Documentation / tutorial.txton commit Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/gitk/gitk (d69dc37)
   1A tutorial introduction to git
   2==============================
   3
   4This tutorial explains how to import a new project into git, make
   5changes to it, and share changes with other developers.
   6
   7First, note that you can get documentation for a command such as "git
   8diff" with:
   9
  10------------------------------------------------
  11$ man git-diff
  12------------------------------------------------
  13
  14Importing a new project
  15-----------------------
  16
  17Assume you have a tarball project.tar.gz with your initial work.  You
  18can place it under git revision control as follows.
  19
  20------------------------------------------------
  21$ tar xzf project.tar.gz
  22$ cd project
  23$ git init-db
  24------------------------------------------------
  25
  26Git will reply
  27
  28------------------------------------------------
  29defaulting to local storage area
  30------------------------------------------------
  31
  32You've now initialized the working directory--you may notice a new
  33directory created, named ".git".  Tell git that you want it to track
  34every file under the current directory with
  35
  36------------------------------------------------
  37$ git add .
  38------------------------------------------------
  39
  40Finally,
  41
  42------------------------------------------------
  43$ git commit -a
  44------------------------------------------------
  45
  46will prompt you for a commit message, then record the current state
  47of all the files to the repository.
  48
  49Try modifying some files, then run
  50
  51------------------------------------------------
  52$ git diff
  53------------------------------------------------
  54
  55to review your changes.  When you're done,
  56
  57------------------------------------------------
  58$ git commit -a
  59------------------------------------------------
  60
  61will again prompt your for a message describing the change, and then
  62record the new versions of the modified files.
  63
  64A note on commit messages: Though not required, it's a good idea to
  65begin the commit message with a single short (less than 50 character)
  66line summarizing the change, followed by a blank line and then a more
  67thorough description.  Tools that turn commits into email, for
  68example, use the first line on the Subject line and the rest of the
  69commit in the body.
  70
  71To add a new file, first create the file, then
  72
  73------------------------------------------------
  74$ git add path/to/new/file
  75------------------------------------------------
  76
  77then commit as usual.  No special command is required when removing a
  78file; just remove it, then commit.
  79
  80At any point you can view the history of your changes using
  81
  82------------------------------------------------
  83$ git whatchanged
  84------------------------------------------------
  85
  86If you also want to see complete diffs at each step, use
  87
  88------------------------------------------------
  89$ git whatchanged -p
  90------------------------------------------------
  91
  92Managing branches
  93-----------------
  94
  95A single git repository can maintain multiple branches of
  96development.  To create a new branch named "experimental", use
  97
  98------------------------------------------------
  99$ git branch experimental
 100------------------------------------------------
 101
 102If you now run
 103
 104------------------------------------------------
 105$ git branch
 106------------------------------------------------
 107
 108you'll get a list of all existing branches:
 109
 110------------------------------------------------
 111  experimental
 112* master
 113------------------------------------------------
 114
 115The "experimental" branch is the one you just created, and the
 116"master" branch is a default branch that was created for you
 117automatically.  The asterisk marks the branch you are currently on;
 118type
 119
 120------------------------------------------------
 121$ git checkout experimental
 122------------------------------------------------
 123
 124to switch to the experimental branch.  Now edit a file, commit the
 125change, and switch back to the master branch:
 126
 127------------------------------------------------
 128(edit file)
 129$ git commit -a
 130$ git checkout master
 131------------------------------------------------
 132
 133Check that the change you made is no longer visible, since it was
 134made on the experimental branch and you're back on the master branch.
 135
 136You can make a different change on the master branch:
 137
 138------------------------------------------------
 139(edit file)
 140$ git commit -a
 141------------------------------------------------
 142
 143at this point the two branches have diverged, with different changes
 144made in each.  To merge the changes made in the two branches, run
 145
 146------------------------------------------------
 147$ git pull . experimental
 148------------------------------------------------
 149
 150If the changes don't conflict, you're done.  If there are conflicts,
 151markers will be left in the problematic files showing the conflict;
 152
 153------------------------------------------------
 154$ git diff
 155------------------------------------------------
 156
 157will show this.  Once you've edited the files to resolve the
 158conflicts,
 159
 160------------------------------------------------
 161$ git commit -a
 162------------------------------------------------
 163
 164will commit the result of the merge. Finally,
 165
 166------------------------------------------------
 167$ gitk
 168------------------------------------------------
 169
 170will show a nice graphical representation of the resulting history.
 171
 172If you develop on a branch crazy-idea, then regret it, you can always
 173delete the branch with
 174
 175-------------------------------------
 176$ git branch -D crazy-idea
 177-------------------------------------
 178
 179Branches are cheap and easy, so this is a good way to try something
 180out.
 181
 182Using git for collaboration
 183---------------------------
 184
 185Suppose that Alice has started a new project with a git repository in
 186/home/alice/project, and that Bob, who has a home directory on the
 187same machine, wants to contribute.
 188
 189Bob begins with:
 190
 191------------------------------------------------
 192$ git clone /home/alice/project myrepo
 193------------------------------------------------
 194
 195This creates a new directory "myrepo" containing a clone of Alice's
 196repository.  The clone is on an equal footing with the original
 197project, posessing its own copy of the original project's history.
 198
 199Bob then makes some changes and commits them:
 200
 201------------------------------------------------
 202(edit files)
 203$ git commit -a
 204(repeat as necessary)
 205------------------------------------------------
 206
 207When he's ready, he tells Alice to pull changes from the repository
 208at /home/bob/myrepo.  She does this with:
 209
 210------------------------------------------------
 211$ cd /home/alice/project
 212$ git pull /home/bob/myrepo
 213------------------------------------------------
 214
 215This actually pulls changes from the branch in Bob's repository named
 216"master".  Alice could request a different branch by adding the name
 217of the branch to the end of the git pull command line.
 218
 219This merges Bob's changes into her repository; "git whatchanged" will
 220now show the new commits.  If Alice has made her own changes in the
 221meantime, then Bob's changes will be merged in, and she will need to
 222manually fix any conflicts.
 223
 224A more cautious Alice might wish to examine Bob's changes before
 225pulling them.  She can do this by creating a temporary branch just
 226for the purpose of studying Bob's changes:
 227
 228-------------------------------------
 229$ git fetch /home/bob/myrepo master:bob-incoming
 230-------------------------------------
 231
 232which fetches the changes from Bob's master branch into a new branch
 233named bob-incoming.  (Unlike git pull, git fetch just fetches a copy
 234of Bob's line of development without doing any merging).  Then
 235
 236-------------------------------------
 237$ git whatchanged -p master..bob-incoming
 238-------------------------------------
 239
 240shows a list of all the changes that Bob made since he branched from
 241Alice's master branch.
 242
 243After examing those changes, and possibly fixing things, Alice can
 244pull the changes into her master branch:
 245
 246-------------------------------------
 247$ git checkout master
 248$ git pull . bob-incoming
 249-------------------------------------
 250
 251The last command is a pull from the "bob-incoming" branch in Alice's
 252own repository.
 253
 254Later, Bob can update his repo with Alice's latest changes using
 255
 256-------------------------------------
 257$ git pull
 258-------------------------------------
 259
 260Note that he doesn't need to give the path to Alice's repository;
 261when Bob cloned Alice's repository, git stored the location of her
 262repository in the file .git/remotes/origin, and that location is used
 263as the default for pulls.
 264
 265Bob may also notice a branch in his repository that he didn't create:
 266
 267-------------------------------------
 268$ git branch
 269* master
 270  origin
 271-------------------------------------
 272
 273The "origin" branch, which was created automatically by "git clone",
 274is a pristine copy of Alice's master branch; Bob should never commit
 275to it.
 276
 277If Bob later decides to work from a different host, he can still
 278perform clones and pulls using the ssh protocol:
 279
 280-------------------------------------
 281$ git clone alice.org:/home/alice/project myrepo
 282-------------------------------------
 283
 284Alternatively, git has a native protocol, or can use rsync or http;
 285see gitlink:git-pull[1] for details.
 286
 287Git can also be used in a CVS-like mode, with a central repository
 288that various users push changes to; see gitlink:git-push[1] and
 289link:cvs-migration.html[git for CVS users].
 290
 291Keeping track of history
 292------------------------
 293
 294Git history is represented as a series of interrelated commits.  The
 295most recent commit in the currently checked-out branch can always be
 296referred to as HEAD, and the "parent" of any commit can always be
 297referred to by appending a caret, "^", to the end of the name of the
 298commit.  So, for example,
 299
 300-------------------------------------
 301git diff HEAD^ HEAD
 302-------------------------------------
 303
 304shows the difference between the most-recently checked-in state of
 305the tree and the previous state, and
 306
 307-------------------------------------
 308git diff HEAD^^ HEAD^
 309-------------------------------------
 310
 311shows the difference between that previous state and the state two
 312commits ago.  Also, HEAD~5 can be used as a shorthand for HEAD{caret}{caret}{caret}{caret}{caret},
 313and more generally HEAD~n can refer to the nth previous commit.
 314Commits representing merges have more than one parent, and you can
 315specify which parent to follow in that case; see
 316gitlink:git-rev-parse[1].
 317
 318The name of a branch can also be used to refer to the most recent
 319commit on that branch; so you can also say things like
 320
 321-------------------------------------
 322git diff HEAD experimental
 323-------------------------------------
 324
 325to see the difference between the most-recently committed tree in
 326the current branch and the most-recently committed tree in the
 327experimental branch.
 328
 329But you may find it more useful to see the list of commits made in
 330the experimental branch but not in the current branch, and
 331
 332-------------------------------------
 333git whatchanged HEAD..experimental
 334-------------------------------------
 335
 336will do that, just as
 337
 338-------------------------------------
 339git whatchanged experimental..HEAD
 340-------------------------------------
 341
 342will show the list of commits made on the HEAD but not included in
 343experimental.
 344
 345You can also give commits convenient names of your own: after running
 346
 347-------------------------------------
 348$ git-tag v2.5 HEAD^^
 349-------------------------------------
 350
 351you can refer to HEAD^^ by the name "v2.5".  If you intend to share
 352this name with other people (for example, to identify a release
 353version), you should create a "tag" object, and perhaps sign it; see
 354gitlink:git-tag[1] for details.
 355
 356You can revisit the old state of a tree, and make further
 357modifications if you wish, using git branch: the command
 358
 359-------------------------------------
 360$ git branch stable-release v2.5
 361-------------------------------------
 362
 363will create a new branch named "stable-release" starting from the
 364commit which you tagged with the name v2.5.
 365
 366You can reset the state of any branch to an earlier commit at any
 367time with
 368
 369-------------------------------------
 370$ git reset --hard v2.5
 371-------------------------------------
 372
 373This will remove all later commits from this branch and reset the
 374working tree to the state it had when the given commit was made.  If
 375this branch is the only branch containing the later commits, those
 376later changes will be lost.  Don't use "git reset" on a
 377publicly-visible branch that other developers pull from, as git will
 378be confused by history that disappears in this way.
 379
 380Next Steps
 381----------
 382
 383Some good commands to explore next:
 384
 385  * gitlink:git-diff[1]: This flexible command does much more than
 386    we've seen in the few examples above.
 387
 388  * gitlink:git-format-patch[1], gitlink:git-am[1]: These convert
 389    series of git commits into emailed patches, and vice versa,
 390    useful for projects such as the linux kernel which rely heavily
 391    on emailed patches.
 392
 393  * gitlink:git-bisect[1]: When there is a regression in your
 394    project, one way to track down the bug is by searching through
 395    the history to find the exact commit that's to blame.  Git bisect
 396    can help you perform a binary search for that commit.  It is
 397    smart enough to perform a close-to-optimal search even in the
 398    case of complex non-linear history with lots of merged branches.
 399
 400Other good starting points include link:everyday.html[Everday GIT
 401with 20 Commands Or So] and link:cvs-migration.html[git for CVS
 402users].  Also, link:core-tutorial.html[A short git tutorial] gives an
 403introduction to lower-level git commands for advanced users and
 404developers.