserve your modifications in context.
 198        However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current
 199        branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch
 200        is done, and you will be on the new branch.
 201+
 202When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting
 203paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts
 204and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge
 205should result in deletion of the path).
 206+
 207When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate
 208the conflicted merge in the specified paths.
 209
 210--conflict=<style>::
 211        The same as --merge option above, but changes the way the
 212        conflicting hunks are presented, overriding the
 213        merge.conflictstyle configuration variable.  Possible values are
 214        "merge" (default) and "diff3" (in addition to what is shown by
 215        "merge" style, shows the original contents).
 216
 217-p::
 218--patch::
 219        Interactively select hunks in the difference between the
 220        <tree-ish> (or the index, if unspecified) and the working
 221        tree.  The chosen hunks are then applied in reverse to the
 222        working tree (and if a <tree-ish> was specified, the index).
 223+
 224This means that you can use `git checkout -p` to selectively discard
 225edits from your current working tree. See the ``Interactive Mode''
 226section of linkgit:git-add[1] to learn how to operate the `--patch` mode.
 227
 228--ignore-other-worktrees::
 229        `git checkout` refuses when the wanted ref is already checked
 230        out by another worktree. This option makes it check the ref
 231        out anyway. In other words, the ref can be held by more than one
 232        worktree.
 233
 234<branch>::
 235        Branch to checkout; if it refers to a branch (i.e., a name that,
 236        when prepended with "refs/heads/", is a valid ref), then that
 237        branch is checked out. Otherwise, if it refers to a valid
 238        commit, your HEAD becomes "detached" and you are no longer on
 239        any branch (see below for details).
 240+
 241As a special case, the `"@{-N}"` syntax for the N-th last branch/commit
 242checks out branches (instead of detaching).  You may also specify
 243`-` which is synonymous with `"@{-1}"`.
 244+
 245As a further special case, you may use `"A...B"` as a shortcut for the
 246merge base of `A` and `B` if there is exactly one merge base. You can
 247leave out at most one of `A` and `B`, in which case it defaults to `HEAD`.
 248
 249<new_branch>::
 250        Name for the new branch.
 251
 252<start_point>::
 253        The name of a commit at which to start the new branch; see
 254        linkgit:git-branch[1] for details. Defaults to HEAD.
 255
 256<tree-ish>::
 257        Tree to checkout from (when paths are given). If not specified,
 258        the index will be used.
 259
 260
 261
 262DETACHED HEAD
 263-------------
 264HEAD normally refers to a named branch (e.g. 'master'). Meanwhile, each
 265branch refers to a specific commit. Let's look at a repo with three
 266commits, one of them tagged, and with branch 'master' checked out:
 267
 268------------
 269           HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
 270            |
 271            v
 272a---b---c  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'c')
 273    ^
 274    |
 275  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 276------------
 277
 278When a commit is created in this state, the branch is updated to refer to
 279the new commit. Specifically, 'git commit' creates a new commit 'd', whose
 280parent is commit 'c', and then updates branch 'master' to refer to new
 281commit 'd'. HEAD still refers to branch 'master' and so indirectly now refers
 282to commit 'd':
 283
 284------------
 285$ edit; git add; git commit
 286
 287               HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
 288                |
 289                v
 290a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 291    ^
 292    |
 293  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 294------------
 295
 296It is sometimes useful to be able to checkout a commit that is not at
 297the tip of any named branch, or even to create a new commit that is not
 298referenced by a named branch. Let's look at what happens when we
 299checkout commit 'b' (here we show two ways this may be done):
 300
 301------------
 302$ git checkout v2.0  # or
 303$ git checkout master^^
 304
 305   HEAD (refers to commit 'b')
 306    |
 307    v
 308a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 309    ^
 310    |
 311  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 312------------
 313
 314Notice that regardless of which checkout command we use, HEAD now refers
 315directly to commit 'b'. This is known as being in detached HEAD state.
 316It means simply that HEAD refers to a specific commit, as opposed to
 317referring to a named branch. Let's see what happens when we create a commit:
 318
 319------------
 320$ edit; git add; git commit
 321
 322     HEAD (refers to commit 'e')
 323      |
 324      v
 325      e
 326     /
 327a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 328    ^
 329    |
 330  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 331------------
 332
 333There is now a new commit 'e', but it is referenced only by HEAD. We can
 334of course add yet another commit in this state:
 335
 336------------
 337$ edit; git add; git commit
 338
 339         HEAD (refers to commit 'f')
 340          |
 341          v
 342      e---f
 343     /
 344a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 345    ^
 346    |
 347  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 348------------
 349
 350In fact, we can perform all the normal Git operations. But, let's look
 351at what happens when we then checkout master:
 352
 353------------
 354$ git checkout master
 355
 356               HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
 357      e---f     |
 358     /          v
 359a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
 360    ^
 361    |
 362  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 363------------
 364
 365It is important to realize that at this point nothing refers to commit
 366'f'. Eventually commit 'f' (and by extension commit 'e') will be deleted
 367by the routine Git garbage collection process, unless we create a reference
 368before that happens. If we have not yet moved away from commit 'f',
 369any of these will create a reference to it:
 370
 371------------
 372$ git checkout -b foo   <1>
 373$ git branch foo        <2>
 374$ git tag foo           <3>
 375------------
 376
 377<1> creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', and then
 378updates HEAD to refer to branch 'foo'. In other words, we'll no longer
 379be in detached HEAD state after this command.
 380
 381<2> similarly creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f',
 382but leaves HEAD detached.
 383
 384<3> creates a new tag 'foo', which refers to commit 'f',
 385leaving HEAD detached.
 386
 387If we have moved away from commit 'f', then we must first recover its object
 388name (typically by using git reflog), and then we can create a reference to
 389it. For example, to see the last two commits to which HEAD referred, we
 390can use either of these commands:
 391
 392------------
 393$ git reflog -2 HEAD # or
 394$ git log -g -2 HEAD
 395------------
 396
 397EXAMPLES
 398--------
 399
 400. The following sequence checks out the `master` branch, reverts
 401the `Makefile` to two revisions back, deletes hello.c by
 402mistake, and gets it back from the index.
 403+
 404------------
 405$ git checkout master             <1>
 406$ git checkout master~2 Makefile  <2>
 407$ rm -f hello.c
 408$ git checkout hello.c            <3>
 409------------
 410+
 411<1> switch branch
 412<2> take a file out of another commit
 413<3> restore hello.c from the index
 414+
 415If you want to check out _all_ C source files out of the index,
 416you can say
 417+
 418------------
 419$ git checkout -- '*.c'
 420------------
 421+
 422Note the quotes around `*.c`.  The file `hello.c` will also be
 423checked out, even though it is no longer in the working tree,
 424because the file globbing is used to match entries in the index
 425(not in the working tree by the shell).
 426+
 427If you have an unfortunate branch that is named `hello.c`, this
 428step would be confused as an instruction to switch to that branch.
 429You should instead write:
 430+
 431------------
 432$ git checkout -- hello.c
 433------------
 434
 435. After working in the wrong branch, switching to the correct
 436branch would be done using:
 437+
 438------------
 439$ git checkout mytopic
 440------------
 441+
 442However, your "wrong" branch and correct "mytopic" branch may
 443differ in files that you have modified locally, in which case
 444the above checkout would fail like this:
 445+
 446------------
 447$ git checkout mytopic
 448error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches.
 449------------
 450+
 451You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a
 452three-way merge:
 453+
 454------------
 455$ git checkout -m mytopic
 456Auto-merging frotz
 457------------
 458+
 459After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_
 460registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what
 461changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
 462
 463. When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with
 464the `-m` option, you would see something like this:
 465+
 466------------
 467$ git checkout -m mytopic
 468Auto-merging frotz
 469ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz
 470fatal: merge program failed
 471------------
 472+
 473At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in
 474the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted
 475files.  Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with
 476`git add` as usual:
 477+
 478------------
 479$ edit frotz
 480$ git add frotz
 481------------
 482
 483GIT
 484---
 485Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite