1git-rerere(1) 2============= 3 4NAME 5---- 6git-rerere - Reuse recorded resolution of conflicted merges 7 8SYNOPSIS 9-------- 10'git rerere' ['clear'|'forget' [<pathspec>]|'diff'|'status'|'gc'] 11 12DESCRIPTION 13----------- 14 15In a workflow employing relatively long lived topic branches, 16the developer sometimes needs to resolve the same conflicts over 17and over again until the topic branches are done (either merged 18to the "release" branch, or sent out and accepted upstream). 19 20This command assists the developer in this process by recording 21conflicted automerge results and corresponding hand resolve results 22on the initial manual merge, and applying previously recorded 23hand resolutions to their corresponding automerge results. 24 25[NOTE] 26You need to set the configuration variable rerere.enabled in order to 27enable this command. 28 29 30COMMANDS 31-------- 32 33Normally, 'git rerere' is run without arguments or user-intervention. 34However, it has several commands that allow it to interact with 35its working state. 36 37'clear':: 38 39This resets the metadata used by rerere if a merge resolution is to be 40aborted. Calling 'git am [--skip|--abort]' or 'git rebase [--skip|--abort]' 41will automatically invoke this command. 42 43'forget' <pathspec>:: 44 45This resets the conflict resolutions which rerere has recorded for the current 46conflict in <pathspec>. The <pathspec> is optional. 47 48'diff':: 49 50This displays diffs for the current state of the resolution. It is 51useful for tracking what has changed while the user is resolving 52conflicts. Additional arguments are passed directly to the system 53'diff' command installed in PATH. 54 55'status':: 56 57Like 'diff', but this only prints the filenames that will be tracked 58for resolutions. 59 60'gc':: 61 62This prunes records of conflicted merges that 63occurred a long time ago. By default, unresolved conflicts older 64than 15 days and resolved conflicts older than 60 65days are pruned. These defaults are controlled via the 66`gc.rerereunresolved` and `gc.rerereresolved` configuration 67variables respectively. 68 69 70DISCUSSION 71---------- 72 73When your topic branch modifies an overlapping area that your 74master branch (or upstream) touched since your topic branch 75forked from it, you may want to test it with the latest master, 76even before your topic branch is ready to be pushed upstream: 77 78------------ 79 o---*---o topic 80 / 81 o---o---o---*---o---o master 82------------ 83 84For such a test, you need to merge master and topic somehow. 85One way to do it is to pull master into the topic branch: 86 87------------ 88 $ git checkout topic 89 $ git merge master 90 91 o---*---o---+ topic 92 / / 93 o---o---o---*---o---o master 94------------ 95 96The commits marked with `*` touch the same area in the same 97file; you need to resolve the conflicts when creating the commit 98marked with `{plus}`. Then you can test the result to make sure your 99work-in-progress still works with what is in the latest master. 100 101After this test merge, there are two ways to continue your work 102on the topic. The easiest is to build on top of the test merge 103commit `{plus}`, and when your work in the topic branch is finally 104ready, pull the topic branch into master, and/or ask the 105upstream to pull from you. By that time, however, the master or 106the upstream might have been advanced since the test merge `{plus}`, 107in which case the final commit graph would look like this: 108 109------------ 110 $ git checkout topic 111 $ git merge master 112 $ ... work on both topic and master branches 113 $ git checkout master 114 $ git merge topic 115 116 o---*---o---+---o---o topic 117 / / \ 118 o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o---+ master 119------------ 120 121When your topic branch is long-lived, however, your topic branch 122would end up having many such "Merge from master" commits on it, 123which would unnecessarily clutter the development history. 124Readers of the Linux kernel mailing list may remember that Linus 125complained about such too frequent test merges when a subsystem 126maintainer asked to pull from a branch full of "useless merges". 127 128As an alternative, to keep the topic branch clean of test 129merges, you could blow away the test merge, and keep building on 130top of the tip before the test merge: 131 132------------ 133 $ git checkout topic 134 $ git merge master 135 $ git reset --hard HEAD^ ;# rewind the test merge 136 $ ... work on both topic and master branches 137 $ git checkout master 138 $ git merge topic 139 140 o---*---o-------o---o topic 141 / \ 142 o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o---+ master 143------------ 144 145This would leave only one merge commit when your topic branch is 146finally ready and merged into the master branch. This merge 147would require you to resolve the conflict, introduced by the 148commits marked with `*`. However, this conflict is often the 149same conflict you resolved when you created the test merge you 150blew away. 'git rerere' helps you resolve this final 151conflicted merge using the information from your earlier hand 152resolve. 153 154Running the 'git rerere' command immediately after a conflicted 155automerge records the conflicted working tree files, with the 156usual conflict markers `<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>` in 157them. Later, after you are done resolving the conflicts, 158running 'git rerere' again will record the resolved state of these 159files. Suppose you did this when you created the test merge of 160master into the topic branch. 161 162Next time, after seeing the same conflicted automerge, 163running 'git rerere' will perform a three-way merge between the 164earlier conflicted automerge, the earlier manual resolution, and 165the current conflicted automerge. 166If this three-way merge resolves cleanly, the result is written 167out to your working tree file, so you do not have to manually 168resolve it. Note that 'git rerere' leaves the index file alone, 169so you still need to do the final sanity checks with `git diff` 170(or `git diff -c`) and 'git add' when you are satisfied. 171 172As a convenience measure, 'git merge' automatically invokes 173'git rerere' upon exiting with a failed automerge and 'git rerere' 174records the hand resolve when it is a new conflict, or reuses the earlier hand 175resolve when it is not. 'git commit' also invokes 'git rerere' 176when committing a merge result. What this means is that you do 177not have to do anything special yourself (besides enabling 178the rerere.enabled config variable). 179 180In our example, when you do the test merge, the manual 181resolution is recorded, and it will be reused when you do the 182actual merge later with the updated master and topic branch, as long 183as the recorded resolution is still applicable. 184 185The information 'git rerere' records is also used when running 186'git rebase'. After blowing away the test merge and continuing 187development on the topic branch: 188 189------------ 190 o---*---o-------o---o topic 191 / 192 o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o master 193 194 $ git rebase master topic 195 196 o---*---o-------o---o topic 197 / 198 o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o master 199------------ 200 201you could run `git rebase master topic`, to bring yourself 202up-to-date before your topic is ready to be sent upstream. 203This would result in falling back to a three-way merge, and it 204would conflict the same way as the test merge you resolved earlier. 205'git rerere' will be run by 'git rebase' to help you resolve this 206conflict. 207 208 209Author 210------ 211Written by Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 212 213GIT 214--- 215Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite